Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Zealand v Ireland, 1st test, Eden Park 2012 *Mod Warning Post 1 and 1220*

  • 07-06-2012 7:41am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,407 ✭✭✭✭justsomebloke


    Mod warning: any crap and cards and bans will be handed out very quickly. Don't force us to lock the thread.

    New warning post 1220
    Ok I will be reopening this thread in a few minutes. YOU have been warned. Any pop shots at any posters or back seat modding no matter how small will result in bans.

    If you are a regular you know how these threads end up so if you hav issues with "new posters" just leave it and maybe ignore the thread.

    If you are new to posting here, don't attack other posters, be civil in your replies, explain your posts and everything will be fine. If you can't do this then this may not be the forum for you.


    2012 SUMMER TOUR FIRST TEST: Saturday, June 9
    NEW ZEALAND v IRELAND, Eden Park, 7.35pm local time/8.35am Irish time (live Sky Sports 2/RTÉ Radio 1)

    NEW ZEALAND: Israel Dagg (Crusaders); Zac Guildford (Crusaders), Conrad Smith (Hurricanes), Sonny Bill Williams (Crusaders), Julian Savea (Hurricanes); Dan Carter (Crusaders), Aaron Smith (Highlanders); Tony Woodcock (Blues), Andrew Hore (Highlanders), Owen Franks (Crusaders), Brodie Retallick (Chiefs), Sam Whitelock (Crusaders), Victor Vito (Cork Hurricanes), Richie McCaw (Crusaders) (capt), Kieran Read (Crusaders).

    Replacements: Hikawera Elliot (Chiefs), Ben Franks (Crusaders), Ali Williams (Blues), Adam Thomson (Highlanders), Piri Weepu (Blues), Aaron Cruden (Chiefs), Ben Smith (Highlanders).

    IRELAND: Rob Kearney (UCD/Leinster); Fergus McFadden (Old Belvedere/Leinster), Brian O'Driscoll (UCD/Leinster) (capt), Keith Earls (Young Munster/Munster), Simon Zebo (Cork Constitution/Munster); Jonathan Sexton (St. Mary's College/Leinster), Conor Murray (Garryowen/Munster); Cian Healy (Clontarf/Leinster), Rory Best (Banbridge/Ulster), Declan Fitzpatrick (Dungannon/Ulster), Dan Tuohy (Ballymena/Ulster), Donnacha Ryan (Shannon/Munster), Peter O'Mahony (Cork Constitution/Munster), Sean O'Brien (Clontarf/Leinster), Jamie Heaslip (Naas/Leinster).

    Replacements: Sean Cronin (St. Mary's College/Leinster), Ronan Loughney (Galwegians/Connacht), Donncha O'Callaghan (Cork Constitution/Munster), Kevin McLaughlin (St. Mary's College/Leinster), Eoin Reddan (Lansdowne/Leinster), Ronan O'Gara (Cork Constitution/Munster), Darren Cave (Belfast Harlequins/Ulster).

    Referee: Nigel Owens (Wales)
    Assistant Referees: Jaco Peyper (South Africa), James Leckie (Australia)
    Television Match Official: Matt Goddard (Australia)

    Head-To-Head:

    Played - 24
    Ireland Won - 0
    Drawn - 1
    New Zealand Won - 23

    Previous Meetings:

    Saturday, November 25, 1905 - Tour Match - Ireland 0 New Zealand 15, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, November 1, 1924 - Tour Match - Ireland 0 New Zealand 6, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, December 7, 1935 - Tour Match - Ireland 9 New Zealand 17, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, January 9, 1954 - Tour Match - Ireland 3 New Zealand 14, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, December 7, 1963 - Tour Match - Ireland 5 New Zealand 6, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, January 20, 1973 - Tour Match - Ireland 10 New Zealand 10, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, November 23, 1974 - Tour Match - Ireland 6 New Zealand 15, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, June 5, 1976 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 11 Ireland 3, Athletic Park
    Saturday, November 4, 1978 - Tour Match - Ireland 6 New Zealand 10, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, November 18, 1989 - Tour Match - Ireland 6 New Zealand 23, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, May 30, 1992 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 24 Ireland 21, Carisbrook
    Saturday, June 6, 1992 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 59 Ireland 6, Athletic Park
    Saturday, May 27, 1995 - Rugby World Cup - Ireland 19 New Zealand 43, Ellis Park
    Saturday, November 15, 1997 - Autumn Test - Ireland 15 New Zealand 63, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, November 17, 2001 - Autumn Test - Ireland 29 New Zealand 40, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, June 15, 2002 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 15 Ireland 6, Carisbrook
    Saturday, June 22, 2002 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 40 Ireland 8, Eden Pak
    Saturday, November 12, 2005 - Autumn Test - Ireland 7 New Zealand 45, Lansdowne Road
    Saturday, June 10, 2006 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 34 Ireland 23, Waikato Stadium
    Saturday, June 17, 2006 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 27 Ireland 17, Eden Park
    Saturday, June 7, 2008 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 21 Ireland 11, Westpac Stadium
    Saturday, November 15, 2008 - Autumn Test - Ireland 3 New Zealand 22, Croke Park
    Saturday, June 12, 2010 - Summer Tour - New Zealand 66 Ireland 28, Yarrow Stadium
    Saturday, November 20, 2010 - Autumn Test - Ireland 18 New Zealand 38, Aviva Stadium


«13456730

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭JonnyF


    would be really happy with that team if you swapped ferg to centre and put earls on the wing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    can you put in "1st test" in the thread title? Would make it easier to look up this thread in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 gingangoolu


    Hi all.
    I don't have sky sports so does any know if any of the Irish/British channels awill be showing highlights of this match?
    Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    I'm a firm believer that Kidney is an absolute joke-merchant. We've been begging him for years to pick a non-conservative team, and now he's gone and done that - but picked the wrong team for this game!

    Am I over reacting? Yeah, probably. In fairness I'm glad he's picked something different - but most of those changes are injury forced, and secondly I honestly think this shows how out of his depth he is and how much he relies on the training paddock rather then results/form from games.

    I'm calling shennigans on this - Kidney's hand was forced by injuries, and has now shown he has no idea what he's doing as he's picked wrong injury replacements.

    If he wanted to 'experiment' he could've done this (provided he brought the right players with him):

    15. R Kearney
    14. F. McFadden
    13. D. Cave
    12. B. O'Driscoll
    11. K. Earls
    10. J. Sexton
    09. E. Reddan
    08. J. Heaslip
    07. S. O'Brien
    06. P. O'Mahoney
    05. D. Touhy
    04. D. Ryan
    03. Fitzpatrick
    02. R. Best
    01. C. Healy



    16. S. Cronin
    17. T. Court
    18. DOC/McCarthy
    19. K. McLaughlin
    20. Marshall
    21. Madigan
    22. D. Kearney/Gilroy

    Note on selections:
    Let's face it, we all know BOD, whilst in prime form, have developed all the attributes of a 2nd 5/8 lately - an ability to break the gain line, a lovely short pass and offload, able to read an attacking gain line and stop it dead, and as always he's king over the ball and utterly regardless for his own safety at the breakdown. He hasn't the gas to make those line breaks anymore, and his long pass has imo suffered. He should be tried at 12. Plus it also makes way for D. Cave who is the next best successor for the 13 jersey imo.

    Also it puts Earls back in his most dangerous position - wearing 11 imo. With a bit of space the man is lethal, but defensively he's suspect at 13, never mind 12. Has he ever played 12 before? Not that I can recall. He did a good job at 13 for the 6N, but I think Cave would do better.

    Sexton and Reddan need to start together. It's no coincidence that our best games (Aus 2011 and Eng 2011) had these two at the helm. Putting Sexton and Murray together is like putting Cooper with Mike Phillips. They cancel each other out.

    The pack picks itself - although I'm still worried about DOC on the bench, I'd like to see McCarthy given another shot. Also and I'd have D. Kearns because he can cover FB also, but wouldn't be disappointed with Gilroy either. Having a center on the bench is stupid tbh. Although having said that I'm obviously happy Cave is going to get a run out (as I'm sure we'll be 20 points down with 20 minutes left, he should get a run out regardless).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,320 ✭✭✭Teferi


    .ak wrote: »
    15. R Kearney
    14. F. McFadden
    13. D. Cave
    12. B. O'Driscoll
    11. K. Earls
    10. J. Sexton
    09. E. Reddan
    08. J. Heaslip
    07. S. O'Brien
    06. P. O'Mahoney
    05. D. Touhy
    04. D. Ryan
    03. Fitzpatrick
    02. R. Best
    01. C. Healy



    16. S. Cronin
    17. T. Court
    18. DOC/McCarthy
    19. K. McLaughlin
    20. Marshall
    21. Madigan
    22. D. Kearney/Gilroy

    Now that is a team I would like to see play New Zealand. I think we could do serious damage fielding that line up.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Farrelly wrote an article this morning on the game from 1992 where we lost by three points.

    http://www.independent.ie/sport/rugby/remembering-boys-of-92-who-rattled-the-kiwis-3131445.html

    It's up on youtube.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    .ak wrote: »
    I'm a firm believer that Kidney is an absolute joke-merchant. We've been begging him for years to pick a non-conservative team, and now he's gone and done that - but picked the wrong team for this game!

    Am I over reacting? Yeah, probably. In fairness I'm glad he's picked something different - but most of those changes are injury forced, and secondly I honestly think this shows how out of his depth he is and how much he relies on the training paddock rather then results/form from games.

    I'm calling shennigans on this - Kidney's hand was forced by injuries, and has now shown he has no idea what he's doing as he's picked wrong injury replacements.

    If he wanted to 'experiment' he could've done this (provided he brought the right players with him):

    15. R Kearney
    14. F. McFadden
    13. D. Cave
    12. B. O'Driscoll
    11. K. Earls
    10. J. Sexton
    09. E. Reddan
    08. J. Heaslip
    07. S. O'Brien
    06. P. O'Mahoney
    05. D. Touhy
    04. D. Ryan
    03. Fitzpatrick
    02. R. Best
    01. C. Healy



    16. S. Cronin
    17. T. Court
    18. DOC/McCarthy
    19. K. McLaughlin
    20. Marshall
    21. Madigan
    22. D. Kearney/Gilroy

    Note on selections:
    Let's face it, we all know BOD, whilst in prime form, have developed all the attributes of a 2nd 5/8 lately - an ability to break the gain line, a lovely short pass and offload, able to read an attacking gain line and stop it dead, and as always he's king over the ball and utterly regardless for his own safety at the breakdown. He hasn't the gas to make those line breaks anymore, and his long pass has imo suffered. He should be tried at 12. Plus it also makes way for D. Cave who is the next best successor for the 13 jersey imo.

    Also it puts Earls back in his most dangerous position - wearing 11 imo. With a bit of space the man is lethal, but defensively he's suspect at 13, never mind 12. Has he ever played 12 before? Not that I can recall. He did a good job at 13 for the 6N, but I think Cave would do better.

    Sexton and Reddan need to start together. It's no coincidence that our best games (Aus 2011 and Eng 2011) had these two at the helm. Putting Sexton and Murray together is like putting Cooper with Mike Phillips. They cancel each other out.

    The pack picks itself - although I'm still worried about DOC on the bench, I'd like to see McCarthy given another shot. Also and I'd have D. Kearns because he can cover FB also, but wouldn't be disappointed with Gilroy either. Having a center on the bench is stupid tbh. Although having said that I'm obviously happy Cave is going to get a run out (as I'm sure we'll be 20 points down with 20 minutes left, he should get a run out regardless).

    I think you're being a tad harsh ak! I have gripes with some of the combinations but if Kidney wanted to he could have picked a far more conservative team even with the injuries

    That's not to say his experimentation isn't misguided but I'd take the team now ahead of the one we all thought it would be


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭DDC1990


    .ak wrote: »
    The pack picks itself - although I'm still worried about DOC on the bench, I'd like to see McCarthy given another shot. Also and I'd have D. Kearns because he can cover FB also, but wouldn't be disappointed with Gilroy either. Having a center on the bench is stupid tbh. Although having said that I'm obviously happy Cave is going to get a run out (as I'm sure we'll be 20 points down with 20 minutes left, he should get a run out regardless).

    ???

    Makes perfect sense no?

    Injury at Wing/Fullback, Cave to 12 Earls to W/FB
    Injury to Center, Cave to Center!

    All back positions covered!

    Kidney has named a strog team with a mix of youth and experience, gives new caps to 2 players. Starts McFadden. Picks Touhy, and has Cave on the Bench. Doesn't start DOC and is still criticized. :confused:

    We'll get wiped by the All Blacks anyway tbh, no matter what Kidney does, so he might as well experiment.

    Also, someone asked why McFadden wasn't at 12 and Earls at 14. I think its to do with NZ's center combination being so abrasive, and McFadden not being renouned for his tackling. I know people have issues with Earls' tackling as well, but he rarely falls off a Head to Head tackle, like you would see at 12. He can miss tackles, around the outside (like Tuilagi's pre-WC), which is more about timing IMO.

    Its an experiment anyway and Im glad to see the team that is named.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    .ak wrote: »
    I'm a firm believer that Kidney is an absolute joke-merchant. We've been begging him for years to pick a non-conservative team, and now he's gone and done that - but picked the wrong team for this game!

    Am I over reacting? Yeah, probably. In fairness I'm glad he's picked something different - but most of those changes are injury forced, and secondly I honestly think this shows how out of his depth he is and how much he relies on the training paddock rather then results/form from games.

    I'm calling shennigans on this - Kidney's hand was forced by injuries, and has now shown he has no idea what he's doing as he's picked wrong injury replacements.

    If he wanted to 'experiment' he could've done this (provided he brought the right players with him):

    15. R Kearney
    14. F. McFadden
    13. D. Cave
    12. B. O'Driscoll
    11. K. Earls
    10. J. Sexton
    09. E. Reddan
    08. J. Heaslip
    07. S. O'Brien
    06. P. O'Mahoney
    05. D. Touhy
    04. D. Ryan
    03. Fitzpatrick
    02. R. Best
    01. C. Healy



    16. S. Cronin
    17. T. Court
    18. DOC/McCarthy
    19. K. McLaughlin
    20. Marshall
    21. Madigan
    22. D. Kearney/Gilroy

    Note on selections:
    Let's face it, we all know BOD, whilst in prime form, have developed all the attributes of a 2nd 5/8 lately - an ability to break the gain line, a lovely short pass and offload, able to read an attacking gain line and stop it dead, and as always he's king over the ball and utterly regardless for his own safety at the breakdown. He hasn't the gas to make those line breaks anymore, and his long pass has imo suffered. He should be tried at 12. Plus it also makes way for D. Cave who is the next best successor for the 13 jersey imo.

    Also it puts Earls back in his most dangerous position - wearing 11 imo. With a bit of space the man is lethal, but defensively he's suspect at 13, never mind 12. Has he ever played 12 before? Not that I can recall. He did a good job at 13 for the 6N, but I think Cave would do better.

    Sexton and Reddan need to start together. It's no coincidence that our best games (Aus 2011 and Eng 2011) had these two at the helm. Putting Sexton and Murray together is like putting Cooper with Mike Phillips. They cancel each other out.

    The pack picks itself - although I'm still worried about DOC on the bench, I'd like to see McCarthy given another shot. Also and I'd have D. Kearns because he can cover FB also, but wouldn't be disappointed with Gilroy either. Having a center on the bench is stupid tbh. Although having said that I'm obviously happy Cave is going to get a run out (as I'm sure we'll be 20 points down with 20 minutes left, he should get a run out regardless).

    Tom Court is injured and out of the squad, so couldn't be selected. Loughney is just about the only option we have at 17. McCarthy and Toner would also be well ahead of DOC if he was picking on form. I'd have Gilroy ahead of MdFadden and Henry ahead of McLaughlin as a bench option, but apart from that your team is ok.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    Should be a great game for the neutral. Some serious clashes to look forward to

    Kearney and Daag arguably the two best 15's in the world right now

    McCaw vs SOB

    Heaslip vs Reid

    BOD vs Smith!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭PhatPiggins


    Its the first test of 3. DK is actually experimenting !!

    Touhy is starting :eek: I'm very happy with the team. Reddan,Gilroy,Cave et al will all get a shot at some stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    Its the first test of 3. DK is actually experimenting !!

    Touhy is starting :eek: I'm very happy with the team. Reddan,Gilroy,Cave et al will all get a shot at some stage.

    Do you know something we don't?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    .ak wrote: »
    Note on selections:
    Let's face it, we all know BOD, whilst in prime form, have developed all the attributes of a 2nd 5/8 lately - an ability to break the gain line, a lovely short pass and offload, able to read an attacking gain line and stop it dead, and as always he's king over the ball and utterly regardless for his own safety at the breakdown. He hasn't the gas to make those line breaks anymore, and his long pass has imo suffered. He should be tried at 12. Plus it also makes way for D. Cave who is the next best successor for the 13 jersey imo.

    Also it puts Earls back in his most dangerous position - wearing 11 imo. With a bit of space the man is lethal, but defensively he's suspect at 13, never mind 12. Has he ever played 12 before? Not that I can recall. He did a good job at 13 for the 6N, but I think Cave would do better.
    Ok, couple of things here.

    1. Earls doesn't want to play on the wing. He has said that in the national press. So although you might think 11 is his best position (I don't), he does not want to play there and realistically won't be playing there in the long term if he's set against it.

    2. SURELY at this stage, having watched the 6 Nations, people still can't be saying Earls is defensively suspect at 13?! Also defending the 12 channel is not as demanding as defending outside, especially with Sexton beside you.

    I personally think the BOD/Earls combo adds more than a BOD/Cave one. I really like Cave as a player but himself and BOD are similar in their strengths and weaknesses whereas the BOD/Earls combination is more varied and offers more in attack as a unit. And that is why I prefer the BOD/Earls combination from the start.
    .ak wrote: »
    Sexton and Reddan need to start together. It's no coincidence that our best games (Aus 2011 and Eng 2011) had these two at the helm. Putting Sexton and Murray together is like putting Cooper with Mike Phillips. They cancel each other out.
    I agree that Reddan/Sexton combination is better. I'd much prefer to see it. However if used correctly, starting Murray with Reddan off the bench could potentially be more succesful over 80 minutes. I'm just petrified that ROG will see the field before the 70th minute and destroy that theory.
    .ak wrote: »
    The pack picks itself - although I'm still worried about DOC on the bench, I'd like to see McCarthy given another shot. Also and I'd have D. Kearns because he can cover FB also, but wouldn't be disappointed with Gilroy either. Having a center on the bench is stupid tbh. Although having said that I'm obviously happy Cave is going to get a run out (as I'm sure we'll be 20 points down with 20 minutes left, he should get a run out regardless).

    I think DOC and McCarthy are fairly similar at this point. Neither are going to be starters in future and so I don't really mind who gets the bench spot. DOC has the upper hand in terms of leadership though, must be said.

    Cave on the bench makes a lot of sense to me. Earls to shift out in case of an injury in the back 3 with Cave coming in. Cave is the best back not starting as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    DDC1990 wrote: »
    ???

    Makes perfect sense no?

    Injury at Wing/Fullback, Cave to 12 Earls to W/FB
    Injury to Center, Cave to Center!

    All back positions covered!

    Kidney has named a strog team with a mix of youth and experience, gives new caps to 2 players. Starts McFadden. Picks Touhy, and has Cave on the Bench. Doesn't start DOC and is still criticized. :confused:

    We'll get wiped by the All Blacks anyway tbh, no matter what Kidney does, so he might as well experiment.

    Also, someone asked why McFadden wasn't at 12 and Earls at 14. I think its to do with NZ's center combination being so abrasive, and McFadden not being renouned for his tackling. I know people have issues with Earls' tackling as well, but he rarely falls off a Head to Head tackle, like you would see at 12. He can miss tackles, around the outside (like Tuilagi's pre-WC), which is more about timing IMO.

    Its an experiment anyway and Im glad to see the team that is named.

    I dunno, you're right, but I just prefer to have someone that's more versatile in the 22 shirt.

    I'm not going to hold back just because he benches DOC. :P That's like applauding a toilet for flushing ... two years later.

    I'll be genuinely interested at Earls at 12, but I just think he could've picked a far superior team with Cave and BOD on the field and Earls at 11 with a bit of space. I fear for Zebo tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 177 ✭✭cp


    Surprised by the amount of negativity generally about this selection. I'm no Kidney apologist, and there'll always be 50/50 selections and/or players picked to suit a particular game-plan, but credit where its due on a bold selection. Remember this is a 3 test series so there'll certainly be changes for the 2nd and 3rd tests.

    Am I right in saying that BOD is the only player in that starting 15 over 30? (Best is 29??) When's the last time we could say that about an Irish team?

    Reality here is we'll be doing well to come close to the blacks in one or two of the games with our injury list and the depth of quality they have, Kidney could have very easily used that as an excuse to pick the old dogs, but he hasn't, and while its frustratingly erratic after the shambles of only starting 18 different players in the 6n, it would be nice if people would give some of the younger guys space to find their feet at this level instead of slating them before they even start just because its Kidney that's picking them..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    cp wrote: »
    Surprised by the amount of negativity generally about this selection. I'm no Kidney apologist, and there'll always be 50/50 selections and/or players picked to suit a particular game-plan, but credit where its due on a bold selection. Remember this is a 3 test series so there'll certainly be changes for the 2nd and 3rd tests.

    Am I right in saying that BOD is the only player in that starting 15 over 30? (Best is 29??) When's the last time we could say that about an Irish team?

    Reality here is we'll be doing well to come close to the blacks in one or two of the games with our injury list and the depth of quality they have, Kidney could have very easily used that as an excuse to pick the old dogs, but he hasn't, and while its frustratingly erratic after the shambles of only starting 18 different players in the 6n, it would be nice if people would give some of the younger guys space to find their feet at this level instead of slating them before they even start just because its Kidney that's picking them..

    :confused: I think most people are happy there is at last change in the team, even if they don't agree with all the selections, I don't think anybody is really being "slated".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    I'd have gone with Mcfadden/BOD myself, Earls/BOD is interesting but its not exactly a long term solution. Either Earls is starting at 12 where he's unlikely to feature for Munster or BOD will be at 12 and its a position change in the twilight of his career. Mcfadden looks the most likely to be the successor at 12 so why not start him and have Earls on the wing. The cynic in me thinks its just to accomodate Zebo in the side. Hate to be a naysayer as I'm genuinely pleasantly surprised by the unforced changes but the logic in them escapes me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Ok, couple of things here.

    1. Earls doesn't want to play on the wing. He has said that in the national press. So although you might think 11 is his best position (I don't), he does not want to play there and realistically won't be playing there in the long term if he's set against it.

    2. SURELY at this stage, having watched the 6 Nations, people still can't be saying Earls is defensively suspect at 13?! Also defending the 12 channel is not as demanding as defending outside, especially with Sexton beside you.

    To be honest, since when does a player pick where they play? That's a bit ridiculous. We all know Luke Fitz didn't fancy playing at 12 during the WC but he did a great job there anyway. Besides, Earls said that he'd rather play 13 at a very specific time - when BOD was injured. Ofcourse you'd say that, the best time to nail a starting slot in a position.

    My personal opinion is that Earls is a far better back-three player then a centre. He's lethal on the wing, and I get excited every time he gets the ball on the wing as I know something is going to happen. What have we seen in this years 6N that proves he's a top class centre? He's improved his pass, and didn't make any mistakes - fairplay, but I'd rather have one of our best wingers on the wing.
    I personally think the BOD/Earls combo adds more than a BOD/Cave one. I really like Cave as a player but himself and BOD are similar in their strengths and weaknesses whereas the BOD/Earls combination is more varied and offers more in attack as a unit. And that is why I prefer the BOD/Earls combination from the start.

    The way I look at it BOD has turned into D'Arcy in his prime. He's got a brilliant step, always breaks the first tackle, and is constantly looking to put that ball infront of a player with a bit of space. He's the ideal 12, and I think Cave has the pace to pick up on that and could be a serious threat.
    I agree that Reddan/Sexton combination is better. I'd much prefer to see it. However if used correctly, starting Murray with Reddan off the bench could potentially be more succesful over 80 minutes. I'm just petrified that ROG will see the field before the 70th minute and destroy that theory.

    Agreed.
    I think DOC and McCarthy are fairly similar at this point. Neither are going to be starters in future and so I don't really mind who gets the bench spot. DOC has the upper hand in terms of leadership though, must be said.

    Agreed also!
    Cave on the bench makes a lot of sense to me. Earls to shift out in case of an injury in the back 3 with Cave coming in. Cave is the best back not starting as well.

    In fairness you're right here, don't mind me, I'm just ranting. I'd like to see Cave start, but it's probably not the wisest thing to drop him into a starting 15 against the ABs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,741 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Farrelly wrote an article this morning on the game from 1992 where we lost by three points.

    that was one of the greatest games I ever saw Ireland play - fast, in your face direct rugby - with a relativly weak team , the game plan nearly came off - super performance by Ireland that day - 20 years ago - where have the years gone :-)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I really like this selection and I also like McFadden on the wing. He's a great strike rate for Ireland there in that he's got three tries all from the wing (1 against France, 1 against Russia, and 1 against Scotland were I think he came on for D'arcy but actually played on the wing).

    Earls at 12 will be very interesting to watch (even though I'd say himself and BOD will mix it up who players 12 and 13). Earls is a strong runner and cause problems for Sonny Bill.

    Zebo on the wing will be exciting to and I hope he continues his try scoring form.

    Defensively there may be problems but I don't think they'll be in the centre or from McFadden. Kearney and Zebo mightn't be great here but Trimble has been caught out a few times this season in defence as well.

    The pack looks good in that we've gotten a very abrasive second and back row line up. I do hope as others have said that POM stays away from the niggly stuff. It achieves nothing. I also like having McLaughlin on the bench as he will offer something different when he/if he comes on.

    Obviously player selection is one thing and you need to get them playing in the right way. With a team like Kidney's named though it's a running team and that is what excites me most.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    shuffol wrote: »
    I'd have gone with Mcfadden/BOD myself, Earls/BOD is interesting but its not exactly a long term solution. Either Earls is starting at 12 where he's unlikely to feature for Munster or BOD will be at 12 and its a position change in the twilight of his career. Mcfadden looks the most likely to be the successor at 12 so why not start him and have Earls on the wing. The cynic in me thinks its just to accomodate Zebo in the side. Hate to be a naysayer as I'm genuinely pleasantly surprised by the unforced changes but the logic in them escapes me.

    I don't see McFadden as the likely successor at 12 and I don't think whoever it will be has established themselves yet. He can't get ahead of D'arcy for Leinster and Wallace is still very much first choice for Ulster.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭boynesider


    I am pleasantly surprised by the 22 that has been picked. I disagreed with much of the original touring squad but I think that he is doing the best with what he has with this selection.

    Earls and BOD excites me in midfield. We have lacked a real line breaking threat here for the last few years and I think that Earls could provide this. BOD is still world class, but clean linebreaks are something which you don't expect from him anymore. But he has all the intelligence and class required to unleash those around him, which is why I think its great that he will probably be playing at 12. You want him on the ball as much as possible and his partnership with Sexton has serious playmaking potential.

    In the absence of POC, Ryan and Tuohy are our 2 best locks and therefore it is the correct partnership (honestly wasn't expecting it though).

    Backrow is spot on, including McLaughlin on the bench who is a better player than Henry. I know Henry has a lot of fans on here however, and I'm sure he will get a chance in the remaining tests.

    Having said all that you would have to be a little worried about Zebo and Fitzpatrick. There aren't many who make their international debuts against the best team in the world, a team which is arguably stronger than the one which won the world cup, and I hope people will keep this in mind before being excessively critical of them if things go pear-shaped for these lads (which is a strong possibility). I know there are a lot of rugby followers who are just waiting for a chance to put the boot into Zebo.


    I'm looking forward to these games, but at the same time it would be a shock to me if we managed to win one. To do that I think we would need Ferris, POC, Bowe, Ross and Fitzgerald in full fitness. Still though, I think that this team is clear evidence that Kidney is beginning to realise the failure of the conservative team selection and tactics he has been using for the last few years, and I hope that he will continue in this vein next season (assuming he is still in a job of course ;)). There is loads of good young talent out there and it has to be developed now with an eye on the next World cup (although he clearly seems to view young Munster talent as being inherently superior to young Ulster and Leinster talent. Still cannot believe no Madigan :confused:).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭LeftBase


    It's interesting I think. Earls is good with ball in hand but sometimes an accident waiting to happen in defence. I think that Earl's time on the wing has long sailed due to his lack of positional awareness.

    I do however fear that the All Blacks will murder this team by basicaly running over Earls. When his happens we then will have no plan B. Personally the only option I believe would be Ferg to 12 and D Kearney to the wing.

    Murray showed in the 6 nations that he is not up to international rugby yet and his selection ahead of Reddan and Marshall is a disgrace in my opinion!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭RoundBox11


    shuffol wrote: »
    I'd have gone with Mcfadden/BOD myself, Earls/BOD is interesting but its not exactly a long term solution. Either Earls is starting at 12 where he's unlikely to feature for Munster or BOD will be at 12 and its a position change in the twilight of his career. Mcfadden looks the most likely to be the successor at 12 so why not start him and have Earls on the wing. The cynic in me thinks its just to accomodate Zebo in the side. Hate to be a naysayer as I'm genuinely pleasantly surprised by the unforced changes but the logic in them escapes me.


    I'm not so sure anymore. Perhaps he will be for a year or two but only if he improves his defense. As ive said before, i hope the long term option at 12 will be Luke Marshall or maybe JJ Hanrahan


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    LeftBase wrote: »
    It's interesting I think. Earls is good with ball in hand but sometimes an accident waiting to happen in defence. I think that Earl's time on the wing has long sailed due to his lack of positional awareness.

    I do however fear that the All Blacks will murder this team by basicaly running over Earls. When his happens we then will have no plan B. Personally the only option I believe would be Ferg to 12 and D Kearney to the wing.
    !

    He's the best winger in the squad

    Earls is a good one on one tackler. His problems in defense were largely down to his positioning which he amended hugely this year as we all saw in the 6 nations

    12 is easier to defend than 13 and if he wasn't "run over" in the six nations I can't see it happening tomorrow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    Inside the camp rumours acircling that Kidney had originally put McFadden at 12 but Earls threw a fit. Original team had Earls at 14 a position he was unfamilar with. He said in no uncertain terms to Declan that he wouldn't play there and to find him a new position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭WeeBushy


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    Inside the camp rumours acircling that Kidney had originally put McFadden at 12 but Earls threw a fit. Original team had Earls at 14 a position he was unfamilar with. He said in no uncertain terms to Declan that he wouldn't play there and to find him a new position.

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    Inside the camp rumours acircling that Kidney had originally put McFadden at 12 but Earls threw a fit. Original team had Earls at 14 a position he was unfamilar with. He said in no uncertain terms to Declan that he wouldn't play there and to find him a new position.

    I highly doubt that

    Kidney has never really seen McFadden as an option at 12 and Earls isn't a prima dona

    Have you any source for this?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    Inside the camp rumours acircling that Kidney had originally put McFadden at 12 but Earls threw a fit. Original team had Earls at 14 a position he was unfamilar with. He said in no uncertain terms to Declan that he wouldn't play there and to find him a new position.

    It wasn't a fit it was an Irish jig and when Kidney saw his quick footwork he knew he had to play him at 12 to dazzle Sonny "float like a butterfly sting like a bee" Williams. SBW won't know whether to punch him or tackle him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    yes I do. This is true. Kidney had McFadden at 12. D'arcy by the way has a slight injury and they decided to use the opportunity to rest him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 743 ✭✭✭LeftBase


    Fishooks12 wrote: »
    He's the best winger in the squad

    Earls is a good one on one tackler. His problems in defense were largely down to his positioning which he amended hugely this year as we all saw in the 6 nations

    12 is easier to defend than 13 and if he wasn't "run over" in the six nations I can't see it happening tomorrow

    Maybe he's the best with ball in hand, but defencively he is always out of position and gives and easy out ball for the opposition 10. He's a bit like Ugo Monye, the ball is always just sailed over his head as he is too far up.

    Earls was hidden in the 6 nations in defence much like ROG used to be. Ferris and O'Brien made his tackles for him.

    On a backrow note, why are O'Mahoney and O'Brien playing in eachother's positions?? I think O'Brien is a better 6 and O'Mahoney a better 7!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    What's your source then


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭boynesider


    LeftBase wrote: »
    It's interesting I think. Earls is good with ball in hand but sometimes an accident waiting to happen in defence. I think that Earl's time on the wing has long sailed due to his lack of positional awareness.

    I do however fear that the All Blacks will murder this team by basicaly running over Earls. When his happens we then will have no plan B. Personally the only option I believe would be Ferg to 12 and D Kearney to the wing.

    Murray showed in the 6 nations that he is not up to international rugby yet and his selection ahead of Reddan and Marshall is a disgrace in my opinion!


    You're being harsh on Earls. I certainly would have doubted Earls defence before christmas or so but it has improved immensely. He didn't miss a tackle during the 6 nations and he brought down Tuilagi and Rougerie every time they ran at him, and they're two of the hardest running centres around. To be honest I'm worried about all of our backs with Sonny Bill and Julian Savea going hard at them on front foot ball, I wouldn't single out Earls!

    As for wanting Paul Marshall over Murray? Not a hope. If you only watch Ulster when Pienaar plays and Marshall comes on to buzz about for the last 20 minutes and looks brilliant then maybe, but it is clear whenever he starts for them that he hasn't anywhere near the level of control required to be a top level scrum-half (hasn't got it yet anyway. He is talented and I wouldn't write him off).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭Seph503


    Delighted to see some new faces in the team.

    The cynic in me however predicts the following substitutions between 60-65min mark.

    1. Zebo off, Earls to wing, Sexton to 12, ROG on.
    2. SOB off, DOC on, Ryan to 6, POM to 7.

    Please don't let it be! :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    Will Reddan ever start ahead of the ponderous Connor Murray? I have visions of Ireland getting turned over repeatedly because of his slowness.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,592 ✭✭✭GerM


    Fishooks12 wrote: »
    He's the best winger in the squad

    Earls is a good one on one tackler. His problems in defense were largely down to his positioning which he amended hugely this year as we all saw in the 6 nations

    I think his positioning and tackling have improved hugely. This weekend will be a test at another level again though. I think his one on one tackling was very poor in the past. Sackey, Tindall, Malzieu, BOD and Tuilagi have all gone through him for tries in the past couple of years. The past 8 months have seen a bigger improvement in those aspects of his game than the previous 3 years though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭RoundBox11


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    yes I do. This is true. Kidney had McFadden at 12. D'arcy by the way has a slight injury and they decided to use the opportunity to rest him.


    Pull the other one will you. We're not fools here.

    Tell us your source if its true?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    why does it matter? I could easily make up a source anyway if it was untrue.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I couldn't see Ryan moving to the back row when McLaughlin is on the bench. While both players get the "he can play both back and second row" Ryan is a far better second row and McLaughlin is a far better back rower.

    The Sexton to 12 is still a worry though but with Cave on the bench it would be bizarre to actually put Sexton at 12.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭WeeBushy


    Having picked a center on the bench I hope this will stop Kidney doing the ridiculous by putting Sexton at 12.

    This is the most excited I've been to see Ireland play in ages.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    LeftBase wrote: »
    the ball is always just sailed over his head as he is too far up.

    Earls is rarely caught out of position on the wing
    Earls was hidden in the 6 nations in defence much like ROG used to be. Ferris and O'Brien made his tackles for him.

    Simply not true. Watch the games again, he put in some brilliant tackles and was solid defensively for the entire competition
    On a backrow note, why are O'Mahoney and O'Brien playing in eachother's positions?? I think O'Brien is a better 6 and O'Mahoney a better 7!

    SOB has only played at 6 a handful of times this season and POM has only played at 7 a handful too. Both are in their correct more familiar positions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    I would genuinely fear for O'Gara's safety if he was brought on. At this stage in his career I reckon he would struggle physcially with some SCT players. Hes always been a road bump but now hes actually jumping out of the way of tackles as seen against Ospreys.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    why does it matter? I could easily make up a source anyway if it was untrue.

    Ok well I heard that DOC and Tuohy had a dust up after the team announcement

    I don't want to back it up either so you should just take what I say as the truth


    see the problem?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    Not really, you can believe what you want. If I throw a bone I dont want to know if it tastes good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Tox56 wrote: »
    What's your source then
    DeccieLeaks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    Not really, you can believe what you want. If I throw a bone I dont want to know if it tastes good.

    Ok we'll all take your nuggets of inside info with a pinch of salt next time so seeing as you can't back them up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    ok fishhooks. Glad to be of assistance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    TonyTonga wrote: »
    Not really, you can believe what you want. If I throw a bone I dont want to know if it tastes good.

    Ah but if you sow a seed you want to know how it grows grasshopper....


    Personally I don't believe Earls had a fit. And if he did, I doubt the management would bend to his will. He can watch the game from the stands if he wants. I've heard of Heaslip having words with Kidders before and that didn't go down well - I don't think Kidney has any problems dealing with attitude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭WeeBushy


    I heard the reason Madigan isn't in the squad is because ROG told Kidney he could f*ck off if he was going to be behind two ladyboys.

    I also heard that Kidney had originally picked O'Callaghan to start but O'Driscoll blew up on him saying Touhy should start and he would go home and bring all the rugby balls with him if DOC started.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 108 ✭✭TonyTonga


    o.k I get the point I wont divulge any more inside track in future. Its a bit unrealistic to expect me to name the source though. I expected the forum to be a little bit more mature. If you dont believe it then fine but no need to continiously deride it. The fact is Earls had a fit and said he wanted centre


  • Advertisement
Advertisement