Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Migrating away from 'Prism' companies

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,485 ✭✭✭✭Khannie


    Mailvelope - GPG encryption for webmail clients. Pretty slick actually. Open source. Currently Chrome / Chromium only but a firefox version is apparently in the works.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,808 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    No mention of moving from brandname routers to dd-wrt ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 678 ✭✭✭silentrust


    No mention of moving from brandname routers to dd-wrt ?

    Presumably this would make it impossible for the big brands to stick a backdoor into your firmware as you're putting your own on there?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,808 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    silentrust wrote: »
    Presumably this would make it impossible for the big brands to stick a backdoor into your firmware as you're putting your own on there?
    means they'd have to be sneakier, but on a cheap consumer router that would cost too much.

    you can get BSD firewalls that don't use IP addresses and just inspect the packets as they pass , but in a cheap router that extra HW would show up.


    Also if truly paranoid you'd need to vet your compiler too :pac:
    http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/08/induc/
    Security experts seem more intrigued than alarmed over a newly-discovered virus that inserts itself into a Delphi compiler, and replicates itself in every program compiled.

    It can't be said too often that security is built up of layers and since any one layer could be compromised the more layers you have the better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 678 ✭✭✭silentrust


    means they'd have to be sneakier, but on a cheap consumer router that would cost too much.

    you can get BSD firewalls that don't use IP addresses and just inspect the packets as they pass , but in a cheap router that extra HW would show up.


    Also if truly paranoid you'd need to vet your compiler too :pac:
    http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/08/induc/

    It can't be said too often that security is built up of layers and since any one layer could be compromised the more layers you have the better.

    Did you see that it had found its way into a trojan? Oh, the irony! :-)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement