Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

maximum points?

  • 14-06-2012 10:07am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭


    so with the introduction of the 25 bonus points, 625 is now the maximum you can get in the leaving cert, right? my question is is the points cap for courses also going to change or is 625 just theoretical, like someone with 7 A1s saying they got 700? just say for instance there's 20 places on a course and all 20 get, say 610, is that going to be the minimum points for that course? will people without honours maths therefore not be able to even stand a chance at getting into the course? or will the minimum points just be 600. this is all figurative of course :)


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭Chris68


    The cap will change. 625 is not theoretical. Sorry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    What's the point of bonus points if they're going to be purely theoretical?

    With this (IMO) terrible idea of giving bonus points to HL Maths they've essentially locked out people who don't have an aptitude for Maths from competitive courses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    I seriously doubt the minimum points for any course will exceed 600.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    finality wrote: »
    I seriously doubt the minimum points for any course will exceed 600.
    Dental Science might just about approach 600 i'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    Dental Science might just about approach 600 i'd say.

    It'll be interesting to see, that's for sure.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    Dental Science might just about approach 600 i'd say.

    Do you think people applying for Dentistry do Honors maths? In your experience, hanging out around trinity, do dental students usually have higher maths?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Do you think people applying for Dentistry do Honors maths? In your experience, hanging out around trinity, do dental students usually have higher maths?
    I know a few people studying dental science and they all did HL Maths. Not because they needed it for the course but because they needed it for points (back during the pre-bonus days). Now with the points bonus, i'd imagine it'll be almost impossible to be competitive unless you're decent at HL Maths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 MeltyButter


    What's the point of bonus points if they're going to be purely theoretical?

    With this (IMO) terrible idea of giving bonus points to HL Maths they've essentially locked out people who don't have an aptitude for Maths from competitive courses.


    Yeah we should keep telling everyone that they're special on the inside and just let them do all of the courses that they're not qualified to do.

    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Yeah we should keep telling everyone that they're special on the inside and just let them do all of the courses that they're not qualified to do.
    You don't need HL Maths for a lot of high points courses. Medicine, Pharmacy, Dental Science, Law and many other high points courses don't actually require HL Maths but due to the bonus points it's become almost essential for the CAO.
    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.
    In the vast majority of cases, you're right. In certain cases however some people might just not be able for HL Maths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 iluvgreenday246


    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.

    Thats a horrible thing to say.... im repeating this year but last year i didnt do honours maths because in all honesty i knew i wouldnt have gotten the payback on points for honours maths as i would have in other subjects! I would have had to spend ages on it every night and it would have impacted my other subjetcs so dont go try telling me i dont do honours maths because im lazy. Take your snobbery elsewhere....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 283 ✭✭validusername1


    Yeah, it makes the maximum points 625 now.
    I wouldn't worry though, I doubt much people will get that high!

    I think the bonus points for passing HL maths is beyond stupid. They're doing it to give people an incentive to do HL maths, fair enough, but if people found HL maths too difficult before, they are still going to find it as difficult now. The course needs to change. It is a ridiculous level of difficulty for students who may not even/probably won't need it ever again! If they want students to improve maths skills, they need to ease the course a bit and change the way it is taught, as previous maths results clearly show that the current way is not working out very well.

    It's also not fair to people who excel at other subjects. Hypothetically, let's say I'm amazing at Irish. Why can I not get bonus points for being great at that but somebody else will get bonus points for being great at Maths!? It just makes no sense at all.
    /Rant over.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,372 ✭✭✭im invisible


    Do they give bonus points for doing all the exams through irish?
    Been a while since i sat the leaving, but you used to get bonus points for HL maths in specific courses, i think in UCD anyway, why did they change it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 mcmxci


    It must depend on the course/institution. If you need an HPAT for example, they subtract a set number of your CAO points and then add your HPAT score, which is in marks, not a percentage. People need unearthly totals of more than 700.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 mcmxci


    Do they give bonus points for doing all the exams through irish?
    Been a while since i sat the leaving, but you used to get bonus points for HL maths in specific courses, i think in UCD anyway, why did they change it?

    I think answering through Irish gets additional marks. In History, you get extra marks for doing the paper through Irish but not for the pre-submitted essay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭Zomg Okay


    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.

    I can assure you that I am absolutely hopeless at maths and it isn't for lack of trying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,298 ✭✭✭Namlub


    Yeah we should keep telling everyone that they're special on the inside and just let them do all of the courses that they're not qualified to do.

    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.

    And your massively over-simplistic viewpoint isn't lazy at all...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    Yeah, it makes the maximum points 625 now.
    I wouldn't worry though, I doubt much people will get that high!

    I think the bonus points for passing HL maths is beyond stupid. They're doing it to give people an incentive to do HL maths, fair enough, but if people found HL maths too difficult before, they are still going to find it as difficult now. The course needs to change. It is a ridiculous level of difficulty for students who may not even/probably won't need it ever again! If they want students to improve maths skills, they need to ease the course a bit and change the way it is taught, as previous maths results clearly show that the current way is not working out very well.

    It's also not fair to people who excel at other subjects. Hypothetically, let's say I'm amazing at Irish. Why can I not get bonus points for being great at that but somebody else will get bonus points for being great at Maths!? It just makes no sense at all.
    /Rant over.

    Um, they have changed the course? And I don't think HL maths is too difficult at all, it's much easier than the equivalent in other countries. Ireland tends to do quite badly in international second level maths Olympiads because of the fact that our syllabus is inferior to other countries. I have a book that's used to help students prepare for maths Olympiads and the material in it is much, much harder than anything covered by HL maths. Making it easier just because some students find it difficult is absolutely stupid.

    The bonus points may be a bit unfair but can you think of another way of encouraging students to take the subject at higher level? Much higher percentages sit higher level in most, if not all other subjects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 The Pharmacist on the Moon



    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.

    do you actually realise how ridiculous a statement this is? as mentioned already some people just don't understand maths but that doesn't make them lazy. In fact there are numerous examples of people in my course(Pharmacy) who didn't do honours maths and i can assure you that they are far from lazy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Niall8100


    No you can't get 625 points. Say if you get 580 points and HL maths is one of your subjects, they'll just give you 20 of the 25 bonus points to bring you to 600. You can't get more. That's what the principal of my school said anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    Niall8100 wrote: »
    No you can't get 625 points. Say if you get 580 points and HL maths is one of your subjects, they'll just give you 20 of the 25 bonus points to bring you to 600. You can't get more. That's what the principal of my school said anyway

    Nope, you can get 625 your principal is wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,813 ✭✭✭Togepi


    Yeah 625 points is definitely the new max. I hope people don't start saying they got 725 or 825 this year. :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 144 ✭✭Chris68


    Niall8100 wrote: »
    No you can't get 625 points. Say if you get 580 points and HL maths is one of your subjects, they'll just give you 20 of the 25 bonus points to bring you to 600. You can't get more. That's what the principal of my school said anyway

    Your principal is wrong. http://www2.cao.ie/schools_corr/sep_2011/BonusPointsMathsWithExamples.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 283 ✭✭validusername1


    finality wrote: »
    I don't think HL maths is too difficult at all. Making it easier just because some students find it difficult is absolutely stupid.

    Yeah well difficulty depends on the person. That's your opinion. Considering the high level of fails at HL maths, I think it's safe to assume that quite a lot find it too difficult. And again, it's just your opinion that it's stupid to ease the course.. Mine is that it makes sense. No need to patronise.
    finality wrote: »
    The bonus points may be a bit unfair but can you think of another way of encouraging students to take the subject at higher level? Much higher percentages sit higher level in most, if not all other subjects.

    Just because there's not many other ways to give people an incentive to do HL Maths doesn't take away from the fact that the current way unfair. Imo, that should be priority - fairness. Also, I don't really see why it's so important for people to do HL Maths in the first place or to even excel at Maths in general, considering that the majority don't even go on to do further study in Maths. I understand that Maths is an important life skill, but the majority of LC maths serves no purpose besides for the exam.. After school, if a person is not doing further study in maths or engineering, they are never going to have to solve things like ''Show that kx – t is a factor of 3 3 2 2 2 k x − k tx + ktx − t where k and t are non-zero real constants'' ever again. And if someone is gonna study those things, surely they'd be doing HL maths regardless of these bonus points.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    Yeah well difficulty depends on the person. That's your opinion. Considering the high level of fails at HL maths, I think it's safe to assume that quite a lot find it too difficult. And again, it's just your opinion that it's stupid to ease the course.. Mine is that it makes sense. No need to patronise.
    I wasn't being patronizing. Second level maths in Ireland is already easier than in other countries. I don't want to see Ireland's second level education become even weaker internationally, but it looks like that's what's happening with project maths.

    Just because there's not many other ways to give people an incentive to do HL Maths doesn't take away from the fact that the current way unfair. Imo, that should be priority - fairness. Also, I don't really see why it's so important for people to do HL Maths in the first place or to even excel at Maths in general, considering that the majority don't even go on to do further study in Maths. I understand that Maths is an important life skill, but the majority of LC maths serves no purpose besides for the exam.. After school, if a person is not doing further study in maths or engineering, they are never going to have to solve things like ''Show that kx – t is a factor of 3 3 2 2 2 k x − k tx + ktx − t where k and t are non-zero real constants'' ever again. And if someone is gonna study those things, surely they'd be doing HL maths regardless of these bonus points.
    Maths is a part of a lot of university courses. And if someone sticks with higher level maths they may discover they really enjoy it and decide to do something maths-related in college.
    But I actually agree with you here, trying to force students to keep on higher level maths if they have absolutely no interest in pursuing something maths-related after school is quite pointless. But then, forcing students to study Irish at leaving cert level is pointless too. It seems our education system is all about appearances- keep Irish compulsory, it'll look like people can actually speak it. Get more people to study higher level maths, it'll look like Irish students are better at maths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 670 ✭✭✭Naomi00


    Yeah we should keep telling everyone that they're special on the inside and just let them do all of the courses that they're not qualified to do.

    In all seriousness: No such thing as "no aptitude for maths"; only "no aptitude for working" - in other words, laziness.

    Ok so, if the extra 25 points were for higher level Irish would you have the same opinion?


    I'm pretty sure that if that was the case there would be plenty of people complaining that they have no aptitude for languages and it's not fair etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 153 ✭✭Zaffy


    You don't need HL Maths for a lot of high points courses. Medicine, Pharmacy, Dental Science, Law and many other high points courses don't actually require HL Maths but due to the bonus points it's become almost essential for the CAO.

    TBH, it might not be a requirement to have High Maths, but I know the courses would much prefer you if they don't have to teach you stuff which is taught in HL maths.
    The course needs to change. It is a ridiculous level of difficulty for students who may not even/probably won't need it ever again!

    They are changing the course, project maths.
    It's also not fair to people who excel at other subjects. Hypothetically, let's say I'm amazing at Irish. Why can I not get bonus points for being great at that but somebody else will get bonus points for being great at Maths!? It just makes no sense at all.
    /Rant over.

    That's being introduced next year, for the current 5th years going into 6th year.

    Also, maths is required for a successful economy, irish isn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 iluvgreenday246


    To be honest i really think that the bunus points thing is justified. The thing that would have pushed most people away from honours maths is the time that they would have had to spend on it to get a high grade when it was only worth the same amount of points to them as an 'easy' subject like biology or whatever. But now with this extra 25 points people can justify spending that extra time every night on maths. I agree its not fair to reward the person who is quite simply just a maths genius and ignore someone whose gone to france every summer looking for a high grade in french. In all fairness why dont they introduce the extra 25 points for all the core subjects?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    finality wrote: »
    Um, they have changed the course? And I don't think HL maths is too difficult at all, it's much easier than the equivalent in other countries. Ireland tends to do quite badly in international second level maths Olympiads because of the fact that our syllabus is inferior to other countries. I have a book that's used to help students prepare for maths Olympiads and the material in it is much, much harder than anything covered by HL maths. Making it easier just because some students find it difficult is absolutely stupid.

    The bonus points may be a bit unfair but can you think of another way of encouraging students to take the subject at higher level? Much higher percentages sit higher level in most, if not all other subjects.

    That's interesting, I was speaking to a guy finishing his PhD in pure Mathematics in NUIG a few weeks ago (he was from Brazil), and he said that Ireland's honours maths syllabus was a good deal harder than most 'higher level' syllabii in other countries. Just something to consider. He did the equivalent of higher level maths for his school leaving exam in Brazil, and he said that the demands placed on HL students in Ireland in the Leaving are much higher than in many other countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭OneOfThem Stumbled


    Yeah we should keep telling everyone that they're special on the inside and just let them do all of the courses that they're not qualified to do.

    Such as Maths, Engineering, a couple of Economics courses, and em.. theoretical physics?

    I cannot think of any other course where maths is a defining requisite. Not to take away from the importance of maths, but, you know, it's just maths. :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 283 ✭✭validusername1


    Zaffy wrote: »

    Also, maths is required for a successful economy, irish isn't.

    I clearly said ''hypothetically'' when I used Irish as an example. Also, if you read on, you'd see that I said ''I understand that Maths is an important life skill, but the majority of LC maths serves no purpose besides for the exam.. After school, if a person is not doing further study in maths or engineering, they are never going to have to solve things like ''Show that kx – t is a factor of 3 3 2 2 2 k x − k tx + ktx − t where k and t are non-zero real constants'' ever again.'' So I don't know why I should bother repeating myself? You're trying to say that questions like ''Show that kx – t is a factor of 3 3 2 2 2 k x − k tx + ktx − t where k and t are non-zero real constants'' are needed for a successful economy? Ha, right whatever ya say :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,572 ✭✭✭Canard


    I think the best idea would be to make OL easier, but that's a bit...stupid, considering the already huge gulf between HL and OL maths. I did HL maths and I found it to be the most difficult of all my subjects but I knew what I was getting into and I wanted the extra points - if someone's pissed over having to solve equations that are pointless, then just drop to OL and voila, your problem is solved.

    HL is hard, thats why there was such a low take up rate. I dont know how it compares to international standards but I assume it was at its standard for a reason. Then again, project maths sort of destroys any point to maths at all, making it too hard for people like me who dont really care for maths and too basic for people who want to do it in college so I would question that "standard".

    And Zaffy didnt say those equations were important for a successful economy...but as he said, maths is in general. A friend of mine is doing economics in tcd this year and needs a HC3 in maths. 25 points for HL Irish is beyond pointless and would be even more unfair than the people who get extra marks for answering through Irish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 541 ✭✭✭TheBegotten


    The idea behind extra points is NOT to incentivise people to do HL maths but to increase the standard of maths and science in the country. The idea is to reward comprehension of maths rather than encourage rote learning. Lowering the difficulty of the exam is counter-productive. Unfortunately, if you're not good at that, well sorry. Find somewhere that could use your skill set.

    P.s. extra points for an arts subject is ludacrious. Have fun finding an economy that'll reward your knowledge of hurlamaboc or the signifigance of orange.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    I clearly said ''hypothetically'' when I used Irish as an example. Also, if you read on, you'd see that I said ''I understand that Maths is an important life skill, but the majority of LC maths serves no purpose besides for the exam.. After school, if a person is not doing further study in maths or engineering, they are never going to have to solve things like ''Show that kx – t is a factor of 3 3 2 2 2 k x − k tx + ktx − t where k and t are non-zero real constants'' ever again.'' So I don't know why I should bother repeating myself? You're trying to say that questions like ''Show that kx – t is a factor of 3 3 2 2 2 k x − k tx + ktx − t where k and t are non-zero real constants'' are needed for a successful economy? Ha, right whatever ya say :rolleyes:

    When am I ever going to use Le Chatelier's principle in real life? What use is an understanding of radioactivity? When will the ability to analyse Hamlet come in handy? When am I going to need to know how to dissect a heart?

    Very little of what's taught in school is used later on in life, yet somehow it seems to be only maths which is seen as pointless.

    Also, kx - t isn't a factor of that. Just saying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    Patchy~ wrote: »
    I think the best idea would be to make OL easier, but that's a bit...stupid, considering the already huge gulf between HL and OL maths. I did HL maths and I found it to be the most difficult of all my subjects but I knew what I was getting into and I wanted the extra points - if someone's pissed over having to solve equations that are pointless, then just drop to OL and voila, your problem is solved.

    HL is hard, thats why there was such a low take up rate. I dont know how it compares to international standards but I assume it was at its standard for a reason. Then again, project maths sort of destroys any point to maths at all, making it too hard for people like me who dont really care for maths and too basic for people who want to do it in college so I would question that "standard".

    And Zaffy didnt say those equations were important for a successful economy...but as he said, maths is in general. A friend of mine is doing economics in tcd this year and needs a HC3 in maths. 25 points for HL Irish is beyond pointless and would be even more unfair than the people who get extra marks for answering through Irish.

    Yis all need to get over this, tbf. The extra marks are pretty much negligible from a B3 up, because after 70% you're only awarded 10% of the marks you didn't get. I.E if you get 280/400 which is just about a B3, you only get 10% of 120. Which is 12. 12 extra marks. Come on like. It's practically nothing.

    And it decreases as you go up, when you get to the high Bs and As it's irrelevant. It's pretty much just a safety net for stupid people who are fluent at Irish not to fail subjects at Honours level. Like, say someone gets 150/400 (a fail), then the bonus marks are just enough to get that person a pass. So yeah, I'm a fluent Irish speaker but I did all my exams in English because I'm expecting good grades and the extra effort in learning them all in Irish would just not have been worth it.

    But 25 extra points for Irish would be totally retarded too. There's a reason why HL Maths has gotten the 25 extra points, but the only thing the SEC and CAO need to be careful about is that course points don't get inflated by it. They'll probably realise a year or three too late that the HL maths points are inflating points for all colleges and do something overly drastic to fix it, like lower entry points for every course. Wouldn't surprise me. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,572 ✭✭✭Canard


    I'm not saying its a huge difference, but its still pretty unfair...I mean its not like they had to learn Irish to that standard then sit the exam. They speak it as a first language just like English except not all of us do. We all answer it in a language we're comfortable with, and in something like French or even maths, there is so little English/Irish to be written that those extra marks shouldnt even apply. I just think its a completely backwards thing to do, especially since most fluent Irish speakers will already have a HL A1 in the bag.

    Like what if someone did their maths exam through English, failed, then someone who did it through Irish failed harder but got brought up for doing it in Irish, got into college instead? Unlikely but I'd say it's happened. Thats an argument for another day though. :P


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    The idea behind extra points is NOT to incentivise people to do HL maths but to increase the standard of maths and science in the country. The idea is to reward comprehension of maths rather than encourage rote learning. Lowering the difficulty of the exam is counter-productive. Unfortunately, if you're not good at that, well sorry. Find somewhere that could use your skill set.

    P.s. extra points for an arts subject is ludacrious. Have fun finding an economy that'll reward your knowledge of hurlamaboc or the signifigance of orange.

    Lol at the hurlamaboc reference. I agree with ya, if they're going to teach Irish literature on the course they'd be better off teaching actual Irish literature, something like Caisleain Oir or the Táin Bó Cúailnge. Arts subjects are very important though, you can't just have automatons who derive and integrate all day. Maths is fascinating but it's only one half of the equation, so to speak.

    However increasing the points for HL maths isn't going to increase the standard of maths and science at all. Nobody expects someone coming out of 2nd level to have an intricate knowledge of any field, especially Maths. That's the kind of knowledge you pick up in university. Better standard of Science and Maths? Ha? Science subjects and Maths are on the LC so that you can use them to get into college and ACTUALLY study them, in depth. The LC just scratches the surface of these topics.

    Also, I don't understand this mad rush to turn people into Maths and Science geniuses by 22/23 years old. Learning is a lifelong experience, and trying to compress what might take one person years to fully grasp, and another months, into a crude one-size-fits-all system just invites disaster. The pressure that's put on people in our culture to know what they want to do when they're 18, and then fully apply themselves to it in 4 short years of study, is mad. Why not relax, work steadily, accumulate the knowledge over time instead of burning yourself out. That's how knowledge is built up over time.

    There's no doubt that there's a cultural aversity to Science and Maths in Ireland (and much of the West) but that can be changed easily with time. If the government feel so strongly about the cultural attitude towards these things I'm sure they can just nationalise a few radio stations when we have our next housing boom. In the meantime, if you have an interest in Science and Maths, it's a good thing, it means you're preparing for the future. If not - develop one, pronto :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    But 25 extra points for Irish would be totally retarded too. There's a reason why HL Maths has gotten the 25 extra points, but the only thing the SEC and CAO need to be careful about is that course points don't get inflated by it. They'll probably realise a year or three too late that the HL maths points are inflating points for all colleges and do something overly drastic to fix it, like lower entry points for every course. Wouldn't surprise me. :rolleyes:

    They can't lower entry points because they have no control whatsoever over them. I think there should be a sticky about the way the points system functions.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    Patchy~ wrote: »
    I'm not saying its a huge difference, but its still pretty unfair...I mean its not like they had to learn Irish to that standard then sit the exam. They speak it as a first language just like English except not all of us do. We all answer it in a language we're comfortable with, and in something like French or even maths, there is so little English/Irish to be written that those extra marks shouldnt even apply. I just think its a completely backwards thing to do, especially since most fluent Irish speakers will already have a HL A1 in the bag.

    Like what if someone did their maths exam through English, failed, then someone who did it through Irish failed harder but got brought up for doing it in Irish, got into college instead? Unlikely but I'd say it's happened. Thats an argument for another day though. :P

    You'd actually be very surprised :P Most of my class barely scraped high Cs/Bs in the mocks. And they'd speak Irish every day at home and at school. English is still spoken more though. It's like 60/40, in favour of English. As well as that the Irish around here is pure pidgin, people have conversations half in Irish and half in English. Plus there's the fact that most of the people in Ireland who'd speak Irish more than English probably haven't opened a textbook on Irish grammar in about 40-50 years. And they don't understand it any better than someone who's not fluent, really.

    Irish native speakers such as myself (in my experience) struggle with understanding the grammar of the language as much as anyone else. Having a fluent convo in Irish with another native speaker is more of a case of saying 'fúck it' and just motoring on, who cares if you make a few mistakes. It's a very instinctive language at the spoken level, no one gives a flying shíte if you leave out a few seimhiús and urús here and there, that's not what Irish is about. But the exams try and make it like that even though Irish has never developed a 'formal' aspect like the Romance languages have.

    Jeez I should do a thesis on this stuff, wadya think? :pac:
    finality wrote: »
    They can't lower entry points because they have no control whatsoever over them. I think there should be a sticky about the way the points system functions.

    Yes they can. Why else would they be there? :confused: If they don't control the entry points then there should be no reason for the CAO to exist.

    From what I know the CAO functions in one of two ways. It either:
    1) Aggregates the points of all the applicants for a course, sticks the numbers in a function, the function spits out a value which is the cut-off point for the course.
    2) The applicant who got in on the lowest points, their points become the cut-off point.

    I've never seen anything to suggest it's definitely one or the other, but if it's #1 then the CAO definitely have control over the system and can change it to suit whatever changes they might want to make. If it's #2 (which I've seen people say before on here, I think it was you), then fair enough the CAO can't do f**k all about it. But some kind of mechanism has to be brought in to prevent points inflation, otherwise people who don't do HL maths will be put at a severe disadvantage in the LC and points for nearly every course will end up skyrocketing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,572 ✭✭✭Canard


    Even still, I just think getting marks for it is unfair. I wont lose marks in geography for spelling words wrong so I doubt I'd lose marks for spelling them wrong through Irish, and I'm quite good at Irish too so its not as if I'm one of those people complaining because its out of my grasp, but on the whole I dont think extra marks / points are fair (though the HL maths points are, it was to match international standards as said already).

    And the CAO points works like this: 60 apply for a course, 50 meet the matriculation, 20 places - highest 20 points get it, lowest of the 20 becomes the cutoff. Because no one can control someone's points (in theory an arts course could become 625), no one can lower them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭QueenOfLeon


    finality wrote: »
    They can't lower entry points because they have no control whatsoever over them. I think there should be a sticky about the way the points system functions.

    Erm...there is :P


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 103 ✭✭AllyMcFearless


    It's a serious predicament, because if it does effect points then people that aren't taking HL will be short.. although in my opinion, I reckon it'll stay that you CAN achieve 625 but the highest for any course won't exceed 600.

    Because with the extra 25 points, it should shift some pressure off people as those 25 points can boost up other subjects majorly.

    I dropped to pass maths the year before it was announced, glad I did but also kind of disappointed as it was so easy. Should be an in between level..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 iluvgreenday246


    finality wrote: »
    When am I ever going to use Le Chatelier's principle in real life?

    What?? Le chateliers principle is the basis for industrial chemistry :s Its actually vital if you go into that area but its just that some things in maths are based on what seem like almost imaginary concepts that cant be used anywhere in any job :/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,813 ✭✭✭Togepi


    Having a fluent convo in Irish with another native speaker is more of a case of saying 'fúck it' and just motoring on, who cares if you make a few mistakes. It's a very instinctive language at the spoken level, no one gives a flying shíte if you leave out a few seimhiús and urús here and there, that's not what Irish is about.

    This is why I (used to) love Irish! The Leaving Cert (round two especially) has put me off it completely, when it used to be my favourite subject. I would love it if they put a little less emphasis on perfect grammar, but mainly, they need to get rid of the prós and poetry completely. It's useless if you want to know how to speak Irish. It would be epic if they got random fluent Irish speakers who didn't teach the language to mark students in the orals. Obviously that'd be impossible, but it would be a brilliant way of stopping rote-learning. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 789 ✭✭✭FaoiSin


    I'm hoping they'll be lenient on the grammar marking in Irish this year. The only reason I learn essays by heart for it is so I don't make mistakes. It's too hard to get everything done on the day with perfect grammar especially if you're not fluent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    Togepi wrote: »
    This is why I (used to) love Irish! The Leaving Cert (round two especially) has put me off it completely, when it used to be my favourite subject. I would love it if they put a little less emphasis on perfect grammar, but mainly, they need to get rid of the prós and poetry completely. It's useless if you want to know how to speak Irish. It would be epic if they got random fluent Irish speakers who didn't teach the language to mark students in the orals. Obviously that'd be impossible, but it would be a brilliant way of stopping rote-learning. :D

    Ah I know, Irish is so fun to speak properly like :) What I think they should do is make Irish a 25 bonus points subject but make the prós and filiocht sections actually... Decent. Like, have proper Irish books for prós, (make a single text question similar to Hamlet in English or something), make the poetry a challenge and improve the standard of essay writing.

    However even though the future of Irish lies in it as a spoken language, having a really good technical knowledge of it is great too. I think there should be more emphasis on actually knowing what's going on, grammar-wise. And Irish should definitely be optional - but add in the 25 extra points and a literature course which is actually challenging to balance it out.

    Also, guess I got told about the CAO thing. :pac: But, measures should still be taken to prevent grade inflation, in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭F9Devil


    What I think they should do is make Irish a 25 bonus points subject

    342-i-dont-want-to-live-on-this-planet-anymore.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,813 ✭✭✭Togepi


    Ah I know, Irish is so fun to speak properly like :) What I think they should do is make Irish a 25 bonus points subject but make the prós and filiocht sections actually... Decent. Like, have proper Irish books for prós, (make a single text question similar to Hamlet in English or something), make the poetry a challenge and improve the standard of essay writing.

    However even though the future of Irish lies in it as a spoken language, having a really good technical knowledge of it is great too. I think there should be more emphasis on actually knowing what's going on, grammar-wise. And Irish should definitely be optional - but add in the 25 extra points and a literature course which is actually challenging to balance it out.

    Also, guess I got told about the CAO thing. :pac: But, measures should still be taken to prevent grade inflation, in my opinion.

    Definitely don't think they should give 25 extra points for Irish. Ever. :P I'm leaning more towards making it optional for the Leaving at this stage (never thought I'd say that). Surely people will be more likely to keep it on with 40% for the oral! But I think there should just be four or five subjects for the Leaving, so if that was the case it would obviously have to be optional.

    As for Maths, if they're giving 25 extra points, they shouldn't be making the course easier.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    Togepi wrote: »
    Definitely don't think they should give 25 extra points for Irish. Ever. :P I'm leaning more towards making it optional for the Leaving at this stage (never thought I'd say that). Surely people will be more likely to keep it on with 40% for the oral! But I think there should just be four or five subjects for the Leaving, so if that was the case it would obviously have to be optional.

    As for Maths, if they're giving 25 extra points, they shouldn't be making the course easier.

    Hmm, there's a secondary agenda at play though, which is keeping Irish alive in young people. I'm quite blessed with Irish because I'm fluent, etc, but it seems like most people who've sat the LC see Irish as a terrible thing that should just be gotten rid of. Pretty sad really.

    The reason I suggest that 25 extra points should be given is because it's an important part of our heritage. The reason I suggest that it should be made optional at the same time is so people who don't want to do it don't have to. But it should be made more comprehensive as well. Like, there are a lot of non-fluent Irish speakers who sit the LC and scrape through Irish . The paper is too easy for fluent speakers and too hard for non-fluent speakers.

    As well as that, people don't really take an interest in Irish. They just learn what they have to for the exam. That's mostly because it's hard to take an interest in it unless you live in the Gaeltacht, it's not a language spoken all over the world like French, English, etc. so people don't really feel like it's useful to them.

    And yeah, HL maths should definitely stay at the same level of difficulty as it's at now!
    F9Devil wrote: »
    342-i-dont-want-to-live-on-this-planet-anymore.png

    You didn't see the bit where I suggested making it optional, did you. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,813 ✭✭✭Togepi


    People would still be forced to do it though, just for the 25 points! It would basically be compulsory for anyone able to pass it at higher level. And it would give a completely unfair advantage to people who are fluent.

    As for Maths, I meant they shouldn't make it easier than it was last year, which they are by introducing Project Maths!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 825 ✭✭✭Dwellingdweller


    Togepi wrote: »
    People would still be forced to do it though, just for the 25 points! It would basically be compulsory for anyone able to pass it at higher level. And it would give a completely unfair advantage to people who are fluent.

    As for Maths, I meant they shouldn't make it easier than it was last year, which they are by introducing Project Maths!

    Yeah that would give fluent speakers (like me!) a bit of an unfair advantage. :pac: Whatever, I'm just thinking out loud here haha. I thought Project Maths was making maths harder overall? That's the gist I've been getting :P


  • Advertisement
Advertisement