Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Colts Trade Block

  • 16-04-2012 12:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    I won't be agreeing to anything until progressions are done (unless you're crazy about one of my guys and are willing to overpay)

    Mike Wallace - 93 - WR - A - Speed 98
    Johnny Knox - 84 - WR - A - Speed 97
    Steve Gregory - 75 - SS - B - Pursuit 86
    Winston Justice - 73 - RT - B
    Christian Ponder - 76 - QB - A - Good accuracy short and medium and can throw on the run
    Matt Hill - 74 - QB - B - Good on mid and long throws
    Philip Rivers - 96 - QB - A - If I get substantial improvement out of either of my other two QBs I'll look to cash in on Rivers
    Nate Livings - 79 - LG - B
    Terrence Cody - 73 - DT - B - 360 pounds! Ravens, you know you want him!
    Montra Haynes - 79 - DT - B
    Nick Cole - 74 - C - C


    Have no particular needs at the moment (may change if any of my players retire or deteriorate after progressions) so right now probably only interested in elite players that would be an obvious upgrade.

    All my players under 75 overall are available as part of any trade.

    would be very unlikely to let go of 2 players from the same position (e.g. Wallace or Knox, not both)


Comments



  • have a look at my roster for terrence cody dt


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    have a look at my roster for terrence cody dt

    Cody is definitely surplus to requirements for me so I'll be happy to trade him to you. We can wait till we see the progressions or you can have him now for your #2 pick.




  • McG wrote: »
    Cody is definitely surplus to requirements for me so I'll be happy to trade him to you. We can wait till we see the progressions or you can have him now for your #2 pick.

    i think my number 2 pick is gone il have to check is there anyone you like on my roster


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    I like this Knox guy, and Matt Hill. Anyone you want on my roster? You seem to be throwing out the speed at WR so maybe you'd like Wes Welker and something else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    I like this Knox guy, and Matt Hill. Anyone you want on my roster? You seem to be throwing out the speed at WR so maybe you'd like Wes Welker and something else?

    I could definitely be interested in Welker. He'd probably be a better match for Wallace than Knox (both are too similar). Won't be agreeing to anything though till progressions are done.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    I could definitely be interested in Welker. He'd probably be a better match for Wallace than Knox (both are too similar). Won't be agreeing to anything though till progressions are done.

    What do you want to go with Welker? Would you be interested in upgrading to Harper at SS? He's A potential so he should progress from 85, as should your current starter.

    I know we're not agreeing to anything yet but I just want something in place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    McG wrote: »
    I could definitely be interested in Welker. He'd probably be a better match for Wallace than Knox (both are too similar). Won't be agreeing to anything though till progressions are done.



    What do you want to go with Welker? Would you be interested in upgrading to Harper at SS? He's A potential so he should progress from 85, as should your current starter.

    I know we're not agreeing to anything yet but I just want something in place.


    That sounds like it might work. Not at a PC now but will look over proposal numbers on the morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    That sounds like it might work. Not at a PC now but will look over proposal numbers on the morning.

    Sorry about this, I could swear I put it in my last post, but it seems I didn't. I may need need another strong safety to replace harper, so I'd like to wait on the progressions, I think Gregory and Mays will both progress well for you but I have a B potential SS who could progress either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Sorry about this, I could swear I put it in my last post, but it seems I didn't. I may need need another strong safety to replace harper, so I'd like to wait on the progressions, I think Gregory and Mays will both progress well for you but I have a B potential SS who could progress either.

    Knox + Hill for Welker plus a pick might work. We'll have a clearer idea after progressions

    EDIT: If you have an offer pre progressions I'll listen (bear in mind Hill should definitely improve, Knox probably will and Welker may drop a little at his age).

    Need to keep up with the neighbours (Texans and Titans making big moves already in my division)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    i think my number 2 pick is gone il have to check is there anyone you like on my roster

    No big needs (at least until progressions are done) so the only players on your side I'd be interested in right now are some of your top guys like:

    Snee RG
    Clemons LE
    Ryans MLB
    Scott RE
    Jackson CB
    Bironas K

    any deal involving them would certainly be more complicated than a swap so have a look at the rest of my roster and see if you can come up with something (including my/your picks).


  • Advertisement


  • McG wrote: »
    No big needs (at least until progressions are done) so the only players on your side I'd be interested in right now are some of your top guys like:

    Snee RG
    Clemons LE
    Ryans MLB
    Scott RE
    Jackson CB
    Bironas K

    any deal involving them would certainly be more complicated than a swap so have a look at the rest of my roster and see if you can come up with something (including my/your picks).


    ok how about you get

    clemons de 91
    and jacobs hb 80(possibly the best short yardage back in the game)

    for
    cody dt 73
    jones hb 75
    and hall cb 88


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    on how abut you get

    clemons de 91
    and jacobs hb 80(possibly the best short yardage back in the game)

    for
    cody dt 73
    jones hb 75
    and hall cb 88

    I can include Jones in any trade but can't afford to let Hall go.

    Clemons for Cody, Jones + ? (pick or player)




  • McG wrote: »
    I can include Jones in any trade but can't afford to let Hall go.

    Clemons for Cody, Jones + ? (pick or player)

    ok how about you get

    clemons de 91
    jacobs hb 80(possibly the best short yardage back in the game)
    sean jones ss 80
    and my 3rd (first user pick or the round)


    for
    cody dt 73
    jones hb 75
    mays ss 79
    knox wr 84
    and your second
    i think were close enough to a deal just have to tweak it a bit if it dosent suit you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    o
    i think were close enough to a deal just have to tweak it a bit if it dosent suit you

    This is getting very complicated. I have another possible trade involving Knox so I'd rather not include him. I'm not very interested in Jacobs as I don't usually change my RBs too much. And I don't want to give up too much for a 32 year old before we see progressions.

    How about Ryans MLB (86) for Cody DT (73) and Siler MLB (79)?




  • McG wrote: »
    This is getting very complicated. I have another possible trade involving Knox so I'd rather not include him. I'm not very interested in Jacobs as I don't usually change my RBs too much. And I don't want to give up too much for a 32 year old before we see progressions.

    How about Ryans MLB (86) for Cody DT (73) and Siler MLB (79)?

    id be slow to trade ryans if you have a variation on a clemons trade or a scott trade id be interested


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    Lads get a room :pac:
    McG you're head will be spinning from all the permutations tomorrow!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    id be slow to trade ryans if you have a variation on a clemons trade or a scott trade id be interested

    Scott RE (84) + 3rd round pick for Cody DT (73) + Odom RE (82) ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    Lads get a room :pac:
    McG you're head will be spinning from all the permutations tomorrow!

    It really will be! I shouldn't have gone near trades till after playoffs!

    It's hard work this trade thing, trying to find a fair price on either side.




  • McG wrote: »
    Scott RE (84) + 3rd round pick for Cody DT (73) + Odom RE (82) ?

    i like that if we can work jones hb into it for something


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    i like that if we can work jones hb into it for something

    ok. Not sure if this is something you'll be interested in but I can't find too many outside your top 4 or 5 I'd be all that interested in


    Cody (73) + Jones (75) + Odom (82)
    for
    Scott (84) + Jackson (80)


  • Advertisement


  • McG wrote: »
    ok. Not sure if this is something you'll be interested in but I can't find too many outside your top 4 or 5 I'd be all that interested in


    Cody (73) + Jones (75) + Odom (82)
    for
    Scott (84) + Jackson (80)

    i cant give up jackson my secondary would be non existant without him keep looking
    id give scott my 3rd(first user pick almost a 2nd)+maby a 3rd next year or one of my other corners


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    i cant give up jackson my secondary would be non existant without him keep looking
    id give scott my 3rd(first user pick almost a 2nd)+maby a 3rd next year or one of my other corners

    have good corners already so only interested if I can get a very good one.
    I'm really struggling to up with something fair (that doesn't leave me with a gap somewhere. Jones will have to be replaced but I'm not keen on Jacobs before we see pregressions. Cody does not need to be replaced, I'm good at DT).


    Cody (73) + Jones (75) + Odom (82) + Brown [C] (86) + 3rd rounder
    for
    Scott (84) + Mangold (97)


    ... that's me done for a while. if that doesn't work fire up a few suggestions and I'll have a look when I get a chance.




  • McG wrote: »
    have good corners already so only interested if I can get a very good one.
    I'm really struggling to up with something fair (that doesn't leave me with a gap somewhere. Jones will have to be replaced but I'm not keen on Jacobs before we see pregressions. Cody does not need to be replaced, I'm good at DT).


    Cody (73) + Jones (75) + Odom (82) + Brown [C] (86) + 3rd rounder
    for
    Scott (84) + Mangold (97)


    ... that's me done for a while. if that doesn't work fire up a few suggestions and I'll have a look when I get a chance.

    no sorry its a decent deal but mangold is my only untouchable

    il think up a few new ideas get back to me when you can


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Would you give me Montra Haynes for Felix Jones?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Would you give me Montra Haynes for Felix Jones?

    Yeah. That suits me, need a backup for McFadden now that Jones is gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    Yeah. That suits me, need a backup for McFadden now that Jones is gone.

    So we'll wait until the progressions and do it, will we?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    So we'll wait until the progressions and do it, will we?

    no need in this trade unless you want to. They're both B potential and neither of them are too old so I'm happy to go ahead now and take the chace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    no need in this trade unless you want to. They're both B potential and neither of them are too old so I'm happy to go ahead now and take the chace.

    Alright, are you able to now? I can do it in the next 10 minutes, after that I have my plate match.

    EDIT: Sorry I'm an idiot you're in playoffs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Alright, are you able to now? I can do it in the next 10 minutes, after that I have my plate match.

    EDIT: Sorry I'm an idiot you're in playoffs.

    Yeah, I think the Titans might object to that! :P


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    McG wrote: »
    Yeah, I think the Titans might object to that! :P

    You're lucky mcg I was getting schaub and mjd!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    You're lucky mcg I was getting schaub and mjd!!!

    that's some rebuilding Matthew's doing at the Raiders. We need a wheeler dealer award or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    that's some rebuilding Matthew's doing at the Raiders. We need a wheeler dealer award or something.

    As is the usual deal with the Raiders, after a 9-7 season and missing the playoffs we simply had to fire the whole staff and many players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭BigBadRob83


    Hey McG, if you have Felix Jones, any interest in trading his cousing Taiwan Jones?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    Hey McG, if you have Felix Jones, any interest in trading his cousing Taiwan Jones?

    he's on his way to the Redskins, which is why I felt I needed to accept Felix trade


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    Mike Wallace - 93 - WR - A - Speed 98
    *Johnny Knox - 84 - WR - A - Speed 97
    Steve Gregory - 75 - SS - B - Pursuit 86
    Winston Justice - 73 - RT - B
    Christian Ponder - 76 - QB - A - Good accuracy short and medium and can throw on the run
    *Matt Hill - 74 - QB - B - Good on mid and long throws
    Philip Rivers - 96 - QB - A - If I get substantial improvement out of either of my other two QBs I'll look to cash in on Rivers
    Nate Livings - 79 - LG - B
    Terrence Cody - 73 - DT - B
    Montra Haynes - 79 - DT - B
    Nick Cole - 74 - C - C
    Antwan Odom - 82 - RE - B


    OUT:
    Taiwan Jones (HB) -> Redskins
    Montra Haynes (DT) -> Raiders
    Terrence Cody (DT) -> Redskins
    Antwan Odom (RE) -> Falcons

    IN:
    Felix Jones (HB) <- Raiders
    Trevor Scott (RE) <- Redskins
    Clifton Ryan (DT) <- Falcons


    * Deal in works.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Getting back to our potential deal Colts, you want Roman Harper and Wes Welker right? I wanted Hill and Knox. I think that trade is more favourable to you than it is to me, so I'd like Taylor Mays and I'll give you the Bengals second round pick, and they are in slot 21 or 22.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Getting back to our potential deal Colts, you want Roman Harper and Wes Welker right? I wanted Hill and Knox. I think that trade is more favourable to you than it is to me, so I'd like Taylor Mays and I'll give you the Bengals second round pick, and they are in slot 21 or 22.

    No, was never interested in Harper.

    Just Welker + ? for Knox and Hill.

    I'd take a 3rd round pick with him now or we can wait till after progressions to see if Welker regresses and how much my 2 guys improve.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    Just Welker + ? for Knox and Hill.

    I'd take a 3rd round pick with him now

    Deal. EDIT: What a shame, I have no third round pick. I guess I'll just have to give you a second.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    Deal. EDIT: What a shame, I have no third round pick. I guess I'll just have to give you a second.

    cool. suits me :)

    Hill and Knox for Welker and 2nd rounder

    The Colts beat the Titans tonight so we'll have to hold off on completing these for a little while yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    Colts you will be using the Bengals pick by the way. I could give you the Titans but that would be mean on them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    Mike Wallace - 93 - WR - A - Speed 98
    Johnny Knox - 84 - WR - A - Speed 97
    Christian Ponder - 76 - QB - A - Good accuracy short and medium and can throw on the run
    Matt Hill - 74 - QB - B - Good on mid and long throws
    Philip Rivers - 96 - QB - A - If I get substantial improvement out of either of my other two QBs I'll look to cash in on Rivers
    Terrence Cody - 73 - DT - B
    Montra Haynes - 79 - DT - B
    Antwan Odom - 82 - RE - B
    Steve Gregory - 75 - SS - B - Pursuit 86
    Winston Justice - 73 - RT - B
    Nick Cole - 74 - C - C
    Nate Livings - 79 - LG - B


    OUT:
    Taiwan Jones (HB) -> Redskins
    Montra Haynes (DT) -> Raiders
    Terrence Cody (DT) -> Redskins
    Antwan Odom (RE) -> Falcons
    Johnny Knox (WR) -> Raiders
    Matt Hill (QB) -> Raiders

    IN:
    Felix Jones (HB) <- Raiders
    Trevor Scott (RE) <- Redskins
    Clifton Ryan (DT) <- Falcons
    Wes Welker (WR) <- Raiders
    Bengals 2nd Round Pick <- Raiders

    Not much left on my board now. I think I've lost a little depth but improved on 2 starters (RE and WR) and 2 backups (marginal improvement at HB and DT). I've also picked up a second round pick which might turn out to be useful. So far content with my progress and happy that I haven't created any new needs to be filled at draft so my picks are there to replace retired or regressed players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    I just looked at Terrence Cody there out of interest and he has insane key stats in block shedding and power moves, but jesus christ that guy must be the slowest in the game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    matthew8 wrote: »
    I just looked at Terrence Cody there out of interest and he has insane key stats in block shedding and power moves, but jesus christ that guy must be the slowest in the game.

    360lbs is tough to move.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    360lbs is tough to move.

    Try saying that to Haloti Ngata.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,599 ✭✭✭matthew8


    McG wrote: »
    360lbs is tough to move.

    Infact I just noticed he is equal to Casey Hampton in a lot of very important stats. I think anyone running the 3-4 should definitely consider trading for him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Shane.C


    Would you be interested in Elvis Dumervil? RE 95 Ovr, My elite D Lineman, I'm in need of a MLB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    Shane.C wrote: »
    Would you be interested in Elvis Dumervil? RE 95 Ovr, My elite D Lineman, I'm in need of a MLB.

    Too big a drop at MLB for a straight swap (Urlacher has been my most important D player every season)

    Might do Urlacher (MLB 94) + Scott (RE 85) for Dumervil (RE 95) + Vilma (MLB 85)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Shane.C


    Yea i understand, i don't wanna lose any MLB, so i can't accept.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭McG


    Mike Wallace - 93 - WR - A - Speed 98
    Johnny Knox - 84 - WR - A - Speed 97
    Christian Ponder - 80 - QB - A
    Matt Hill - 74 - QB - B
    Philip Rivers - 96 - QB - A
    Terrence Cody - 73 - DT - B
    Montra Haynes - 79 - DT - B
    Antwan Odom - 82 - RE - B
    Steve Gregory - 77 - SS - B
    Winston Justice - 73 - RT - B
    Nick Cole - 74 - C - C
    Nate Livings - 79 - LG - B
    Pacman Jones - 73 - CB
    Neil Rackers - 80 - K
    Tony Scheffler - 76 - TE
    Demetris Banks - 74 - HB


    OUT:
    Taiwan Jones (HB) -> Redskins
    Montra Haynes (DT) -> Raiders
    Terrence Cody (DT) -> Redskins
    Antwan Odom (RE) -> Falcons
    Johnny Knox (WR) -> Raiders
    Matt Hill (QB) -> Raiders

    IN:
    Felix Jones (HB) <- Raiders
    Trevor Scott (RE) <- Redskins
    Clifton Ryan (DT) <- Falcons
    Wes Welker (WR) <- Raiders
    Johnny Patrick (CB) <- Bengals

    Needs:
    No pressing needs but would be happy to part with a combination of the players left on my block for:
    FB, WR in mid 70s or above.
    RG, RT, OLB, FS in high 70s or above.


Advertisement