Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

'Boks v 'Bies

Options
24

Comments

  • Options
    #32
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    Awec, shield your eyes - but Du Preez is SO much better than Pienaar, it's not funny. Steyn has those Garyowens on a string too.

    I been saying that till i am blue in the face....one of the modern greats.

    On a side not Alberts slammed that guy after the dangerous tackle...


  • Options
    #33
    DDC1990
    Registered Users Posts: 10,363 ✭✭✭✭DDC1990


    Stupid from Alberts. Unneccesary.


  • Options
    #34
    irishbucsfan
    Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    What's the score in this one?


  • Options
    #35
    Kiwi_knock
    Registered Users Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭Kiwi_knock


    irishbucsfan wrote: »
    What's the score in this one?

    20-3 to SA


  • Options
    #36
    stefan idiot jones
    Registered Users Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭stefan idiot jones


    ...and when you're struggling for possession, just kick the ball away ?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #37
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    Fardie should be off...professional foul.


  • Options
    #38
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    On a side note, I think Garces is my favourite ref at the moment. Just superb IMO.


  • Options
    #39
    thomond2006
    Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    That dummy from the Beast! :eek:


  • Options
    #40
    awec
    Administrators Posts: 53,553 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Australia are fecking rubbish.


  • Options
    #41
    rudiger2.0
    Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭rudiger2.0


    Why did Garces ask for the Tmo to look at the afters of that tackle and then not actually listen to the tmo.

    Also, jumping the tackle, could have been a penalty to Australia.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #42
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    rudiger2.0 wrote: »
    Why did Garces ask for the Tmo to look at the afters of that tackle and then not actually listen to the tmo.

    Also, jumping the tackle, could have been a penalty to Australia.

    He could see it in the big screen himself. Instant decision, I applaud Garces.


  • Options
    #43
    Kiwi_knock
    Registered Users Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭Kiwi_knock


    rudiger2.0 wrote: »
    Why did Garces ask for the Tmo to look at the afters of that tackle and then not actually listen to the tmo.

    Also, jumping the tackle, could have been a penalty to Australia.

    He wanted to watch the tackle himself on the big screen so he used to the TMO so it would be put on the big screen.


  • Options
    #44
    thomond2006
    Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    What the hell was Alexander doing taking that tap?!


  • Options
    #45
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    thomond2006 wrote: »
    What the hell was Alexander doing taking that tap?!

    I'd rate Scotland to take down Aussie at the moment. That says it all. (OK I know Scotland have done it twice recently...)


  • Options
    #46
    rudiger2.0
    Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭rudiger2.0


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    He could see it in the big screen himself. Instant decision, I applaud Garces.

    Ok I get the tackle but he said he wanted to look and the scuffle and then he didn't.


  • Options
    #47
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    South Africa for all their good play only have 2 tries.

    How long can Australia hang on with no possesion


  • Options
    #48
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    rudiger2.0 wrote: »
    Ok I get the tackle but he said he wanted to look and the scuffle and then he didn't.

    Yeah Alberts was lucky there.


  • Options
    #49
    Kiwi_knock
    Registered Users Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭Kiwi_knock


    Nasty looking


  • Options
    #50
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    Oh Flip you have played so well and then does that.

    Yellow and may be sighted for next week with Alberts and Du Plessis.


  • Options
    #51
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Emperor1989 wrote: »
    Oh Flip you have played so well and then does that.

    Yellow and may be sighted for next week with Alberts and Du Plessis.

    The Boks are a dirty unit. I expect more of the same next week. Might cost you the game TBH.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #52
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    thomond2006 wrote: »
    They've plenty of time to get two more tries.

    You were saying...

    They should get it, but if they don't they'll feel foolish having taken unnecessary shots at goal with such a comfortable lead.


  • Options
    #53
    thomond2006
    Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    You were saying...

    They should get it, but if they don't they'll feel foolish having taken unnecessary shots at goal with such a comfortable lead.

    I was surprised they took the three points in front of the posts when Hooper was in the bin.


  • Options
    #54
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    The Boks are a dirty unit. I expect more of the same next week. Might cost you the game TBH.

    I don't think they are dirty at all. I think Flip defo has some of the Bakkies in him but other than that they are on side in terms of the law.

    Hooper should have been more careful in his tackle and Alberts just slammed him to the ground. Didn't see what du plessis did but heard the commentators say it.

    There game is to intmidate the opposition and they are doing it. Mowen and Moore are losing the plot especially the hooker.

    Australia are not even engaging the scrum and basically hinging its a disgrace tbh.


  • Options
    #55
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Emperor1989 wrote: »
    I don't think they are dirty at all. I think Flip defo has some of the Bakkies in him but other than that they are on side in terms of the law.

    Hooper should have been more careful in his tackle and Alberts just slammed him to the ground. Didn't see what du plessis did but heard the commentators say it.

    There game is to intmidate the opposition and they are doing it. Mowen and Moore are losing the plot especially the hooker.

    Australia are not even engaging the scrum and basically hinging its a disgrace tbh.

    I won't get into a debate, but the Boks have history. Since time immemorial. They're a very physical side, but it costs them. The worse recent example was Dean Grayling in Dunedin who had possibly the worst impact off the bench. Bakkies Botha on multiple occasions and so on. Not the whole team, but certain players.

    Du Plessis eye gouge BTW according to commentators.


  • Options
    #56
    Kiwi_knock
    Registered Users Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭Kiwi_knock


    Saw nothing in the Alberts scuffle, but du Plessis looked like he might have had fingers in Moore's eyes (would be interesting to see it again).

    Good start to the game, but getting a bit scrappy and far too may scuffles breaking out. SA still well on course for getting the BP, Australia are offering absolutely nothing.


  • Options
    #57
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    Swiwi. wrote: »
    I won't get into a debate, but the Boks have history. Since time immemorial. They're a very physical side, but it costs them. The worse recent example was Dean Grayling in Dunedin who had possibly the worst impact off the bench. Bakkies Botha on multiple occasions and so on. Not the whole team, but certain players.


    Dean Greyling was fecking disgrace. Cowardly and should never get a cap again and won't. Terrible example. A gym monkey who couldn't play the game.

    Whats the story with the citing. If it has been dealt with by the ref can it be reviewed?. Surely Du Plessis will get that....sloppy placement of hands.


  • Options
    #58
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    Kiwi_knock wrote: »
    Saw nothing in the Alberts scuffle, but du Plessis looked like he might have had fingers in Moore's eyes (would be interesting to see it again).

    Good start to the game, but getting a bit scrappy and far too may scuffles breaking out. SA still well on course for getting the BP, Australia are offering absolutely nothing.

    Yeah can't see Alberts getting anything after further thought. But Du Plessis will have to answer....not in his nature to be a twat like that. He would be a loss next week, Oosty has yet to prove he can scrum at this level and last 80 mins.


  • Options
    #59
    Swiwi.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Emperor1989 wrote: »
    Dean Greyling was fecking disgrace. Cowardly and should never get a cap again and won't. Terrible example. A gym monkey who couldn't play the game.

    Whats the story with the citing. If it has been dealt with by the ref can it be reviewed?. Surely Du Plessis will get that....sloppy placement of hands.

    I think citing guy can refer, also I think teams can ask citing guy to review. Don't think what ref does has any effect.


  • Options
    #60
    stefan idiot jones
    Registered Users Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭stefan idiot jones


    Thank God Genia is on for that moustached fool.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #61
    Emperor1989
    Registered Users Posts: 924 ✭✭✭Emperor1989


    I don't agree with Stephen Jones much but he is perfectly correct in terms of this Australian front row.

    A fecking disgrace


Advertisement