Allowing Test Drives when selling

Whyner

I'm selling my car and have someone viewing it tonight

The car is no longer insured as I transferred it over to my new car. How do people handle the insurance situation when you obviously have to allow them to test drive it?

It's not possible right?

Voodoomelon

Some potential buyers insurance policies do not require the vehicle to be insured by another party, ie you. But this depends on their insurance.

You would need them to bring proof of this if you want to be certain. Because if you get pulled by the Gardaí whilst both of you are in the car and their policy does not allow this, both of you will be done for no insurance.

It depends entirely on their own insurance policy.
My zurich policy gives me third party insurance on any vehicle under 2000cc which is not registered in mine, or my spouse's name, even if that vehicle is not otherwise insured.

MugMugs

If they have a Third Party Extension and show you proof of the same then they are road legal to drive your car from an Insurance point of view. Check the policy document for details on if that is the case.

As for any damage they cause to your car. You could have faith that they will repair any damage they cause if they cause any or you could request they sign a form giving you an indemnity should an incident occur. Recovery of this would no doubt be difficult though.

One would assume with you selling a car that you would facilitate road legal drivers with the option of a road test.

Merch

I would not allow someone to drive it if it or they were not insured under their own policy and that they agreed to that. Depending on the value of the car, I would nearly get them to put that in writing.Having said that regardless of the value of the vehicle, if they hit someone or something how much your vehicle is worth might not matter.
I'd be looking for their policy and contact their insurer with them regarding that, I'd also be looking for a drivers licence and ensure that and their policy allows them to drive your vehicle by confirming that with the insurer.

For their own piece of mind, I'd assume they would want to know they are covered or they could possibly face the consequences of driving without insurance if stopped.
Someone has mentioned above (post#2) that as the owner and as a passenger you may also face consequences if their insurance doesnt cover them for driving, I am unsure how accurate that is but it is something you need to find out.

seamus

Merch wrote: »

I would not allow someone to drive it if it or they were not insured under their own policy and that they agreed to that, depending on the cost of the car, I would nearly get them to put that in writing.

It is an offence to allow someone to drive your car uninsured and will result in disqualification, fines and jail time for you.

CiniO

This actually shows how messed up and stupid is the whole Irish car insurance system.

Main aim of the insurance requirement should be to make sure that every one on the road is insured. Irish system allows for thousands of situations, where there are uninsured drivers on the road.

Tazio

For any car I've sold privately....

I temporarily moved insurance on to the car for sale (via web - Aviva) prior to a potential buyer calling. I've also asked potential drivers calling to bring license and proof of comprehensive insurance.

Also, don't be afraid to refuse a potential buyer if you get the 'tyre kicker' feeling.. no offense intended to them, but trust your gut! You'll get a good feeling anyway over the phone by the tone of the conversation... imo.

Pick up the phone and ask your insurance company how they suggest you handle the sale too.

I hope your sale works out ok...

CiniO

CiniO wrote: »

This actually shows how messed up and stupid is the whole Irish car insurance system.

Main aim of the insurance requirement should be to make sure that every one on the road is insured. Irish system allows for thousands of situations, where there are uninsured drivers on the road.

But even if the OPs car was insured, the potential buyer would not have fully comprehensive insurance on it anyway (unless the OP had open drive). I can't really see how the insurance system is to blame for situations like these.

Whyner

I've requested their insurance details so will see what they say. Otherwise it's a 2nd gear spin in the cul de sac

CiniO

Deleted User wrote: »

But even if the OPs car was insured, the potential buyer would not have fully comprehensive insurance on it anyway (unless the OP had open drive). I can't really see how the insurance system is to blame for situations like these.

How do they manage in other countries, where there are not "named driver thing", but just if car is insured, everyone is allowed to drive it.

CiniO

CiniO wrote: »

How do they manage in other countries, where there are "named driver thing", but just if car is insured, everyone is allowed to drive it.

You can do that here, it's called open drive, but very few people choose to take the open drive option (or even look into it) because of the cost.

Regardless though, even if the OP did have open driver, he has moved his insurance to another car, so it wouldn't apply.

Gophur

seamus wrote: »

It is an offence to allow someone to drive your car uninsured and will result in disqualification, fines and jail time for you.

For the love of God, yet more nonsensical advice on this forum.

Show us some evidence of people who have been disqualified and jailed for allowing someone to drive a car uninsured?

If you cannot, then please refrain from posting such garbage.

CiniO

Deleted User wrote: »

You can do that here, it's called open drive, but very few people choose to take the open drive option (or even look into it) because of the cost.

Regardless though, even if the OP did have open driver, he has moved his insurance to another car, so it wouldn't apply.

In Poland there is a system, that every car which is registered must have at least third party insurance at all times, and this insurance must cover anyone to drive. When a car is sold, insurance policy is sold with it.

Thanks to that, there isn't really any problem with uninsured drivers, as they just don't exist.

Johntegr

You do 1 of 2 things.

1. They bring a copy of their insurance cert to show they have 3rd party extension on any car that isn't their own. However read it properly. Some companies require that the car being driven has an active policy on it.

2. They ring their insurance company and temporarily transfer their full cover over for a half hour or whatever amount of test driving they want to do.

Keep in mind with option 1, if they have an accident, your car is not covered. Only the car they hit.

Also, seeing as you took your policy off your car to put it on your new one, that car is now not covered should it be stolen and/or damaged.

seamus

Gophur wrote: »

For the love of God, yet more nonsensical advice on this forum.

Show us some evidence of people who have been disqualified and jailed for allowing someone to drive a car uninsured?

If you cannot, then please refrain from posting such garbage.

http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1961/en/act/pub/0024/sec0056.html#sec56

Road Traffic Act, Section 56, subsection 3 provides that the owner of a vehicle which is driven uninsured is liable for a fine and jail time. The Second Schedule of the Act also allows for the owner to be disqualified by way an ancillary disqualification order.

Where a person contravenes subsection (1) of this section, he and, if he is not the owner of the vehicle, such owner shall each be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding one hundred pounds or, at the discretion of the court, to imprisonment for any term not exceeding six months or to both such fine and such imprisonment.

The fine has obviously been updated as time went on.

Please check your facts before dismissing posts as "Garbage".

Whether or not anyone has been charged with this is irrelevant. It's an offence and a Garda could easily choose to charge you with it.

CiniO

I found one thing interesting.
I'm a bit fussy when it comes to buying cars, and it's usually on average at least 10 cars which I go to see and in some cases testdrive, before I decide to buy.
So generally, I've test driven a lot of cars, and in most cases what owners were doing, they were just giving me the keys, and let go on my own to test drive it.

Nothing like this ever happened to me when I was living in Poland, neither anytime I did let anyone test-drive my car like that.

Would you guys give someone a car to test drive on his own?


PS - No one ever asked me for proof of insurance before test drive.
Even more - when I was buying my first car, I told the lady I was not insured, and she said she didn't mind as it was just a test drive, so surely her insurer wouldn't mind

CiniO

CiniO wrote: »

In Poland there is a system, that every car which is registered must have at least third party insurance at all times, and this insurance must cover anyone to drive. When a car is sold, insurance policy is sold with it.

Thanks to that, there isn't really any problem with uninsured drivers, as they just don't exist.

But that system still wouldn't protect the OPs car - which is obviously what he is interested in doing.

Gophur

seamus wrote: »

http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1961/en/act/pub/0024/sec0056.html#sec56

Road Traffic Act, Section 56, subsection 3 provides that the owner of a vehicle which is driven uninsured is liable for a fine and jail time. The Second Schedule of the Act also allows for the owner to be disqualified by way an ancillary disqualification order.



The fine has obviously been updated as time went on.

Please check your facts before dismissing posts as "Garbage".

Whether or not anyone has been charged with this is irrelevant. It's an offence and a Garda could easily choose to charge you with it.

You are back-tracking!

Your original post stated "...will result in disqualification, fines and jail time for you."

You are now saying that the "....Garda could easily choose to charge you with it!"

So? Which is it?

I stand by my comment. Your original post was unadulterated nonsense. Hysterical and completely OTT.

Sure the OP might get into some bother but jail and disqualification are not guaranteed, if convicted and found guilty of such an offence.

seamus

Gophur wrote: »

You are back-tracking!

And you're being a pedant. Seems like your blood sugars are low, go have a cookie.

There's nothing factually incorrect in my posts. You would be a complete moron to allow anyone to drive your car uninsured under any circumstances.

djimi

CiniO wrote: »

So generally, I've test driven a lot of cars, and in most cases what owners were doing, they were just giving me the keys, and let go on my own to test drive it.

Anyone stupid enough to do this deserves to never see their car again tbf...

kildare.17hmr

Gophur wrote: »

seamus wrote: »

It is an offence to allow someone to drive your car uninsured and will result in disqualification, fines and jail time for you.

For the love of God, yet more nonsensical advice on this forum.

Show us some evidence of people who have been disqualified and jailed for allowing someone to drive a car uninsured?

If you cannot, then please refrain from posting such garbage.

Friend of mine ended up in court a few years ago for letting a lad drive his car, they guy told him he had insurance and even showed a policy. Anyway he walked out of court a grand out of pocket because of it and got points or an endorsment on his licence, cant remember which but his insurance went up after it too

Gophur

seamus wrote: »

And you're being a pedant. Seems like your blood sugars are low, go have a cookie.
..............

Now you're a doctor? Thanks, but no.

seamus wrote: »

.......

There's nothing factually incorrect in my posts.........

There is.
Go back and read what you stated would happen, then back-tracked to say could happen. You offered definite advice that was wrong.

seamus wrote: »

......... You would be a complete moron to allow anyone to drive your car uninsured under any circumstances.

That's a different point entirely.

Gophur

kildare.17hmr wrote: »

Friend of mine ended up in court a few years ago for letting a lad drive his car, they guy told him he had insurance and even showed a policy. Anyway he walked out of court a grand out of pocket because of it and got points or an endorsment on his licence, cant remember which but his insurance went up after it too

And that's what "could" happen. It's not definite and not guaranteed.

Merch

CiniO wrote: »

In Poland there is a system, that every car which is registered must have at least third party insurance at all times, and this insurance must cover anyone to drive. When a car is sold, insurance policy is sold with it.

Thanks to that, there isn't really any problem with uninsured drivers, as they just don't exist.

So if it's registered, it has 3rd party insurance? is this registration annually? i assume if it's annually and it isn't re-registered then the insurance goes out of date and then being uninsured. It cant be a one off registration,when sold firstly, so it must be possible for it to go out of date somehow, or so cheap as to be not worth considering to allow to happen as an option.

CiniO wrote: »

I found one thing interesting.
I'm a bit fussy when it comes to buying cars, and it's usually on average at least 10 cars which I go to see and in some cases testdrive, before I decide to buy.
So generally, I've test driven a lot of cars, and in most cases what owners were doing, they were just giving me the keys, and let go on my own to test drive it.

Nothing like this ever happened to me when I was living in Poland, neither anytime I did let anyone test-drive my car like that.

Would you guys give someone a car to test drive on his own?


PS - No one ever asked me for proof of insurance before test drive.
Even more - when I was buying my first car, I told the lady I was not insured, and she said she didn't mind as it was just a test drive, so surely her insurer wouldn't mind

In answer to the last bit, hell no , but I have come across the nonchalant attitude you describe to test drives and insurance during them quite a bit, when buying or just off people from their own experience (either selling or buying). Its a bit crazy really. If thats fussy then I'm an OCD mental case.

CiniO

Deleted User wrote: »

But that system still wouldn't protect the OPs car - which is obviously what he is interested in doing.

If OP had a full comprehensive insurance, it would.

CiniO

CiniO wrote: »

If OP had a full comprehensive insurance, it would.

But the OP wouldn't be the one driving??

You said that the system in poland ensured all cars were covered with third party insurance. So that would only cover a third party, not the OPs car

CiniO

Merch wrote: »

So if it's registered, it has 3rd party insurance? is this registration annually? i assume if it's annually and it isn't re-registered then the insurance goes out of date and then being uninsured. It cant be a one off registration,when sold firstly, so it must be possible for it to go out of date somehow, or so cheap as to be not worth considering to allow to happen as an option.

What I meant is just if car is registered in the country once (when it's new or imported secondhand), receives a registration number, and since then it's regsitered at all times, until it's scrapped or exported. That's it.
So generally speaking every car must have at least third party insurance at all times.
And yes - it is cheap.
Depends on engine size, owners age and NCB, usually between €60 and €250 per annum.

In answer to the last bit, hell no , but I have come across the nonchalant attitude you describe to test drives and insurance during them quite a bit, when buying or just off people from their own experience (either selling or buying). Its a bit crazy really. If thats fussy then I'm an OCD mental case.

When I said I was fussy, I meant that I need to go through a good few cars to see and check, before I could decide to buy that one which was the best, in oppose to people who just go, take a quick look at car and buy it.

CiniO

Deleted User wrote: »

But the OP wouldn't be the one driving??

You said that the system in poland ensured all cars were covered with third party insurance. So that would only cover a third party, not the OPs car

OK. I didn't add that in addition to third party insurance, you can always buy a comprehensive insurance (which is not obligatory) and covers your own car, no matter who drives it.

So if person selling a car, would have such kind of insurance, it would cover damage to his own car, no matter who was driving.

mathepac

MugMugs wrote: »

If they have a Third Party Extension and show you proof of the same then they are road legal to drive your car from an Insurance point of view...

Incorrect. The potential buyer needs a "Driving Other Cars" extension on his policy.

Johntegr wrote: »

... 1. They bring a copy of their insurance cert to show they have 3rd party extension on any car that isn't their own. ...

Incorrect. The potential buyer needs a "Driving Other Cars" extension on his policy.

Lads in fairness OP has asked for help with a problem. If you don't know the rules & regs please don't post or give inaccurate information; the consequences might be serious. What happens in Poland or elsewhere is all Off-topic as it has no bearing on OP's situation.

If you want to accuse me or report me for back-seat modding, be my guest.

OP if you have an account on askaboutmoney.com login over there and have a look at a key-post I wrote for Brendan a couple of years ago about selling your car. HTH

CiniO

mathepac wrote: »

Incorrect. The potential buyer needs a "Driving Other Cars" extension on his policy.
Incorrect. The potential buyer needs a "Driving Other Cars" extension on his policy.

Lads in fairness OP has asked for help with a problem. If you don't know the rules & regs please don't post or give inaccurate information; the consequences might be serious. What happens in Poland or elsewhere is all Off-topic as it has no bearing on OP's situation.

If you want to accuse me or report me for back-seat modding, be my guest.

OP if you have an account on askaboutmoney.com login over there and have a look at a key-post I wrote for Brendan a couple of years ago about selling your car. HTH

I thoght "third party extension" was just a different name of "driving other cars extension".
Whatever it's called it's still the same.

Beside, we are just chatting here on the subject or around.
That's what the forum is for, really.

Merch

CiniO wrote: »

What I meant is just if car is registered in the country once (when it's new or imported secondhand), receives a registration number, and since then it's regsitered at all times, until it's scrapped or exported. That's it.
So generally speaking every car must have at least third party insurance at all times.
And yes - it is cheap.
Depends on engine size, owners age and NCB, usually between €60 and €250 per annum.

When I said I was fussy[/B], I meant that I need to go through a good few cars to see and check, before I could decide to buy that one which was the best, in oppose to people who just go, take a quick look at car and buy it.

Apologies, I'm a bit confused, you seem to say it happens when the car is registered first (you say, thats it), AND you also say it is annually (at maybe 60 to 250 euros).

So it is an annual payment?

CiniO

Merch wrote: »

Apologies, I'm a bit confused, you seem to say it happens when the car is registered first (you say, thats it),

AND you also say it is annually (at maybe 60 to 250 euros).
So it is an annual payment?

No no...
From the moment car becomes registered first time in the country (aquires registration number) owner must make sure it is insured until the vehicle is sccraped or exported.
Insurance is the same like in Ireland provided by insurance company in a form of annual policies, which cost 60 to 250.
Hope that's understandable now.

Speaking in other words, if you own a car, you must have it insured at all times.
There is no such thing, that you decide not to use a car, keep it at your driveway and don't pay insurance. No such thing. You have to pay insurance no matter if you intend to drive it or not.

Merch

CiniO wrote: »

I thoght "third party extension" was just a different name of "driving other cars extension".
Whatever it's called it's still the same.

Beside, we are just chatting here on the subject or around.
That's what the forum is for, really.

I agree, anyone would be foolish to take advice here and apply it without confirming it to be accurate, its a bit of informal sidetracking.

CiniO wrote: »

No no...
From the moment car becomes registered first time in the country (aquires registration number) owner must make sure it is insured.
Insurance is the same like in Ireland provided by insurance company in a form of annual policies, which cost 60 to 250.
Hope that's understandable now.

I understand now, same as Ireland really.

Anyway, from the OPs perspective, I'd be checking to see someone IS actually covered and licenced to drive the vehicle they are selling, even though a lot of people seem to have a very lax understanding/view of insurance on test drives, certainly I would never allow someone to drive a car on their own if I was selling it, to ensure they didnt do anything crazy or disappear. I'd want to make sure they and I were covered as much as is reasonably possible, some people seem not to mind at all.

Whyner

kildare.17hmr wrote: »

Friend of mine ended up in court a few years ago for letting a lad drive his car, they guy told him he had insurance and even showed a policy. Anyway he walked out of court a grand out of pocket because of it and got points or an endorsment on his licence, cant remember which but his insurance went up after it too

I would be worried about this :eek:

Whyner

Here's another thing, there's is no tax on the car, make a difference?

Merch

Whyner wrote: »

I would be worried about this :eek:

Why? that was a few years ago, not even that poster? do you mean something else?

Whyner wrote: »

Here's another thing, there's is no tax on the car, make a difference?

I'm beginning to wonder about this thread now, right, first off, No Tax, then you cannot be on the road (shouldn't be, and shouldn't need to ask really, I mean if you really don't know, by all means, ask, but people should know that).
Also, I dont mean to be a pedant but,
"There's" means "there is" adding an "is" afterwards is redundant sorry, its like reading, "there is is".

So back to the first quote, why should he be worried??? I'm lost on that one?

Whyner

Merch wrote: »

Why? that was a few years ago, not even that poster? do you mean something else?



I'm beginning to wonder about this thread now,
right, first off, No Tax, then you cannot be on the road (shouldn't be, and shouldn't need to ask really).
Also, I dont mean to be a pedant but,
"There's" means "there is" adding an "is" afterwards is redundant sorry, its like reading, "there is is".

So back to the first quote, why should he be worried??? I'm lost on that one?

Lighten up. I added 's by mistake, well spotted, go log a bug

The car is off the road since end of Jan when the tax expired. Why would I renew it when I have a new car?

I'm not sure I understood the story of the friend above but getting done for allowing someone to drive your car is not appealing to me.

"I'm beginning to wonder about this thread now, " What on earth does this mean?

Johntegr

mathepac wrote: »

Incorrect. The potential buyer needs a "Driving Other Cars" extension on his policy.
Incorrect. The potential buyer needs a "Driving Other Cars" extension on his policy.

That's just a sub heading of the policy. On my certificate of insurance there's just that.

The heading says "Driving other cars"

It then says that "All named drivers on this policy can drive a vehicle under 3rd party cover ONLY provided that such vehicle is not owned by the proposer, does not exceed the value of €50,000,is not modified, is road worthy, has valid tax and is not owned by a member of the trade."

Whyner wrote: »

Here's another thing, there's is no tax on the car, make a difference?

No tax = It shouldn't be on the road.

CiniO

Merch wrote: »

I understand now, same as Ireland really.

After all that, you completely missed my point.
The point was - that it's significently different that Ireland.
In Ireland you have to do really much to make sure no one is driving uninsured. If you want your friend to drive for you as your are tires, you have add him to your insurance policy which might be difficult especially on weekends or evening. If you are selling a car there is a problem as well.
If you forgot to inform your insurance company about any fact about you or car, you might not be insured. Generally speaking, you have to really do a lot to make sure that everyone and everytime is insured while driving your car.
People very often don't care, f.e. with test-drives like described in this thread, and therefore there is quite a lot of uninsured drivers on Irish roads.

In Poland it's the insurance legislation which ensures everyone is covered, and therefore cases of someone driving uninsured nearly doesn't happen.

That's the difference.

Whyner

CiniO wrote: »

After all that, you completely missed my point.
The point was - that it's significently different that Ireland.
In Ireland you have to do really much to make sure no one is driving uninsured. If you want your friend to drive for you as your are tires, you have add him to your insurance policy which might be difficult especially on weekends or evening. If you are selling a car there is a problem as well.
If you forgot to inform your insurance company about any fact about you or car, you might not be insured. Generally speaking, you have to really do a lot to make sure that everyone and everytime is insured while driving your car.
People very often don't care, f.e. with test-drives like described in this thread, and therefore there is quite a lot of uninsured drivers on Irish roads.

In Poland it's the insurance legislation which ensures everyone is covered, and therefore cases of someone driving uninsured nearly doesn't happen.

That's the difference.

Exactly, it's a pain in the hoop. We're not great with cars and laws over here

Jimmy Bottlehead

I still find it insane that the seller let me test drive his Honda S2000 with him not being in the car with me.
If I was selling her in the morning, there's no chance I'd let a stranger head off in my car without me here.

Sound chap though

Anan1

Jimmy Bottlehead wrote: »

I still find it insane that the seller let me test drive his Honda S2000 with him not being in the car with me.
If I was selling her in the morning, there's no chance I'd let a stranger head off in my car without me here.

Sound chap though

And you bought the car. I've done it myself, for the right potential buyer.:)

Whyner

Jimmy Bottlehead wrote: »

I still find it insane that the seller let me test drive his Honda S2000 with him not being in the car with me.
If I was selling her in the morning, there's no chance I'd let a stranger head off in my car without me here.

Sound chap though

Why did he not get in the car with you?

Merch

Whyner wrote: »

Lighten up. I added 's by mistake, well spotted, go log a bug

The car is off the road since end of Jan when the tax expired. Why would I renew it when I have a new car?

I'm not sure I understood the story of the friend above but getting done for allowing someone to drive your car is not appealing to me.

"I'm beginning to wonder about this thread now, " What on earth does this mean?

Well, I did apologise in advance , we seem to have a communication difficulty, I have no idea what log a bug means now?

I meant, Im beginning to wonder because, I wasn't sure if you or the thread was serious at all, honestly thats what i thought when you ask at the start about insurance then only mention way after about tax.
If you dont have one or the other then you cant be on the road with that car.
Well and good if you aren't aware, then you have to ask, better to than not, but really drivers should be aware they need both.

For you own sake, ensure you and your car is covered somehow when out on the road with test drivers as if they knock someone down or hit a car, you likely may be screwed and it wont be worth it. If you have no tax they or you may be in trouble.
Re the renew tax, why you would renew it is so it can be on the road, just cos you have a new car doesnt mean this one shouldnt be taxed also, its not great but its an added selling point plus test drivers may not appreciate you having no tax and them driving it.

Whyner

Ok, fair enough, some good points

I wouldn't tax it because it's a big engine and I wasn't sure I was going to be able to shift it, why waste more money.

I know where I stand now. This thread clearly shows that it's a grey area

Thanks for all replies

creedp

[QUOTEIn Ireland you have to do really much to make sure no one is driving uninsured. If you want your friend to drive for you as your are tires, you have add him to your insurance policy which might be difficult especially on weekends or evening. If you are selling a car there is a problem as well.[/QUOTE]

I presume you mean that if you want comprehensive cover you need to add the driver to your policy. Most people I know have policies which automatically cover any driver over 25 with a full licence on TP basis. I have driven many other people's cars on this basis. Obviously there is an element of risk in that if I crash the car the owner/I is liable for the damage to the car but at least all third part damage is covered. As for the tax situation, how many cars are being driven around this country at present with no tax .. are these people also uninsured? If so the Gardai would want to be more proactive on the matter!

coylemj

We've been over this urban myth so many times it's just become tiresome.

If someone has an insurance policy which allows them to drive 'other cars', it is NOT a condition that the car itself be the primary vehicle on a separate insurance policy i.e. that the car has it's own policy.

I can drive any other car with the permission of the owner which is (1) not owned by me and (2) not hired by me. Those are the only conditions imposed by Axa and having searched several insurance company policy documents, I can assure all and sundry that the same applies to all other Irish insurers.

Most insurance companies say that if you are driving another car and have an accident, you are obliged to claim under the other person's policy but that only applies IF there is such a policy, otherwise your policy will pay out.

OP, if someone turns up with an insurance cert. which says he can drive other cars, he is covered for 3rd party to drive your car. What happens if he wraps your car around a lamp post through his fault is another matter....

CiniO

creedp wrote: »

I presume you mean that if you want comprehensive cover you need to add the driver to your policy. Most people I know have policies which automatically cover any driver over 25 with a full licence on TP basis. I have driven many other people's cars on this basis.

What you are describing, is a open driving policy, and to be honest, I don't know a single person which would have one.
Also by saying - "driver over 25" you they leave space for anyone younger who would not be covered.

As for the tax situation, how many cars are being driven around this country at present with no tax .. are these people also uninsured? If so the Gardai would want to be more proactive on the matter!

Why would they be uninsured?
Tax has nothing to do with insurance.

Anan1

CiniO wrote: »

What you are describing, is a open driving policy, and to be honest, I don't know a single person which would have one.
Also by saying - "driver over 25" you they leave space for anyone younger who would not be covered.

Open driving is when my policy covers you to drive my car. Creedp is talking about a driving other cars extension, whereby my insurance covers me (TP only) to drive your car.

CrowdedHouse

....and here's an interesting thing about Open Driving, my OH has it 'cos she works for an insurance company and gets it very cheap.

According to her if I was driving her car and had an accident the open driving would cover her damages but the third party claim would be against mine if I have 'driving other cars' cover