Irish Nurse "Who saw everything” after suspicious Batman shooting mysteriously drowns

Run_to_da_hills

This subject now deserves a thread on its own as details of the story is starting to unfold just like the main Aurora incident on which this case has unfortunately developed from.

It was mentioned in previous post prior to the link below of the suspicious circumstances behind this case, ie the fact that she attended so many injuries, saw and witnessed so much and then mysteriously drowns.

Another point worth mentioning is that Irish Media AKA Belfast telegraph, the Independent and Herald were the only papers that gave the connection between herself, the drownings and the ffact that she was a hero to the killings while state controlled US main stream media stayed silent on connection..

I also mentioned in a previous post that this case if of significant interest to this country as it involves the possible murdering of an Irish national on US soil by the corrupt US Government.

Photo depicts Obama’s visit shows Gallagher just feet from Obama. This was just over two weeks before she was silenced.



Some very interesting points in the link below to worth considering.

http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=21279

seannash

Jenny and her friend decided to take a boat out on to a lake.

So in your opinion the friend did it and was in on it?
The article puts forward abolutely no shred of evidence other than the newspaper failed to make a connection with her to the shooting.

I really hate to tell you this but jusdt because she played gaelic does not make her "a formidable athlete"
I have played Gaelic in America and you should see these "formidable Athletes" I played with

This article also alleges that her husband didnt inform the police til the next morning,so is he in on this

Jesus you are clutching at straws with this one

Jonny7

now.. the next step, what are they going to do with all those who were injured, all the witnesses in the cinema, all the paramedics and cops, they'll have to be disappeared too?

BunShopVoyeur

Someone needs to seriously consider getting some mental help...

Chazz Michael Michaels

Jonny7 wrote: »

now.. the next step, what are they going to do with all those who were injured, all the witnesses in the cinema, all the paramedics and cops, they'll have to be disappeared too?

So many drownings, so little time...

seannash

Also this women isn't even in the ground and already your getting her mixed up in a conspiracy
Once again you show no respect for the dead once you can shoehorn it into a CT

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Photo depicts Obama’s visit shows Gallagher just feet from Obama. This was just over two weeks before she was silenced.

I suppose it would have been too obvious if Obama just strangled here there and then?

Run_to_da_hills

seannash wrote: »

So in your opinion the friend did it and was in on it?
The article puts forward abolutely no shred of evidence other than the newspaper failed to make a connection with her to the shooting.

I really hate to tell you this but jusdt because she played gaelic does not make her "a formidable athlete"
I have played Gaelic in America and you should see these "formidable Athletes" I played with

This article also alleges that her husband didnt inform the police til the next morning,so is he in on this

Jesus you are clutching at straws with this one

There seems to be quite a lot of media confusion and unanswered questions on on this subject.

Some interesting points worth bearing in mind.

1. Was she really not “a very strong swimmer”? Is her husband even correctly quoted on this matter by the Herald (who seem to have misquoted him elsewhere)? Jenny was 46 years old and a formidable athlete. She had been playing Gaelic football for over a decade, having competed in the North American finals in 2000. Recently, she and her teammates on the Denver Gaels ladies football team competed in a tournament at the Colorado Irish Festival, which they won, beating teams from San Fransisco and Dallas. A tribute published in the club’s newsletter says that “memories of trips with the Gaels” such as “surfing in Costa Rica” would not “have been so fond had Jenny not been there”.

2. Why, while vacationing out of state, did Jenny decide to take a boat out onto a lake, at night, after her husband and son had already gone to bed, especially if she “wasn’t a very strong swimmer”?

3. If she did decide to do that, wouldn’t she at least wear a life vest?

4. Who is this friend that was allegedly with her? Why is this friend not identified by name? Why has this friend not been mentioned in previous reports?

5. If she did drown at night while boating with a “friend”, why were police and rescue crews not notified until the following day? The original Sheriff’s office press release said that she was “reported missing by family” the following “morning”.

Chazz Michael Michaels

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

There seems to be quite a lot of media confusion and unanswered questions on on this subject.

Some interesting points worth bearing in mind.

1. Was she really not “a very strong swimmer”? Is her husband even correctly quoted on this matter by the Herald (who seem to have misquoted him elsewhere)? Jenny was 46 years old and a formidable athlete. She had been playing Gaelic football for over a decade, having competed in the North American finals in 2000. Recently, she and her teammates on the Denver Gaels ladies football team competed in a tournament at the Colorado Irish Festival, which they won, beating teams from San Fransisco and Dallas. A tribute published in the club’s newsletter says that “memories of trips with the Gaels” such as “surfing in Costa Rica” would not “have been so fond had Jenny not been there”.

2. Why, while vacationing out of state, did Jenny decide to take a boat out onto a lake, at night, after her husband and son had already gone to bed, especially if she “wasn’t a very strong swimmer”?

3. If she did decide to do that, wouldn’t she at least wear a life vest?

4. Who is this friend that was allegedly with her? Why is this friend not identified by name? Why has this friend not been mentioned in previous reports?

5. If she did drown at night while boating with a “friend”, why were police and rescue crews not notified until the following day? The original Sheriff’s office press release said that she was “reported missing by family” the following “morning”.

That poor woman. Not even in her grave...

To think her family may even see this thread.

You have no shame. Why don't you report that?

---

>

Run_to_da_hills

Monty Burnz wrote: »

I suppose it would have been too obvious if Obama just strangled here there and then?

Obama doesn't work that way, he has his secret agents doing the dirty work.

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It was mentioned in previous post prior to the link below of the suspicious circumstances behind this case, ie the fact that she attended so many injuries, saw and witnessed so much and then mysteriously drowns.

simply because you are unwilling to accept anything other than it being "mysterious" does not, in fact, make it mysterious.

For a damn start being "a formidable athlete" does not inherantly make one a strong swimmer. You require different skills for both for a start, as they work different sets of muscles. Also, y'know, technique.
Something the ghoulish chucklefuck putting that 'article' together has conveniently glossed over.
Also, Lakes, being freshwater, are a lot harder to swim in than the sea, so making comparisons based on the fact she'd been surfing (a sea based activity) is also equally dishonest.

The subsequent questions are equally boneheaded and are weaker than the original silly premise that she couldn't have been a weak or average swimmer.

Unsurprisingly, people do stupid stuff all the fucking time and shitty accidents happen.
What isn't happening here is what you're alleging - which is based on zero evidence and a fervent desire to the contrary.

Run_to_da_hills

seannash wrote: »

Also this women isn't even in the ground and already your getting her mixed up in a conspiracy
Once again you show no respect for the dead once you can shoehorn it into a CT

Strike wile the iron is hot before the story gets fluffed out by mainstream media disinformation just like the mother story, the Aurora incident. Fortunately this is cracking at the seems. No doubt more will be killed off coming up to the trial. .

Chazz Michael Michaels

This thread is in poor taste. I'm out.

seannash

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

There seems to be quite a lot of media confusion and unanswered questions on on this subject.

Some interesting points worth bearing in mind.

1. Was she really not “a very strong swimmer”? Is her husband even correctly quoted on this matter by the Herald (who seem to have misquoted him elsewhere)? Jenny was 46 years old and a formidable athlete. She had been playing Gaelic football for over a decade, having competed in the North American finals in 2000. Recently, she and her teammates on the Denver Gaels ladies football team competed in a tournament at the Colorado Irish Festival, which they won, beating teams from San Fransisco and Dallas. A tribute published in the club’s newsletter says that “memories of trips with the Gaels” such as “surfing in Costa Rica” would not “have been so fond had Jenny not been there”.

2. Why, while vacationing out of state, did Jenny decide to take a boat out onto a lake, at night, after her husband and son had already gone to bed, especially if she “wasn’t a very strong swimmer”?

3. If she did decide to do that, wouldn’t she at least wear a life vest?

4. Who is this friend that was allegedly with her? Why is this friend not identified by name? Why has this friend not been mentioned in previous reports?

5. If she did drown at night while boating with a “friend”, why were police and rescue crews not notified until the following day? The original Sheriff’s office press release said that she was “reported missing by family” the following “morning”.

Nice copy and paste job.I read that.
Have you ever swam,Its about tecnique more than anything.Doesnt matter how "fit" you are.

So you are putting suspicion on the friend.if it turns out to be a lifelong buddy who will you blame then?

Not everyone wears a lifevest by the way,same way some people dont put on a seatbelt.

This is very very very wild speculation with absolutely no evidence,Absolutely none.

charlemont

seannash wrote: »

Also this women isn't even in the ground and already your getting her mixed up in a conspiracy
Once again you show no respect for the dead once you can shoehorn it into a CT

Why are you reading it so ?

Run_to_da_hills

Jonny7 wrote: »

now.. the next step, what are they going to do with all those who were injured, all the witnesses in the cinema, all the paramedics and cops, they'll have to be disappeared too?

No doubt,Im sure Obama has all their phones and IP addresses monitored and seeing who is making the most noise so they can subsequently silence them before trial.

Suceed

She was a nurse who treated the victims. How did she "see everything", despite the hyperbole of her husband's quote in the second paragraph?

That's incomprehensible logic.

Run_to_da_hills

seannash wrote: »

Nice copy and paste job.I read that.
Have you ever swam,Its about tecnique more than anything.Doesnt matter how "fit" you are.

So you are putting suspicion on the friend.if it turns out to be a lifelong buddy who will you blame then?

Not everyone wears a lifevest by the way,same way some people dont put on a seatbelt.

This is very very very wild speculation with absolutely no evidence,Absolutely none.

The reason its a copy and paste job is that it is in a direct response to an individual that decides to pick and chose from the same article. :rolleyes:

RGDATA!

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Another point worth mentioning is that Irish Media AKA Belfast telegraph, the Independent and Herald were the only papers that gave the connection between herself, the drownings and the ffact that she was a hero to the killings while state controlled US main stream media stayed silent on connection..

This was reported, including the connection with Aurora, not only by the Irish press, not only by the UK press (Mail and Mirror and other) but also by the mainstream US media - LA Times, Washington Post, CBS Denver Post, Huffington Post.

All of those reports were in the public domain at the time you made the original post in this thread, which shows how much research you did before making your outlandish claims.

daRobot

An innocent women died from an accident, and you genuinely believe it was an assassination because she happened to have treated victims from the Batman shooting, and she "saw" what "really" happened?

The conspiracy is claiming that the Batman shooter was trained and supplied weapons by US government forces to cause a massacre large enough, to give the government an excuse to remove all civilian owned guns from america, and the evil Obama can then enslave them?

It's baseless and absurd. Unfortunately, other nutjobs collaborate quite well online, and validate each others theories, and give credence to this absolute nonsense.

Run_to_da_hills

RGDATA! wrote: »

This was reported, including the connection with Aurora, not only by the Irish press, not only by the UK press (Mail and Mirror and other) but also by the mainstream US media - LA Times, Washington Post, CBS Denver Post, Huffington Post.

All of those reports were in the public domain at the time you made the original post in this thread, which shows how much research you did before making your outlandish claims.

The Irish papers were the first to come out with it.

DELAYED REVELATION

Yesterday, nine days after her body was found, an article was published by Ireland’s Herald which finally revealed some information about Gallagher and broke the story of her status as a UCH nurse and witness to the bloody aftermath of the carnage in Aurora.

This revelation has since been picked up and reported on by several other Irish sites, such as Ireland’s Independent.ie and the Irish-America IrishCentral.com, as well as the UK-based Belfast Telegraph. However, as of this writing there still do not appear to be any reports by the major U.S. national media.

LeinsterDub

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Some interesting points worth bearing in mind.

1. Jenny was 46 years old and a formidable athlete.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/7476430/Rugby-player-drowned-after-getting-cramp 26 and most likely an even more formidable athlete. These things happen

A Primal Nut

She didn't actually see everything - she only treated some of the injured in hospital. She wasn't at the cinema. So why would she know the truth any more than anyone else?

If they really killed her because she was about to reveal the truth - why haven't any of the injured people revealed the truth (seen as they actually saw the incident).

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

There seems to be quite a lot of media confusion and unanswered questions on on this subject.

Some interesting points worth bearing in mind.

1. Was she really not “a very strong swimmer”? Is her husband even correctly quoted on this matter by the Herald (who seem to have misquoted him elsewhere)? Jenny was 46 years old and a formidable athlete. She had been playing Gaelic football for over a decade, having competed in the North American finals in 2000. Recently, she and her teammates on the Denver Gaels ladies football team competed in a tournament at the Colorado Irish Festival, which they won, beating teams from San Fransisco and Dallas. A tribute published in the club’s newsletter says that “memories of trips with the Gaels” such as “surfing in Costa Rica” would not “have been so fond had Jenny not been there”.

2. Why, while vacationing out of state, did Jenny decide to take a boat out onto a lake, at night, after her husband and son had already gone to bed, especially if she “wasn’t a very strong swimmer”?

3. If she did decide to do that, wouldn’t she at least wear a life vest?

4. Who is this friend that was allegedly with her? Why is this friend not identified by name? Why has this friend not been mentioned in previous reports?

5. If she did drown at night while boating with a “friend”, why were police and rescue crews not notified until the following day? The original Sheriff’s office press release said that she was “reported missing by family” the following “morning”.

Did you just copy and paste that whole lot from someone else's blog? Is that allowed?

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

No doubt,Im sure Obama has all their phones and IP addresses monitored and seeing who is making the most noise so they can subsequently silence them before trial.

So there will probably be dozens more sudden accidents involving the medical staff, the injured and the hundreds of survivors of the attack?

Won't that look a bit suspicious? And if it doesn't happen, will you admit that this is another one of your 'Olympic False Flag' specials?

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

The Irish papers were the first to come out with it.

And this proves that....? What? The Irish papers have more interest in the death of an Irish woman?

AnonoBoy

Clearly anyone who isn't killed off is "in on it".

Brown Bomber

Monty Burnz wrote: »

So there will probably be dozens more sudden accidents involving the medical staff, the injured and the hundreds of survivors of the attack?

Won't that look a bit suspicious? And if it doesn't happen, will you admit that this is another one of your 'Olympic False Flag' specials?

For arguments sake assume that the nurse had noticed something off with the wounds or had been told by one of her patients about a second shooter or something to that effect and she had made arrangements to inform the FBI and this was all known amongst the other hospital staff and then she ends up drowned - Wouldn't this be likely to make anyone else think twice about going public or to the FBI?

LeinsterDub

Brown Bomber wrote: »

she had made arrangements to inform the FBI a

I'm pretty sure that is only a Hollywood plot device, you can walk into any FBI office you want and speak to an agent or ring them or email them .

Brown Bomber

LeinsterDub wrote: »

I'm pretty sure that is only a Hollywood plot device, you can walk into any FBI office you want and speak to an agent or ring them or email them .

... which is covered under " to inform" innit?

Funny you should say that though, I had the Pelican Brief in my head at the time

Monty Burnz

Brown Bomber wrote: »

For arguments sake assume that the nurse had noticed something off with the wounds or had been told by one of her patients about a second shooter or something to that effect and she had made arrangements to inform the FBI and this was all known amongst the other hospital staff and then she ends up drowned - Wouldn't this be likely to make anyone else think twice about going public or to the FBI?

I think it would make some people think twice about going public or to the FBI. Other people would become even more determined to do so, don't you think? I'd like to think I'd be in that category.

It would be a crazy risk for Obama to count on everybody falling into the first category, especially knowing that any more sudden deaths would more or less prove the conspiracy at a stroke.

LeinsterDub

Brown Bomber wrote: »

... which is covered under " to inform" innit?

Funny you should say that though, I had the Pelican Brief in my head at the time

Sorry maybe I misunderstood you . I though to meant Hollywood style where they've to make an appointment next week

old hippy

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Strike wile the iron is hot before the story gets fluffed out by mainstream media disinformation just like the mother story, the Aurora incident. Fortunately this is cracking at the seems. No doubt more will be killed off coming up to the trial. .

Just when I thought cons. threads couldn't sink any lower

maximoose

You can't seriously believe all this sh*te that you post.

Alive063

Have a look at this well researched alternative take on the batman shooting; http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
some of the 'victims' have been dead for years! and yer man was so doped up he couldn't have fired a peashooter!

Brown Bomber

maximoose wrote: »

You can't seriously believe all this sh*te that you post.

If it was a Mafia don who was suspected of murder and a witness drowned. Would you be more open to the possibility of murder (of the witness)?

(Where there is no proof of the Mafia boss's involvement in either events.)

Brown Bomber

Monty Burnz wrote: »

I think it would make some people think twice about going public or to the FBI. Other people would become even more determined to do so, don't you think? I'd like to think I'd be in that category.

It would be a crazy risk for Obama to count on everybody falling into the first category, especially knowing that any more sudden deaths would more or less prove the conspiracy at a stroke.

Maybe, maybe not. Heroes are few and far between and we live in a society were the majority would walk past an assault in the street so as to not get involved, or harmed themselves.

Monty Burnz

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Maybe, maybe not. Heroes are few and far between and we live in a society were the majority would walk past an assault in the street so as to not get involved, or harmed themselves.

But would you gamble your hold on power on not a single one of hundreds of people managing to talk to the FBI? How many suspicious deaths do you think you could get away with?

Brown Bomber

Monty Burnz wrote: »

But would you gamble your hold on power on not a single one of hundreds of people managing to talk to the FBI? How many suspicious deaths do you think you could get away with?

It's not a gamble though if you have nothing to lose. Assuming she was talking/going to talk - though I don't believe so - Causing her death silences her and serves as a warning to others.

Put it this way: If you were a decision maker in some black ops section of the FBI and you knew that someone had information incriminating your unit in a major crime and wasn't open to believing otherwise. What would you do?

And bare in mind you have the power to cover up crimes also.

Monty Burnz

Brown Bomber wrote: »

It's not a gamble though if you have nothing to lose. Assuming she was talking/going to talk - though I don't believe so - Causing her death silences her and serves as a warning to others.

Put it this way: If you were a decision maker in some black ops section of the FBI and you knew that someone had information incriminating your unit in a major crime and wasn't open to believing otherwise. What would you do?

And bare in mind you have the power to cover up crimes also.

But how do they know that she is the only one with info? And how do they know that other people haven't talked already? And don't they realise that killing her after she tells people she's going to talk means that they KNOW that the whole thing was a set-up, and that their lives aren't safe whether they talk or not?

dlofnep

Is there any death RTTH won't exploit to suit his agenda? If any of my children ever turn out like you, I'll drown them in a lake.

Monty Burnz

Alive063 wrote: »

Have a look at this well researched alternative take on the batman shooting; http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/
some of the 'victims' have been dead for years! and yer man was so doped up he couldn't have fired a peashooter!

One of the people that clown is claiming didn't exist seems to have had a wife and family that seem to be pretty convinced that he did indeed exist:

Alex M. Sullivan, 27: No match in Social Security Database.

NY Daily News:

Alex Sullivan died celebrating his 27th birthday.

The married bartender was confirmed late Friday as one of 12 victims who were fatally gunned down in a darkened movie theater as they were enthralled with the “The Dark Knight Rises” unfolding on the screen.

"The Sullivan family lost a cherished member of their family today," the family said in a statement. "Alex was smart, funny, and above all loved dearly by his friends and family."

Compounding the tragedy, Sullivan died just two days before his one-year anniversary to his wife, Cassandra, Rochester, N.Y.’s WHAM-TV reported.

Earlier in the day, Sullivan’s family became a symbol of the tragedy enveloping Aurora, captured in an anguished embrace by an AP photographer as they waited for news outside Gateway High School, searching for news of their missing son.

His father, Tom Sullivan, had been showing a picture of his son to the assembled media, asking them if they had any information.

Friends and family had been unable to reach him over the course of the day, his cell phone switched off from the start of the movie.

“There is a reason why he has not responded,” Bryan Beard, a high school friend of Sullivan told ABC News as hope dwindled during the course of the afternoon.

Handout Alex Sullivan, a victim of the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado on July 20, 2012.

Sullivan’s family got the grim news at about 11 p.m. - their son and husband had been one of the 10 fatalities that remained inside the theater while police completed their investigation of the scene.

A scene where hours earliercops say 24-year-old James Holmes, dressed in body armor and a gas mask, threw tear gas and opened fire on moviegoers in the resulting chaos.

“Oh man one hour till the movie and its going to be the best BIRTHDAY ever,” Sullivan tweeted before the movie started.

Here are the people 'clearly' pretending to be the guy's family:



This would be funny if it wasn't so offensive to the victims. I didn't bother even searching for the others when the first one I check was such obvious BS on the blog fantasist's part.

Run_to_da_hills

dlofnep wrote: »

Is there any death RTTH won't exploit to suit his agenda? If any of my children ever turn out like you, I'll drown them in a lake.

Is there any deaths that evil Governments of this age don't exploit to push their greed and fascist powers. RIP to all those 2,977 slaughtered in 9/11, 52 in 7/7 those in Bali, Madrid and Mumbai. not mentioning the thousands of innocent civilians killed by UN supplied rebels in Syria, the list goes on.

Go tell me who is exploiting deaths for political agenda,. :rolleyes:

dlofnep

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Go tell me who is exploiting deaths for political agenda,. :rolleyes:

I believe I already did - you are.

Sonics2k

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Go tell me who is exploiting deaths for political agenda,. :rolleyes:

You?

Brown Bomber

dlofnep wrote: »

Is there any death RTTH won't exploit to suit his agenda? If any of my children ever turn out like you, I'll drown them in a lake.

... And with that all pretense of the moral highground is gone. Well done!

Owryan

Brown Bomber wrote: »

For arguments sake assume that the nurse had noticed something off with the wounds or had been told by one of her patients about a second shooter or something to that effect and she had made arrangements to inform the FBI and this was all known amongst the other hospital staff and then she ends up drowned - Wouldn't this be likely to make anyone else think twice about going public or to the FBI?

Allowing the "for arguments sake" part, would it not have been more probable that if she "had been told by one of her patients about a second shooter or something to that effect" Would she not have felt the need to inform the police/FBI straight away rather than waiting ? a detail like that would be passed on at once rather than waiting to make an appointment imo ?

Father Damo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Obama doesn't work that way, he has his secret agents doing the dirty work.

maximoose wrote: »

You can't seriously believe all this sh*te that you post.

Of course he doesnt. I am of the honest belief that deep down he does not believe any of it. More of a hobby. A bit like people who continue going to mass even though they have no strong opinion either way about the existance of god, it is just something that they do because they always have done.

My main reason being, if RTDH really lived in fear of a NWO that would eventually introduce internment without trial for thought crimes, he really should not be leaving a load of incriminating evidence of his opposition on an internet forum :pac: But he does. Which leads me to believe he does not, deep down, believe it will ever happen.

Run_to_da_hills

Father Damo wrote: »

My main reason being, if RTDH really lived in fear of a NWO that would eventually introduce internment without trial for thought crimes, he really should not be leaving a load of incriminating evidence of his opposition on an internet forum :pac: But he does. Which leads me to believe he does not, deep down, believe it will ever happen.

I wont be taking their subdermal microchip so what difference dose it make.

anniemcl

I'll take it...just so I get access to their database.

RMD

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

There seems to be quite a lot of media confusion and unanswered questions on on this subject.

Some interesting points worth bearing in mind.

1. Was she really not “a very strong swimmer”? Is her husband even correctly quoted on this matter by the Herald (who seem to have misquoted him elsewhere)? Jenny was 46 years old and a formidable athlete. She had been playing Gaelic football for over a decade, having competed in the North American finals in 2000. Recently, she and her teammates on the Denver Gaels ladies football team competed in a tournament at the Colorado Irish Festival, which they won, beating teams from San Fransisco and Dallas. A tribute published in the club’s newsletter says that “memories of trips with the Gaels” such as “surfing in Costa Rica” would not “have been so fond had Jenny not been there”.

2. Why, while vacationing out of state, did Jenny decide to take a boat out onto a lake, at night, after her husband and son had already gone to bed, especially if she “wasn’t a very strong swimmer”?

3. If she did decide to do that, wouldn’t she at least wear a life vest?

4. Who is this friend that was allegedly with her? Why is this friend not identified by name? Why has this friend not been mentioned in previous reports?

5. If she did drown at night while boating with a “friend”, why were police and rescue crews not notified until the following day? The original Sheriff’s office press release said that she was “reported missing by family” the following “morning”.

Can you form an opinion of your own or do you continually just copy points raised by others, yet again word for word? http://www.theendrun.com/batman-shooting-nurse-jenny-gallagher-dead-at-46-alleged-drowning

Just another CT sheeple RtdH. Someone posts up a view which goes against that of mainstream media and you jump on it.