Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

AAFRP 2012

  • 12-02-2012 1:04pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭


    Ok - decided to geek it up this morning and do a couple of questions.

    Q 1.11 Global Holidays

    You end up revaluing the asset back to what the carrying value would have been if no impairment had of taken place the previous year

    Would it be correct to say this was in accordance with IAS 37 because the carrying value was lower than the recoverable amount. OR is it revalued back to what the carrying value would have been because they have decided to reverse the impairment that took place?


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    Havent looked at it yet so cant answer your question but would be interested to hear how people are going to approach studying for this? What grade are you aiming for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 738 ✭✭✭Whiplash85


    It has to be a competent really.Anything less and you will be under pressure.I'm just going to go over my standards folder from CAP 2 going through the questions in the examples.Then I'll have a look at the toolkit and then the sample papers.No point looking at sample papers or Toolkit until you have revised the standards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    think Ill take out the toolkit and revise the standards in full as I come to them. Id be afraid id spend all my time reading notes and not get to the toolkit and samples otherwise. Will be trying the samples properly though, without solutions etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    yeah - im mixing it up a little and doing some standards one day and then a question or two another day and obv reading away at standards whilst doing the questions. so hopefully something is going in. think most people last year got RC.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    yeah - im mixing it up a little and doing some standards one day and then a question or two another day and obv reading away at standards whilst doing the questions. so hopefully something is going in. think most people last year got RC.

    Yeh I got RC in this last year and went on to get a yellow in the PM indicator. Gonna do it again and aim to get competent at worst but knowing my luck I'll get NA as it's a bit of an all duck or no dinner assessment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    Didn't realise how well we are going to need to know the standards. Might prepare my own notes pages with condensed points+notes for each standard for quick reference. You don't have time to waste = flicking through the standards book could be a real time killer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 snowdrop85


    I've only just started going through my standards again. FR is my worst subject so not looking forward to this exam before. I did CAP1 & CAP2 so I know what it is like to work and study but really struggling to find the time to get any study done this year!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    Where is the link to the sample papers for the AAFRP exam? Its impossible to find anything on the Institute website.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    http://www.charteredaccountants.ie/

    click students (top right) > exams (bottom left) > exams, papers & solutions (LHS) + login (RHS) > Sample papers and solutions > FAE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    how are people getting on with this? Ive made just about zero progress :( might do the revision course for it, but would miss a tax elective class and not sure if theyre recorded


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭KingEnda


    EveT wrote: »
    how are people getting on with this? Ive made just about zero progress :( might do the revision course for it, but would miss a tax elective class and not sure if theyre recorded

    Hi EveT What dates are the revision courses on? I cannt see them on the Institutes timetable?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    KingEnda wrote: »
    Hi EveT What dates are the revision courses on? I cannt see them on the Institutes timetable?

    hi there, its not the institute, its the chartered grind school one.

    http://www.charteredgrindschool.com/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    Q2.1 Diagnostic Research PLC

    The solution says per IAS 37.92 in extremely rare cases, disclosure of some or all of the info required by IAS 37:84-89 can be excluded basically.

    What other information was left out?!

    They have already disclosed:
    • litigation
    • with competitor
    • over patent rights
    • seeking damages £2m
    Why is there a need to say:
    "The information usually required by IAS37 is not disclosed on grounds that it can be expected to seriously prejudice the outcome of the litigation."???

    What else would you normally disclose?
    • The name of the competitor? < It doesn't say that is required anywhere in the disclosures section. (does it?)
    • Expected timing? < This isn't given to you anyway!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭funkymonkey9


    Just looking at question 1.25 Street Plc,
    I assumed that the €15k payment was received prior to accounts being authorised for issue therefore journal:
    Dr Bank 15k
    Dr SOCI 85k
    Cr Receivables 100k

    Solution with this assumption:
    Dr SOCI 85k
    Cr Receivables 85k

    Question says final payment was made to Street in Feb 2010. Does that not mean 15k was received into their bank account???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    Just looking at question 1.25 Street Plc,
    I assumed that the €15k payment was received prior to accounts being authorised for issue therefore journal:
    Dr Bank 15k
    Dr SOCI 85k
    Cr Receivables 100k

    Solution with this assumption:
    Dr SOCI 85k
    Cr Receivables 85k

    Question says final payment was made to Street in Feb 2010. Does that not mean 15k was received into their bank account???

    it wouldnt have hit the bank by 31 December so think thats why you wouldnt include it, its not part of the adjusting event really, the 15 is still a debtor that will be received at 31 Dec, its not cash in the bank


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭KingEnda


    The AAFRP at Chartered Grind School is full for this weekend. If anyone has a place and cann't make it please PM me and I will 'buy' the place from you, I need to get to this course as I have nothing done yet

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    KingEnda wrote: »
    The AAFRP at Chartered Grind School is full for this weekend. If anyone has a place and cann't make it please PM me and I will 'buy' the place from you, I need to get to this course as I have nothing done yet

    Thanks

    it says there is another one...


    A SECOND AAFRP COURSE IS BEING RUN ON GOOD FRIDAY APRIL 6TH AND SUNDAY APRIL 15TH. BOOK ON-LINE OR DOWNLOAD AN APPLICATION FORM FROM THE WEBSITE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 133 ✭✭RT2010


    EveT wrote: »
    it says there is another one...


    A SECOND AAFRP COURSE IS BEING RUN ON GOOD FRIDAY APRIL 6TH AND SUNDAY APRIL 15TH. BOOK ON-LINE OR DOWNLOAD AN APPLICATION FORM FROM THE WEBSITE.

    Do ya reckon this will be worth doing guys?

    Have gone through most of the section one and section 2 questions in the book so far. Seems ok but can be tricky to identify exactly what disclosures they are looking for in some section two questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    RT2010 wrote: »
    Do ya reckon this will be worth doing guys?

    Have gone through most of the section one and section 2 questions in the book so far. Seems ok but can be tricky to identify exactly what disclosures they are looking for in some section two questions.

    Im about at the same stage of study as you, doing the course this weekend, will post how it goes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 133 ✭✭RT2010


    EveT wrote: »
    Im about at the same stage of study as you, doing the course this weekend, will post how it goes

    That would be great, cheers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭froggatt2011


    Hey guys,

    Attended the tutorial for this today in Belfast and I think I know how I am going to tackle it. Of course this may not be the best approach so any suggestions, especially from you lot who have been to the Grindschool, would be appreciated.

    Basically I am just going to blitz the toolkit and the sample papers over the next week or so, note areas I am struggling with then go back and revise them. The tutor said that the sample paper scenarios are not indicative of what we will get in the exam proper, that they are too waffly and take too much time and the real exam won't be like that. If you can handle the sample paper questions comfortably you will be fine I think. The toolkit is apparently of the standard we can expect in the exam.

    Also important in my humble opinion to have templates for things like lease agreement payments, construction contracts, employee benefits etc etc in case calcs come up for them and put them with the standard. Produce a template for the stuff you don't know off by heart and bring it with you. I did this for my CAP2 FR last year and having them with me saved my skin.

    Perhaps a wee tip? The IAS website has summaries of all the standards and IFRSs on their website for those of us who can't cope with the myriad of notes we were given at CAP2. I have almost 4 files full and find it impossible to whittle them down, and time is of course of the essence during the exam. I used these summaries for the audit classes/exam last year and they are a good quick reference guide as I know I will get lost flicking through my notes if I need to look something up. http://www.iasplus.com/en/standards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    anyone come across any examples on financial instruments?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    EveT wrote: »
    anyone come across any examples on financial instruments?

    Think there's a couple in Derry Cotter book if I remember correctly from last year. Probably some examples in Connolly book aswell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 133 ✭✭RT2010


    How did the chartered grind school course go the wknd anyone who was there?

    Thinking of doing next wknds one if its worth it.

    Cheers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38 Lis9


    Chartered Grind School defo worth it. Don't know how Liam Doran got through so much info in two days. He gave us notes which summarise the IAS's/ IFRS's and disclosure notes to tick off for section two. And went through alot of the Toolkit and Sample questions. Exhausting, intensive weekend, but great revision.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    Section B seems a lot trickier than last year where we were just given 4 choices and pick the correct disclosure. Could be tight for time this year!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14 fifa87


    can you explain what kind of notes he gave you to tick off for section 2? Am going on Friday but will be useful to know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭mrduffy


    any1 sorted for this exam ? do not know where to start ... reading 2 books i will never get them read red ifrs book


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    grindschool very good, worth going.

    Im going to go over the questions again, IAS by IAS, and make v basic notes as I go, like not rewrite the standards, but like for the journal entries, as in if X comes up DR this CR that.

    Disclosures sections, eeks, gonna be winging it a bit there, too many standards to study all the disclosures like.

    think areas I need to focus on are share based payments, construction contracts, groups (goodwill etc), what people think about financial instruments? dont see much on them in the questions from what ive seen, hate them!! not sure what to do for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    Aye - trying to make notes on what I've learn't through the questions and separating it into different IASs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 Mavic09


    Anyone know where to get the solutions to the end of chapter questions in Derry Cotter's book. Checked online at Pearson Education but it says I need a password?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    Is this right

    IAS16: PP&E

    Revaluing upwards:
    Dr PP&E
    Cr Reval Surplus

    To Reverse:
    Cr PP&E
    Dr Reval Surplus
    Dr P&L (balance)

    Revaluing downwards
    Cr PP&E
    Dr P&l

    To Reverse:
    Dr PP&E
    Cr P&L
    Cr Other Comprehensive Income (balance)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭HeinekenTicket


    No

    IAS16: PP&E

    Revaluing upwards (general rule)
    Dr PP&E
    Cr OCI (gain on revaluation)

    The OCI becomes part of the revaluation reserve in balance sheet equity.

    The exception to the general rule arises when the revaluation upwards follows a previous revaluation that resulted in a deficit. In this case of the exception, the entry to recognise the current gain would be:

    Dr PPE
    Cr P&L (gain on revaluation that reverses the amount of a deficit previously charged to P&L)


    Revaluing downwards (general rule)
    Dr P&L
    Cr PPE

    The deficit is, in effect, an impairment, is charged to P&L and reduces retained earnings in equity.

    The exception to the general rule arises when the revaluation downwards follows a previous revaluation that resulted in a gain. In the case of the exception, the entry to recognise the current deficit would be:

    Dr OCI (loss on revaluation that reverses a gain on the same asset previously credited to OCI)
    Cr PPE

    The debit to the OCI reduces the revaluation reserve in balance sheet equity.

    The above entries ignore deferred tax but it should be considered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    That's what the standard says - but the example questions/solutions I have looked at definitely credit revaluation surplus and don't mention anything about OCI when revaluing upwards. Is it just the same thing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭HeinekenTicket


    Same thing. Just as profit/loss gets taken to retained earnings in equity, a revaluation gain through OCI goes to revaluation reserve in equity.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭mrduffy


    Im hoping it does not come up, concentrating on everything else so I am not wasting my time on ppe but will go on gut feeling on the day. I have not looked at it yet so I might have a different opinion when I do


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    Solution 2.11 - Hedge plc should read Payable at 31 December 2011 €20,000 not Receivable as stated in solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭chursy


    hi All

    I am struggling with the consolidation journals (which bloody every question in Section 3 is about).

    Would anyone be able to share some notes/information detailing the respective journals used for IFRS 3 ( calculating Goodwill) - Basic Consolidation (associated/investments/subsidiary). I did consolidation using T accounts during Cap 2 and dont have a clue about journals!. This was a while ago hence forgotten all.

    perhaps if someone can share relevant notes that would be very useful!

    Also has anyone come across any mistakes in the toolkit yet?

    In Solution 3.2 - Should there be a debit in investment property 200k?

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭chursy


    Solution 2.11 - Hedge plc should read Payable at 31 December 2011 €20,000 not Receivable as stated in solution.

    Yes this should be a payable in Hedge plc financial statements as per question is owed by hedge to Cleanco Ltd and the disclosure is for hedge financial statements so should be a payable indeed!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    CRH financial statements are a good help regarding notes to financial statements and disclosures required. Anyone know any other examples that can be found on the web?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    Why are questions 3.1 and 3.2 identical but the solutions differ for East River Warehouse part?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭EveT


    CRH financial statements are a good help regarding notes to financial statements and disclosures required. Anyone know any other examples that can be found on the web?

    do you have a link to them please?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭chursy


    Why are questions 3.1 and 3.2 identical but the solutions differ for East River Warehouse part?

    In 3.1 - Finance Ireland is subsidiary company hence in group accounts you treat it inline with IAS16 and not as an investment property.

    In 3.2 - This is for separate FS of proinvestment ltd ( not group consolidated accounts) hence treated as an investment property.

    The solution explains this clearly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭froggatt2011


    Attaching a doc which I got from Margaret Darcy last year. Hopefully it helps.

    Is this right

    IAS16: PP&E

    Revaluing upwards:
    Dr PP&E
    Cr Reval Surplus

    To Reverse:
    Cr PP&E
    Dr Reval Surplus
    Dr P&L (balance)

    Revaluing downwards
    Cr PP&E
    Dr P&l

    To Reverse:
    Dr PP&E
    Cr P&L
    Cr Other Comprehensive Income (balance)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭supernova84


    In Question 3.18 should the 400k impairment not be recognised as a DR in SOCI - P/L instead of SOCI - OCI as stated in solution?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭R0N BURGUNDY


    See belowfor journal adjustments:

    In 2010 you revalued pp&e upwards by £0.45m.
    (Cost = £6m less depn £0.6m = £5.4m. Revalued to £5.85m)

    In 2011 you revalue pp&e downwards by £0.4m.
    (NBV = £5.85m less depn £0.65m = £5.2m. Revalued to £4.8m)

    The downward revaluation in 2011 is a reversal of the upward revaluation in 2010therefore it is debited against OCI and not P/L. If it had of been revalued downwards by more than £0.45m, you would have debited OCI by £0.45m and the rest against P/L. i.e. Before you charge the P/L for a downward revaluation, you have to cancel out any upward revaluation done previously. If there had of been no upward revaluation previously, then you charge it to the P/L.


    IAS16: PP&E


    Revaluing upwards:
    Dr PP&E
    Cr OCI (which goes to Reval Surplus)

    To Reverse:
    Cr PP&E
    Dr OCI (Reval Surplus)
    Dr P&L (balance)

    Revaluing downwards
    Cr PP&E
    Dr P&L

    To Reverse:
    Dr PP&E
    Cr P&L
    Cr Other Comprehensive Income (balance)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭mrduffy


    1.15 solution is wronged can some one agree with me ? in the toolkit

    correct answer
    cr
    25 000 bank
    225000 receivables


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 06431755l


    No, dont think any error with Qu 1.15.

    Receivables initially debited with 25k as will receive money next year. Now reverse this as grant to be repaid. ie. Credit receivables.

    Full amount initially received was 200k plus 25k = 225k. Now owe this back to grant agency, so Cr Payables 225k.

    Could assume you have enough money in bank i suppose and then Credit Bank. But solution assumes liability.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement