Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Particulars of a case

  • 23-04-2013 01:43AM
    #1
    CIARAN_BOYLE
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭


    Just a reminder I'm not a lawyer. I'm a business student but I've taken a couple of classes in law.

    Anyway a friend told me a story about an issue at work and I half remember a case that is very similar. If you could give me the name of the case or a link to the judgement it would be much appreciated.

    The case related to psychiatric nurses and discrimination. The job description for psychiatric nurses was broad ranging but male psychiatric nurses were expected to do all physical work including 'dangerous tasks' such as restraining patients.

    As far as I remember the male psychiatric nurses took a descrimination case claiming that they were being discriminated against since they had to do all the least desired work from the job description.

    If you could help find the case in question it would be appreciated.


Advertisement