Eyewitness: 4 Man Team Behind Sikh Temple Shooting

Run_to_da_hills

Dont fall for this dirty trick all over again. This is being done by design. They always choose white males as shooters because they're dying to remove guns from the white americans.

Somehow, they would link this shooting to a hate crime, tea party and the shooters being racist republicans. Even a white democrat would do as long as he's white.

This is just a distraction tactic of Obama from the elections He's playing dirty politics of the third world countries. This is what happens in their politics as well, mass shootings to garner sympathy before the elections.

Next their target would be a mosque or a church. Then Obama would go there, give a lecture and get their votes.

A family member whose parents were victims of the shooting said his parents told him there were “multiple shooters” involved in a “coordinated” attack".

An eyewitness to the Sikh temple shooting in Wisconsin says that a team of four men dressed in black carried out the massacre, contradicting the official narrative that a lone gunman was the culprit. Just like the ‘Batman’ massacre, eyewitnesses are reporting multiple shooters

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYCurbSAsd4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ecdSKi9_fs

Channel Zero

Not surprising that Alex Jones and his gang of useful idiots at Infowars are straight out of the blocks, blaming the gubmint and Obama.

"We would be crazy not to look at this crew of anti-freedom scum as the number one suspects."

"With the federal government already labelling the shootings a "domestic terror incident", the narrative is already being manufactured to blame the tragedy on conservatives and libertarians."

Father Damo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Somehow, they would link this shooting to a hate crime, tea party and the shooters being racist republicans.

Now....this is a long shot....but....

Do you think that maybe, just maybe, that of all the idiots who follow the Tea Party, that a sizeable percentage, in fact, the vast majority of them, are racist republicans? That the only reason the Tea Party exists is not because of Obamas policies, but because they still cant handle there being a black president? People who would want him out of office if he restored the US to full employment in the space of a few months?

This is just a distraction tactic of Obama from the elections

And the proof of Obama being involved lies.....where? Apart from in your demented ramblings that have not a shred of evidence I mean. And I mean real evidence, not some contrived sh1te from a link obtained from some nutjob who hangs off retards like Alex Jones.

Next their target would be a mosque or a church. Then Obama would go there, give a lecture and get their votes.

Right wing Tea Party portrayed gunmen are going to be attacking bible belt churches next?

You dont even believe this stuff yourself, never mind trying to convince anyone else.

Run_to_da_hills

Father Damo wrote: »

And the proof of Obama being involved lies.....where? Apart from in your demented ramblings that have not a shred of evidence I mean. And I mean real evidence, not some contrived sh1te from a link obtained from some nutjob who hangs off retards like Alex Jones.

Like AP and local press interviews. :rolleyes:

I guess you would gather all your evidence on this case from Fox news.

On fox news a homocide detective says that police call this situation an act of 'Domestic terrorism'

'Its defined as a person who causes a major crime against a person within the confines of the united states. And who is trying to further their political or religious objectves.

I guess they have just described, Barack Obama.

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

A family member whose parents were victims of the shooting said his parents told him there were “multiple shooters” involved in a “coordinated” attack".

A small number of people claiming the above doesn't make it true.
Why is it that in these cases we must accept the word of the people who are outliers over everyone else?

It's just plain old contrarian arguing, a worthless endeavour if ever there was one.

Channel Zero

Father Damo wrote: »

Do you think that maybe, just maybe, that of all the idiots who follow the Tea Party, that a sizeable percentage, in fact, the vast majority of them, are racist republicans?

To say i'm not a fan of the Tea Party is a huge understatment, believe me.
But as much as i detest their agenda and tactics, saying that "the vast majority" are racists is not accurate imv. There is a substantial element though i grant you.

That the only reason the Tea Party exists is not because of Obamas policies, but because they still cant handle there being a black president?

The Tea Party is an astroturf top-down organisation created and funded by the Koch brothers.
Its existence has nothing to do with Obama being black; most of them couldn't give a flying **** what colour his skin is or where he was born. That's just a tactic they've utilised.

The reason the Tea Party exists is because they're against underprivileged people of all colours, and despise the idea of paying any of their tax to help them in any way. That's the crux of what they're about. Just greedy rich folks for the most part. So they'll always vote Republican over Democrat. Not that there's much difference between them mind you.

Edit:

..Apart from in your demented ramblings..

There's really no need for that in fairness. This is a forum for discussing theories, however outlandish, not for flinging abuse. A few of people in here seem to be confusing the two.

hooradiation

Channel Zero wrote: »

The Tea Party is an astroturf top-down organisation created and funded by the Koch brothers.
Its existence has nothing to do with Obama being black; most of them couldn't give a flying **** what colour his skin is or where he was born. That's just a tactic they've utilised.

While they may not be KKK levels of racist, the organisation certainly has not tried to distance itself from it's more racially motivated members.

While they may be utilising the theory of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" I can certainly see why people would view them as either a racist organisation or at the very least, one that has no qualms about getting into bed with racists.

Channel Zero wrote: »

The reason the Tea Party exists is because they're against underprivileged people of all colours, and despise the idea of paying any of their tax to help them in any way.

The best part, is somehow they've managed to convince those same people to vote against their own interests.
It's a special brand of crazy.

Channel Zero

hooradiation wrote: »

The best part, is somehow they've managed to convince those same people to vote against their own interests.
It's a special brand of crazy.

Yea exactly. There's plenty of poor tea baggers aswell. Turkeys voting for Christmas.
All the money swishing around political campaigns from the usual sources seems to be the main culprit.

JustinDee

. . . and once again, the grave dancing begins before a casket is even filled.
This is a bad taste hobby for some fantasists.

Run_to_da_hills

JustinDee wrote: »

. . . and once again, the grave dancing begins before a casket is even filled.
This is a bad taste hobby for some fantasists.

You shouldn't be in this forum if you get upset over some conspiracy issue.

I suggest you get back in front of your big flat screen television set and continue watching FOX news. :rolleyes:.

JustinDee

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

You shouldn't be in this forum if you get upset over some conspiracy issue.

I suggest you get back in front of your big flat screen television set and continue watching FOX news. :rolleyes:.

I don't watch Fox News, for a start.
Don't be surprised if you get pulled up on baseless claims such as Obama's campaign being behind multiple massacres on US streets.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

You shouldn't be in this forum if you get upset over some conspiracy issue.

I suggest you get back in front of your big flat screen television set and continue watching FOX news. :rolleyes:.

And you shouldn't be posting it up if you can't deal with it called what it is: opportunistic and ghoulish nonsense.

Run_to_da_hills

JustinDee wrote: »

I don't watch Fox News, for a start.
Don't be surprised if you get pulled up on baseless claims such as Obama's campaign being behind multiple massacres on US streets.

I do believe his administration is behind these atrocities.

I know exactly where he is coming comes from. If he can back Syrian rebels with secret arms deals to carry out false flag atrocities killing innocent civilians for political global take over AKA UN gain. He is nothing no more than an evil terrorist, he has been terrorising the airline industry since 9/11 with countless false flag underwear bombers, he is now working on the ground terrorising theatres, temples and no doubt the supermarkets next.

It won't be too long before he will enforce NDAA Martial law, that's when you see bloodshed on the streets of America.

And yes this is exactly how he will go about getting votes. Problem - Reaction - Solution. We have all seen it before.

JustinDee

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I do believe his administration is behind these atrocities.

I know exactly where he is coming comes from. If he can back Syrian rebels with secret arms deals to carry out false flag atrocities killing innocent civilians for political global take over AKA UN gain. He is nothing no more than an evil terrorist, he has been terrorising the airline industry since 9/11 with countless false flag underwear bombers, he is now working on the ground terrorising theatres, temples and no doubt the supermarkets next.

It won't be too long before he will enforce NDAA Martial law, that's when you see bloodshed on the streets of America.

And yes this is exactly how he will go about getting votes. Problem - Reaction - Solution. We have all seen it before.

Y'see, the reality of it all is that all these disasters, disgraces or tragedies are actually seperate incidents and not some comic book conspiracy.
In the real world, s*** does actually just happen, kiddo.

kippy

Eyewitness accounts of these events (especially when viewed in isolation) can often times be incorrect. I mean, theres bullets flying all over the place in chaotic scenes where you most basic instincts are to survive. Your recollection or indeed perception of events can often be different to that of others.

As for the conspiracy theory, thats just crazy.
However if the end result of all of these events is a realisation among Americans that easy and acceptable access to guns isn't a good thing then perhaps the conspirators should have conspired decades ago.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

And you shouldn't be posting it up if you can't deal with it called what it is: opportunistic and ghoulish nonsense.

You shouldn't participate in this forum if you cant handle CT's on a fresh news topic.

My attitude on these issues is to strike while the iron is hot, because if you don't many independent news reports could be pulled down, stories changed, bribes, cover ups or what ever.

Sikhs are possibly the most honourable people about so I would well take their word rather than any pre written police reports.

I guess Another candidate for sitting in front of a TV set watching FOX news. :rolleyes:

Lefticus Loonaticus

(1) There is a documentary currently being produced called 'Sirius'. Its to do with UFOs and free energy propulsion. Two of the main people involved in the production are Steven Greer(Disclosure Project) and Arm Kaleka. Arm Kaleka's father was one of those injured but not killed in the shooting.

(2) The so-called shooter, named as Michael Wade, was previously attached to a psychological operations unit of the US army.

(3) Other people who were connected to Greer and disclosure project issues are known to have been assasinated. One example is former CIA Director Bill Colby.

-

Is someone trying to send a direct message to the makers of this documentary............?

Or is this just another run of the mill American massacre?

Corkfeen

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

You shouldn't participate in this forum if you cant handle CT's on a fresh news topic.

My attitude on these issues is to strike while the iron is hot, because if you don't many independent news reports could be pulled down, stories changed, bribes, cover ups or what ever.

Sikhs are possibly the most honourable people about so I would well take their word rather than any pre written police reports.

I guess Another candidate for sitting in front of a TV set watching FOX news. :rolleyes:

Most of the theories that you're spreading sound like something that Fox News would love to report on. Since it is extreme right wing propoganda. :pac: So you probably shouldn't be the one accusing your critics of being brainwashed.

Run_to_da_hills

Lefticus Loonaticus wrote: »

(2) The so-called shooter, named as Michael Wade, was previously attached to a psychological operations unit of the US army.


Or is this just another run of the mill American massacre?

Obama's agents have now developed some very powerful mind controlling narcotics. The very same drugs, I believe called "devils breath" that were induced into James Holmes at the Arura case, he was fortunate to come out alive.

They don't give a danm who they capture, drug up or kill while their sharp shooters do the dirty work and escape. Unfortunately the patsy in this case didn't make it out alive.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

You shouldn't participate in this forum if you cant handle CT's on a fresh news topic.

I can handle your nonsense fine, I just seen no reason to call it anything other than what it is. And it's uninformed, biased and disrespectful.
If you don't like people calling it what it is, then you shouldn't be posting it.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

My attitude on these issues is to strike while the iron is hot, because if you don't many independent news reports could be pulled down, stories changed, bribes, cover ups or what ever.

You mean jump to the conclusion you want before you have any information so you can spout all your usual unsupported waffle.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Sikhs are possibly the most honourable people about so I would well take their word rather than any pre written police reports.

So the witnesses confirming that there was only one shooter, or confirming details you can't use to confirm your pre-determined conspiracy, are what?
Lying? Paid off? Just mistaken?

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I guess Another candidate for sitting in front of a TV set watching FOX news. :rolleyes:

I don't watch Fox News, or own a TV set.
Put please, keep making up stereotypes, they just serve to undermine your ramblings all the more.

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It won't be too long before he will enforce NDAA Martial law, that's when you see bloodshed on the streets of America.

Ok, prediction time, is it?
This will not happen in the next five years.
I am assuming that Obama wins a second term - which looks pretty damn likely. But I'm so goddamn confident that you're wrong that I'll extend this bet to the first term of Romney's presidency, should that happen.

That's a very specific bet by the way. By the end of the next presidential term NDAA martial law won't be declared and there won't be a following bloodshed.
And as a further lesson in basic human interaction, IF I'm wrong I will have no problem digging this up and admitting as such

You willing to match this, or not?

Run_to_da_hills

hooradiation wrote: »

Ok, prediction time, is it?
This will not happen in the next five years.

I give it before Christmas, maybe possibly just before the presidential election.

NDAA was drafted by Obama earlier on in the year, so why not pull this trump card in the next state of emergency, he can also pull the switch on the Internet while he's at it.

King Mob wrote: »

You mean jump to the conclusion you want before you have any information so you can spout all your usual unsupported waffle.

Two independent news clips were posted in the OP reporting from witnesses that saw several shooters involved. Is that jumping to conclusions. :rolleyes:

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Two independent news clips were posted in the OP reporting from witnesses that saw several shooters involved. Is that jumping to conclusions. :rolleyes:

Going from that to being sure that it's a plot by the Antichrist to steal people's guns is very much the definition of jumping to conclusions.

So what about the witnesses who don't agree with you?
Why do they say something different? Why should we choose to believe the few witnesses you do over them?

Perhaps because they better suit your preferred conclusion?

Corkfeen

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I give it before Christmas, maybe possibly just before the presidential election.

NDAA was drafted by Obama earlier on in the year, so why not pull this trump card in the next state of emergency, he can also pull the switch on the Internet while he's at it.

Prisonplanet have been making the same claims once a week since their inception. :pac:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the_nazification_of_america.html
Apparently George Bush has been a dictator since 2002 and much of the images match the ones that you apply to the obama administration.

Most people are liable to have PTSD just after witnessing such a traumatic event. The actual facts don't generally come out till everyone has settled down. The fact that you apply the illuminati to every occurrence makes you rather biased in this scenario.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Going from that to being sure that it's a plot by the Antichrist to steal people's guns is very much the definition of jumping to conclusions.

So what about the witnesses who don't agree with you?
Why do they say something different? Why should we choose to believe the few witnesses you do over them?

Perhaps because they better suit your preferred conclusion?

It is all about daemonizing guns and invoking new fascist EO's to combat this "problem"

It was also mentioned in an earlier post that there may have been another motive in this shoot out. Ie those shot may have been wanted over some conflict and needed to be silenced. I have yet to look into this

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It is all about daemonizing guns and invoking new fascist EO's to combat this "problem"

It was also mentioned in an earlier post that there may have been another motive in this shoot out. Ie those shot may have been wanted over some conflict and needed to be silenced. I have yet to look into this

And neither of these conclusions are supported by actual facts.
You jumped to these conclusions.

And again, why are you ignoring the eyewitnesses that don't agree with your prefered version of reality?
Why are you ignoring this question?

Run_to_da_hills

Corkfeen wrote: »

Prisonplanet have been making the same claims once a week since their inception. :pac:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the_nazification_of_america.html
Apparently George Bush has been a dictator since 2002 and much of the images match the ones that you apply to the obama administration.

Most people are liable to have PTSD just after witnessing such a traumatic event. The actual facts don't generally come out till everyone has settled down.

Its good cop bad cop, when Obama first hit the scene after coming from his office Illinois everyone wanted him as he was a breath of fresh air compared to George Bush, it didn't take too long for him to show his colours, I had him sussed out before he got,

At this stage I don't give a damn who gets in, they are all corrupt, republicans and democrats are separate legs of the same person and both support their secretive fascist Globalisation cause.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Its good cop bad cop, when Obama first hit the scene after coming from his office Illinois everyone wanted him as he was a breath of fresh air compared to George Bush, it didn't take too long for him to show his colours, I had him sussed out before he got,

At this stage I don't give a damn who gets in, they are all corrupt, republicans and democrats are separate legs of the same person and both support their secretive fascist Globalisation cause.

But I thought you believed that Obama and Obama alone was the Antichrist?
You had a bunch of numerology and Bible verses to prove all that...

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

But I thought you believed that Obama and Obama alone was the Antichrist?
You had a bunch of numerology and Bible verses to prove all that...

I have not changed at all on my stance on that one.

We may even get another lotto surprise at his next election.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have not changed at all on my stance on that one.

We may even get another lotto surprise at his next election.

So you believe he's the antichrist, but you also believe that there's a chance he'll not get elected?
For some reason you theory doesn;t make a how bunch of sense on to of being completely unsupported...

So again, why are you ignoring witnesses that report things different to what you would prefer happened?
Why have I to repeat this question several times without getting an answer?

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

So you believe he's the antichrist, but you also believe that there's a chance he'll not get elected?
For some reason you theory doesn;t make a how bunch of sense on to of being completely unsupported...

So again, why are you ignoring witnesses that report things different to what you would prefer happened?
Why have I to repeat this question several times without getting an answer?

He will get in.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

He will get in.

So since you've yet again avoided a simple question can I assume you're not going to be honest enough to answer it?

Probably for the best since it completely destroys you point and shows your inexcusable bias.
You don't care about what actually happened or why. You don't care about the truth. You're just jumping on an event and declaring it a conspiracy because you want everything to be one.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

You're just jumping on an event and declaring it a conspiracy because you want everything to be one.

I'm in the right forum for that. :pac:

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I'm in the right forum for that. :pac:

Yup. Honesty, integrity and reality be damned. As long as you get to post nonsensical propaganda for your own amusement.

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

Yup. Honesty, integrity and reality be damned. As long as you get to post nonsensical propaganda for your own amusement.

Since when was the last time that I posted a David Dee's illustration that related to Obama?

Nonsense to you yourself but not to those that understand his murderous schemes.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Since when was the last time that I posted a David Dee's illustration that related to Obama?

All of your completely unsupported conclusions are insensitive scaremongering propaganda. As bad if not worst than the crap Fox News puts out.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Nonsense to you yourself but not to those that understand his murderous schemes.

No it's nonsense because there's no evidence for it, it's based on your very shakey (to say the least) conclusions and most importantly you are unable to answer a simple direct question about it.

The fact you just ignored the question about the witnesses you don't want to listen to shows that you've no basis for your theory, and that you don't particularly care about what happened in reality.
The fact you've ignored this makes it clear that you realise the questions show this and you are ignoring it rather than answering it, which shows that you are willing to act dishonestly to defend you theory.

So since there's no evidence, it makes no sense and you have to basically lie to argue for it, what are your ramblings other than nonsense?

Run_to_da_hills

King Mob wrote: »

All of your completely unsupported conclusions are insensitive scaremongering propaganda. As bad if not worst than the crap Fox News puts out.

It only freaks out the sheeple that are so accustomed to mainstream dumdown reports

King Mob wrote: »

No it's nonsense because there's no evidence for it, it's based on your very shakey (to say the least) conclusions and most importantly you are unable to answer a simple direct question about it.

Plenty of evidence, when you see a defendant in court still out of his head on serious drugs three days after a shoot out and the following two weeks press are banned from taking photos or receiving information on the case you smell a rat.

We are beginning to see a familiar pattern to all this, and just like the Arura case this one is also full of holes.

King Mob wrote: »

The fact you just ignored the question about the witnesses you don't want to listen to shows that you've no basis for your theory, and that you don't particularly care about what happened in reality..

I have produced what I can about the witnesses, they were interviewed, also if you read one of the reports in an Irish Newspaper, a witness saw several shooters.

Logical_Bear

asking RTDH for any proper answer/quote is like asking mysterious for facts:pac:

in fairness to RTDH ,his spelling is better(science as opposed to sigh-ience)and like mysterious he can make sensible posts out side of the CT forum(apart from Ah were stupid retarded posts are the norm:pac::pac:)

now there's a conspiracy..mysterious got permabannned,took over RTDH's account and then in a shocking turnabout agreed(out of guilt and enjoying RTDH's offer of teaching proper english) decided to share the account.

The catch,RTDH had to spout unspported bolloxogy some of the time but not all of the time.

makes a change from worrying about the jewsisraeli/zionist world plan where we all get our penises scarred and not have to worry about islamists blowing themselves up!

Stainless_Steel

I thought Prince Charles was the anti-Christ?

These theories are delusional. Classic case of paranoid schizophrenia.

Run_to_da_hills

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It only freaks out the sheeple that are so accustomed to mainstream dumdown reports

Ah yes anyone who disargees with you is a sheeple...:rolleyes:
That totally excuses you from using dishonesty and scarmongering.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

Plenty of evidence, when you see a defendant in court still out of his head on serious drugs three days after a shoot out and the following two weeks press are banned from taking photos or receiving information on the case you smell a rat.

None of that is evidence for the conclusions you reach.
And none of that has anything to do with this topic. (though when you jump on any tragedy to support your crap it's understandable you get mixed up.)

You did not have even that "evidence" when you declared the last shooting was a conspiracy and you don't even have such "evidence" when you've decided this one was a conspiracy as well.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

We are beginning to see a familiar pattern to all this, and just like the Arura case this one is also full of holes.

But you've not pointed out any holes in either case, just reposting what you've read from any source (even the feared MSM) and accept it as true if it confirms your theory, whether or not it's actually true.

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I have produced what I can about the witnesses, they were interviewed, also if you read one of the reports in an Irish Newspaper, a witness saw several shooters.

This is not an answer to the questions I asked.
You are relying on your insistence that Sikhs are incapable of lying or being mistaken, so the ones who claim there were multiple shoots must be right.
However there are witnesses who claim there was only one shooter. And since they are also Sikh, they are likewise unable to lie or make mistakes.
So how can infallible witnesses report contradictory things?

Why do some witnesses report stuff that does not agree with your preferred story?

Similarly, your post does not offer any explanation as to why you repeatedly ignored this simple question.

Brown Bomber

Stainless_Steel wrote: »

I thought Prince Charles was the anti-Christ?

These theories are delusional. Classic case of paranoid schizophrenia.

In your professional opinion right? Or are you just being judgemental and needlessly offensive?

Besides, it's not "delusional" - the Whte Supremacist circles that the alleged shooter moved in are heavily infiltrated by the FBI, This excellent article is a good starting point if you are actually interested in learning.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/04/18/patriot_games

Brown Bomber

Alleged shooter


Stormfront Logo.

FWIW it seems to me like the shooter mistook the Sikhs for Muslims and carried out a sucide mission to take as many people down with him as possible. A terrorist hate crime. A US Mosque was also burned down today, a bad day for race relations. These are the results of the mainstreaming of Islamophobia created by the Zionist financiers.

JustinDee

So its back to those big bad Jews again, is it?
Lol. At least you're entertaining, I suppose.

Logical_Bear

doubt it very much that he thought they were muslim's,he knew full well who they were

Jonny7

Why doesn't Obama just use his satanic powers as the anti-Christ to speed this whole process up?

Logical_Bear

Logical_Bear wrote: »

doubt it very much that he thought they were muslim's,he knew full well who they were

But then the theory does not link back to any of the favourite targets, so that idea is ignored.

Father Damo

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I guess Another candidate for sitting in front of a TV set watching FOX news. :rolleyes:

If there was even sketchy evidence that Democrats were staging shootings to put laws into action to seize weapons from mostly right wing Americans, I am fairly sure Fox News would be somewhat interested.

Even they realise this is a non starter.

weisses

King Mob wrote: »

No it's nonsense because there's no evidence for it, it's based on your very shakey (to say the least) conclusions and most importantly you are unable to answer a simple direct question about it.

The fact you just ignored the question about the witnesses you don't want to listen to shows that you've no basis for your theory, and that you don't particularly care about what happened in reality.
The fact you've ignored this makes it clear that you realise the questions show this and you are ignoring it rather than answering it, which shows that you are willing to act dishonestly to defend you theory.

So since there's no evidence, it makes no sense and you have to basically lie to argue for it, what are your ramblings other than nonsense?

The Irony ... You used more or less the same angle in the discussion on the Mural (different thread) and in there calling people who are defending the official stance in the matter ... "having trouble with reading comprehension." .. being, pedantic,.. obtuse.. to just quote a few of your statements.

So now you see that it is not easy defending something that you don't have any proof/evidence for ... Yet in both discussions everyone is wrong except you

Brown Bomber

JustinDee wrote: »

So its back to those big bad Jews again, is it?
Lol. At least you're entertaining, I suppose.

It's sad that you play the anti-semitic card when the shooter was an actual anti-semite; one that would have been equally happy to shoot up a synagogue.

While it's true that many of the hatemongers suckling on the Islamophobia cash cow are Jewish, some are not, but all are extreme Zionists.

If you can't make the distinction and see all Jews as Zionists I suggest you look a little closer to home before making such nasty claims of anti-semitism.

hooradiation

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I give it before Christmas, maybe possibly just before the presidential election.

Fine, Christmas it is.
I look forward to seeing you finally admitting that you were wrong.

JustinDee

Brown Bomber wrote: »

It's sad that you play the anti-semitic card when the shooter was an actual anti-semite; one that would have been equally happy to shoot up a synagogue.

While it's true that many of the hatemongers suckling on the Islamophobia cash cow are Jewish, some are not, but all are extreme Zionists.

If you can't make the distinction and see all Jews as Zionists I suggest you look a little closer to home before making such nasty claims of anti-semitism.

I know perfectly well the differences you allude to, fella.
Only pointing out one lazy generalism with another, so quit playing the victim.