Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

is there such a thing as a selfless act?

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭badgerbadger


    Do you ever stop to consider the nature of time the Garda asked the publican ( who was pulling a pint at 10:30 ) sarcastically. Look at it this way. Suppose a man's life is 60 years and a horse's 20. The horse is aging three times as fast as the man. This ratio is maintained in all proportions which involve the factor of time. When we talk of a horse galloping at 30 miles per hour we mean that he is covering thirty miles in the space of a human hour. To assess the animal's objectively, we must think in terms of horse-hours. It takes three of his own hours to cover his thirty miles and thus he is making the comparatively poor time of 10 miles an hour. On the other hand a man running at the rate of ten miles an hour would be regarded as the fleetest of creatures by an elephant, who lives ten times as long as man, because the hour would represent only six minutes of the elephant's time. To give you some inkling of what's happening when a man travels at 'thirty' 'miles' per 'hour' on horseback, I'm afraid I would have to send up to Merrion Square for the loan of a few quaternions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭KKkitty


    I think all prisoners should have to read the OP aloud at intervals during the day. Scrolling through that on the touch site is painfu.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭51NN3R


    I believe that we are going in circles. :D

    yup,look on you-tube for the double-slit experiment ,it shows that reality is entirely our created perception,look for "dr quantum double-slit" /watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc and then the "Reality is a Matrix" watch?v=XPqferL9no8,you might like what you find

    this makes it easier to understand why we all find it so hard to actually see the other persons point of view :)

    i would just embed those videos here but have no clue how to do this hehe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49 FreeasmyHair


    Did you get this from Friends?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    51NN3R wrote: »
    yup,look on you-tube for the double-slit experiment ,it shows that reality is entirely our created perception,look for "dr quantum double-slit" /watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc and then the "Reality is a Matrix" watch?v=XPqferL9no8,you might like what you find

    this makes it easier to understand why we all find it so hard to actually see the other persons point of view :)

    i would just embed those videos here but have no clue how to do this hehe
    51NN3R wrote: »
    just imagine how far over the edge I'm gone with all this tripe,it's a thing i can't stop thinking about,years of quantum physics to Plato's Allegory of the Cave.

    thanks for your comment :)


    Years of quantum physics, and yet you never got around to learning how to embed a YouTube clip? Fùck.

    Anyway, see the brackets? Stick the Video ID (the part after the v= in between the ] [.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭51NN3R


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    Years of quantum physics, and yet you never got around to learning how to embed a YouTube clip? Fùck.

    Anyway, see the brackets? Stick the Video ID (the part after the v= in between the ][.

    There was a time when i knew how to do it ,it's just something I'd forgotten,
    as Bud once said about Kelly,you can only pour so much water in a glass before some of it starts to spill out :P

    thanks for the tip




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭crazy cabbage


    Does that mean that when people are praying for someone that they are actully doing it becouse it makes them feel good and not becouse of the person they are ment to be praying for.

    I was going to try and argue against you but that is actully a point in your favour and an important point in the debate. In no way does me praying for someone else benifit them in any way but people still do it.

    They will tell themselves that they are doing it for someone else and they mightn't even tell anyone. It doesn't benifit the other person so they only reason they could be doing it is becouse it makes them feel good. or it was bet into them

    Again i am really not sure that this is selfish though. Naive maby but not selfish


    ps: to the poster above me. That Dr.Quantam video is psudo science at its best. While it is takeing some good facts it is twisting them into something it isn't.
    edit: prehaps that was a bit extream but there is alot of newage BS attached to that video and 'what the beep do we know' in general


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    Ego, schmego. I'm all about the Super Id thesedays.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭51NN3R


    Does that mean that when people are praying for someone that they are actully doing it becouse it makes them feel good and not becouse of the person they are ment to be praying for.

    I was going to try and argue against you but that is actully a point in your favour and an important point in the debate. In no way does me praying for someone else benifit them in any way but people still do it.

    They will tell themselves that they are doing it for someone else and they mightn't even tell anyone. It doesn't benifit the other person so they only reason they could be doing it is becouse it makes them feel good. or it was bet into them

    Again i am really not sure that this is selfish though. Naive maby but not selfish


    ps: to the poster above me. That Dr.Quantam video is psudo science at its best. While it is takeing some good facts it is twisting them into something it isn't.
    edit: prehaps that was a bit extream but there is alot of newage BS attached to that video and 'what the beep do we know' in general

    The DR.Quantum video is to guide others in the direction of this topic,it's a nice way to start the understanding of reality until you find
    Claus Jönsson who did it in 1961 and then Giulio Pozzi in 1974, Akira Tonomura in 1989,again by Pozzi in i think 2008 with a single electron and one by one last year by Pozzi,and Feynman's thought experiment ,this is a very complexed subject to which no one has the answer but there is one point that gets me and that is 'if according to these experiments and then coming to the conclusion that reality is nothing but a self created illusion then so too are the tools used to perform the experiments and cannot therefore be considered accurate which leads you into an insanity i know all too well,

    As to your praying for others,you are right in it being about you and as for believing in a God ,you have to accept that even God is selfish in that God wants the worshiper to do things Gods way "worship me,obey me,pray to me or burn in everlasting torment,seems God truly did make us all in his own image but according to the Unified Field "we are God split to infinity experiencing existence in all possible forms" or God is everywhere and in everything always and forever.

    I don't like bringing the God into it because it always sets off a religious debate but i did so now i have to watch it develop and vanish over the next few days,

    oh well ,here we go :)


Advertisement