Viruses used in vaccines can recombine and get virulent

Dave!

Maybe you could summarise the results she reached which show a causal relationship between vaccines and autism? Rather than quoting a biased report on a study/review.

Read:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/04/05/the-resident-anti-vaccine-reporter-at-cb/

stuar

stuar wrote: »

For all those who've declared the autism-vaccine debate over - a new scientific review begs to differ. It considers a host of peer-reviewed, published theories that show possible connections between vaccines and autism.

And I have posted a long list of studies that show the exact opposite.
This one study is not enough to call it a debate even if it didn't have a plethora of red flags around it.

Xeyn

The same peer reviewed journal has also published a response to your piece. She does not actually bring any new evidence to the table. She merely does a meta analysis review of other peoples work to come to her conclusion.
She uses the same speculation and theory that has existed for years and tries to pass herself off as credible by stating she worked in the industry so therefore that automatically assigns credibility. To be fair it gives her some credibility for sure, but the way she goes about passing off her theory to people who she knows will take is as fact shows she probably has ulterior motives. Watch this space for a new book by Dr Helen Ratajczak.

So, again, no new information, no new connection to autism and vaccination.