Irish Times Article on Greystones

Car2318

http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/uptown-and-downtown-1.1557925

Interested in hearing others opinions on the Irish Times Article about Greystones and Edenderry on Saturday.
I for one as a Charlesland resident and community volunteer was fuming...........

The Edenderry side focussed correctly on the commercial side of the town and its impact. I grow up close to this town and am aware of this.
The Greystones side was meant to be about how little business units are empty etc but half of the article was spent criticising Charlesland - harshly too.

My tuppence worth...in no particular order

• Charlesland is not high rise- 90% of units are two storey
• More business units would be empty if Greystones did not have Charlesland
• Significant number of residents in Charlesland are younger generation of old Greystones
• The demographic between Charlesland and other estates is the same (comment by local)
• Charlesand is nearer to village than Eden Gate (comment by local)

I understand that comments made by 3 particular locals were perhaps made in haste but really could they have been anymore ignorant on the facts.

Felt whole bashing was unnecessary and makes me think twice about the amount of energy I put into the village and environs if thats how the 'real' locals feel

Emma A

couldn't agree more Caroline ! I am fuming and surely Leone Dooley's comments are just as applicable if not more to us living in Charlesland ?

"that Eden Gate, where she has lived for four years in an apartment, has a healthy mix of houses and apartments, with both young children and older people, singles and couples, and is within walking and cycling distance of the town "

I'm quite sure my cream and red bricked fronted two bed house is not a " bit of an eyesore "

In fact every visitor I have comments how well kept the estate is - no one is disputing its a big development but come on a "concrete jungle " ??!!

legrand

Got to agree - its was a strange and inconsistent article - I live the the 'heart' of Greystones (how priveledged I am :rolleyes:) and did feel Charlesland was maligned.

You got to wonder who Ms Holms was speaking to. The same paper also did separate fashion article on a local shop complete with local fashion model etc.

Not the first time Greystones has featured in the IT - I suspect we have some IT staffers living in our midst who have a particular jaundiced view of the social makeup of Greystones.

Robertr

"Charlesland, a brutally efficient steel and glass high-rise that looks out of place"

Ha ha...

who came up with that one????

stevestevenson

Read the article, agree on all points of the OP, and would also echo Emma's points on the "healthy mix of houses and apartments" apparently available in Eden Gate -has Ms. Dooley ever been in Charlesland?

Charlesland is well laid out, has plently of green areas, is impeccably maintained, and itself "has a healthy mix of houses and apartments".

At the time of buying, we had a choice between EG and Charlesland and chose the latter. EG is further away from the village, and on plans (and in reality subsequently) the buildings seemed very cramped.

You will always find ignorant people willing to give an opinion, unfortunately for the article it found three of them.
Disappointed in the Times, the article could have done with a bit more of a sample opinion.

I'm a big fan of the "today's news is tomorrow's litter tray" analogy, so in the interests of giving this story the attention it warrants I wouldn't be commenting any further on it.

Spongebopp

stevestevenson wrote: »

Read the article, agree on all points of the OP, and would also echo Emma's points on the "healthy mix of houses and apartments" apparently available in Eden Gate -has Ms. Dooley ever been in Charlesland?

Charlesland is well laid out, has plently of green areas, is impeccably maintained, and itself "has a healthy mix of houses and apartments".

At the time of buying, we had a choice between EG and Charlesland and chose the latter. EG is further away from the village, and on plans (and in reality subsequently) the buildings seemed very cramped.

You will always find ignorant people willing to give an opinion, unfortunately for the article it found three of them.
Disappointed in the Times, the article could have done with a bit more of a sample opinion.

I'm a big fan of the "today's news is tomorrow's litter tray" analogy, so in the interests of giving this story the attention it warrants I wouldn't be commenting any further on it.

I agree, I was so angry reading this. I have e-mailed The Irish Times to complain, I also asked them to consider putting a correction piece in.
Maybe others could consider doing the same, strength in Numbers.
It was supposed to be about Commercial units and instead took a pop at Charlesland! Imagine how danamging that is for people trying to sell a Property here. Why did they single out Charlesland like that?
Lazy, poorly researched Journalism in my opinion.

MyPerfectCousin

Why not ping the author directly via Twitter? It looks like she seeks input for her articles through that medium, anyway.

https://twitter.com/kateholmquist

Zoo4m8

Hmmm, seems Ms H has managed to upset residents across the board, I don't live in Charlesland and have my own thoughts about that development but I can see why the residents there would be livid and it's quite correct to say that there wouldn't be the same amount of thriving businesses without threir custom.

To suggest that Eden Gate in splendid isolation at two kilometers away is part of the town is ridiculous IMO

And dragging up the old chestnut of the supposed religious bias and the predominance of retired military types in the past in the Burnaby is sloppy journalism at its worst.

Why not feature an established eatery ? The Happy Pear has been done to death but what about the Three Q's , three young men trying to make a living in a small premises and holding their own against increasing quality opposition .

Anyway, that's my rant, lazy, lazy poorly researched writing, and SteveS, my edition was under the cat's litter tray by lunchtime Sat..

Car2318

Disappointingly most of the ignorant comments came from named Greystones residents. One even a member of our Chamber of Commerce.

I for one love my paradise in Charlesland

Lumbarda

We were fuming as well when we read it. It smacks of such lazy journalism, she obviously came out to Greystones, stood on the Main St and interviewed a handful of people, making no attempt to verify what they were saying/get a different opinion.

What really struck us was the description of Charlesland, as Robertr quoted: "Charlesland, a brutally efficient steel and glass high-rise that looks out of place." YOU WHAT???? She obviously didn't even bother coming out to look at Charlesland or, if she did, maybe she could point out where this steel and glass high-rise is as, having lived here over 7 years, I've never come across it! Very disappointed in Kate Holmquist.

pixbyjohn

A very disappointing article by Kate Holmquist.
It has the effect to be pitting new estates against each other reading the comments of 1 resident of Eden Gate and now the comments in this forum.
Imagine how wrong she got her piece, all the more surprising as 2 of her colleagues are living in Greystones. Tim O Brien & Peter Murtagh, surely she could have had a chat with them before writing such a misguided article.

Lumbarda

Car2318 wrote: »

Disappointingly most of the ignorant comments came from named Greystones residents. One even a member of our Chamber of Commerce.

I for one love my paradise in Charlesland

Who was the member of the Chamber of Commerce and do they own a business in the town? Would be good to know as, if they object so much to Charlesland, I'm sure they'd also object to me spending my money in their business so I'll take my business elsewhere!

Lumbarda

Car2318 wrote: »

Disappointingly most of the ignorant comments came from named Greystones residents. One even a member of our Chamber of Commerce.

I for one love my paradise in Charlesland

Who was the member of the Chamber of Commerce and do they own a business in the town? Would be good to know as, if they object so much to Charlesland, I'm sure they'd also object to me spending my money in their business so I'll take my business elsewhere!

Car2318

Lumbarda wrote: »

Who was the member of the Chamber of Commerce and do they own a business in the town? Would be good to know as, if they object so much to Charlesland, I'm sure they'd also object to me spending my money in their business so I'll take my business elsewhere!

I don't like to name the person directly here but it is made clear in the article. I suppose we also have to assume/hope the comments were made in haste................

stevestevenson

Lumbarda wrote: »

Who was the member of the Chamber of Commerce and do they own a business in the town? Would be good to know as, if they object so much to Charlesland, I'm sure they'd also object to me spending my money in their business so I'll take my business elsewhere!

Robin Archer - Killincarrig resident. Builder & Chamber of Commerce (chairman I think?).

Robyn Archer - Wife of Robin - Career highlight: Once offered flower arranging lesson as a prize in Delgany NS Charity auction :-) http://delganyns.com/files/final_auction_list_2012.pdf

Leone Dooley: Random Eden Gate apartment resident. Likes (very) long walks to the village, and housing developments that have "a healthy mix of houses and apartments, with both young children and older people, singles and couples" - which apparently doesn't include Charlesland

So there :-)

Mr.Fred

stevestevenson wrote: »

At the time of buying, we had a choice between EG and Charlesland and chose the latter. EG is further away from the village, and on plans (and in reality subsequently) the buildings seemed very cramped..

You chose wrong Eden Gate is by far the better development with regard to quality of finish. I worked on both sites when they were being built and Charlesland was literally thrown together.

It's by no means a concrete jungle. I was shocked to see in the terraced houses that the only thing seperating one neighbour from the other is about 4 sheets of plasterboard and a stud wall. Not to mention the fake chimeys.

I think if Cosgraves had been the developers on Charlesland it would have been done to a higher standard. In saying that though there are plenty of open areas(islands surrounded by busy roads) for kids to play in.

I think it was a poorly planned development but a long way from being the worst one. Parking is defintely an issue but it seems to be developing well and there doesn't seem to be any signs of it becoming a rough area.

Car2318

Not often I would use this but Steve................ LMAO!!
Its the way you say it..................

red_bairn

Robin Archer of Archers glass.

http://www.archerswindows.ie/

stevestevenson

Mr.Fred wrote: »

You chose wrong Eden Gate is by far the better development with regard to quality of finish. I worked on both sites when they were being built and Charlesland was literally thrown together.

It's by no means a concrete jungle. I was shocked to see in the terraced houses that the only thing seperating one neighbour from the other is about 4 sheets of plasterboard and a stud wall. Not to mention the fake chimeys.

I think if Cosgraves had been the developers on Charlesland it would have been done to a higher standard. In saying that though there are plenty of open areas(islands surrounded by busy roads) for kids to play in.

I think it was a poorly planned development but a long way from being the worst one. Parking is defintely an issue but it seems to be developing well and there doesn't seem to be any signs of it becoming a rough area.

I think I'm the best judge of how well I chose, but thanks for the concern :-) I live in a well-finished house in the Grove (I've had no issues in 8yrs), on a well-lit road, in a well-maintained, spacious area; and have great neighbours - but maybe I just got lucky Fred.

Eden Gate is a lovely area also, but it (still) wouldn't be my choice to live there - but then I'm not Leone Dooley, what do I know :-)

Emma A

funny how you Mr Fred and all the other builders were happy to be paid to "literally throw together" all these houses and never said a word ...

Spongebopp

stevestevenson wrote: »

Robin Archer - Killincarrig resident. Builder & Chamber of Commerce (chairman I think?).

Robyn Archer - Wife of Robin - Career highlight: Once offered flower arranging lesson as a prize in Delgany NS Charity auction :-) http://delganyns.com/files/final_auction_list_2012.pdf

Leone Dooley: Random Eden Gate apartment resident. Likes (very) long walks to the village, and housing developments that have "a healthy mix of houses and apartments, with both young children and older people, singles and couples" - which apparently doesn't include Charlesland

So there :-)

Pretty sure Leone works in PR, so that would explain why she was quoted. Nothing can however explain her inaccurate statements.

Annasopra

The people named in the article are not absolute fair game for criticism as per the forum charter. What they said in the article is. Please remember this when posting. As always moderation feedback should never be on thread. Any issues/problems pm me or Damo

willow80

red_bairn wrote: »

Robin Archer of Archers glass.

http://www.archerswindows.ie/

I would like to point out that Robin Archer is not involved with Archers Glass/Windows. Just to clarify.

red_bairn

willow80 wrote: »

I would like to point out that Robin Archer is not involved with Archers Glass/Windows. Just to clarify.

Oh fair enough. I thought I saw him drive around in one of the vans.

IanL

Read the article, you get those small minded people in every small town which is what Greystones once was who want it to stay the same forever. They can't see that building Charlesland which is hardly an eye sore has brought more money to the town. Plenty have come from Greystones that live there but me for one and plenty others didn't as it was a more affordable area to live than a lot of Dublin at the time of buying.

Reminds me of a time some idiot on the Dart when I first moved in was going on about how nice the houses in the Burnaby are compared to the Ghastly Charlesland on a Dart which would have been full of Charlesland commuters.

Greystones was once a quaint little quiet village but unlike other parts of the country the estates are lived in and there are no ghost estates and little or no unoccupied houses.

There's not much antisocial behaviour than anywhere else (probably less as you don't see gangs hanging around)

Charlesland has enhanced the area, all that was there before was a barren field!

Spongebopp

Emma A wrote: »

funny how you Mr Fred and all the other builders were happy to be paid to "literally throw together" all these houses and never said a word ...

I agree, why were you were happy to do a sub standard job knowing families were going to live there and pay high prices for these houses.
My house in The Court is well built so you must have been having a good day!

red_bairn

IanL wrote: »

Read the article, you get those small minded people in every small town which is what Greystones once was who want it to stay the same forever. They can't see that building Charlesland which is hardly an eye sore has brought more money to the town. Plenty have come from Greystones that live there but me for one and plenty others didn't as it was a more affordable area to live than a lot of Dublin at the time of buying.

Reminds me of a time some idiot on the Dart when I first moved in was going on about how nice the houses in the Burnaby are compared to the Ghastly Charlesland on a Dart which would have been full of Charlesland commuters.

Greystones was once a quaint little quiet village but unlike other parts of the country the estates are lived in and there are no ghost estates and little or no unoccupied houses.

There's not much antisocial behaviour than anywhere else (probably less as you don't see gangs hanging around)

Charlesland has enhanced the area, all that was there before was a barren field!

It's also good to note that the facilities such as the swimming pool and gym (formerly Shoreline) are most likely mainly used by these residents since they are in the locality. I like in Rathdown and haven't yet used either of them but I've been to the astro turf/skate park area.

Huntthe

Don't let it bother you too much Folks. I am middle aged and have lived here all my life. For some people that is still not long enough. Thankfully I think those bigots (not naming anyone) are dying out, literally, although some of their offspring still have a bit of a chip. So don't worry Charleslanders , it's not personal it's just what all us 'blow in's':D have to go through. For the record, the apartments in Charlesland are bigger than the apartments in Kilcoole North ....oops sorry, I meant Eden gate

lakeroad

Mr.Fred wrote: »

It's by no means a concrete jungle. I was shocked to see in the terraced houses that the only thing seperating one neighbour from the other is about 4 sheets of plasterboard and a stud wall. Not to mention the fake chimeys.

You obviously were not involved in the whole development because the same detail / wall construction was used in Eden Gate.

2011

Mr.Fred wrote: »

You chose wrong Eden Gate is by far the better development with regard to quality of finish. I worked on both sites when they were being built and Charlesland was literally thrown together.

I don't think that it was Mr.Fred's intention to offend.
He was simply speaking form his own experience/observations.

Emma A wrote: »

funny how you Mr Fred and all the other builders were happy to be paid to "literally throw together" all these houses and never said a word ...

It is important to note that tradespeople were not responsible for the design of buildings in Charlesland or for the methods of construction. Buildings / housing estates are designed by architects and engineers and signed off by same.

Millers02

2011 wrote: »

It is important to note that tradespeople were not responsible for the design of buildings in Charlesland or for the methods of construction. Buildings / housing estates are designed by architects and engineers and signed off by same.

Yes, but they were responsible for things like not connecting the waste water pipe to the bath, etc. (as happened to a neighbour).

We have redone our bathroom and the plumber who did the work couldn't believe that the cistern to our toilet had been attached to the wall by two nails, through the cistern. He couldn't believe it hadn't sprung a leak - nothing wrong with the quality of the cistern or other materials used, just shoddy workmanship in assembling everything.

Personally, I steer clear of plumbers/electricians who tell me they worked on finishing these houses, the standard of care was not always what it should have been.

Lumbarda

Maybe people don't mean to offend but I think they should bear in mind, when they use such disparaging terms as "thrown together" and "eyesore" that they are talking about people's HOMES at the end of the day.

I also have to disagree with Mr Fred's opinion, we were househunting for 3 years before we decided to buy in Charlesland and, in that time, we did indeed see some examples of houses which were "thrown together", including one showhouse in a much sought after area with a crack down the wall through which you could see daylight! Therefore, when we did look at Charleland we were very impressed by the build quality and, over 7 years later, have had no structural issues or other concerns. In fact I am amazed at how good the soundproofing is between the houses, we have one direct neighbour with a young family and we literally hear NOTHING unless they are really yelling at the tops of their voices! My sister lived in a South Dublin Victorian redbrick(i.e. many people's ideal house) for many years and could hear practically every conversation that her neighbours had!

We also looked at Eden Gate but chose Charlesland as, yes, while the finish was better in Eden Gate, we couldn't justify paying 40% more for a smaller house with a tiny garden. We certainly haven't regretted our choice, couldn't be happier than we are in Charlesland, we have lovely neighbours, lots of kids around for our little one to play with, really quiet at night (visitors can never get over how peaceful it is, given its size!), easy walking distance to Greystones (no uphill climb ) etc. etc.

I just wish the Irish Times had bothered to look at the area properly before publishing such an inconsiderate and ill-judged article. :mad:

2011

Millers02 wrote: »

Yes, but they were responsible for things like not connecting the waste water pipe to the bath, etc. (as happened to a neighbour).

Absolutely.

We have redone our bathroom and the plumber who did the work couldn't believe that the cistern to our toilet had been attached to the wall by two nails, through the cistern. He couldn't believe it hadn't sprung a leak - nothing wrong with the quality of the cistern or other materials used, just shoddy workmanship in assembling everything.

Personally, I steer clear of plumbers/electricians who tell me they worked on finishing these houses, the standard of care was not always what it should have been.

I think that this is the exactly the sort of thing that Mr.Fred was referring to in terms of "quality of finish".

Lumbarda wrote: »

Maybe people don't mean to offend but I think they should bear in mind, when they use such disparaging terms as "thrown together" and "eyesore" that they are talking about people's HOMES at the end of the day.

I agree, but those terms were not used by Mr.Fred.

Therefore, when we did look at Charlesland we were very impressed by the build quality and, over 7 years later, have had no structural issues or other concerns.

It does not necessarily follow that a building that does not have "structural issues" is well built, designed or finished.

Do you not have "other concerns" because of a qualification you have related to the construction industry (engineer/tradesperson etc..)?

We also looked at Eden Gate but chose Charlesland as, yes, while the finish was better in Eden Gate, we couldn't justify paying 40% more for a smaller house with a tiny garden.

It would seem that you made the correct choice, for you.
It would also seem that you are suggesting that Eden Gate has a better finish which was part of Mr.Fred's point.

We certainly haven't regretted our choice, couldn't be happier than we are in Charlesland

This seems to be the view of most people that live there from what I can see.

I too was disappointed by the article, but I do not feel that it follows that the standard of construction and finishing in Charlesland was good.

red_bairn

Lumbarda wrote: »

[...] easy walking distance to Greystones (no uphill climb ) etc. etc.

I just wish the Irish Times had bothered to look at the area properly before publishing such an inconsiderate and ill-judged article. :mad:

The apartments at the end of Charlesland stick up high...but it's on an incline. Could this have made the journalist think they were quite high or did she just ask from the public in the town? :S

R.F.

Having grown up in Greystones and moving out at 18 (that was in 1999), the difference when I visit the town now is dramatic. I must say I am not overly fond of the area any more. IT has lost its charm in a big way.


Charlesland is part of that reason, but above all the harbour and La Touché Hotel have effectively destroyed what was once a beautiful village

Lumbarda

"I agree, but those terms were not used by Mr.Fred."

Actually Mr Fred DID use the term "literally thrown togther" .

"Do you not have "other concerns" because of a qualification you have related to the construction industry (engineer/tradesperson etc..)?"

What has this got to do with anything? I am just stating OUR experience, i.e. we have had NO problems with our house, tho', yes, BTW we do have professional experience in the construction industry.



"It would seem that you made the correct choice, for you.
It would also seem that you are suggesting that Eden Gate has a better finish which was part of Mr.Fred's point."

Indeed, as I said, and which certainly came at a premium pricewise as I also stated.

"I too was disappointed by the article, but I do not feel that it follows that the standard of construction and finishing in Charlesland was good."

Well I am just stating my opinion as an actual resident of Charlesland, based on my experience over the past 7+ years living here, but maybe that doesn't count for anything.



P.S. for some reason quotes didn't work!!

Car2318

I too left the little village I was reared in at 18 (circa 1996 ) but I do not expect or wish for it to be same almost 20 years later. Nor was it the same 20 years prior to my arrival into this world.

The main point here is that the article was used by the journalist as an attack on one of many new estates that have been built in the area, coupled with some hastily made comments by residents.

Thankfully us Charleslanders are clearly very fond of our own homes, neighbours and concrete community...........................

Greystones today.............tomorrow the world!!

2011

Lumbarda wrote: »

What has this got to do with anything?

Clearly the opinion of a qualified professional carries more weight. That is the whole point of a qualification

Indeed, as I said, and which certainly came at a premium pricewise as I also stated.

...and that was never disputed.

Jimjay

2011 wrote: »

I don't think that it was Mr.Fred's intention to offend.
He was simply speaking form his own experience/observations.



It is important to note that tradespeople were not responsible for the design of buildings in Charlesland or for the methods of construction. Buildings / housing estates are designed by architects and engineers and signed off by same.

That may be the case but was it the architects and engineers that didnt bother making all the tiles in the bathroom reach the ceiling, or was it those who put a timer on the boiler but didnt bother wiring it in. Or who wired the electrics up for the lighting incorrectly and instead of correcting it just wired the switches up wrong to compensate ;-), or not bother putting pipes in-between the vents, i could go on (and on).
There were a lot of corners cut when building charlesland but we have modified our house that much any problems have been put right, i am sure that most people who have lived here for a while have gotten round to fixing things that were not right during the build.

On top of that all our visitors (mostly from UK) love the estate and how well kept it is, they also say seeing the apartments make them feel like they are at a holiday resort (in a good way)

2011

Jimjay wrote: »

That may be the case but was it the architects and engineers that didnt bother making all the tiles in the bathroom reach the ceiling, or was it those who put a timer on the boiler but didnt bother wiring it in. Or who wired the electrics up for the lighting incorrectly and instead of correcting it just wired the switches up wrong to compensate ;-), or not bother putting pipes in-between the vents, i could go on (and on).
There were a lot of corners cut when building charlesland but we have modified our house that much any problems have been put right, i am sure that most people who have lived here for a while have gotten round to fixing things that were not right during the build.

On top of that all our visitors (mostly from UK) love the estate and how well kept it is, they also say seeing the apartments make them feel like they are at a holiday resort (in a good way)

All fair points. I agree with all of the above and if it any consolation I have spent the last few years dealing with similar issues in my own home.

stevestevenson

red_bairn wrote: »

The apartments at the end of Charlesland stick up high...but it's on an incline. Could this have made the journalist think they were quite high or did she just ask from the public in the town? :S

Is this like the Fr. Ted analogy, "Small vs. Far away"?

cuddlycavies

The article confuses seaview with Charlesland. Seaview does look a bit out of place TBH! Eden Gate is nicer than Charlesland but dearer and further away from the village. All in all charlesland is a great place to live. a mixed group of people from everywhere so no blow in nonse here! Very little trouble and well policed. Reasonably well finished now. Was put together by less than skilled people but structurally allright and well insulated. Good environment is a bonus. Shopping centre needs work and rents revised.

Zoo4m8

IanL wrote: »

Read the article, you get those small minded people in every small town which is what Greystones once was who want it to stay the same forever. They can't see that building Charlesland which is hardly an eye sore has brought more money to the town. Plenty have come from Greystones that live there but me for one and plenty others didn't as it was a more affordable area to live than a lot of Dublin at the time of buying.

Reminds me of a time some idiot on the Dart when I first moved in was going on about how nice the houses in the Burnaby are compared to the Ghastly Charlesland on a Dart which would have been full of Charlesland commuters.

Greystones was once a quaint little quiet village but unlike other parts of the country the estates are lived in and there are no ghost estates and little or no unoccupied houses.

There's not much antisocial behaviour than anywhere else (probably less as you don't see gangs hanging around)

Charlesland has enhanced the area, all that was there before was a barren field!

Eh no, what was there before Charlesland was a tidy well run tillage farm, just for the record like....

Millers02

2011 wrote: »

I think that this is the exactly the sort of thing that Mr.Fred was referring to in terms of "quality of finish".

To be more clear. When we renovated our bathroom and saw how the cistern had been fixed to the wall, a couple of neighbours checked theirs, to make sure that they weren't in danger of leaks - they weren't. The other cisterns had been fixed to the wall very nicely, it was just us. This method was not the specified finish.

Maybe it was a Friday afternoon and the plumber doing our bathroom wanted to get home, maybe it was an apprentice who didn't know what he was doing - I don't know, but it was the plumber - and no one else - who was responsible.

2011

Millers02 wrote: »

Maybe it was a Friday afternoon and the plumber doing our bathroom wanted to get home, maybe it was an apprentice who didn't know what he was doing - I don't know, but it was the plumber - and no one else - who was responsible.

Agreed, plumber is responsible for those sort of issues.
That is why my reply to your comment about this (above) was "Absolutely".

Huntthe

In general the standard of workmanship during the Celtic piss ant period was of a lower quality than at any other time in the States history. I think that is and undeniable fact.

Cheeky Chops

This isn't about building standards. Stay on topic. It is about an inaccurate piece of journalism that has been published in a national paper, that creates bad feeling in a small town and most importantly could affect house prices.

It's about a small bigoted few that do not realise that without Charlesland's money, the Main Street would have very few cafes and restaurants. That Charlesland probably brings an increased footfall to those businesses of 50% or more because over 90% of the estate (at least) is the demographic that eat and drink in the Main Street unlike the increasingly elderly population of this so called Protestant town in 2013. That the restaurant/cafe culture is thriving BECAUSE of Charlesland.

It's not only lazy journalism but quite a nasty little article.

BTW I read on FB someone saying (presumably a Stoner born and bred) that they objected to the development but they now have friends in Charlesland. It reminded me of the "I have a friend who is gay/black". Wow! Good for you being mates with one. Make sure you wash your hands now.

Annasopra

Cheeky Chops wrote: »

This isn't about building standards. Stay on topic. It is about an inaccurate piece of journalism that has been published in a national paper, that creates bad feeling in a small town and most importantly could affect house prices.

It's about a small bigoted few that do not realise that without Charlesland's money, the Main Street would have very few cafes and restaurants. That Charlesland probably brings an increased footfall to those businesses of 50% or more because over 90% of the estate (at least) is the demographic that eat and drink in the Main Street unlike the increasingly elderly population of this so called Protestant town in 2013. That the restaurant/cafe culture is thriving BECAUSE of Charlesland.

It's not only lazy journalism but quite a nasty little article.

BTW I read on FB someone saying (presumably a Stoner born and bred) that they objected to the development but they now have friends in Charlesland. It reminded me of the "I have a friend who is gay/black". Wow! Good for you being mates with one. Make sure you wash your hands now.

Please do not back seat moderate. If you feel a comment is off topic then report it and the moderators will deal with it. Also with regard to the FB comment I've also asked previously on this thread that people adhere to the forum charter. Comments like that are veering towards a charter breach.

GSLOCAL

Wow, well everyone seems to have been very busy since the Irish Times article came out. I've read all the comments and like the journalists piece, some of them are incredibly lazy with regard to facts.

1) The local mentioned in the article doesn't work for Archers Windows.
2) He does not "head up the Chamber'
3) The journalist did her utmost not to quote him properly. I've been in his company and heard him make the case that some people move to Greystones and then want to keep it as it is, because that's what's brought them here. He argues if he, as a long standing resident, had had the same attitude then Hillside, Redford etc might not have been built. She decided for her own reasons to take part of his comments and make them into an attack on Charlesland. From my dealings with him I would say he's all for progress/development carried out in a sensitive way, which would seem logical to me.

The sad thing from looking at the comments is that instead of everyone defending our beautiful town (yes despite the harbour not being finished) it turns into some sort of Charlesland versus the Burnaby rant.

There's more things right than wrong in the area so why not focus on the positive and complain about the shoddy journalism. Edenderry went mad building during the boom, hence it has loads of places empty, Greystones did not, hence our commercial occupancy rate is high. It's not rocket science but clearly past this journalist by.

Car2318

I think you have missed the point.
It is because we love Greystones that we in Charlesland were so insulted. We feel we contribute in many different ways to this town.
Everyone agrees about the shoddy journalism and yes it is unfortunate that she used their quotes in the article but at end of day it was said. I hope those individuals have pulled Ms Holmquist apart on it as am sure they are not happy either.
P.s i dont see any mention of Burnaby in previous posts?

Most importantly everyone agrees on what a great spot this is.....why the hell did author not concentrate on that and reasons it has done so well?

Thats my last on it.

Car2318

Actually thats not my last on it )
Greystones and ALL of it is a super area. We love it here and plan on staying and rearing our kids here. Everyone together makes it.

Either I am getting old or sensitive but would hate to think those quoted were upset over it all. Gosh if I was ever caught on bad day I'd be up in court for what I may say!!

Just saying......