Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Law Firm Big 5 Salaries 2012

Options
2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭xoxyx


    Just to elaborate on a point made earlier on about the top 5: the salaries may be higher, but the salary : hours worked ratio may be a hell of a lot lower. Having worked in one of the topper of the top 5, I remember a NQ calculating that he was earning lower than minimum wage - the number of hours he worked vs. his yearly salary had him coming out with just over €7.50 p/h. (Can't remember exactly, but his charge out rate at the time was approx. €220 p/h.) While it does depend on the department you get into, my experience is that 8am - 10pm two or three months in a row is not unusual. You can forget about work/life balance - work/work balance is a hard enough trick to manage and, realistically - if you really want to make a mark and move up through the ranks quickly - that's not going to change for at least 5 - 7 years.

    In saying that, you would not believe the clout that, firstly, being accepted in a top 5 law firm, and, secondly, being kept on will give you. I think of it as The Devil Wears Prada" period. A few years of working in a big firm may kick start your career in a huge way, even if you decide not to stay on, as long as you leave on good terms.

    A bonus for trainees getting into a top firm (that hasn't been mentioned) is the amount of support they get. I never know how trainees do it when they work in small offices without many, if any, peers. Guaranteed that in a big firm you'll have people in the same boat as you and people who did it all a year before, and there tends to be a huge support network.

    I've seen this all from a good few angles and this stage, and I'd just say to be wary of considering jobs based on how much you'll get paid for them, without considering how much they might take from you. While times have changed, you can still qualify and earn pots of money - but the top firms aren't successful because they pay so much. They are well versed in utilising the top talent that they hire to their full extent and they will ensure that you earn your every cent that you make.

    But, with that cheerful note, I wish you the best of luck! There are still plenty of opportunities out there, but make sure you think of yourself along the way!! ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,455 ✭✭✭krd


    xoxyx wrote: »
    In saying that, you would not believe the clout that, firstly, being accepted in a top 5 law firm, and, secondly, being kept on will give you. I think of it as The Devil Wears Prada" period. A few years of working in a big firm may kick start your career in a huge way, even if you decide not to stay on, as long as you leave on good terms.

    Yes.."good terms"...........Bad terms is having the wrong psychopath on your tail. And they can come after you, and get their rat faced little helpers, after you for a very long time.

    A bonus for trainees getting into a top firm (that hasn't been mentioned) is the amount of support they get. I never know how trainees do it when they work in small offices without many, if any, peers. Guaranteed that in a big firm you'll have people in the same boat as you and people who did it all a year before, and there tends to be a huge support network.


    The "huge support network" is the rest of the religious cult. Work hard and don't complain....There's a slice of that pie in the sky, just as long as you hold out long enough. Don't complain....keep that vacant look on your face, along with that waxy joyless perma smile.

    I've seen this all from a good few angles and this stage, and I'd just say to be wary of considering jobs based on how much you'll get paid for them, without considering how much they might take from you. While times have changed, you can still qualify and earn pots of money

    Yes...."pots of money" just at the end of that rainbow.....Have some Koolaid kiddo....the money wagon is comin' just around the corner. Chooo Chooo
    - but the top firms aren't successful because they pay so much.

    Why are they so "successful"?............If they don't pay so much.......I mean on this thread, they were making out people could start on 50, 60 thousand....if they don't pay so much, why are people saying things like that.

    No one is starting on 50 to 60k.....NO FCUKING ONE.....

    They are well versed in utilising the top talent that they hire to their full extent and they will ensure that you earn your every cent that you make.

    They bleed you f'ing dry........And what makes you think you're so "talented"?..because they told you so...because they gave you a little money - and it was a little money. Are any of these people extraordinarily talented in any way really - and I don't mean they won a running and jumping medal somewhere before starting work for the firm.


    "I'm talented...I look the business in a suit....I put in "face time"....the people I work with are my "support network"...They're my "friends".......They'd never stick a knife in my back.....Just as long as I'm careful enough not to upset anyone and keep "fitting in".....And it's nothing like being in a George Orwell novel.... nothing at all like that....I'm a free person...In the free market....hurrah for Aviva Stadium, rugby and the free market....nothing at all like the Soviet Union....nothing at all like that"
    But, with that cheerful note, I wish you the best of luck! There are still plenty of opportunities out there, but make sure you think of yourself along the way!! ;)


    Yes....Indeed......Keep looking after Number 1


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 hopefullegal


    Krd there's nothing wrong with making legitimate criticism of the top 5 firms. But tone down the language a bit.

    Out of interest were you a trainee in one yourself once?

    Oh and I don't think anyone was suggesting that any trainees are starting on 50/60k.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭xoxyx


    krd wrote: »
    Good points.

    Totally know where you're coming from in addressing everything I said. After all, I said all those things in a cautionary spirit. For example:
    krd wrote: »
    Yes.."good terms"...........Bad terms is having the wrong psychopath on your tail. And they can come after you, and get their rat faced little helpers, after you for a very long time.

    This is true. I saw one associate leave the firm after four years' PQ experience and she found it very hard to get another job. She is extremely bright and good at her job, but she didn't fit into the mentality being an earthy person concerned with reducing air miles and eating organic 'cause it's good for the planet (not 'cause it's good for your image / skin). The legal circle in Ireland is a small one, and lots of people are friends with people who will block you if you piss them off. (That's in an extreme enough case - but happens to people who join top firms and leave on bad terms.)

    However, it's not all as bad as you make out.
    xoxyx wrote: »
    A bonus for trainees getting into a top firm (that hasn't been mentioned) is the amount of support they get. I never know how trainees do it when they work in small offices without many, if any, peers. Guaranteed that in a big firm you'll have people in the same boat as you and people who did it all a year before, and there tends to be a huge support network.
    krd wrote: »
    The "huge support network" is the rest of the religious cult. Work hard and don't complain....There's a slice of that pie in the sky, just as long as you hold out long enough. Don't complain....keep that vacant look on your face, along with that waxy joyless perma smile.

    That's not a good way to look at things. The "huge support network" is comprised, mostly, of trainees. They may be well on the way to joining "the cult", but they're not there yet. And believe me, they complain a-plenty. This is a period where they (IMO) should be soaking up everything they can get -- but, if they're not at a stage where they can distinguish between a job that will work for them and a job that they can work for, then this is a fault of their education.
    xoxyx wrote: »
    I've seen this all from a good few angles and this stage, and I'd just say to be wary of considering jobs based on how much you'll get paid for them, without considering how much they might take from you. While times have changed, you can still qualify and earn pots of money
    krd wrote: »
    Yes...."pots of money" just at the end of that rainbow.....Have some Koolaid kiddo....the money wagon is comin' just around the corner. Chooo Chooo

    Yes "pots of money". And I used that phrase deliberately. The point I was making is that there still is an opportunity to make many monies. It's harder than it once was - but it's still there. NQS still may propel themselves into high salaried positions if they think outside the box and work hard (I see it all the time as the Top 10 have been hiring for the past year and a half and then some and there are some serious opportunities for promotion in the lower 5).

    Those are the points I feel I can address. While I agree with some of your sentiment, I think you're going a bit too far and you are amplifying arguments that have already been made without any grounding.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭Jev/N


    krd wrote: »
    Rabble

    Seriously, who pissed in your Cornflakes this morning?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    krd wrote: »
    It's called a "face time" culture. And it's fools gold to work for any firm who do it. When you breakdown how much you're being paid, it could be in and around minimum wage.

    10 to 20 hours or real work in a week. And then 50 of pure arse kissing.

    These firms also have a habit of chewing people up and spitting them out really quickly. They sack people for the sake of it. You have to survive on your "social skills" (ability to kiss ass, and not seem a threat to whoever the nearby psychopaths are). The descriptions of these places I've heard are awful. Everyone is terrified they're about to be sacked. Everyone is "working" excessive hours. They're more like religious cults with psychopathic leaders.

    And I wouldn't believe talk of 50 or 60 thousand. These firms pay the minimum possible. People tend to exaggerate.

    Of course. If you're pompous, psychopathic, like working practice that are so restrictive it's worse than prison, and that you have to spend all your time socialising with the pompous psychopaths you work with or risk getting the sack, then.....Maybe the big firm is the kind of place that would suit you down to the ground.

    All that glitters, is not gold.

    At one point I was working around 70 billable hours a week (so probably spending around 90 hours over 6 days). Was it hell? Not really, it was a lot of work but I enjoyed the big case.

    I find it offensive that you would say that people who work long hours are there for the "arse-kissing" or that that's all that's needed to survive/thrive.

    I genuinely enjoy working with the team and department, we get to look at huge deals that affect the country and the partners/associates/trainees who work alongside me/who I work for are all dedicated and knowledgeable professionals. You may be there till 12 but hey, the job needs to be done.

    Certainly, if you don't enjoy the legal work you shouldn't be in one of these firms. But if you don't enjoy legal work you probably shouldn't be working in the legal industry.

    Yes you can get huge hours, you may be limited in time for other things, but it is a choice and many of my fellow trainees were able to leave at reasonable hours (6ish). It depends on departments and whether it's the peak season or not. I did not encounter one person who was simply in the office for the sake of being there, rather than being there to do a job.

    Some benefits of working long days:
    1. you appreciate the weekends and holidays more
    2. you get to save a lot of money since you're in the office all day ;)

    So, in conclusion - big 5 isn't for everyone, do try and get an internship to see if it's for you. Some people get a buzz off closing a multi-million euro deal at 5am in the morning. Horses for courses :)

    But I don't think it's fair to paint a picture of the firms as being a backstabbing political game of sorts. People don't get far by being unprofessional and hard work is rewarded. Face-time amounts for little if you have no substance to back it up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭mitzicat


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    At one point I was working around 70 billable hours a week (so probably spending around 90 hours over 6 days). Was it hell? Not really, it was a lot of work but I enjoyed the big case.

    I find it offensive that you would say that people who work long hours are there for the "arse-kissing" or that that's all that's needed to survive/thrive.

    I genuinely enjoy working with the team and department, we get to look at huge deals that affect the country and the partners/associates/trainees who work alongside me/who I work for are all dedicated and knowledgeable professionals. You may be there till 12 but hey, the job needs to be done.

    Certainly, if you don't enjoy the legal work you shouldn't be in one of these firms. But if you don't enjoy legal work you probably shouldn't be working in the legal industry.

    Yes you can get huge hours, you may be limited in time for other things, but it is a choice and many of my fellow trainees were able to leave at reasonable hours (6ish). It depends on departments and whether it's the peak season or not. I did not encounter one person who was simply in the office for the sake of being there, rather than being there to do a job.

    Some benefits of working long days:
    1. you appreciate the weekends and holidays more
    2. you get to save a lot of money since you're in the office all day ;)

    So, in conclusion - big 5 isn't for everyone, do try and get an internship to see if it's for you. Some people get a buzz off closing a multi-million euro deal at 5am in the morning. Horses for courses :)

    But I don't think it's fair to paint a picture of the firms as being a backstabbing political game of sorts. People don't get far by being unprofessional and hard work is rewarded. Face-time amounts for little if you have no substance to back it up.

    Agreed. That's the way it is in any billable industry. People have a modicum of intelligence know that being able to bill 70 hours in a week is excellent, business is good. It's how you make your money, or, if a lowly trainee/newly qualified, show you are essential. People who complain about poor work/life balance at the beginning of a law career should find a new profession. I fear some of this is chalked up to young people who were coddled by their mammies and now can't hack it in the real world.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,968 ✭✭✭McCrack


    Thirdfox out of interest what is a typical length of day for the various levels (trainee, associate and partner) in a big firm? I have always and continue to work in small practices so I have really no idea. I have certainly heard anecdotally from colleagues that there are often 5 am finishes in these places and back in again for 9 or 10 am.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭johnfás


    McCrack wrote: »
    Thirdfox out of interest what is a typical length of day for the various levels (trainee, associate and partner) in a big firm? I have always and continue to work in small practices so I have really no idea. I have certainly heard anecdotally from colleagues that there are often 5 am finishes in these places and back in again for 9 or 10 am.

    I generally work about 8:30 - about 6:30. Obviously in the waves and troughs that can vary a bit. 5am finishes do exist, but are rarities generally caused by something unforeseen. You might get a week of them and then not experience it again for 9 months. Obviously periodically you are in until after 10 if there is a major issue that has arisen. The FaceTime argument is pure nonsense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 415 ✭✭shaneybaby


    mitzicat wrote: »
    Agreed. That's the way it is in any billable industry. People have a modicum of intelligence know that being able to bill 70 hours in a week is excellent, business is good. It's how you make your money, or, if a lowly trainee/newly qualified, show you are essential. People who complain about poor work/life balance at the beginning of a law career should find a new profession. I fear some of this is chalked up to young people who were coddled by their mammies and now can't hack it in the real world.

    While I agree with the sentence before it i'm not sure the last part is quite fair. Just because you work 70/80 hours a week every week doesn't make you someone who can 'hack it'. There's nothing macho about spending your entire 20's and/or 30's being involved in big deals and shiney offices.

    I realised a little too late how doing those hours can affect your life, relationships and your health. I'm not some hippy sh1t who thinks we should all be out working the fields and feeding butterflys and i still run a decent time on a mile but there HAS to be a work life balance. I saw it in the last industry i worked where 70 hour weeks were the norm, great money nice offices, the works. i saw the divorces and mental breakdowns that went with it when things started to catch up on people. Yup i made enough cash to last me and maybe for some people that money is enough reward. Enjoy the cut and trust of being in a commercial firm (like me;) but make sure the rest of it doesn't pass you by (unlike me;)

    (Maybe i'm having a epiphany like yer man in Goldman Sachs or something;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    McCrack wrote: »
    Thirdfox out of interest what is a typical length of day for the various levels (trainee, associate and partner) in a big firm? I have always and continue to work in small practices so I have really no idea. I have certainly heard anecdotally from colleagues that there are often 5 am finishes in these places and back in again for 9 or 10 am.
    johnfás wrote: »
    I generally work about 8:30 - about 6:30. Obviously in the waves and troughs that can vary a bit. 5am finishes do exist, but are rarities generally caused by something unforeseen. You might get a week of them and then not experience it again for 9 months. Obviously periodically you are in until after 10 if there is a major issue that has arisen. The FaceTime argument is pure nonsense.

    Sounds about right - I'd be getting out at 7 but only start at 9 so quite similar to Johnfas there.

    As for partners/associates it really depends. You have those who burn the midnight oil (i.e. still there when I'm gone at 11) and those who encourage us to leave at 6 when they're gone too.

    I've never had a 5am finish but one trainee did. So it is rare - it's only at the end of big cases when, like johnfas says, something pops up that must be dealt with before the deal is signed at 9 the next morning etc.

    Oh and another "benefit" of working long hours - you never notice any traffic on the roads :D I remember finishing work at 5:30 one day and getting on a jam-packed bus, felt so strange :P

    As for work/life balance - I think it's a situation where you work hard and play harder. People are still involved in their sports teams here and can even be given time off to compete.

    That's another benefit of working in the big 5 - generally your fellow trainees will be exceptional people in many fields, academia, sporting, etc.

    Would I work 70 hours a week non-stop? Nope - that's why I didn't go to New York or London. It's definitely more manageable over here. That's where my conscious work/life balance decision was made -

    "I could get 180,000 dollars a year plus bonuses in NY and slave away for 12 months 70-80 hours a week or get a lot less money, but also have free time to enjoy for myself while still doing "big" work that I'll find challenging and enjoyable".


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 hopefullegal


    Thanks a lot for all the info guys. Seems that if you love what you do you don't mind the hours. Friends have said, like you have, that hours are dependent on the department, your partner, and the time of year.

    Out of interest was one of the earlier posters correct when he/she said that NQ in the Big 5 are normally on 50k? It's much lower than the figures I've heard anecdotally. NQs in London seem to be on at least 60k sterling straight away.

    Also I don't understand fully how your career progresses in the firms. Is it 3yrs trainee, a few yrs qualified, then a few yrs as a senior associate, and eventually if you're lucky, partner?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭johnfás


    Thanks a lot for all the info guys. Seems that if you love what you do you don't mind the hours. Friends have said, like you have, that hours are dependent on the department, your partner, and the time of year.

    Out of interest was one of the earlier posters correct when he/she said that NQ in the Big 5 are normally on 50k? It's much lower than the figures I've heard anecdotally. NQs in London seem to be on at least 60k sterling straight away.

    Also I don't understand fully how your career progresses in the firms. Is it 3yrs trainee, a few yrs qualified, then a few yrs as a senior associate, and eventually if you're lucky, partner?

    There's no point comparing qualified salaries to London - its a different market. The cost of living in London will of course eat up alot of the difference too.

    And yes, your training contract is generally 2.5-3 years. Look at bright water salary survey for salary projections.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 josephotoole91


    Sorry to disappoint you hopefullegal but the bridge water salary survey for 2012 has the BEST paid NQ in Dublin on €47,000 pa. The highest paid partners are on €180,000. If that's not enough for you it's London or NYC for the big bucks! There are no partners on a mil a year here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    I assume those are the salaried partners and not the equity ones. Equity partners can earn a lot more - though to get to the very top takes some doing!


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 purpleglory


    That 180k figure must relate to salaried partners and even then it sounds quite low to me. Equity partners in some of the top 5 would be clearing a lot more than 180k after tax nevermind before tax


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 josephotoole91


    I seriously doubt there are partners in the Big 5 firms earning more than 180,000 after tax. That would mean 400,000 gross at least which seems unrealistic.

    Also most NQs in the Big 5 would be on 45,000 max.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 purpleglory


    Those figures are just wrong. 45k max implies that after 3 years training some of the NQs are getting 7k more a year than they were before they went to blackhall. They are circa 55k and can be slightly more.

    Sure some of the trainees in blackhall are on about 45k.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 josephotoole91


    What firm pays trainees more than €40,000? I think most are still at €35,000 at the most after the pay cuts nearly all the big 5 imposed after the crash. Do you actually know personally of any trainee on more than that?

    As many posters have said pay inc bonuses is in the mid to maybe at a stretch high forties. Unless you know the mythical NQ on €60,000 in Dublin :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 purpleglory


    Maples pay at least 40k and more if what I hear is correct. I personally know of people on more than 35k and am myself as a trainee with one of the Big 5. All of these cuts in the crash have mostly been done away with by the firms and salaries have gone back up in the last couple of years. Not trying to get into an argument here but your figures are on the lowside


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12 josephotoole91


    No worries at all! I may very well be wrong, working on out of date information. I should point out I don't mind if people are on good money. From this thread it sounds like you work for it!

    I forgot that a lot firms pay exam bonuses after Blackhall exams too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 purpleglory


    No worries. I do agree with some of the above points. I have friends in the magic circle who are on slightly more money than the firms pay here. But even they admit that with the extra cost of living in London (820 a month for rent) and the extra hours there is not much in the difference at all.

    The bonuses are a small factor but the best bonus that I have heard is an extra weeks holidays from one of the top firms.


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 hopefullegal


    Just to bring the thread back on topic. We've got:

    Trainees
    MC - around 40k
    A&L - 35k (but figure is a few years out of date)
    AC - ?
    MOP -?
    McCanns - ?
    William Fry - ?

    Newly Qualified
    Consensus is 50-60k depending on the firm (ie Maples at the top probably)

    As I said it would be great if people who actually have TCs could give/confirm figures. Not sure if it is possible to post here anon. People may fear being tracked down ala The Firm!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭Jicked


    krd's rant a few pages back is absolutely hilarious.I love he manages to imply that he hasn't actually worked a day in a big 5 firm in his life. I'm sure there's a great story behind his dealings with a big 5 firm though. Juicy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 252 ✭✭Surinam


    Just to bring the thread back on topic. We've got:

    Trainees
    MC - around 40k
    A&L - 35k (but figure is a few years out of date)
    AC - ?
    MOP -?
    McCanns - ?
    William Fry - ?

    Newly Qualified
    Consensus is 50-60k depending on the firm (ie Maples at the top probably)

    As I said it would be great if people who actually have TCs could give/confirm figures. Not sure if it is possible to post here anon. People may fear being tracked down ala The Firm!

    MOP - 36k
    McCann- 36k but I think this rises through the three yeas of traineeship
    William Fry - 37k this year
    A&L - 35k
    Arthur Cox - 32/33k
    Maples - 40k

    The above are only what I've heard from people in college who got offered TC's this year. Some firms do bonuses based on performance too.

    I'd advise people to get to know firms better before choosing based on perks of the job like pay etc. - for example, you have to like the people you'll be working with too!


  • Registered Users Posts: 370 ✭✭paulanthony


    krd wrote: »
    I've heard, that for the big firm law stuff in London. All of the stuff is boiler plate. They just red pen through what is and isn't applicable. And the rest of the time is purely bollox "face time" - ass kissing clients - looking smort in a smort suit. Etc.

    Some legal work is based on boiler plate agreements etc but the above is not true at all.
    krd wrote: »
    The firms sack people for the sake of sacking them, because it gives a little share price bump to announce and execute "cost cutting" - doesn't matter they hire replacements nearly straight away - blood letting for the sake of blood letting seems to give the "water voles" of the market a hard on.

    Law firms don't have share prices.
    krd wrote: »
    And I've heard too, that even the big firms think their own lawyers are sh1te, and hire in the small firms to do the niggly bits.

    That's nonsense too. The only time other firms are consulted (by the big firms anyway) is on advices relating to other jurisdictions.


  • Registered Users Posts: 370 ✭✭paulanthony


    krd wrote: »
    No one is starting on 50 to 60k.....NO FCUKING ONE.....

    That's wrong.
    krd wrote: »
    They bleed you f'ing dry........And what makes you think you're so "talented"?..because they told you so...because they gave you a little money - and it was a little money. Are any of these people extraordinarily talented in any way really - and I don't mean they won a running and jumping medal somewhere before starting work for the firm.

    You are expected to work hard, but are paid well and nobody is being forced to stay - there are plenty of opportunities elsewhere for people who have trained or worked in the big firms.
    krd wrote: »
    "I'm talented...I look the business in a suit....I put in "face time"....the people I work with are my "support network"...They're my "friends".......They'd never stick a knife in my back.....Just as long as I'm careful enough not to upset anyone and keep "fitting in".....And it's nothing like being in a George Orwell novel.... nothing at all like that....I'm a free person...In the free market....hurrah for Aviva Stadium, rugby and the free market....nothing at all like the Soviet Union....nothing at all like that"

    OK.....


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 hopefullegal


    Thanks Surinam!

    Paulanthony do you know what NQs im the big 5 normally start on?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭johnfás


    It should be added that you'll work the long hours as a trainee in any firm inside the top 10 - 15 firms in Dublin, not just in the "big 5".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 415 ✭✭shaneybaby


    johnfás wrote: »
    It should be added that you'll work the long hours as a trainee in any firm inside the top 10 - 15 firms in Dublin, not just in the "big 5".

    Id nearly say in any firm in dublin city these days. There are plenty others trying to get into that top 15 placings.


Advertisement