E.U. to vote on Europe wide porn ban

Nika Bolokov

A totally unenforceable piece of legislation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9917189/MEPs-to-vote-on-EU-ban-on-all-forms-of-pornography.html

'The proposal "calls on the EU and its member states to take concrete action on discrimination against women in advertising... [with] a ban on all forms of pornography in the media".

Kartika Liotard, a Dutch left-wing feminist MEP, is seeking "statutory measures to prevent any form of pornography in the media and in advertising and for a ban on advertising for pornographic products and sex tourism", including measures in the "digital field".

Just another symptom of overbearing political correctness which is little by little restricting freedom of speech and expression.

Interesting to see how the Irish MEP's vote !

smash

I stopped reading at "Feminist"

juice1304

I hate feminists complete tards.:pac: I bet she is a minger they usually are.

Nika Bolokov

juice1304 wrote: »

I hate feminists complete tards.:pac: I bet she is a minger they usually are.

Well I certainly hope she isnt reading this thread..........

P_1

Its gas how it's always left wing politicians who should be socially liberal by definition who seem to be the ones to propose these socially conservative policies

Cee-Jay-Cee

Fuck her.

1ZRed

****! :mad:

smash

CJC999 wrote: »

Fuck her.

That's sexist!!!!



Make love to her.

BillyMitchel

Fap fap fap fap

Fock right off!!

Fap some more.

1ZRed

The MEPs are also demanding the establishment of state sex censors with "a mandate to impose effective sanctions on companies and individuals promoting the sexualisation of girls".

Fucking idiots always using that point that doesn't even hold up any more.

And besides, not all porn even has women in it, so all of it should get banned as a result?

Nika Bolokov

1ZRed wrote: »

Fucking idiots always using that point that doesn't even hold up any more.

And besides, not all porn even has women in it, so all of it should get banned as a result?

Exactly

GalwayGuy2

Its gas how it's always left wing politicians who should be socially liberal by definition who seem to be the ones to propose these socially conservative policies

There has been a turn hasn't there? I guess everybody want to improve society in their own image but it seems more common in the left to try and force it onto you.

The right just tells you to get out if you don't like it:P

Pornographic products

That's the dildos gone. True, men use them also, but the vast majority of the buyers are women.

wnolan1992

To quote Dr. Perry Cox:

"I'm pretty sure if you took all the porn off the internet, there'd only be one site left, and it'd be called 'Bring Back the Porn!'."

franktheplank

I think you see a lot more objectification of men in ads these days.....

baalthor

This will be a tough one for the Daily Mail and Express !

Duggy747

Because men don't appear in pornos.....

and women certainly never watch porn.....

and men are also never sexualised in adverts, either............

mike65

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056898309

bgrizzley

Great idea, it might stop all that fraping...

1ZRed

Duggy747 wrote: »

Because men don't appear in pornos.....

and women certainly never watch porn.....

and men are also never sexualised in adverts, either............

You could argue that men are far more sexualised than women in straight porn. All a man is in them is his cock, nothing more.

They get payed feck all in comparison to women as a result of that too, yet did they ever factor that into their decision to ban porn?

It's just the tired aul "the poor women are nothing but sex objects" argument from the 50's all over again.

Men watch porn and women also watch porn. Can't believe they don't seem to get that.

krudler

Hope this applies to discrimination in men in advertising too, didn't you know all men are dangerous driving rapists who can't work washing machines?

freyners

wnolan1992 wrote: »

To quote Dr. Perry Cox:

"I'm pretty sure if you took all the porn off the internet, there'd only be one site left, and it'd be called 'Bring Back the Porn!'."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rm5gRN9KDc

RossPaws

Most people who hate feminism actually don't fully understand it.

Pherekydes

juice1304 wrote: »

I hate feminists complete tards.:pac: I bet she is a minger they usually are.

Ugly women's opinions should be discounted because they're not pretty; pretty women's opinions should be discounted because they are pretty?

krudler

Pherekydes wrote: »

Ugly women's opinions should be discounted because they're not pretty; pretty women's opinions should be discounted because they are pretty?

AH logic

Grayditch

I hope it is banned.

Even more forbidden. Even more awesome.

P_1

Censorship and prohibition has worked so well in the past...

oh wait

B 12

krudler wrote: »

Hope this applies to discrimination in men in advertising too, didn't you know all men are dangerous driving rapists who can't work washing machines?

Well this week i managed to break my car and washing machine, 2 outa 3 someone is in trouble

Ruudi_Mentari

Duggy747 wrote: »

and men are also never sexualised in adverts, either............

We are mostly portrayed as a bear, that just took a **** in the woods

BillyMitchel

Grayditch wrote: »

I hope it is banned.

Even more forbidden. Even more awesome.

A whole new meaning to the term danger ****.

1ZRed

P_1 wrote: »

Censorship and prohibition has worked so well in the past...

oh wait

I'd just start making my own. I've already some homemade stuff on my phone anyway.

It's some good stuff too;)

Come at me EU!

Kxiii

krudler wrote: »

Hope this applies to discrimination in men in advertising too, didn't you know all men are dangerous driving rapists who can't work washing machines?

Hey now. I can use a washing machine, I just choose not to.

wnolan1992

1ZRed wrote: »

I'd just start making my own. I've already some homemade stuff on my phone anyway.

It's some good stuff too;)

[OBLIGATORY]
Pics or GTFO!
[/OBLIGATORY]

spankysue

Fight and you may die. Run and you will live at least awhile. And dying in your bed many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here as young men/women and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our FAPPING!!!!

Fromthetrees

I like the idea of desexualising society in general, it's a good thing to keep sexual explicitness off the tv before the watershed and off ads out in public where children can be exposed to them.

But.

Trying to ban porn and sex between consenting adults is as crazy a thing as you can get. Grown up adults must be free to choose what they want to do.

Duggys Housemate

Funny that Holland - once the centre of sexual licence and legalisation of prostitution should produce this kinda politician.

Or maybe not.

In any case it's one voice in the EU. Not the entire parliament.

Steve O

spankysue wrote: »

Fight and you may die. Run and you will live at least awhile. And dying in your bed many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here as young men/women and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our FAPPING!!!!

I wonder did they ever make a pornographic braveheart.

They could call it, depraveheart.

King of Kings

RossPaws wrote: »

Most people who hate feminism actually don't fully understand it.

this old chestnut ...jaysys...what a worn out cliche.

Zomg Okay

Steve O wrote: »

I wonder did they ever make a pornographic braveheart.

You are obviously unfamiliar with Rule #34 of the Internet.

GalwayGuy2

Originally Posted by RossPaws
Most people who hate feminism actually don't fully understand it.

I'd argue you can't ever completely understand all the various views in the umbrella term of feminism, as I view at as theory, or solutions, or even personal opinions, rather than an ideal that seeks to improve women's rights.

Steve O

Zomg Okay wrote: »

You are obviously unfamiliar with Rule #34 of the Internet.

Thank you oh wise one.

My quest for the evening has been revealed...

Duggys Housemate

Steve O wrote: »

Thank you oh wise one.

My quest for the evening has been revealed...

Can you find us a glass hammer while you're out there?

wolfpawnat

Nika Bolokov wrote: »

Kartika Liotard, a Dutch left-wing feminist MEP, is seeking "statutory measures to prevent any form of pornography in the media and in advertising and for a ban on advertising for pornographic products and sex tourism", including measures in the "digital field"[/B][/I].

She is aware her country would go broke in a week right? I mean seriously, the only things the Netherlands have going for it is flowers, weed, prostitution and ingenuitive use of attics!

So she doesn't like women being "sexualised" in the media, does this mean no more shirtless men in Diet Coke ads and A&F ads, since you know, equal rights and all? Clearly an ugly harpy annoyed that other women are able to make a few Euro from their appearance!

Truncheon Rouge

productivity and the economy would increase x 10.
men would start reading and thinking and inventing.

but violent assaults would increase too.

kleenex sales would remain the same....but for the first time since the 90's they'd be mostly used for tears.

Steve O

Duggys Housemate wrote: »

Can you find us a glass hammer while you're out there?

BDSM is not of my particular taste.

Truncheon Rouge

all this talk of porn has me hankering for a wi.nk.



wink

TeddyTedson

They can take away our porn, but they will never stop us masturbating!
If one things sure in life, there will always be ****.

I wonder would it come to marches if they get far with this?

Toby Take a Bow

P_1 wrote: »

Its gas how it's always left wing politicians who should be socially liberal by definition who seem to be the ones to propose these socially conservative policies

'Left wing' doesn't necessarily mean socially liberal, as much as right wing doesn't necessarily mean socially conservative.

As for the porn thing, as much as there are many, many, many problems with porn, any law trying to prevent information passing through the internet is doomed to failure. The person who proposed this is either trying for some media coverage or really doesn't understand the internet.

And the comments about feminism and feminists are so predictable and depressing.

Ilik Urgee

Was full sure it was a wind up when I read OP's username-Nika Bolokov

starlings

krudler wrote: »

Hope this applies to discrimination in men in advertising too, didn't you know all men are dangerous driving rapists who can't work washing machines?

mmmm washing machines...

Tar.Aldarion

To the streets my brothers and sisters!

Daveysil15

The people who want to ban porn are always those you wouldn't want to shag in the first place.