Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Football Refereeing

  • 26-08-2012 03:28PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭


    I know we have had many threads on the standard of refereeing over the years on this forum, but I don't think I've ever seen such an abject performance by a referee, then the one I've just witnessed in the Mayo vs Meath Minor Semi-Final.

    The RTE analysts described the performance as "Pathetic", and that was putting it mildly.

    He constantly broke the flow of the game up in the second half giving needless yellow cards.
    He then stopped giving Mayo frees as soon as they went 6 points up. They couldn't get past the half way line because they're game relied on runners off the shoulder, but Meath started to take the runners out off the ball and got away with it.
    I know referees like to let a team back in the game, but this was rediculous. Don't get me wrong, Mayo had many other failings. They got tired, they got sloppy and dropped a lot of ball in the back line. They also went ultra defensive, and lost midfield.
    However they were still in control of the game until the referee gave Meath a sideline, after a Meath played pushed a Mayo player out over the line with two hands. From the line ball, Meath won the break and had a shot on goal. A Mayo player 3 meters away from the man shooting, slid on one knee and the ball hit off his leg. The referee gave a penalty for a footblock, either not knowing the rules of the game, or deliberatly giving Meath an opportunity to level the game.

    The damage was done then, and Meath were piling forward. A Meath player broke through and landed on the ground still holding the ball, which most referee's would give as a free out. He then rolled over and threw the ball towards his nearest teamate, who proceded to control the ball on the ground. The referee ignore this and the Meath player had a shot which was halfblocked and fell to another Meath player, who fumbled the ball before another Meath player kicked the ball to the back of the net.

    While the blame cannot be placed on the Referee's shoulders, there is a panel of 24 young men who have missed out on the biggest day of their lives because of Cathal O'Hagan's shambolic display of refereeing. I have refereed at underage and at schools level. I know it can be difficult, and you can't get everything right. An All Ireland Semi-Final brings huge pressure for a referee as well, and mistakes are going to be made. However, it is clear that this referee was not up to refereeing at this level.

    Anyway, my question is what can be done? How can we make sure these sort of displays don't become the norm. This display will be ignored because its "only the minors", but the refereeing at Senior level has been shambolic this year as well. The Gaa has money, can they put serious resources into trainign referees? I know despite refereeing at underage level, I'd never be willing to make the step up to senior level, because the pressure, the abuse and the complete lack of training that is available to referees these days.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59 ✭✭cossy09


    Could not agree more. Well said. It was a complete an utter disgrace to award the line ball and then the penalty for a foot block WTF? I have no loyalty to either team and Mayo did not do themselves any favours by not scoring for most of the second half but the referee completly ruined the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭DDC1990


    As if to enforce my point, David Coldrick has followed a similar line in the senior game, of refereeing one team and not the other.

    Donegal seem to get frees for nothing, whereas Cork are being fouled left right and center without any whistle.

    Again no loyalty towards any team, but its getting rediculous at this stage!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭Tipperary animal lover


    Both ref's bad today, the minor one was a disgrace.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Pegasusbridge


    Maybe it looked different on the tv but from my spot in the hogan it looked like coldrick got most of the decisions correct. Donegal won because they were the better team. I agree the ref in the minor match was poor but Meath were on the receiving end of plenty of wrong decisions too. Mayo dominated at times and so did Meath. It was tight but Mayo invited Meath on to them in the second half and Meath took their chances. The ref made a few wrong calls but that happens.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,718 ✭✭✭✭JonathanAnon


    Both ref's bad today, the minor one was a disgrace.....

    That foot block decision was absolutely shocking.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭DDC1990


    Maybe it looked different on the tv but from my spot in the hogan it looked like coldrick got most of the decisions correct. Donegal won because they were the better team. I agree the ref in the minor match was poor but Meath were on the receiving end of plenty of wrong decisions too. Mayo dominated at times and so did Meath. It was tight but Mayo invited Meath on to them in the second half and Meath took their chances. The ref made a few wrong calls but that happens.
    I dunno, his interpretation of the tackle varied hugely today. Cork lads were being tugged back by ther jersey quickly, and surrounded by guys flailing arms in, but free's out were given.

    Donegal on the other hand were given some very soft frees, some for literally running at the Cork player and going down. Thats Barging IMO, but Donegal often win frees for that.

    Not saying that the referee had anything to do with Cork losing or Donegal winning, I just thought he was very tough on Cork and quite easy on Donegal. When Donegal really got a run on Cork, Coldrick was anonymous, which is the best compliment you can pay a referee. It was fast paced and he let the game flow very well.

    I don't think I'd put too much blame on Coldrick, because the tackle law is so so vague, it was just odd that some frees were given to one side that the other side were never going to get.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    As a neutral i felt that the ref started to give cork a few soft decisions when they were 5 or 6 points down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭DDC1990


    woodoo wrote: »
    As a neutral i felt that the ref started to give cork a few soft decisions when they were 5 or 6 points down.
    Still, thats no better.

    The minor referee did that, and Meath ended up winning!

    There has to be a solution, before it gets out of hand!

    The "Give Respect Get Respect" campaign has failed miserably, because the Intercounty Referees are so poor, that they often have a major bearing on which way the match is decided, which leads to a lot of fustrated players!


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 16,724 Mod ✭✭✭✭yop


    Ref in 2nd game had a good game, did slip a bit in the 2nd half but felt he did his job.

    As for the minor, well it was the worst I have seen in a long time. That said 27 mins without a score isn't good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭bohsboy


    Thought that Mayo team were filthy, that back three kicked, punched and goaded Meath players on and off the ball. Delighted Meath came back.

    Senior match, I was very impressed with the ref. Best display of the season imo.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    to be honest lads, i dont totally blame the refs, i blame the authorities. im playing football for 23 years and i did a reffing course a few years back. the amount of bulls*it rules in there is astounding and these refs are being pressured every week into enforcing them.

    letting a game flow, is not allowed according to the rules, there is no advantage rule as such in the rule book and this is something that needs to come in and be rectified.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 16,724 Mod ✭✭✭✭yop


    bohsboy wrote: »
    Thought that Mayo team were filthy, that back three kicked, punched and goaded Meath players on and off the ball. Delighted Meath came back.
    .

    LOL, you have to be trolling us with tripe like that! We are talking about Meath here..... comment of the day that. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 921 ✭✭✭RoscommonTom


    Well if i was a mayo man I would be raging, that ref was pure diar, worst I have ever seen I think. They did themselfs no favors with the deep defending in the second half though and the two lads what went off injured after running into each other had been playing great. Must be a sickener to lose cos of a clown of a ref like that, he must be having relations with the meath manager. Thought the ref in the second game was very good


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭bohsboy


    yop wrote: »
    LOL, you have to be trolling us with tripe like that! We are talking about Meath here..... comment of the day that. :o

    No, I stand by it. Check the "groping" incident by the Mayo defender after yet another free given against him. Around the 45 minute mark. Couldn't believe my eyes.

    Not a Meath fan at all but delighted to see them come back and win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭Frankie Lee


    In the first half of the Senior game Coldrick definitely was giving cork nothing while Donegal were getting very handy frees.
    Another thing that annoys me with Coldrick is the way he wastes so much time giving lectures along with his yellow cards.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 15,247 Mod ✭✭✭✭rebel girl 15


    Most of the regular posters in here would know me as fairly unbiased, and knowledgeable about the rules but I thought Coldrick made some bad calls in the first half, especially with the pickups. I didn't see a foul in the last free he gave Donegal, but I could be biased in that one, thought it was a 50:50 challenge. In fairness, he was good overall, so can't fault him

    There is big problems with both halves of the official guide, rugby in comparison is very black and white, whereas GAA has a lot of interpretation and grey areas left to the referees which ends up with a lot of disparities between games. Problem is that intercounty referees are very focused on the assessor that is rating them, and that can play into getting calls right and wrong on the day.

    The abuse referees are getting at club games is actually stopping the growth of younger referees in the game - potential new intercounty referees are being hindered at club level

    Intercounty referees actually lose money doing games - between the cost of travelling to the game and then feeding their umpires on the way home etc. A lot could be done to improve the rule book to help referees. I'll have a think and come back with a proper list!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭daniels.ducks


    Intercounty referees actually lose money doing games - between the cost of travelling to the game and then feeding their umpires on the way home etc. A lot could be done to improve the rule book to help referees. I'll have a think and come back with a proper list!

    In fairness referees travelling outside the county will usually get an allowance for himself, umpires and linesmen of up to €25 per person. That's to cover food. Then the ref would get a match fee.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 15,247 Mod ✭✭✭✭rebel girl 15


    In fairness referees travelling outside the county will usually get an allowance for himself, umpires and linesmen of up to €25 per person. That's to cover food. Then the ref would get a match fee.

    I've spoken to a few intercounty referees who were out of pocket at the end of the year, think that figure pp has gone up in recent years though

    Umpires would be with the referee, linesmen are appointed by the same committee that would appoint the referee


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭daniels.ducks


    I've spoken to a few intercounty referees who were out of pocket at the end of the year, think that figure pp has gone up in recent years though

    Umpires would be with the referee, linesmen are appointed by the same committee that would appoint the referee

    I have experience of this, I am a referee. I've only ever done the line for one inter-county match. Cork and CIT in the McGrath cup final. All the linesmen and umpires went to the same place for grub on the way back. We were looked after very well.
    Even for county finals in my own county the seven officials are given an allocation to spend on food afterwards as well as that the referee gets a match fee and fuel expenses for travelling outside his own division.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭curry-muff


    I know it might sound like the phrase is getting a bit overused at this stage, but refereeing a gaelic match is really one of the toughest sports to officiate.

    As annoyed as I've gotten with referees myself, I do feel for the poor guys.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    curry-muff wrote: »
    I know it might sound like the phrase is getting a bit overused at this stage, but refereeing a gaelic match is really one of the toughest sports to officiate.

    As annoyed as I've gotten with referees myself, I do feel for the poor guys.

    soccer and rugby have a very basic set of rules, but to ref in GAA you need to have a degree at this stage things are so complicated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭daniels.ducks


    soccer and rugby have a very basic set of rules, but to ref in GAA you need to have a degree at this stage things are so complicated.

    And this causes GAA referees to have their own styles which leads to frustration amongst players


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Padkir


    soccer and rugby have a very basic set of rules, but to ref in GAA you need to have a degree at this stage things are so complicated.

    That might be true to an extent, to do with things like the tackle. But there are simple rules that Cathal (minor ref) got very wrong yesterday, i.e. foot block, over-hand hand pass, picking off the ground and a 2 handed push over the sideline as the Mayo man was about to kick.

    General areas like men coming together and intense tackles like that, I give the ref a bit more credit as it's tough to make those decisions and as long as there's some decent level of consistency it's hard to complain too much.

    But no ref at any level should be getting the decisions I mentioned above wrong!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Pegasusbridge


    Padkir wrote: »
    soccer and rugby have a very basic set of rules, but to ref in GAA you need to have a degree at this stage things are so complicated.

    That might be true to an extent, to do with things like the tackle. But there are simple rules that Cathal (minor ref) got very wrong yesterday, i.e. foot block, over-hand hand pass, picking off the ground and a 2 handed push over the sideline as the Mayo man was about to kick.

    General areas like men coming together and intense tackles like that, I give the ref a bit more credit as it's tough to make those decisions and as long as there's some decent level of consistency it's hard to complain too much.

    But no ref at any level should be getting the decisions I mentioned above wrong!
    I don't think it's as simple as that. The rules state that blocking or attempting to block with the foot is a foul when an opposition player is kicking from the hand. The mayo player slid feet first at the player kicking. I know most people looking at the replay felt the defender was too far away from the attackers foot to call it a foot block but that is their interpretation of the rule. The ref only saw it once and I would argue that by the letter of the law he was correct.
    Many refs don't view it like that and so we get differences between referees and fans get annoyed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭Padkir


    I don't think it's as simple as that. The rules state that blocking or attempting to block with the foot is a foul when an opposition player is kicking from the hand. The mayo player slid feet first at the player kicking. I know most people looking at the replay felt the defender was too far away from the attackers foot to call it a foot block but that is their interpretation of the rule. The ref only saw it once and I would argue that by the letter of the law he was correct.
    Many refs don't view it like that and so we get differences between referees and fans get annoyed.

    But he wasn't diving AT the player kicking, he was diving across in the space between the man and the goal, with every limb outstretched. It was just unfortunate it hit his foot. If it was his knee it hit he'd have been called a hero.

    And that doesn't explain the others, picking from the ground, blatantly incorrect hand-pass, push over the sideline...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭gearoidc


    I don't think it's as simple as that. The rules state that blocking or attempting to block with the foot is a foul when an opposition player is kicking from the hand. The mayo player slid feet first at the player kicking. I know most people looking at the replay felt the defender was too far away from the attackers foot to call it a foot block but that is their interpretation of the rule. The ref only saw it once and I would argue that by the letter of the law he was correct.
    Many refs don't view it like that and so we get differences between referees and fans get annoyed.

    Anyone with an ounce of cop-on knows what was intended with this rule. It is there to prevent the possibility of injury to the kicker and in this particular case simply did not apply.
    The ref deserves a kick up the arse and certainly doesn't deserve people making excuses for him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭celt262


    Padkir wrote: »
    But he wasn't diving AT the player kicking, he was diving across in the space between the man and the goal, with every limb outstretched. It was just unfortunate it hit his foot. If it was his knee it hit he'd have been called a hero.

    And that doesn't explain the others, picking from the ground, blatantly incorrect hand-pass, push over the sideline...

    Did it even hit his foot, i just seen it once and though it hit him above the knee?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Pegasusbridge


    Padkir wrote: »

    But he wasn't diving AT the player kicking, he was diving across in the space between the man and the goal, with every limb outstretched. It was just unfortunate it hit his foot. If it was his knee it hit he'd have been called a hero.

    And that doesn't explain the others, picking from the ground, blatantly incorrect hand-pass, push over the sideline...

    But It didn't hit his knee. If he dived hand first he would have blocked it with no risk of a foul. I accept most people don't view it as a foot block but I think the rule isn't that precise and it's not a completely unreasonable decision. You are right of course that the ref got some decisions wrong but most of those are blatant with the aid of slow motion replays. The ref didn't have that advantage The ref was playing an advantage to Meath when the hand pass/pickup occurred and that might have influenced him. Of course it shouldn't but everyone makes mistakes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Pegasusbridge


    gearoidc wrote: »

    Anyone with an ounce of cop-on knows what was intended with this rule. It is there to prevent the possibility of injury to the kicker and in this particular case simply did not apply.
    The ref deserves a kick up the arse and certainly doesn't deserve people making excuses for him.
    You might well be correct but I think some people were making the point that gaa rules are a bit imprecise and open to interpretation. I would agree with that point and I think that makes it more difficult for referees. The rule just states you can't attempt to block with the foot. I think more precise rules might help refs make less mistakes. I'd also like to see the use of video technology to help refs. Remember the incident happened very quickly and most people sitting beside me in the stand(mostly Donegal fans) felt it was a foot block. It was only when I saw it on the Sunday game that I realised that it was a contentious call.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭daniels.ducks


    I don't think it's as simple as that. The rules state that blocking or attempting to block with the foot is a foul when an opposition player is kicking from the hand. The mayo player slid feet first at the player kicking. I know most people looking at the replay felt the defender was too far away from the attackers foot to call it a foot block but that is their interpretation of the rule. The ref only saw it once and I would argue that by the letter of the law he was correct.
    Many refs don't view it like that and so we get differences between referees and fans get annoyed.

    My interpretation of that rule is when a defending player goes at the player with his foot. I'd nearly even go as far to say in most instances it is only an offence if a player shows studs.
    What happens if there is a bit of a huddle and a player tries to kick the ball low through it and it comes off the back/side of a defending players boot. That is not a foul even though technically it is a foul as he stopped the ball from being played using his foot... i.e footblocked. This could even happen if a defeng player runs across a player kinking the ball low and it happens to come of the defending players boot.


Advertisement