Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Why do mobile broadband ISPs insist on providing minuscule data allowances...??

  • 29-10-2013 07:00PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,122 ✭✭✭


    As in title - seriously, WHY ?


    My only option now is mobile broadband, for broadband, and the fecking low low allowances of 10-30GB is beyond pathetic..! But ofc, the Government still considers this to be on par with 500GB-Unlimited Broadband under their NBS... I'd be more than happy if they had the decently to give 100GB at least!


    Why can't there be a competitive provider that uses the tech to provide home users actual broadband in rural areas...

    e.g. -

    3065628979.png

    That's off a 4G [3G actually] package - Hell of a lot better than Ripplecom that I was with... but the 20GB makes the speed pretty useless to make use off... hit the cap rapidly if watching a few movies off Netflix and the like, or downloading software that are up to 10GB....!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    Only way to get those kinda speeds is to limit the data allowance otherwise the more people download the more your speeds will suffer, Three's is the best with 60gb but their service is very hit and miss


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,122 ✭✭✭BeerWolf


    siblers wrote: »
    Three's is the best with 60gb but their service is very hit and miss

    I know of Three's option, but they've got a rather bad reputation - so I wouldn't want to put up with them for 12 months if it turned out bad...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    I found Vodafone's speeds to have deminished pretty badly recently, on full strength reception you'd get anywhere from between 5-10 mbit/sec but now i'd be lucky to get a 1mbit/sec. That's the biggest problem really with mobile broadband, service is so unreliable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,122 ✭✭✭BeerWolf


    I don't understand why they can't have an option for people in rural areas, that'd be eligible for a higher cap. :/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    Fixed wireless is your best bet in rural areas, they have fairly high caps but a lot of them tend to suffer from congestion during peak hours.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,122 ✭✭✭BeerWolf


    I was with Ripplecom, they were completely rubbish in comparison to this current mobile broadband connection. I've got no other FWA providers in my area.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    Same boat as yourself, I was with a crowd called RuralBroadband, had to cancel after a week as it was just a joke. Waiting on one other crowd to do a site visit, if that's a no go i'll be with Three for the longhaul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭bijou


    siblers wrote: »
    Fixed wireless is your best bet in rural areas, they have fairly high caps but a lot of them tend to suffer from congestion during peak hours.

    Absolutely true and perfectly fine if you are lucky enough to have fixed wireless coverage in your area....

    Unfortunately not all of us have this option nor any other "real" broadband options and are "stuck" with the mobile broadband.


Advertisement