Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

two days until US default deadline

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭Killer Wench


    Piliger wrote: »
    No he won't. The GOP and tea Party will have to own it because the GOP will lose the House and probably the Senate and spend the next decade recovering. The same happened with Gingrich who everybody remembers, and how Clinton wiped the floor with him and the GOP of the time. Obama will not come out of the NSA scandal well but he will be hugely enhanced by this suicide pact by the GOP.

    The GOP doesn't hold the Senate now and will not likely hold it for a long time going forward. The House, however, is a different due to heavy gerrymandering that took place after the last census. That, and the fact that liberals tend not to vote during off year elections which is how there was such a move of Tea Partiers into the House.

    The whole intention behind this mess was to destroy Obama's legacy. They first attempted to attack the Affordable Care Act and then they realized that they had a better chance at ruining it by pursuing this default debacle.

    70% of Americans hold a disfavorable view towards Republicans, but over 50% of Americans believe that Obama has contributed to this mess. The Democratic Party is hovering around 60%.

    Over the weekend, there was a massive failure in the food benefit program, SNAP. Machines didn't work in multiple states, and many, many Americans assumed that it was due to the government shutdown when it was not related. There is a disconnect between the rational and gut-check opinions that Americans hold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭Freddy Smelly


    Plan B: Central banks getting ready for financial Armageddon.





    Today's budget may not matter in a few days time.


    didnt the soviet union collapse in the 80's????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,949 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    didnt the soviet union collapse in the 80's????

    It started to but really didn't stop till 1991. Good book by an Irish author http://www.amazon.co.uk/Moscow-December-25-1991-Soviet/dp/184827114X


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,624 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    seamus wrote: »
    And of course, there is no Oceania anymore. Nobody is concerned that the collapse of the US would let the Commies run roughshod across Europe and Asia.

    Has Australia disappeared or something? What do you mean by that exactly since the continent most certainly is still around.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭tdv123


    I always knew those damn Americans were Hitler lovers.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Has Australia disappeared or something? What do you mean by that exactly since the continent most certainly is still around.
    It's a reference to 1984 :)
    You can make a LOT of money off a stock market doing badly.
    Indeed, the markets will be a little bit wobbly for the next 48 hours. If you have a few grand to spend and you watch some stocks closely, you should buy up anything which is dipping and then sell it on Friday when the markets are happy again and stocks gone back up.

    Won't make you a millionaire, but you'll probably make some beer money for the weekend.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Eight Ball


    Delighted ive no savings in the banks because if I did id be sh1tting it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,017 ✭✭✭Plazaman


    US Congress is as sneaky as our lads at sneaking in amendments. Seemingly any member congress can call for a vote on any bill at any time, i.e. in this case it would be a vote to end the shutdown. However just before the shutdown happened, the GOP quietly passed a measure that said only the House Majority Leader (Eric Cantor) can call for the shutdown to end.

    This means that the most senior member of congress (Speaker of the House) cannot end the shutdown without permission from his own (junior) colleague so I think a default is on the cards.

    Vidya below of Chris Van-Hollen (Maryland) trying to get to the bottom of it. P.S. : US politicians waffle more than Irish ones but you'll get the gist by the 5 minute mark.

    http://www.youtube.com/embed/0Jd-iaYLO1A?wmode=transparent&showinfo=0&controls=1&enablejsapi=1&rel=0&version=3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,900 ✭✭✭General General


    Plazaman wrote: »
    US Congress is as sneaky as our lads at sneaking in amendments. Seemingly any member congress can call for a vote on any bill at any time, i.e. in this case it would be a vote to end the shutdown. However just before the shutdown happened, the GOP quietly passed a measure that said only the House Majority Leader (Eric Cantor) can call for the shutdown to end.

    This means that the most senior member of congress (Speaker of the House) cannot end the shutdown without permission from his own (junior) colleague so I think a default is on the cards.

    Vidya below of Chris Van-Hollen (Maryland) trying to get to the bottom of it. P.S. : US politicians waffle more than Irish ones but you'll get the gist by the 5 minute mark.

    http://www.youtube.com/embed/0Jd-iaYLO1A?wmode=transparent&showinfo=0&controls=1&enablejsapi=1&rel=0&version=3

    Fine big vidya opens when ya click tha' link


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 953 ✭✭✭donegal__road


    didnt the soviet union collapse in the 80's????

    The world reserve currency is currently the dollar. In the main, all commodities are traded with the dollar. But now the Dollar's role as world's leading reserve currency may be at risk. A few days ago, China called for the dollar to be replaced as global reserve currency.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    The world reserve currency is currently the dollar. In the main, all commodities are traded with the dollar. But now the Dollar's role as world's leading reserve currency may be at risk. A few days ago, China called for the dollar to be replaced as global reserve currency.

    Its one of the reserve currencies, the main one. After that it's the euro, JPY and GBP

    The UN, Russia, China and EU have been debating on and off for several years a change in reserves to a non-paper currency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Eight Ball


    The world reserve currency is currently the dollar. In the main, all commodities are traded with the dollar. But now the Dollar's role as world's leading reserve currency may be at risk. A few days ago, China called for the dollar to be replaced as global reserve currency.

    China is playing it's own game against the US and is very slowly winning. They currently are outspending the US in the cyber war and people who are experts in that field think it's only a matter of time now before the US is shut down by a major cyber based attack.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    Eight Ball wrote: »
    China is playing it's own game against the US and is very slowly winning. They currently are outspending the US in the cyber war and people who are experts in that field think it's only a matter of time now before the US is shut down by a major cyber based attack.
    The US have the NSA collaborating with GCHQ, and likely a whole bunch of other foreign secret services, to spy on the Internet traffic of the entire world, and have been for years.

    There's no such thing as a 'cyber war', but if there was, the US are winning by a long margin, and it's more 'governments vs civilians' than 'US vs China'.

    The 'cyber war' nonsense is just perpetuated, to try and justify the massive military spending, put into spying on the populace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Piliger


    Plazaman wrote: »
    US Congress is as sneaky as our lads at sneaking in amendments.
    How exactly have amendments been sneaked in here ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Piliger


    The GOP doesn't hold the Senate now and will not likely hold it for a long time going forward. The House, however, is a different due to heavy gerrymandering that took place after the last census. That, and the fact that liberals tend not to vote during off year elections which is how there was such a move of Tea Partiers into the House.

    The whole intention behind this mess was to destroy Obama's legacy. They first attempted to attack the Affordable Care Act and then they realized that they had a better chance at ruining it by pursuing this default debacle.

    70% of Americans hold a disfavorable view towards Republicans, but over 50% of Americans believe that Obama has contributed to this mess. The Democratic Party is hovering around 60%.

    Over the weekend, there was a massive failure in the food benefit program, SNAP. Machines didn't work in multiple states, and many, many Americans assumed that it was due to the government shutdown when it was not related. There is a disconnect between the rational and gut-check opinions that Americans hold.

    Agreed. One of the challenges that America also faces, illustrated by those numbers, is the enormous amount of lack of knowledge and apathy among huge swathes of the population. Historically this chunk of American society have felt that it is of no interest, the country continued and the economy went through normal cycles, and they just went on with their lives. When asked they have always said how awful the congress is and given negative responses to whatever president is in at the time.

    What tends to be slightly hidden is that a good chunk of that chunk, as it were, are also too apathetic to vote. The probable outcome of all of that currently is that as long as Obama stays strong, the GOP will be seen to have been totally and appallingly irresponsible and also to have lost - and there will be a big shift to the Democrats.

    I just hope they dont forget this debacle and don't stop the current campaigns for the Move to Amend, and the Anti Corruption Act. These are the only hopes for the system to work again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    That article relies on a semantic trick, playing with words: The payments were delayed, not reneged on.

    The potential catastrophe being touted over the US debt, is of debt being reneged on, not delayed - so that's a rather important detail to leave out, in the context of the current debate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Piliger




  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,251 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,777 ✭✭✭sentient_6


    This whole thing confuses me. What have they done only say yay we can borrow more, sure that doesn't fix anything. & why bother setting limits in the first place if they know every time it will just need to be raised.....its clearly not as if they intend to address the imbalance in the mean time.....surely this is only going to come around again in no time after they borrow trillons and trillons in a couple of months(or whatever).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    The US have the NSA collaborating with GCHQ, and likely a whole bunch of other foreign secret services, to spy on the Internet traffic of the entire world, and have been for years.

    There's no such thing as a 'cyber war', but if there was, the US are winning by a long margin, and it's more 'governments vs civilians' than 'US vs China'.

    The 'cyber war' nonsense is just perpetuated, to try and justify the massive military spending, put into spying on the populace.

    Of course there's a "cyber war", with China, the US, Israel, Russia and Iran all known to be major players.

    Given that Cold War style sleeper cells and spies are still being found it'd be absurd to think the information war hasn't gone digital.

    There's no doubt a lot of attacks are coming from civilian groups but, as Stuxnet proved, governments are the biggest threat to each other.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,562 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    No surprises really.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,562 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    sentient_6 wrote: »
    This whole thing confuses me. What have they done only say yay we can borrow more, sure that doesn't fix anything. & why bother setting limits in the first place if they know every time it will just need to be raised.....its clearly not as if they intend to address the imbalance in the mean time.....surely this is only going to come around again in no time after they borrow trillons and trillons in a couple of months(or whatever).

    Potentially. Strong economic growth and inflationary pressures will ease the debt burden though over the medium to long term. The US fiscal deficit isn't as big a problem as some people make out, particularly given the stagnant economic situation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 953 ✭✭✭donegal__road


    it was all theatrics then.. sorry for wasting everyone's time!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Piliger


    sentient_6 wrote: »
    This whole thing confuses me. What have they done only say yay we can borrow more, sure that doesn't fix anything. & why bother setting limits in the first place if they know every time it will just need to be raised.....its clearly not as if they intend to address the imbalance in the mean time.....surely this is only going to come around again in no time after they borrow trillons and trillons in a couple of months(or whatever).

    Remember they are only borrowing to spend what has already been agreed. It won;t increase spending. Under Obama spending has been reducing. But unfortunately because of trade imbalances and interest rates etc. the debt ceiling has had to be increased. It comes around again because of the idiotic system they operate and because the GOP refuse to cooperate in fixing it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,741 ✭✭✭Piliger


    it was all theatrics then.. sorry for wasting everyone's time!
    It's a lot more than theatrics. It is symptomatic of a huge crisis in US politics where money has completely bribed their government politicians and where one small group of right wing nutjobs can hold the whole system to hostage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,390 ✭✭✭clairefontaine


    Piliger wrote: »
    It's a lot more than theatrics. It is symptomatic of a huge crisis in US politics where money has completely bribed their government politicians and where one small group of right wing nutjobs can hold the whole system to hostage.

    It was a Bush appointed Supreme Court justice who made the final ruling on Obamacare. So yes, you're right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Eight Ball


    Ah can kicking. Laughable stuff yet again from the Americans.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,652 ✭✭✭I am pie


    Eight Ball wrote: »
    Ah can kicking. Laughable stuff yet again from the Americans.

    Right, because the EU isn't kicking any cans right now? Ireland, Greece, Spain, Italy...all hunky fcking dory it is?

    Glass houses.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,562 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    I am pie wrote: »
    Right, because the EU isn't kicking any cans right now? Ireland, Greece, Spain, Italy...all hunky fcking dory it is?

    Glass houses.

    None of those countries have full control of monetary policy, they're forced by the troika to tackle budget deficits at present. That's not the case with the US and the Fed who can print their own money and buy their own bonds.


Advertisement