Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

13.8 billion years in the making - Cosmos 2014

  • 27-10-2013 3:17am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭


    Cant wait.



    Tagged:


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,831 ✭✭✭✭The Hill Billy


    Looking forward to it, but...

    This will probably upset your average Fox viewer who thinks that the Earth & the Heavens were only created 6,000 years ago. :pac:


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    Should be good, but can't see it been as fantastic as the original with Carl Sagan. What a man! what a series! :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭mickmackey1


    This will probably upset your average Fox viewer who thinks that the Earth & the Heavens were only created 6,000 years ago. :pac:

    Whatever age it is has no relevance in terms of explaining its origin, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,385 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Whatever age it is has no relevance in terms of explaining its origin, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that :rolleyes:

    A science forum is not the place to be discussing magic sky people and creationism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,689 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    Whatever age it is has no relevance in terms of explaining its origin, but I wouldn't expect you to understand that :rolleyes:

    Shut up.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭mickmackey1


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    A science forum is not the place to be discussing magic sky people and creationism.

    Not to mention the 'big bang' silliness.
    Shut up.

    Past your bedtime kiddie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,831 ✭✭✭✭The Hill Billy


    What you refer to as 'Big Bang silliness' is accepted as a scientific reality.

    What is your basis for referring to as 'silliness'? Bearing in mind that this is a Science forum & not a religious forum, of course...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,840 ✭✭✭Calibos


    Not to mention the 'big bang' silliness.



    Past your bedtime kiddie.

    I'm sorry, which one of us needs promises of goodies or threats of the bogeyman to make us behave again?? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭bogwalrus


    Can mod's just ban obvious troll. I loved the original COSOMS and watched the trailer above that gave me the shivers (in a good way). So exciting and Neil degrasse tyson is such a great choice. Then I have to read down to be reminded people still believe in magic men in the sky which puts a downer on my mood. Science forums should be able to be much more stricter as it is not a belief system like on the religious forums where you have huge battles on who is right and wrong. Science is science and people who post otherwise should probably be warned and then banned.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭mickmackey1


    bogwalrus wrote: »
    Can mod's just ban obvious troll... Science is science and people who post otherwise should probably be warned and then banned.

    Your attempt to ban freedom of speech is seriously sad and should make yourself look in the mirror. Why are you so insecure that you don't want anyone to question your dearly-held scientific 'beliefs'?... and then you pretend to be less intolerant than your religious counterparts. What a joke.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nolars


    Your attempt to ban freedom of speech is seriously sad and should make yourself look in the mirror. Why are you so insecure that you don't want anyone to question your dearly-held scientific 'beliefs'?... and then you pretend to be less intolerant than your religious counterparts. What a joke.

    this is a discussion about Cosmos can you move over to the Religion & Spirituality section if you have an issue. goodluck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,831 ✭✭✭✭The Hill Billy


    I take it that you won't be watching the programme then. So why not let posters who believe in science discuss it without your religion-influenced interference?

    I'd imagine that if the tables were turned we'd not be viewed too kindly by posters in the Religion forums.

    Turn the other cheek if you will.

    On the other hand if you wish to tell us how old you know the Universe to be & the basis for that - we'd be delighted to hear it. Otherwise I'd probably have to agree with the previous poster's assessment of you being a troll.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 13,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    Also looking forward to this. Sagan's 1980 original Cosmos was utterly groundbreaking so this new one has an awful lot to live up to.

    Also looking forward to two space-themed films coming soon - Gravity and The Last Days On Mars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭bogwalrus


    Your attempt to ban freedom of speech is seriously sad and should make yourself look in the mirror. Why are you so insecure that you don't want anyone to question your dearly-held scientific 'beliefs'?... and then you pretend to be less intolerant than your religious counterparts. What a joke.

    I took it you were a troll but if you are not then i apologise.

    This little story might put things into perspective a bit. I was at a restaurant the last night and we were having a conversation about vegetarian food (since it was a veggie restaurant). Then all of a sudden one person just started talking about shoes and handbags out of nowhere. Threw the whole conversation off and the good conversation went a bit downhill after.

    For me your comments were exactly like talking about handbags. Only difference is science can prove a handbag exists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 273 ✭✭okioffice84


    God I hope Fox don't make a hash of this. Love de Grasse Tyson btw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,831 ✭✭✭✭The Hill Billy


    When I was a nipper back in the 70's my Dad gave me a real interest in Astronomy & all things related to space. From satellite spotting in the garden at night (which I still do) to trips to Dunsink.

    Watching the original Cosmos really brought it to another level. I'm really hoping that the new version will do the same for my kids & many others. With modern production techniques, plus the massive advances in our knowledge - I'd imagine that Cosmos 2014 will be fairly spectacular & with Neil involved - scientifically accurate too.

    Bring it on!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    I remember watching the series on RTE back in the early eighties; I must have been about 10 or 12. I was fascinated: I'd never seen anybody present so much information about so much with so much patience, wit and passion. Looking forward to the de Grasse Tyson version. The perfect man for the job!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,013 ✭✭✭Ole Rodrigo


    Brilliant show, cant wait for the re-make. Wish I had seen it as a kid.

    Also looking forward to the Terence Malicks ' Voyage of Time '.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭Seanie M


    Wow, when I saw the title, I thought you were talking about the upcoming Cosmos 2014 Star Party in Tullamore next April... ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭[-0-]


    This looks GREAT! Pity we won't have Sagan presenting it but whatever.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭ps200306


    Probably just me but I cringed when I saw this. I find Neil deGrasse Tyson way, way too pompous. Found Carl Sagan somewhat the same (though maybe not as bad). I also seriously dislike that trailer. Why does it have to look like a magic show? Is deGrasse Tyson a mystic after all? Sagan seemed to fancy himself in that department too. In my book, there's no room for spirituality in science. Maybe it'll inspire a few kiddies, but don't think it's for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭bogwalrus


    ps200306 wrote: »
    Probably just me but I cringed when I saw this. I find Neil deGrasse Tyson way, way too pompous. Found Carl Sagan somewhat the same (though maybe not as bad). I also seriously dislike that trailer. Why does it have to look like a magic show? Is deGrasse Tyson a mystic after all? Sagan seemed to fancy himself in that department too. In my book, there's no room for spirituality in science. Maybe it'll inspire a few kiddies, but don't think it's for me.


    Where can I get your book? Sounds interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭ps200306


    bogwalrus wrote: »
    Where can I get your book? Sounds interesting.
    It is, but unfortunately it's out of print.
    Anything you want to know, just ask.
    :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,013 ✭✭✭Ole Rodrigo


    ps200306 wrote: »
    Probably just me but I cringed when I saw this. I find Neil deGrasse Tyson way, way too pompous. Found Carl Sagan somewhat the same (though maybe not as bad). I also seriously dislike that trailer. Why does it have to look like a magic show? Is deGrasse Tyson a mystic after all? Sagan seemed to fancy himself in that department too. In my book, there's no room for spirituality in science. Maybe it'll inspire a few kiddies, but don't think it's for me.

    If you watch some other video of NDeGT, you'll see he is quite a humble and good humoured guy. Have a look for his interview with John Colbert on youtube, excellent stuff. If anyone took themselves too seriously it was Carl Sagan , but that still didn't detract from the show.

    I just hope some of the graphics are from the same guys who did Gravity. Neil can bellow and bluster all he likes in that case :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    JupiterKid wrote: »
    Also looking forward to this. Sagan's 1980 original Cosmos was utterly groundbreaking so this new one has an awful lot to live up to.

    Also looking forward to two space-themed films coming soon - Gravity and The Last Days On Mars.

    Watched this last night...great movie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭howamidifferent


    Where can I see this COSMOS 2014 show?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nolars


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Watched this last night...great movie

    Check out Neils podcast Startalk Radio on the movie called "Cosmic Queries: Gravity, the movie" was a good listen.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭slade_x


    Nolars wrote: »
    Check out Neils podcast Startalk Radio on the movie called "Cosmic Queries: Gravity, the movie" was a good listen.

    http://www.startalkradio.net/show/cosmic-queries-gravity-the-movie/
    Where can I see this COSMOS 2014 show?


    It doesn't air in the states until Q2 2014 on Fox National Geographic
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmos:_A_Space-Time_Odyssey


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,377 ✭✭✭zenno


    I found this one very interesting, well worth a watch...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭stoneill


    Neil deGrasse Tyson is hosting a new version called "Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey,"
    Ann Druyan and Brannon Braga are also on board for production.


    http://www.space.com/24243-cosmos-tv-series-neil-degrasse-tyson.html

    I hope it inspires as many youngsters as the original Carl Sagan's personal voyage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Taylor365


    stoneill wrote: »
    Neil deGrasse Tyson is hosting a new version called "Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey,"
    Ann Druyan and Brannon Braga are also on board for production.


    http://www.space.com/24243-cosmos-tv-series-neil-degrasse-tyson.html

    I hope it inspires as many youngsters as the original Carl Sagan's personal voyage.
    ...this is what the thread is about....?

    :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    Taylor365 wrote: »
    ...this is what the thread is about....?

    :confused:

    Merged thread, perhaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Taylor365


    pauldla wrote: »
    Merged thread, perhaps?
    Ah....

    Me no scientist.. :(

    Neil deGrasse on the other hand... :D


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 13,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    Looking forward to this show. :)

    If it's even a fraction as good as Carl Sagan's original Cosmos then it will be worth a watch.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭slade_x


    USA: Airing Sunday March 9th 9PM

    http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/cosmos-a-spacetime-odyssey/

    Episode: Standing Up in the Milky Way

    Next Airing: SUN MAR 9 9PM ETSUN MAR 9 8PM CTSUN MAR 9 10PM MTSUN MAR 9 9PM PTSUN MAR 9 8PM ATSUN MAR 9 10PM HT

    The Ship of the Imagination, unfettered by ordinary limits on speed and size, drawn by the music of cosmic harmonies, can take us anywhere in space and time. It has been idling for more than three decades, and yet it has never been overtaken. Its global legacy remains vibrant. Now, it's time once again to set sail for the stars.
    http://natgeotv.com/uk/cosmos-a-spacetime-odyssey

    UK: Sunday March 16th 7PM


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭ankaragucu


    Is this liable to be shown on terrestrial tv at some point?(pardon the pun)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭Nerro


    Anyone seen first episode?is it worth watching?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,295 ✭✭✭✭Duggy747


    I saw it, it's very flashy and the CGI is really quite good, very good for a TV show actually. It's about 40 minutes long so it is trying hard to squeeze everything in but it doesn't feel like it rushes by anything too much. The ad breaks are jarring considering they break the flow and momentum of the show and it did spend a large chunk of it's runtime on an animated telling of Giordano Bruno.

    To be honest, I found it quite cheesy in parts as I was so used to watching Tyson candidly in interviews and speeches for years beforehand. Here he sounds like he's doing a voice-over for a trailer in some parts and feels like I'm watching a sort of watered down version of him, considering how animated he does be when explaining things.

    That being said, he is good and I still think he was the right choice for the show. It had a good start and I'm looking forward to next week's show which will be on evolution.

    Plus, it had a nice tribute to Carl Sagan with Tyson telling his personal story of him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Nolars


    Getting this now forgot all about it, 1080p plz :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭bogwalrus


    I liked it. Not as good as original. Loved the story about Carl and Tyson. Nearly cried. Need to dig out my Carl sagan poster and put it up somewhere in my man cave.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    It's being shown here on Sat at 10:00 pm on Nat Geo. I've told the eldest (9) that he can stay up late to watch it if he's good. I hope he gets as much from it as I got from the original all those years ago!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    pauldla wrote: »
    It's being shown here on Sat at 10:00 pm on Nat Geo. I've told the eldest (9) that he can stay up late to watch it if he's good. I hope he gets as much from it as I got from the original all those years ago!
    Its not on Saturday by the way, its Sunday at 7pm on National Grographic, National Goegraphic Wild, Fox and Sky 1 plus repeated many times over the next few hours and days. 13 episodes in total like the Original. Hope your Son enjoys it. I watched the original myself with Carl Sagan as a 13 year old and it changed my life. Fantastic stuff :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,247 ✭✭✭pauldla


    Beeker wrote: »
    Its not on Saturday by the way, its Sunday at 7pm on National Grographic, National Goegraphic Wild, Fox and Sky 1 plus repeated many times over the next few hours and days. 13 episodes in total like the Original. Hope your Son enjoys it. I watched the original myself with Carl Sagan as a 13 year old and it changed my life. Fantastic stuff :)

    Thanks! It's interesting to see the number of people who remember watching then they were young; I was ten at the time. Are you sure about the time of the show? I checked the Nat Geo Asia site and they're listing as 22:00 on the 15th. I'd hate to miss it....I might just have to spend the whole weekend camped out in front of the TV... :D


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 3,645 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beeker


    pauldla wrote: »
    Thanks! It's interesting to see the number of people who remember watching then they were young; I was ten at the time. Are you sure about the time of the show? I checked the Nat Geo Asia site and they're listing as 22:00 on the 15th. I'd hate to miss it....I might just have to spend the whole weekend camped out in front of the TV... :D

    Sorry I was giving the times for Europe but I see you are in China, so disregard the times I gave :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,344 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    seems they waste of lot of time showing him moving around in his stupid ship, they could have used the cgi budget to come up with better way to show the distances he was travelling


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭thecommander


    Turned it off after 10 minutes. Really hate the CGI, much prefer him to talk through it rather than acting against a green screen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,831 ✭✭✭✭The Hill Billy


    Too heavy on the CGI, nothing new or no special perspectives given on current knowledge.

    All told, I would have said that it was OK, but the extended church-bashing over matters long past was frankly very disappointing.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭slade_x


    Too heavy on the CGI, nothing new or no special perspectives given on current knowledge.

    All told, I would have said that it was OK, but the extended church-bashing over matters long past was frankly very disappointing.

    I also found myself disappointed with the series so far but I should keep in mind it is not intended for me and the majority of regulars here. Its mandate was made clear from the start. to communicate these subjects to the public, the uninterested/ uninformed public.

    The same vision Carl Sagan had, at the time when the vast majority of the scientific community didn't agree. It has become much easier to communicate science to the public in recent years, this series wont have the same polarizing affect the original had because Carl achieved what he set out to do and thus easily achieves the title of the Greatest Science Communicator of our time. Science is not just interesting, it is down right Cool. Thanks to Carl in part for showing us :cool:

    This doesn't diminish the current re-imagining of the show however, it is just for a now young audience, and from what I can tell a young audience loves CG :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    I HATE the movie Armageddon. Absolutely HATE it. But when 7 or 8 year old me saw it I was blown away by the concepts of Asteroids, space shuttle's and gravitational sling shot. It's really odd because the movie that I now can't watch without cringing was the movie that sparked my interest in Space in a big way. I don't even know how terrible that sounds, owing something to Michael Bay. I really wish I'd seen Cosmos. It wasn't until somebody posted in a link in the A&A forum that I saw what the series was about and I was like 'meh' that's good but I know most of that stuff already. It's better to read up in detail and be able to do math with the things to gain some intuitive approximation to what they are.

    Like Slade said, The series isn't aimed at us and I sure as hell prefer the ordinary Joe Soap getting their inspiration for science from shows like the Cosmos rather than CSI or Transformers. Many people here in this forum are looking for something that furthers their knowledge. You're not going to get that in a pop sci show for a mainstream audience. You need to go a little deeper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭bogwalrus


    On the second episode that was on last night he was explaining natural selection in such a nice simple way. I must admit all those gaps I had in my mind were filled and it felt great. The whole thing about artificial selection and dogs was cool also. I think the show is aimed at me tbh.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement