Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Stochastic Terrorism

124»

Comments

  • #92
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    enfant terrible wrote: »
    What left wing media depresses you?
    None, to be honest. They just don't have the apocalyptic tone and fear-mongering approach of Faux.


  • #93
    enfant terrible
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,734 ✭✭✭enfant terrible


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    None, to be honest. They just don't have the apocalyptic tone and fear-mongering approach of Faux.

    Thought so.


  • #94
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    enfant terrible wrote: »
    Thought so.
    So you are in agreement about the tone of Faux News? And their disregard for facts?


  • #95
    The Bishop!
    Closed Accounts Posts: 175 ✭✭The Bishop!


    Beck takes the biscuit.


  • #96
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    So you are in agreement about the tone of Faux News? And their disregard for facts?
    Hmm...I think somebody just ducked out of the discussion.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    Fromthetrees
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Fromthetrees


    Brown Bomber wrote: »
    It seems to me like the only solution from your perspective is racially distinct secular regions. Is that fair to say?


    Which is fine if they are upfront about it. They are not, as evidenced by the groups name "onelawforall".


    No. My point is that if you claim take issue with religous councils in Britain, where there are two, and only focus on one then you are clearly biased and therefore of questionable integrity.
    Ex Muslim women rallying against Sharia Law lose integrity because they don't attack Jews enough? That's what you're saying yeah?
    Obviously the women are going to be biased against Sharia Courts, they were abused by them.
    Do you actually think that if scores of Jewish women came to this organisation with stories of abuse that they would have been turned away, denied membership and have their stories silenced?


  • #98
    Brown Bomber
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Fromthetrees wrote: »
    Ex Muslim women rallying against Sharia Law lose integrity because they don't attack Jews enough? That's what you're saying yeah?
    No. I have been clear in what I have been saying. If your stated cause differs from your actual cause in practice then your output is questionable as it suggests an agenda.

    If I were to campaign for rape victims rights in Ireland and only focus on Nigerian rapists then serious questions would have to be asked about my motivations.

    It's the same here though you are oblivious to it.
    Fromthetrees wrote: »
    Obviously the women are going to be biased against Sharia Courts, they were abused by them.
    Has the founder ever actually been "abused by them"? Can you support this?
    Fromthetrees wrote: »
    Do you actually think that if scores of Jewish women came to this organisation with stories of abuse that they would have been turned away, denied membership and have their stories silenced?
    I see no evidence that there are even scores of Muslim women there with their stories.

    Do you deny the existence of the UK Jewish "chained wives" under Jewish Law?

    If not, why does "One Law For All"?


  • #99
    Fromthetrees
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,846 ✭✭✭Fromthetrees


    Brown Bomber wrote: »
    No. I have been clear in what I have been saying. If your stated cause differs from your actual cause in practice then your output is questionable as it suggests an agenda.

    If I were to campaign for rape victims rights in Ireland and only focus on Nigerian rapists then serious questions would have to be asked about my motivations.

    It's the same here though you are oblivious to it.


    Has the founder ever actually been "abused by them"? Can you support this?


    I see no evidence that there are even scores of Muslim women there with their stories.

    Do you deny the existence of the UK Jewish "chained wives" under Jewish Law?

    If not, why does "One Law For All"?
    They're an explicitly secular organisation who make no references to race on their website so your making a mute comparison.
    But to answer yet another analogy, if a group of Nigerian women who were racially abused decided to set up a group against racism in the UK and they focused specifically on anti Nigerian racism and supported mainly Nigerian women who were racially abused but were extremely clear that they were against all forms of racism would you have a problem with them too?

    I can understand what you're trying to say, but if you look at all of this objectively, Sharia Courts discriminate against women, Islamaphobia is real, Islamic terrorism is real, religious ghettos are real, riots are real, ect.
    All of these roads do not lead back to Israel.


Advertisement