Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Carragher, Neville & MNF On Sky

  • 27-03-2012 11:45PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭


    i think he is a very good analyst on the Premiership
    but i find his commentry in European games very frustating
    because he is so pro the English teams
    Watching the Chelsea game tonight it was nearly like listening to someone on fanzone calling the game
    he completly overated Chelsea's performance tonight too imo
    Tagged:


«13456715

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 35,997 CMod ✭✭✭✭ShamoBuc


    He is good and beating them away is a very good result and should be talked up a bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,873 ✭✭✭Skid


    I don't think he is any more Pro-English teams than any other English Pundit.

    I didn't like him when he was playing but he is doing a good job at Sky.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,630 ✭✭✭steelcityblues


    Him and Tyler seem to be building a good commentary partnership.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,425 ✭✭✭FearDark


    Probably the best sky have to offer at the moment. Hated him as a player, decent pundit. He's pro English teams as are most Irish and English commentators I feel.

    /waits for Liverpool fans opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Agree with the OP.

    He is excellent for the PL stuff, but jesus he is shockingly bad for the CL stuff. Shame really as he's a breath of fresh air at weekends/on MNF.

    It's not even that he's 'pro-English', it's that he's hilariously, comically pro English sides (and English players within those sides). In Napoli the other week at one point he said that apart from 2 players the Napoli team were poor & Chelsea could score 5 or 6 in the away leg?! Wtf?!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    Skid wrote: »
    I don't think he is any more Pro-English teams than any other English Pundit.

    I didn't like him when he was playing but he is doing a good job at Sky.
    John Terry clearly handeld the ball
    & Neville said u can't give that even though he arm was stretched out
    he also said Chelsea dominated the 2nd half at one stage
    & then stats showed Benfica had 12 shots to chelsea's 5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,805 ✭✭✭✭Paul Tergat


    Nev does seem to want to promote the English league. Said a few times only recently that its the best league in world etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    He said after the United Fulham game that he didn't think Chelsea would win in Benfica and would struggle to get a draw. Maybe he was just impressed with them because he rated Benfica so highly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,740 ✭✭✭✭MD1990


    He said after the United Fulham game that he didn't think Chelsea would win in Benfica and would struggle to get a draw. Maybe he was just impressed with them because he rated Benfica so highly.
    he started shouting in the 2nd half for Chelsea to switch the ball to the left because a counter was on
    he was nearly as bad as Ray Wilkins which is hard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,181 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    I think he's excellent but he overkills as a co-commentator during a game. I can't remember the exact game but it was roughly a month ago and he wouldn't come up for air.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 792 ✭✭✭KombuchaMshroom


    Personally I think Neville might be trying to over emphasize his bias for English teams so his natural bias for United doesn't stand out too much.
    As a United fan i was a bit worried that when Neville started with Sky he might become a bit of a joke because of his love for United and that he would show this far too strongly on camera. He's been anything but that though, and probably has been the best pundit on Sky this season. His overly pro-English commentating though is the one thing that has let him down, and it just seems to me that a lad who has such a passion for Man United couldn't possibly have as much desire as he is showing for the likes of Chelsea to do well.

    But i guess this isn't really based on any facts, just my own feeling and opinion, so could easily be pure sh*t*!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Local commentator in bias shocker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,408 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    Yeah, they're all bias on Sky when it comes to the English teams in Europe. Andy Gray going mental a few years ago when Gerrard scored that goal against Olympiakos. Ray Wilkins with Spurs last year and Neville this year with Chelsea. Not too bothered about it really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭Hannibal


    Neville has done a lot better than I thought he would. His spell in the job last season all he seemed to talk about was United but he became a lot less biased this season and I initiallly thought his voice would be too monotonous to be a commentator but to be fair he's very knowledable about the game aswell.

    When you compare him to other co-commentators around like Jim Beglin, Andy Townsend, Mark Lawrenson, Ray Wilkins, Matt Le Tissier I personally would have Neville over any of them.

    The English are notoriously blinkered and biased about their game anyway, it in some ways explains how their national team is so poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    Going to maybe state the obvious here, but does anyone think there is a possibility that the pundits and commentators are told by Sky to promote the EPL and therefore its teams whenever possible? We might be seeing a bit of what Neville thinks but also Sky know they are broadcasting to a largely British audience and also that the EPL is their prized brand. It's in their interests to big it up.

    Anyway as a Liverpool fan, I can say from whatever I've seen of Neville I think he's a step up from the usual pundits on Sky. I've never seen him in Europe so can't comment on that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭Caveman1


    Morzadec wrote: »
    Going to maybe state the obvious here, but does anyone think there is a possibility that the pundits and commentators are told by Sky to promote the EPL and therefore its teams whenever possible? We might be seeing a bit of what Neville thinks but also Sky know they are broadcasting to a largely British audience and also that the EPL is their prized brand. It's in their interests to big it up.

    Anyway as a Liverpool fan, I can say from whatever I've seen of Neville I think he's a step up from the usual pundits on Sky. I've never seen him in Europe so can't comment on that

    I was thinking along the lines of that too, he's hardly going to slate the teams that the majority of the viewers support because then nobody would tolerate him and he's be out of a job, I actually think he does a good job and I couldn't stand him as a player


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,075 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Really like him as a pundit, but I think it's only a matter of time before he says something that will upset set of fans more likely City or Liverpool.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 531 ✭✭✭Ladjacket


    have a lot of time for Neville as a pundit. Respected him as a player but as a person he was not the most likeable. I think most fair-minded people would agree now that he has improved the punditry on sky.

    I liked his little gem on MNF when he spoke about Ronaldo. 'As usual when England are knocked out of a tournament, they look for a scapegoat'. Zing!

    When you compare it to the likes of Redknapp who will not criticise his mates at all, Neville is honest and forthright in his views.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭deman


    Why wouldn't he be biased? He's English. Does George Hamilton not show bias towards Ireland?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,075 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    deman wrote: »
    Why wouldn't he be biased? He's English. Does George Hamilton not show bias towards Ireland?

    think your spot on.

    EVENFLOW



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,206 ✭✭✭gustavo


    I don't mind the English commentators being overly pro English - it's when the Irish ones do it that it gets annoying


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,631 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I think most country's commentators are going to be biased when they report on matches involving their own, it's what the public wants.

    We just get all uppity about it because of history with the English, but I'm sure the Portuguese think the same of the Spanish coverage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭Hangballlouie


    In the studio, he is the best there is in England. Co-commentating he is ok, but when he is analysing in the studio he is quality.

    I'm a Liverpool fan and was a bit worried when he got the gig full-time but he hasn't been biased at all in the EPL IMO.

    He has a fantastic knowledge of the game. Has won it all, and played for and against great teams.

    Sky should have just him and Souness doing the analysing from now on, get rid of the other clowns.

    Btw, I got some stick from my LFC mates for buying it, but his book is a very good read. Recommended reading for all football fans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    I've been really surprised at how good he is. His technical knowledge of the game is a step above anyone else on Sky or any other broadcaster in my opinion, Giles is the closest to him in my book which says a lot about the MOTD or ITV lads. His balanced unbiased approach is what really surprised me, I was shocked when they announced he'd be doing it at the start, thought he'd be totally pro Manc/anti everyone else but he's proved himself since.

    Calling Michael Oliver 'Michael Owen' after the Man U/Fulham game, bit tongue in cheek I wonder?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,342 ✭✭✭✭That_Guy


    I like Gary Neville as a pundit. I didn't think I would but his insight is fantastic at times. Don't really like him on commentary because his voice is a bit annoying but overall he's a decent enough pundit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    Think his very good on the premiership , Breth of fresh air.

    As for this European football ye talk off I thought that finished a few weeks ago :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭token101


    Gary Neville should be drafted into RTE for the Euros, especially for the England games. Him vs Dunphy and Giles would be unbelievable TV!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,687 ✭✭✭✭jack presley


    deman wrote: »
    Why wouldn't he be biased? He's English. Does George Hamilton not show bias towards Ireland?

    Nevilles no George Hamilton. Not until he has a 'danger here' moment anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭carlop


    astrofool wrote: »
    I think most country's commentators are going to be biased when they report on matches involving their own, it's what the public wants.

    We just get all uppity about it because of history with the English, but I'm sure the Portuguese think the same of the Spanish coverage.

    The Portuguese more than likely don't watch or pay any attention to Spanish media coverage. We're a bit of a special case because we nearly are more immersed in the media of another country rather than our own.

    From experience every country's press are just as bad, if not worse than the British. If you watch any La Liga match in Spain I guarantee you'll hear it referred to as the best league in the world three or four times per match, and the commentators make absolutely no attempt to hide their bias in European games.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,942 ✭✭✭missingtime


    As a Liverpool fan I find Gary Neville to be a very good commentator. He is sincere and has a genuine love for the game. He is confident in what he wants to say and is well able to back himself up.

    He also doesn't take himself so seriously, and is well able to make jokes about himself. He made a quip about celebrating in front of fans when Evra did at the Liverpool match.

    BRILLO.jpg

    Gonna be in the shower for a while....


Advertisement