Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why Irish houses are still massively overpriced

Options
15678911»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Icepick wrote: »
    This depends.
    Houses are expensive, but people continue to be obsessed with poorly-insulated larger-than-needed houses. Plus, the civil service is doing everything they can to avoid market pricing: Nama and banks holding stock and not repossessing, high welfare rates, artificial public employment..).
    Why would apartments in established areas go significantly below the current prices? They are already cheaper/same price as any other OECD country, including (much) poorer countries.

    As posted on another thread a dose of reality may help in putting a stop to the delusions you have outlined.
    We are borrowing €12,000,000,000 a year to keep the show on the road
    We are paying interest of €6,000,000,000 to service our debts.

    In addition there are serious headwinds: Mortgage arrears crisis, pressure on our corporate tax rate, Increased costs on our business, Attempts to blow up another property bubble, Mass emigration, Pensions crisis, Out of control Health Costs etc

    The first figure would pay 400,000 people €30,000 per anum (Thats 200 Dell Closure Annoncements)
    The second figure would pay 200,000 people €30,000 per anum

    That's 600,000 workers between our deficit and interest on our debt. Who thinks this is a sustainable situation?

    Sorry for been a bit on the negative side, but I don't want to hear "We didn't see it coming" as an excuse for destroying a country


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭Icepick


    Villa05 wrote: »
    As posted on another thread a dose of reality may help in putting a stop to the delusions you have outlined.
    We are borrowing €12,000,000,000 a year to keep the show on the road
    We are paying interest of €6,000,000,000 to service our debts.

    In addition there are serious headwinds: Mortgage arrears crisis, pressure on our corporate tax rate, Increased costs on our business, Attempts to blow up another property bubble, Mass emigration, Pensions crisis, Out of control Health Costs etc

    The first figure would pay 400,000 people €30,000 per anum (Thats 200 Dell Closure Annoncements)
    The second figure would pay 200,000 people €30,000 per anum

    That's 600,000 workers between our deficit and interest on our debt. Who thinks this is a sustainable situation?

    Sorry for been a bit on the negative side, but I don't want to hear "We didn't see it coming" as an excuse for destroying a country
    Only bankruptcy will put stop these delusions being pursued.
    There isn't a possible government coalition that doesn't involve at least one socialist/populist party.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Icepick wrote: »
    Only bankruptcy will put stop these delusions being pursued.
    There isn't a possible government coalition that doesn't involve at least one socialist/populist party.

    The budget cuts up to last year were mainly on capital projects, the remaining cuts will be more close to the bone and hit hard.

    Bailout deal finishes at the end of this year, no guarantee that we can get cheap finance after that.

    The correct figure for the interest we are paying on our debt is actually €8.500,000,000 and amounts to 20% of the states all tax income. Bankruptcy is not that far from here.

    The present Gov has actually done very to stabilise employment in the face of such cuts, It gets alot harder from here though


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,269 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    OMD wrote: »
    You have a lot of statements there that are simply your opinion nothing more. The benefits of breast feeding after the child is 6 months old are non-existent (the benefits during the first 6 months are not as clear-cut as you imply but that is a different argument). As maternity leave is now over 6 months this point is a red herring.

    You imply house prices were affordable when only one person worked but now they are not with 2 working. That is just nonsense so I'm afraid you need to provide evidence.

    There are some US studies that back this up. Couples buy property in the best school area they can afford, leaving single parents unable to compete and families with less diaposable income than pre 1950-60's.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭ChRoMe


    maninasia wrote: »
    I'm sorry but I'm not impressed by the usual 'I'm a mother of XXX kids', 'I'm also a father of xxx kids', I don't think it's very relevant to personalise your statement as we can all do that.

    So in other words you want to be excused while you dismiss her anecdotal evidence for your own anecdotal evidence.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 66 ✭✭boarsboard


    price house by rent x 15 years by rent

    you can see if its over valued say rents are 800 month x12 then x 15


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭OMD


    boarsboard wrote: »
    price house by rent x 15 years by rent

    you can see if its over valued say rents are 800 month x12 then x 15

    Based on what?
    Is this formula applicable all over the Western World or is Ireland a special case?


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,179 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    boarsboard wrote: »
    price house by rent x 15 years by rent

    you can see if its over valued say rents are 800 month x12 then x 15

    Overly simply metric. By that, every 1 bed apartment in Dublin is massively undervalued yet their prices keep falling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,326 ✭✭✭Farmer Pudsey


    boarsboard wrote: »
    price house by rent x 15 years by rent

    you can see if its over valued say rents are 800 month x12 then x 15


    Where did you come up with this pricing structure. So if I buy a house and rent it, it will cost me 100 euro/ month more than the present rent over 20 years at with ECB rates averaging 3.5% over the 20 year period.

    The house would be paying for itself after year five and turning a profit after year 10.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭Villa05


    While our own mortgage crisis shows no sign of abating, according to my next guest, Britain's housing market is still dangerously dysfunctional...

    In his new book, The Default Line, he traces the origins of the British housing bubble and argues that an entire generation are paying absurd prices for a basic human need - and it doesn't have to be this way.

    http://www.rte.ie/radio/utils/radioplayer/rteradioweb.html#!rii=9%3A20432182%3A15036%3A04%2D09%2D2013%3A


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,198 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Villa05 wrote: »
    The correct figure for the interest we are paying on our debt is actually €8.500,000,000 and amounts to 20% of the states all tax income. Bankruptcy is not that far from here.

    2012 interest bill was 6,133m.

    2013 interest bill to be 8,239m planned.

    Heartbreaking.

    http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/nationalaccounts/governmentfinancestatistics/


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,198 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Villa05 wrote: »
    The correct figure for the interest we are paying on our debt is actually €8.500,000,000 and amounts to 20% of the states all tax income. Bankruptcy is not that far from here.

    This is a key point.

    Gen Govt revenue is approx 56bn during 2009-2012.

    Interest was:

    2009 = 3bn approx
    2012 = 6bn approx

    2013 planned = 8,239m

    The interest bill has nearly tripled, and now accounts for 15% of Govt revenue.

    This does mean very tight Budgets ahead.

    http://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/er/gfsa/governmentfinancestatisticsapril2013/#.UiexHdK-qrw


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,466 ✭✭✭jetfiremuck


    As I see it if the Gov keep taking money out of the economy with on going austerity and punitive taxes there will be no incentive for anyone to hire,expand or even spend money.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Icepick wrote: »
    Why would apartments in established areas go significantly below the current prices? They are already cheaper/same price as any other OECD country, including (much) poorer countries.
    Houses prices have fallen almost 60% already and this reflects the domestic reality. I think the double dip will be caused by events overseas. The most likely instigator will be the attempts to taper QE by the Fed in the US.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,616 ✭✭✭maninasia


    ChRoMe wrote: »
    So in other words you want to be excused while you dismiss her anecdotal evidence for your own anecdotal evidence.


    No, I provided links to scientific research and discussion of the results, go back and read my posts and then read her posts.

    There is also a lot of research that points to double earning couples being partly responsible for house price inflation, which is fairly common sense if you think about it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83



    I had to double check if the above wasn't the 'Waterford Whisperer'


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,180 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    I had to double check if the above wasn't the 'Waterford Whisperer'

    Yes mr jim stafford believes the rest of us should pay to make sure accountants, consultants and solicitors gets to keep their status houses.

    The fooking sense of entitlement in this fooking country is simply astonishing.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Say what you will about him but he created an account on p.ie to respond to the thread about him and attempt to explain himself. I don't remotely like what he said (and don't buy his "explanation") but I do have a certain amount of respect for the extreme bravery he's shown in making an account under his real name and wading into a thread where he's being castigated right, left & centre.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭Icepick


    jmayo wrote: »
    Yes mr jim stafford believes the rest of us should pay to make sure accountants, consultants and solicitors gets to keep their status houses.

    The fooking sense of entitlement in this fooking country is simply astonishing.
    Check the rates insolvency administrators charge for their services.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭Villa05


    gaius c wrote: »
    Say what you will about him but he created an account on p.ie to respond to the thread about him and attempt to explain himself. I don't remotely like what he said (and don't buy his "explanation") but I do have a certain amount of respect for the extreme bravery he's shown in making an account under his real name and wading into a thread where he's being castigated right, left & centre.

    Gaius, your getting a bit soft. The guy left the cat out of the bag in a live interview. He inadvertently told the truth. His Status and reputation which he values so highly is seriously damaged as a result.
    He is now looking for stupidity forgiveness as opposed to debt forgiveness


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Villa05 wrote: »
    Gaius, your getting a bit soft. The guy left the cat out of the bag in a live interview. He inadvertently told the truth. His Status and reputation which he values so highly is seriously damaged as a result.
    He is now looking for stupidity forgiveness as opposed to debt forgiveness

    Well I did open a thread about it on AAM, knowing that he posts there and wondered if he would venture an explanation. I never expected in my wildest dreams that he'd pop onto P.ie to joust with the loons there.

    Also, anyone heard of foreclosure stuffing before?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭Voltex


    gaius c wrote: »
    Say what you will about him but he created an account on p.ie to respond to the thread about him and attempt to explain himself. I don't remotely like what he said (and don't buy his "explanation") but I do have a certain amount of respect for the extreme bravery he's shown in making an account under his real name and wading into a thread where he's being castigated right, left & centre.

    TBH..I don't think the plank had much of a choice! He went on the national airwaves and created societal-economic divide akin to the British class structure. The minute I heard what he said my jaw dropped..I wondered how an educated and professional person who's role as a PIP requires a level of open-mindedness could broadcast such ill-thought stupidity.

    Maybe his comments verify or even validate popular opinion of the professional classes in Ireland.


Advertisement