Do you bother with a dedicated GPS unit?

Howdy folks,

I'm sure this has been covered before, but quick question for ye new and old: Do you bother using a dedicated GPS unit in your car (assuming your car/vehicle doesn't already have one built-in)?

Was in Halfords the other day and seen some units. Think they were all over €100 (or in that area, anyway). Meteor sell a Samsung Galaxy Mini for €50 posted (which has GPS capability).

I understand having a phone as a GPS unit can be troublesome if you get a phone call/text etc. whilst using the GPS/Maps app, but am I the only one who sees the sense in just buying an extra phone to use, along with whatever necessary car charger is needed and a suction mount?


Or am I missing something obvious?

68 lost souls

It depends really, not sure what on exactly but at home I often use a dedicate gps system, i find it easier to read, slightly more accurate, gives a speed read out and always has signal.

I sometimes use my iPhone too with the waze app, its fantastic but works much better stateside. Over there I used it to navigate 3 major road trips including route 66 and more. The thing I prefer about that is real time traffic, social media aspect where you can report accidents, speed cameras etc and you get am advanced warning, the petrol prices which are regularly updated. The downside is all those features work best where there are a lot of users so not as good in Ireland and it also relies on having signal which doesn't always happen, especially in Ireland.

As I said it depends on the situation I think.

Bpmull

I have a suction holder for the window and just use my Iphone as a sat nav. A Proper sat nav I'm sure would be better but for the bit I use it the iPhone does the job.

mickdw

I agree with the phone idea. I went alittle further. Here is what I did with an old samsung galaxy and an electronic box of tricks. This also allowed me to add a reverse cam.
Set destination and return phone to arm rest. Works fantastically. Also means I get youtube etc in car.

JohnBoy26

Yes imo a dedicated system is much better. Also I have one of them samsung galaxy mini's and it's as slow as a wet week and has a poor battery. The gps isnt that good on it either.

mickdw

mickdw wrote: »

I agree with the phone idea. I went alittle further. Here is what I did with an old samsung galaxy and an electronic box of tricks. This also allowed me to add a reverse cam.
Set destination and return phone to arm rest. Works fantastically. Also means I get youtube etc in car.

Looks good, but probably something a little too advanced for the likes of me

pa990

a dedicated GPS unit is more reliable than a phone for when you don't have phone coverage toupdate the mmaps add you travel, also better for foreign travel so you don't end up with massive data roaming charges.

and you can create your own poi lists, as well as adding poi s of speed cameras abroad.

Garmin ftw

darragh o meara

mickdw wrote: »

I agree with the phone idea. I went alittle further. Here is what I did with an old samsung galaxy and an electronic box of tricks. This also allowed me to add a reverse cam.
Set destination and return phone to arm rest. Works fantastically. Also means I get youtube etc in car.

Tell me more about this box of tricks and this setup. I have a pair of Galaxy S2's bought specifically for the job but haven't gotten around to doing anything with them yet.

BTW I only ever use my Iphone and the Tomtom app. Ive found it to be a lot more up to date than any of the usual devices you find around and if you get a decent car charger it will charge it as you navigate too, Something that the cheaper chargers have a problem with.

biko

I sold my Tomtom as soon as I got a smart phone with gps, haven't regretted it a day since.
Connects to stereo with bluetooth.
Yes calls (again via bluetooth) will interrupt it but as soon as it's over it jumps back to gps again.

Cash is king

Please tell us Mick, I am looking to buy one of those audis so I am intrested!

Uriel.

I have two dedicated units, TomTom and a Garmin Nuvi and haven't used either since I got my Galaxy Nexus phone 18 months ago. I find it much quicker, more accurate and all round better using Google maps compared to the dedicated GPS. I find, in particular it is waaaay better finding rural locations compared to the dedicated.

Plus you can have Map view or satellite imagery which can come in dead handy. I can manage PoIs on the fly or pre select them from my laptop. I doubt I'd ever go back to a dedicated unit. Battery life is the big problem but I have an in car charger so it's all good

shooter88

KKV wrote: »

Howdy folks,

I'm sure this has been covered before, but quick question for ye new and old: Do you bother using a dedicated GPS unit in your car (assuming your car/vehicle doesn't already have one built-in)?

Was in Halfords the other day and seen some units. Think they were all over €100 (or in that area, anyway). Meteor sell a Samsung Galaxy Mini for €50 posted (which has GPS capability).

I understand having a phone as a GPS unit can be troublesome if you get a phone call/text etc. whilst using the GPS/Maps app, but am I the only one who sees the sense in just buying an extra phone to use, along with whatever necessary car charger is needed and a suction mount?


Or am I missing something obvious?

The galaxy minis screen is a bit small and could be a danger trying to drive and look at it..a proper GPS is the only way to go unless you onlr want something for a rough idea

tossy

Been using a phone as a sat nav since 2008 - Nokia N97 and Garmin mobile xt were my first combo,got me all around europe and never missed a beat,worked a treat with a bluetooth headunit,.

Today i use Iphone and Tom tom.

I don't go for suction mounts or anything i hate things stuck to my dash or window. The phone sits nicely into the cup holder,the Iphone also sits nicely against the instrument cluster between the Speedo and rev gauge the only thing it blocks is the computer display.

keithclancy

tossy wrote: »

Been using a phone as a sat nav since 2008 - Nokia N97 and Garmin mobile xt were my first combo,got me all around europe and never missed a beat,worked a treat with a bluetooth headunit,.

Today i use Iphone and Tom tom.

I don't go for suction mounts or anything i hate things stuck to my dash or window. The phone sits nicely into the cup holder,the Iphone also sits nicely against the instrument cluster between the Speedo and rev gauge the only thing it blocks is the computer display.

+1
I just ordered a Brodit proclip for mine off Amazon.de
Saw it in a mates car and its pretty good compared to the sucker on the windows job (hate those, especially when it flies off while driving!)

robinph

I have a dedicated Garmin for car use, another for running, another for cycling and another for going up and down mountains. There are also a few retired running models over the years now gathering dust. Getting the right tool for each job is much better than faffing about trying to get the wrong device to do the task.


What I don't have are any shares in Garmin which is a bit of an oversight seeing how much of their kit I have bought.

tossy

robinph wrote: »

I have a dedicated Garmin for car use, another for running, another for cycling and another for going up and down mountains. There are also a few retired running models over the years now gathering dust. Getting the right tool for each job is much better than faffing about trying to get the wrong device to do the task.


What I don't have are any shares in Garmin which is a bit of an oversight seeing how much of their kit I have bought.

Surely a good phone with sat nav built in would do all those jobs more than competently? I'm sure you bring your phone with you while running and going up and down mountains anyway? A separate sat nav for different pursuits sounds crazy - Garmin must love you

Alpha Dog 1

Uriel. wrote: »

I have two dedicated units, TomTom and a Garmin Nuvi and haven't used either since I got my Galaxy Nexus phone 18 months ago. I find it much quicker, more accurate and all round better using Google maps compared to the dedicated GPS. I find, in particular it is waaaay better finding rural locations compared to the dedicated.

Plus you can have Map view or satellite imagery which can come in dead handy. I can manage PoIs on the fly or pre select them from my laptop. I doubt I'd ever go back to a dedicated unit. Battery life is the big problem but I have an in car charger so it's all good

+1 Google navigation is completely free, maps can be downloaded for offline use.
Also when you arrive at your destination it goes into street view to show you the destination, very handy when it's dark.
Can't understand anyone paying for a dedicated device when navigation is free unless you are using it everyday or travel to different countries regularly.

robinph

tossy wrote: »

Surely a good phone with sat nav built in would do all those jobs more than competently? I'm sure you bring your phone with you while running and going up and down mountains anyway? A separate sat nav for different pursuits sounds crazy - Garmin must love you

For the car possibly, but unless you have the maps downloaded in advance it's no use for travelling outside of your home country or outside of mobile coverage.
For running a phone is far too bulky to carry most of the time and especially so in a race, doesn't have heart rate monitor, the battery might not last the distance, won't be waterproof and you can't easily hit the start/ stop button for timing yourself.
For the bike, again a phone doesn't have HRM facility, not waterproof, no cadence sensor, battery won't last the day with gps and screen on, touch screen probably won't work with gloves on, maps will be unlikely to have bike routes.
For wandering up a mountain, again...battery life, waterproof etc plus ruggedness for when you drop it on a rock, no mobile signal, no barometer.

Yes the phone can get you by in all these situations in an emergency, but to do the job properly you need the right tool. Phones are useful, but they are for doing lots of different things OK'ish, not for doing any job really well.

tossy

robinph wrote: »

For the car possibly, but unless you have the maps downloaded in advance it's no use for travelling outside of your home country or outside of mobile coverage.
For running a phone is far too bulky to carry most of the time and especially so in a race, doesn't have heart rate monitor, the battery might not last the distance, won't be waterproof and you can't easily hit the start/ stop button for timing yourself.
For the bike, again a phone doesn't have HRM facility, not waterproof, no cadence sensor, battery won't last the day with gps and screen on, touch screen probably won't work with gloves on, maps will be unlikely to have bike routes.
For wandering up a mountain, again...battery life, waterproof etc plus ruggedness for when you drop it on a rock, no mobile signal, no barometer.

Yes the phone can get you by in all these situations in an emergency, but to do the job properly you need the right tool. Phones are useful, but they are for doing lots of different things OK'ish, not for doing any job really well.

Fair enough,good points.

As regards the car ,i've never used a phone/GPS combo that requires mobile signal to work.Load the maps onto the phone all the time.An entire map of Europe is only going to be a few gigs in size.

robinph

tossy wrote: »

Fair enough,good points.

As regards the car ,i've never used a phone/GPS combo that requires mobile signal to work.Load the maps onto the phone all the time.An entire map of Europe is only going to be a few gigs in size.

I have Europe wide FM traffic fro my in car Garmin which is another reason for dedicated device as you don't require data for that. I would download local OpenStreetMap in advance to the phone though, but that would be used for finding stuff whilst walking about rather than whilst driving.

tossy

robinph wrote: »

I have Europe wide FM traffic fro my in car Garmin which is another reason for dedicated device as you don't require data for that. I would download local OpenStreetMap in advance to the phone though, but that would be used for finding stuff whilst walking about rather than whilst driving.

That's another plus of having Sat nav on a phone.While walking about foreign cities you can leave the phone in your pocket with one ear bud in,it saves you walking around with a big please rob me sign over your head with a big map open and a clueless expression

djimi

Been using Google maps navigation for a couple of years and it does me fine. I dont need GPS that often, nor have I had the need to use it abroad yet, but when I have used it it has brought me to the door of where Im going every time. Cant go wrong for a free system!

listermint

Generally speaking the battery of a phone, even when plugged in isnt enough to retain maps for long travel distances.

They just arent built to have a fully illuminated screen over 3 Hours time. Thats why dedicated GPS systems come into play.

The phones when plugged in cant keep up with the power loss of the screen, processor and GPS signals pulling down its juice.

Fine for short journeys thats about all.

dbrunson

Deleted User wrote: »

Howdy folks,

I'm sure this has been covered before, but quick question for ye new and old: Do you bother using a dedicated GPS unit in your car (assuming your car/vehicle doesn't already have one built-in)?

Was in Halfords the other day and seen some units. Think they were all over €100 (or in that area, anyway). Meteor sell a Samsung Galaxy Mini for €50 posted (which has GPS capability).

I understand having a phone as a GPS unit can be troublesome if you get a phone call/text etc. whilst using the GPS/Maps app, but am I the only one who sees the sense in just buying an extra phone to use, along with whatever necessary car charger is needed and a suction mount?


Or am I missing something obvious?

I generally just read sign posts, saves me buying a gps (that dont really work that well in a country with no post codes) , seriously it works.

djimi

listermint wrote: »

Generally speaking the battery of a phone, even when plugged in isnt enough to retain maps for long travel distances.

They just arent built to have a fully illuminated screen over 3 Hours time. Thats why dedicated GPS systems come into play.

The phones when plugged in cant keep up with the power loss of the screen, processor and GPS signals pulling down its juice.

Fine for short journeys thats about all.

I cant say Ive experienced this tbh. The Galaxy S3 would have a screen that would be about as battery intensive as they come, and Ive never had any issue with using the GPS for long periods of time while the phone is plugged into a car charger. Even on battery you should be able to get several hours out of the GPS, assuming you allow the screen to dim (which should not be an issue on a journey with stretches of motorway).

djimi

dbrunson wrote: »

I generally just read sign posts, saves me buying a gps (that dont really work that well in a country with no post codes) , seriously it works.

Works fine, until you are driving around the countryside where there are no signposts, or no guarantee that the ones that are there are correct...!

GPS has nothing to do with postcodes; Ive used it to get to some pretty remote parts of this country and it has never failed me yet.

mickdw

Cash is king wrote: »

Please tell us Mick, I am looking to buy one of those audis so I am intrested!

Look up xcarlink.co.uk. They do units for most cars. You need a full colour screen though and alot of cars dont have that. All this device does is give you av inputs into the factory system. Its plug and play and is controlled via factory steering wheel controls. It also comes with auto switch reverse cam feed.
Its pretty old tech so the phones are going away from offering the tv out format that suits but I believe iphone still does it. Im using a galaxy s but ive an s3 too and id much prefer to use that for this but it would need a convertor to work.
My ideal setup is the s3 sending wirelessly to the screen and also having a near field com tag in the car programmed to set the phone instandly onto required setting and straight into nav.
Dont think I will get round to that though.

cormie

Definitely a dedicated GPS unit for me for the reasons mentioned above, not having navigation disrupted if you get a phone call etc and also, when on the phone to a customer if you have a problem finding their address, it's great to have the maps in front of you.

I guess the question is, given phones have come on so much and are probably the most advanced technology with a screen that size, would a phone be a better dedicated GPS than the likes of a Garmin? My Nuvi 760's are still going strong although a bit slow with zooming out, re-routing etc, they don't let me down.

Zubeneschamali

I don't have a smartphone. There's a TomTom in the car, but I haven't turned it on since 2010.

listermint

djimi wrote: »

I cant say Ive experienced this tbh. The Galaxy S3 would have a screen that would be about as battery intensive as they come, and Ive never had any issue with using the GPS for long periods of time while the phone is plugged into a car charger. Even on battery you should be able to get several hours out of the GPS, assuming you allow the screen to dim (which should not be an issue on a journey with stretches of motorway).

Not a hope of getting several hours out of an S3 with the screen on and GPS maps running. Its just not going to happen.

Drive to belfast / Tralee from dublin on it and see how several hours its lasts on battery alone.

tossy

listermint wrote: »

Generally speaking the battery of a phone, even when plugged in isnt enough to retain maps for long travel distances.

They just arent built to have a fully illuminated screen over 3 Hours time. Thats why dedicated GPS systems come into play.

The phones when plugged in cant keep up with the power loss of the screen, processor and GPS signals pulling down its juice.

Fine for short journeys thats about all.

I disagree there,i drove 3,300 miles around Europe years ago with a primitive nokia N97 and Garmin XT screen was always on,phone wasn't always plugged in and it never skipped a beat,this was also while playing MP3's all the time from the same phone along with the occasional phone call.In fact it out performed a stand alone Tom tom sat nav and a VW factory sat nav in the other cars,we were on the road for 5/6 hours non stop at times.

Furthest i've gone on the Iphone/Tom tom combo is Birmingham, under similar conditions i'e playing Mp3's answering and making calls it never missed a beat.

The era of the stand alone Sat nav is dead really.