Al-Qaeda 'underpants' bomber was working for CIA

Run_to_da_hills

This goes to prove yet again that the US is has lost its dignity as a respectable western nation and has gone down the same route as those so called "terrorist nations" that it is trying to suppress.

So all the propaganda and fearmongering over this plot was once again over nothing this was yet another staged incident just as the first underwear bomber event was a manufactured hoax from beginning to end.

The al-Qaeda operative tasked with carrying a high-tech new "underpants" bomb onto a US-bound jet was in fact a double agent working for the CIA and Arab intelligence agencies, it has emerged.

The agent penetrated al-Qaeda's deadly affiliate Yemen and tracked the bomb's movement for weeks before smuggling out the device out of the country and into the hands of American authorities.

America is now the official false flag capital of the world.

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/middle-east/alqaeda-underpants-bomber-was-working-for-cia-3103184.html

MagicMarker

What's the problem exactly?

dmc17

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the problem exactly?

He had a bomb in his underpants!

Lando Griffin

Well now isn't that a Y turn.

Wibbs

I got a missile in mine.

MagicMarker

Wibbs wrote: »

I got a missile in mine.

I have a penis.

Ghandee

Ach, PANTS!

dmc17

Wibbs wrote: »

I got a missile in mine.

Is it disarmed?

Run_to_da_hills

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the problem exactly?

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

helimachoptor

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" butt was in fact working for the American Government.

It was supposed to be a scam so that America could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

I'd say it was more counter-insurgency.
Whats the best way to know what the enemy are coming up with to kill you?
Implant someone into their ranks

MagicMarker

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

Well if the terrorists have a new 'bomb pants' that's so technologically advanced, shouldn't they tighten up airport security measures?

Run_to_da_hills

MagicMarker wrote: »

Well if the terrorists have a new 'bomb pants' that's so technologically advanced, shouldn't they tighten up airport security measures?

They can only go so far.

I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

lucylu

This is like an episode of Homeland

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

They can only go so far.

I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

you also believe obama is the antichrist so......
yeah

MagicMarker

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

They can only go so far.

I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

So you're one of those people...

*backs away slowly*

holystungun9

dmc17 wrote: »

He had a bomb in his underpants!

I have 'da bomb' in mine. :eek:

ejmaztec

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

The bum disposal guy should have cut the yellow wire.:(

Mr.Crinklewood

Excellent work by the authorities.

One threat stopped.

A possible future discovered, as a result of which hopefully security will be changed to stop its affect.

humanji

Moved to Conspiracy Theories. Please note that the Forum Charter is different to the After Hours one.

the_syco

Where is the article did it say that the bomber was CIA?

/edit
Just saw humanji's post, so you don't have to answer now, as what they don't say in articles is usually seen as the truth...

2 stroke

Ok, so we ban underwear on international flights. I don't think our commandos will have any problem with that.

Daithi 1

MagicMarker wrote: »

So you're one of those people...

*backs away slowly*

BBC also believe it. Yet, you dont back away from your tv.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk

Monty Burnz

Daithi 1 wrote: »

BBC also believe it. Yet, you dont back away from your tv.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk

I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about?

Daithi 1

the_syco wrote: »

Where is the article did it say that the bomber was CIA?

The title. :rolleyes:

Daithi 1

Monty Burnz wrote: »

I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about?

They say there is some truth to every lie.

Run_to_da_hills

Monty Burnz wrote: »

I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about?

Certain things become too obvious that they can no longer hold back beyond floodgates.

Monty Burnz

Daithi 1 wrote: »

They say there is some truth to every lie.

Well I guess the truth is that the BBC is generally reliable but they have dropped the ball once or twice.

Good documentary you linked, by the way. Although I remember hearing nearly a decade ago that the Al Qaeda 'brand' was promulgated by the Americans, and that there was no centralised organisation - it was basically bunches of local enthusiasts committing atrocities and then sticking on the brand name.

Which - of course - makes it much harder to catch them too.

Daithi 1

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Well I guess the truth is that the BBC is generally reliable but they have dropped the ball once or twice.

Good documentary you linked, by the way. Although I remember hearing nearly a decade ago that the Al Qaeda 'brand' was promulgated by the Americans, and that there was no centralised organisation - it was basically bunches of local enthusiasts committing atrocities and then sticking on the brand name.

Which - of course - makes it much harder to catch them too.

Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war.

Monty Burnz

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war.

That's just PR for the masses in America who are unsure where anywhere outside their immediate state is. There will be no 'victory' in the 'war on terror' (another branding exercise) any more than there has been a victory in the 'war on drugs'.

I would assume Obama and his people know this - the trick is to get US forces out of the Middle East without it looking like a defeat to his home audience and the international audience too. Not an easy task.

Daithi 1

Monty Burnz wrote: »

That's just PR for the masses in America who are unsure where anywhere outside their immediate state is. There will be no 'victory' in the 'war on terror' (another branding exercise) any more than there has been a victory in the 'war on drugs'.

I would assume Obama and his people know this - the trick is to get US forces out of the Middle East without it looking like a defeat to his home audience and the international audience too. Not an easy task.

I know that dude... what the hell are you doing saying it ??

You're supposed to be on the other team man !!. You're wrecking the game :mad:

Run_to_da_hills

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war.

There will be no civil war with Obama.

He knows at the touch of a button who his enemies are him from social media and mobile phone records. All he needs to do is track them down with his storm troopers and forward them on to Fema concentration camps.

Monty Burnz

Daithi 1 wrote: »

I know that dude... what the hell are you doing saying it ??

You're supposed to be on the other team man !!. You're wrecking the game :mad:

Sure nobody (outside the target audience) buys that stuff.

reprazant

Daithi 1 wrote: »

They say there is some truth to every lie.

Or... they are telling the truth when the say the same things I believe to be true.

Everything else is a lie because I don't believe it.

Jonny7

You do realise that this "underwear" bomber was a double-agent? I'm not sure if you have a learning difficulty, but the nature of a double-agent is to infiltrate, so the whole thing appears to be very successful.

Also, can you show us how the original "underwear bomber" was a staged incident, considering the man is serving life.

Daithi 1

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

There will be no civil war with Obama.

He knows at the touch of a button who his enemies are him from social media and mobile phone records. All he needs to do is track them down with his storm troopers and forward them on to Fema concentration camps.

Unless he/they wants a civil war.

Daithi 1

Jonny7 wrote: »

You do realise that this "underwear" bomber was a double-agent? I'm not sure if you have a learning difficulty, but the nature of a double-agent is to infiltrate, so the whole thing appears to be very successful.

Also, can you show us how the original "underwear bomber" was a staged incident, considering the man is serving life.

what bud ?

superluck

jonny7 wrote:

...so the whole thing appears to be very successful.

I agree. What is the big surprise? Double agents work in terrorist organisations all the time. That he carried a bomb on board a plane and tried to detonate it with the full knowledge of security services isn't all that shocking.

Atleast our airports are now much safer with security scanners in place, thanks to the underwear bomber and CIA.

Daithi 1

reprazant wrote: »

Or... they are telling the truth when the say the same things I believe to be true.

Everything else is a lie because I don't believe it.

Not necessarily. They could be mis/disinformed, mistaken, barking up the wrong tree of simply stupid. They don't need to be liars. Cool answer though, you whitty chicken.

Jonny7

superluck wrote: »

I agree. What is the big surprise? Double agents work in terrorist organisations all the time. That he carried a bomb on board a plane and tried to detonate it with the full knowledge of security services isn't all that shocking.

Atleast our airports are now much safer with security scanners in place, thanks to the underwear bomber and CIA.

He didn't try to detonate it.

The informant then turned the device over to his handlers and has left Yemen, the officials told the news agency.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/may/09/underwear-bomber-working-for-cia

Daithi 1

superluck wrote: »

I agree. What is the big surprise? Double agents work in terrorist organisations all the time. That he carried a bomb on board a plane and tried to detonate it with the full knowledge of security services isn't all that shocking.

Atleast our airports are now much safer with security scanners in place, thanks to the underwear bomber and CIA.

Safer ? Like you were in terrible danger before. ffs

You are more likely to win the lottery many times before you are hurt by terrorism. However, CIA agents bringing bombs onto planes might lessen those odds.
Don't be so freaking dramatic.
4 year olds being molested by TSA at airports, does not make you any safer.

Run_to_da_hills

Jonny7 wrote: »

You do realise that this "underwear" bomber was a double-agent? I'm not sure if you have a learning difficulty, but the nature of a double-agent is to infiltrate, so the whole thing appears to be very successful.

Also, can you show us how the original "underwear bomber" was a staged incident, considering the man is serving life.

It doesn't take too much to figure it out.

Classic case of



Problem is created: The boogyman appears on an Airplane with a "bomb"

Reaction: Wide spread international panic, instant fear of death :eek:

Solution. Another step closer towards global electronic enslavement.

Fore all we know, Richard Reid is probably sunning himself in Bermuda under a new identity along with all the others that have been caught with their false flag scare mongering tactics.

Only the Obama following sheeple that watch American main stream media would fall for this stuff and actually believe it.

Daithi 1

superluck wrote: »

I agree. What is the big surprise? Double agents work in terrorist organisations all the time. That he carried a bomb on board a plane and tried to detonate it with the full knowledge of security services isn't all that shocking.

Atleast our airports are now much safer with security scanners in place, thanks to the underwear bomber and CIA.

Cant believe I missed that bit. LOLLOLLOLLOL :pac:

Yeah, thats safe.

Back to AH, much safer there.

Jonny7

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Don't be so freaking dramatic.

4 year olds being molested at airports, does not make any safer.

There is an almost universal loathing for the TSA, however airport security around the world is needed.

Ash.J.Williams

I'd love to know how many double agents were in the irish government, the IRA and Sin fein over the years....i'd say the truth would be shocking. I'd say it went up as far as leadership.

Daithi 1

Jonny7 wrote: »

There is an almost universal loathing for the TSA, however airport security around the world is needed.

It was fine pre 911.

Even if it wasnt an inside job. There is no need for that much increased security.

It's all bull.

Monty Burnz

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Safer ? Like you were in terrible danger before. ffs

You are more likely to win the lottery many times before you are hurt by terrorism.

This is true, but it's slightly circular in that it's very difficult to carry off a successful attack these days because of all the (very annoying) security. If we were back in the days where you rocked up an hour before the flight and didn't pass through a metal detector, there could be planes blown up every day. Every time a plot succeeds (or nearly does), the rules get tightened again.

I hope those people who brought/tried to bring the explosives in the drinking bottles - causing misery for everyone on every flight today - spend a long, miserable life in dreadful conditions, followed by a healthy stint in hell.

Daithi 1

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

I'd love to know how many double agents were in the irish government, the IRA and Sin fein over the years....i'd say the truth would be shocking. I'd say it went up as far as leadership.

I'd love to know how many were on the 911 flights.

Monty Burnz

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

It doesn't take too much to figure it out.

Classic case of



Problem is created: The boogyman appears on an Airplane with a "bomb"

Reaction: Wide spread international panic, instant fear of death :eek:

Solution. Another step closer towards global electronic enslavement.

Fore all we know, Richard Reid is probably sunning himself in Bermuda under a new identity along with all the others that have been caught with their false flag scare mongering tactics.

Only the Obama following sheeple that watch American main stream media would fall for this stuff and actually believe it.

Richard Reid is not the underwear bomber.

hooradiation

Daithi 1 wrote: »

It was fine pre 911.

So - lapses security allowed four planes to be hijacked and three of them used as improvised weapons to attack buildings therefore security was "fine".


Explain that line of thought some more, because there is no possible way how I'm reading that sentence makes sense.

Monty Burnz

Daithi 1 wrote: »

I'd love to know how many were on the 911 flights.

You have to admire their dedication to the New World Order if they sacrificed themselves for it. Either they were evil saints (which doesn't make much sense to me), or just saints.

Daithi 1

Monty Burnz wrote: »

This is true, but it's slightly circular in that it's very difficult to carry off a successful attack these days because of all the (very annoying) security. If we were back in the days where you rocked up an hour before the flight and didn't pass through a metal detector, there could be planes blown up every day. Every time a plot succeeds (or nearly does), the rules get tightened again.

I hope those people who brought/tried to bring the explosives in the drinking bottles - causing misery for everyone on every flight today - spend a long, miserable life in dreadful conditions, followed by a healthy stint in hell.

I'd say the odd of being killed by terrorism pre 911, were less than now, wouldnt you ?