Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Whats better: Projecting on a wall or to a screen

  • 18-06-2012 6:38pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭


    I have been using projectors for the last 10 years as the main home viewing unit. I have always projected on to a wall in the house, in rooms with different colour walls, and even a blue coloured wallpaper. Currently projecting on a cream wall in the sitting room.

    Has anyone here changed over to the screen and noticed a difference. I am looking at getting this. Any opinions?
    LUMENE Projection screen 1:1 - 84" (215 cm) -




    I use optoma hd200x and sony BDVe380 3D system.

    I am thinking about upgrading the projector to this http://www.pixmania.ie/ie/uk/10715733/art/optoma/hd300x-3d-video-projector.html and go full 3D HD.


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    Thats a 1:1 ratio screen, you should be looking at 16:9 ratio screens.

    You will notice the difference when using a screen, especially if you're currently using a coloured wall. Nice choice of PJ too!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,372 ✭✭✭im invisible


    ah shur just pull out the screen 9 16ths of the way, and hey-presto..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference



    does anyone here have a business pixmania account?
    9 euro from biz acc, 99 euro for ordinary people


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    16:9 screen would be an idea, but i watch USB stick TV Dl's, so I may need the ordinary 1 to 1.

    The picture is amazing on the wall, (ivory colour paint) I cannot imagine it being better. The hd200x is excellent, the 300x seems a better future buy all round.

    I'm not sure I get it!! You need a 1:1 screen because you watch TV shows via a USB stick, I've never seen a program shot or displayed in that ratio.....:confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    I'm not sure I get it!! You need a 1:1 screen because you watch TV shows via a USB stick, I've never seen a program shot or displayed in that ratio.....:confused:

    older programmes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    Still don't get it! Your looking to buy a 1080 3D projector and use a 1:1 screen to watch older programs that are probably 4:3! Sounds like a terrible idea!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    Still don't get it! Your looking to buy a 1080 3D projector and use a 1:1 screen to watch older programs that are probably 4:3! Sounds like a terrible idea!

    I already have a 1080p projector, the 1 to 1 screen was 9 euro from pixmania, and it can be adjusted to 4/3 or 16/9 or 2/35 1.

    I just wanna know if the picture on a screen can be any better than my wall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    An 84" 1:1 screen will only fit appox 70" diagonal 16:9 image (maybe less) which is too small IMO.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    An 84" 1:1 screen will only fit appox 70" diagonal 16:9 image (maybe less) which is too small IMO.

    That screen is 84 diagonal, the pic is wrong


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    If the 152cm x 152cm measurement is correct, the biggest 16:9 image you can achieve with that screen is 69" on the diagonal. Using a 4:3 ratio you're looking at approx 75". Still too small.

    Do you "really" watch enough 4:3 content to warrant such a compromise?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    If the 152cm x 152cm measurement is correct, the biggest 16:9 image you can achieve with that screen is 69" on the diagonal. Using a 4:3 ratio you're looking at approx 75". Still too small.

    Do you "really" watch enough 4:3 content to warrant such a compromise?

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/PCW120GE-120-Projector-Screen-Glass-Beaded/dp/B001KN5IB2/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1340718934&sr=8-5

    what do you make of this one


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    An 84" 1:1 screen will only fit appox 70" diagonal 16:9 image (maybe less) which is too small IMO.

    too small for a projector, or too small relative to the screen?

    compare the prices of a 70" tv to a projector and the projector starts to make a whole lot of sense


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, RicherSounds.ie Moderator Posts: 2,505 Mod ✭✭✭✭The Ritz


    That's a glass beaded screen, more suited to a projector with a low light output, like a CRT projector, not suitable for your purposes.


    Ritz


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    That's more like it, great size and correct ratio screen. I'd avoid anything glassed beaded though, they can sparkle and that would drive me cracked!
    mossym wrote: »
    too small for a projector, or too small relative to the screen?
    When I think of a projector setup I think of 100" plus, the scale is what is impressive, it adds to the experience IMO. It all depends how close you are sitting to the image obviously.

    I sit about 13' from my 92" screen and I reckon I could definitely do with an extra few inches but don't have the room for a bigger screen.
    mossym wrote: »
    compare the prices of a 70" tv to a projector and the projector starts to make a whole lot of sense
    Absolutely, I agree 100%, if the OP was limited to a 70" screen fair enough but he was looking at a 1:1 ratio screen which IMO is a bad idea.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym




    When I think of a projector setup I think of 100" plus, the scale is what is impressive, it adds to the experience IMO. It all depends how close you are sitting to the image obviously.

    I sit about 13' from my 92" screen and I reckon I could definitely do with an extra few inches but don't have the room for a bigger screen.


    Absolutely, I agree 100%, if the OP was limited to a 70" screen fair enough but he was looking at a 1:1 ratio screen which IMO is a bad idea.


    scale is one thing, but there are others. my screen is 110",and i watch from around 12ft. however, i'd take a smaller screen to keep the brightness levels up rather than have a huge washed out image. no arguement on the aspect ratio, not that it matters much more than avoiding having wasted non used screen, but i don't agree with calling image sizes too small, as happened a couple of times. there are cases when a 70" screen would be just right for a projector.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,495 ✭✭✭M00lers


    mossym wrote: »
    scale is one thing, but there are others. my screen is 110",and i watch from around 12ft. however, i'd take a smaller screen to keep the brightness levels up rather than have a huge washed out image..
    It all about finding out what's right for your particular room...of course

    mossym wrote: »
    no arguement on the aspect ratio, not that it matters much more than avoiding having wasted non used screen, but i don't agree with calling image sizes too small, as happened a couple of times. there are cases when a 70" screen would be just right for a projector.

    Of course they are cases where a 70" would be perfect but this isn't one of them. He's looking at a 120" screen now.

    Are you taking umbrage with my 70" is too small comments?:confused:


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym



    Are you taking umbrage with my 70" is too small comments?:confused:

    not taking anything at all, 70" is one of those odd places where users have a realistic choice between projector and tv, once you go much bigger you're in projector only territory. was just pointing out that even down there a projector is a valid option, and can offer a lot more bang for the buck, course the tv has a number of advantages,

    comments were more in a general sense than dealing with the ops problem i guess.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference



    Do you "really" watch enough 4:3 content to warrant such a compromise?

    yes


Advertisement