Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Invented Documents "found" in Osama bin Laden raid to be released.

13»

Comments

  • #62
    hooradiation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Could you explain why a 26 foot tall Anubis Statue (Egypyian God of Death) was on public display at the forecourt of Denver International Airport. Why an Airport of all places for something like this?.
    because it's to promote the King Tut exhibit that opens June 26 at the Denver Art Museum.
    It's the second paragraph in the report you linked.
    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    They already have a Horse with Death written all over it that the authorities insist will stay until at least 2013 despite widespread protests.

    Because city regulations require public art installations to stay put for at least five years (also, same article you linked).
    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    The symbolism alone is a just sinister message to keep watch and be vigilant about the place.

    Not really, no.
    And I've been to that airport, it's just another international airport, sadly. It's terribly mundane.
    If a fraction of this were true it might have livened up my journey through the place.


  • #63
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    hooradiation wrote: »
    Not really, no.
    And I've been to that airport, it's just another international airport, sadly. It's terribly mundane.
    If a fraction of this were true it might have livened up my journey through the place.
    I have to say, it's very nice of these evil plotters to leave these helpful clues around the place for internet detectives to find, like something from Scooby Doo.


  • #64
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    hooradiation wrote: »
    And I've been to that airport, it's just another international airport, sadly. It's terribly mundane.

    If a fraction of this were true it might have livened up my journey through the place.
    Perhaps on your next visit take a very good look at the murals, the gargoyles and other strange artifacts that one would not see at an international airport. (That's if they are not already removed or covered up).


  • #65
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Perhaps on your next visit take a very good look at the murals, the gargoyles and other strange artifacts that one would not see at an international airport. (That's if they are not already removed or covered up).
    Why did someone put them there if they didn't want people to see them? :rolleyes:

    Ridiculous. You need to step outside whatever weird box you have trapped your thinking in.


  • #66
    hooradiation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,922 ✭✭✭hooradiation


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Perhaps on your next visit take a very good look at the murals, the gargoyles and other strange artifacts that one would not see at an international airport. (That's if they are not already removed or covered up).

    Oh I did, there's "creative" nonsense in just about every airport. Guess there's only so much you can do to disguise you're what is essentially a giant shed with delusions of grandeur.
    It all gets rather bloody tedious after a while.

    Honestly, unless Satan himself is working the airport bar, then this isn't really going to be much more than "Denver Airport tries to make itself looks interesting, and fails".


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    Why did someone put them there if they didn't want people to see them? :rolleyes:

    Ridiculous. You need to step outside whatever weird box you have trapped your thinking in.
    I believe many of the murals have already been painted over.

    This alone may be enough said.


  • #68
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Yes you correctly pointed that out and I was quick to replace it with a non superimposed map along with amending the text pointing out that people should draw their own conclusions.

    Yes I am vigilant about particular symbols as they have been used and associated with evil cults and empires down through the centuries and what we are now about to witness may no doubt be just history repeating itself.
    But you still make the claim despite you knowing it's not true and you still made it in the first place. You lied. This makes you a liar just as you accuse Obama of being. So therefore we can't take your insistence that you're a Christian any more seriously than you say we should take his.

    So therefore you too are a secret Muslim.

    And you'll have to explain which definition you use for "vigilant" which includes leaving out and manipulating important facts.


  • #69
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    I believe many of the murals have already been painted over.

    This alone may be enough said.
    Why did they put them there in the first place if they did not want people to see them?

    you-pesky-kids.jpg


  • #70
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    King Mob wrote: »

    So therefore you too are a secret Muslim.
    A Muslim will deny outright that "Jesus Christ the son of God" they also deny the resurrection of Christ.

    I do not deny any of the above therefore I am not a Muslim.


  • #71
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    A Muslim will deny outright that "Jesus Christ the son of God" they also deny the resurrection of Christ.

    I do not deny any of the above therefore I am not a Muslim.

    That's exactly the type of sneaky stuff a secret Muslim would say. Aren't you Muslims allowed to lie to further Islam?


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    A Muslim will deny outright that "Jesus Christ the son of God" they also deny the resurrection of Christ.

    I do not deny any of the above therefore I am not a Muslim.

    And? you could still be lying.
    Obama doesn't deny that stuff either.


  • #73
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    That's exactly the type of sneaky stuff a secret Muslim would say. Aren't you Muslims allowed to lie to further Islam?


    Press.

    34fe9e0.jpg


  • #74
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    This comes in handy at times. :)

    Press.

    34fe9e0.jpg

    I guess when you can't answer questions, it is safer to ignore them.


  • #75
    Torakx
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    wow you guys finally decided to just start slinging dirt :P
    He must have hit a sore spot.


  • #76
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Torakx wrote: »
    wow you guys finally decided to just start slinging dirt :P
    He must have hit a sore spot.
    Well, to be fair, he started it! :)

    I'm still hoping that he will explain why somebody would fill Denver Airport with clues indicating an EVIL PLOT and then remove them when people noticed these clues...


  • #77
    Torakx
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    I wouldnt even call them clues.
    It was blatant the story they told.
    If its not true,why did they take it down? :D


  • #78
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Torakx wrote: »
    I wouldnt even call them clues.
    It was blatant the story they told.
    If its not true,why did they take it down? :D
    If it IS true, why did they take it down? :confused:


  • #79
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Jonny7 wrote: »
    You do realise there is a man serving life for attempting the same (and almost succeeding).
    Yes I am now beginning to believe that Reid was in fact innocent and working tor the CIA and was intercepted and hung by the same authority.

    Al-Qaeda 'underpants' bomber was working for CIA

    http://www.independent.ie/world-news/middle-east/alqaeda-underpants-bomber-was-working-for-cia-3103184.html


  • #80
    Torakx
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    Once again half a truth,i suspect.
    They're saying he infiltrated the very depts of the network to take the bomb across the borders into american hands..

    If they can do that,then no problem to have taken out the whole network years ago.

    Since they own it lol


Advertisement