Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rover 75 1.8 question

  • 15-11-2011 11:38am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48


    Hi

    I see there's a few Rover 75 fans on here so I have a couple questions I want to put to them

    I'm considering this car

    http://cars.donedeal.co.uk/for-sale/cars/2213783

    http://cars.donedeal.co.uk/for-sale/cars/2711585

    1 year older but less mileage

    Ok my questions are -

    1) The 1.8 k series engine, surely it's legendary head gasket problems were all ironed out by 2004/2005? Is this the case?

    2) At 118 bhp, is the 75 with this engine underpowered?

    3) Does anyone have experience of real world MPG with this engine/car combo?

    4) I've seen people say that the earlier models were better built. Does this mean the later ones are rubbish? Not up to the job?

    5) Generally, what things should I look out for with this one? I understand the MAF and clutch problems that come with the diesel aren't an issue with the petrols?

    Thanks for your help all


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,610 ✭✭✭Padraig Mor


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    1) The 1.8 k series engine, surely it's legendary head gasket problems were all ironed out by 2004/2005? Is this the case? Don't know.

    2) At 118 bhp, is the 75 with this engine underpowered? Depends on what you're coming from - it ain't fast though!

    3) Does anyone have experience of real world MPG with this engine/car combo? About 28 - 30 mpg mixed driving

    4) I've seen people say that the earlier models were better built. Does this mean the later ones are rubbish? Not up to the job? No
    .


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    ..................................

    1) The 1.8 k series engine, surely it's legendary head gasket problems were all ironed out by 2004/2005? Is this the case?.....................

    Nope, although it would have an uprated inlet manifold gasket fitted from the factory, that was one of the causes of coolant loss that would have led to HG failure in the hands of certain types of owners and repeat HG failure as certain types of mechanics wouldn't diagnose it so the car would go back on the road "repaired" with the inlet manifold gasket leaking coolant.

    Regardless of history a 1.8k is a weekly coolant check car, the HG won't just go all of a sudden without warning though, if caught early it's not too bad to get done, a few hundred onto a timing belt and pump job, less sometimes, cook it and you're in trouble.

    The problem is it's hard to know if one you buying has been cooked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Get the diesel instead. Much more reliable, if harder to find. I'm on the lookout for a Connisseur SE auto diesel atm. Hard to find a cheapish one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Ok 28-30 mpg I cannot afford at the mileage I do. That's basically taken it off the table as an option. The official figure was 39 mpg on the combined cycle though....

    RJ, in your opinion would a 100k well looked after brit import diesel be better than a 48 k 1.8 petrol of the same year and similar condition?


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If doing the mileage most definitely, 100k isn't a lot really, I have almost that on my petrol ZT and its fresh enough.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    crap....guess I'll have to look in the uk so...was hoping to avoid the hassle


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You'll get a diesel 75 here that suits with patience I would think.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    Confab wrote: »
    Get the diesel instead. Much more reliable, if harder to find. I'm on the lookout for a Connisseur SE auto diesel atm. Hard to find a cheapish one.

    eBayISAPI.dll?VISuperSize&item=230690141178
    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rover-75-2-0-CDTi-auto-Connoisseur-SE-/230690141178?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item35b63433fa

    I miss mine somedays.
    RoverJames wrote: »
    If doing the mileage most definitely, 100k isn't a lot really, I have almost that on my petrol ZT and its fresh enough.

    Mine (2L cdt) had 180k on it, and the engine was still sweet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    I forgot about eBay!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    eBayISAPI.dll?VISuperSize&item=230690141178
    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rover-75-2-0-CDTi-auto-Connoisseur-SE-/230690141178?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item35b63433fa

    I miss mine somedays.



    Mine (2L cdt) had 180k on it, and the engine was still sweet.

    Jesus that's respectable mileage. Any trouble with it over the years?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    Definitely miss the luxury of mine alright ... great cars, pity the 75 Coupé never made it to market either!

    Rover-75-Coupe-concept.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Confab wrote: »
    Get the diesel instead. Much more reliable, if harder to find. I'm on the lookout for a Connisseur SE auto diesel atm. Hard to find a cheapish one.


    You see this one?

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Rover/75/2.0-CDTI/201105201103579/advert?channel=CARS


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭Paparazzo


    My dad got one a couple of months ago, something to look for is to check the drain holes for the ECU is clear. His mate had a rover 75 and he had the same problem. Fills with water and obviously water and the ecu should not mix!
    Other than that, both of them reckon it's a fantastic car, and both of them have gone through a lot of cars. He's got the 2l diesel btw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    If anyone does go down the Diesel route, budget about 250/300 straight away, and get the alternator and aircon belts replaced, and replace the crankshaft pulley while you're at it. It's preventative maintenance. Definitely make sure the Plenum drains under the windscreen are clear, and that's about it really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »

    Way above my budget (€2000) and I prefer the look of the pre-facelift models. Also, Project Drive hit the post 02 models hardest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Owen wrote: »
    If anyone does go down the Diesel route, budget about 250/300 straight away, and get the alternator and aircon belts replaced, and replace the crankshaft pulley while you're at it. It's preventative maintenance. Definitely make sure the Plenum drains under the windscreen are clear, and that's about it really.


    By plenum drains, you mean just the regular water channels below the wipers? Is this a major problem? I have to park under a tree that sheds a huge amount of leaves. Would one day's blockage be potentially a disaster?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Confab wrote: »
    Way above my budget (€2000) and I prefer the look of the pre-facelift models. Also, Project Drive hit the post 02 models hardest.


    What happened in Project Drive? This goes back to my original question - are the post 02 models bad quality/loads of problems etc?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    What happened in Project Drive? This goes back to my original question - are the post 02 models bad quality/loads of problems etc?

    No, they're not bad quality or have loads of problems, but they are a lower quality car than the pre-'02. All sorts of stuff was removed to save pennies and it did them no favours.

    Changes in Material/Design
    Leather Handbrake Grip replaced by Plastic Grip
    Leather Gearknob - changed to plastic type
    VIN Plate - change to content
    Sun visors - change to specification
    Tyre size change
    Cigar lighter - change to type fitted
    Door reflectors - change to self-adhesive type (November 2002)
    Bonnet locking platform warning labels - combine 3 into 1
    Engine oil cooler - change to type fitted
    Exhaust System - design change
    Door mirror specification change
    Vented rear brake disc specification change
    Toolkit stowage - common across range (December 2002)
    Alloy Wheel Centres - material change (November 2002)
    Twin Horn replaced with Single Horn (September 2002)

    Items Deleted/Removed
    Bottom coolant hose - heat sleeve deletion
    D post badge - deletion from D post finisher
    Catalyst heat shield
    Front door engine derivative badges
    Front seat belt lower anchorage bolt head caps
    High pressure PAS sensor
    Rover 'Viking' boot badge
    Jack handle grip
    Rear lamp access panel
    Rear parcel shelf sound insulation
    Rear anti-roll bar (1.8 and 2.0 CDT models)
    AM/FM diversity aerial amplifier
    Power steering pump cover
    Headrest trim piping
    Tailgate latch finisher
    Fuel burning heater deletion
    Body colour side finisher deletion (ZT)
    Engine compartment undertray deletion on 1.8
    Automatic Temperature Control (ATC) change to Model applicability
    Tailgate Release Switch (November 2002)
    Drivers grab handle
    Drivers side plenum drain tube (November 2002)
    Transit brake disc covers
    Body colour door mirror caps (Classic models)

    Additions to the specification
    Automatic oil cooler
    Rear parcel shelf - modification & fitment of dynamic absorber
    Plenum drain tube modification
    Instant Tyre Repair (ITR) introduction

    And this list was only up to the end of 2002...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    Jesus that's respectable mileage. Any trouble with it over the years?

    over 6 years 100,000 miles.
    wishbones, bushes, springs, anti roll stab, oil cooler (autobox) very rare part for pre 02 cars, oil coolr hoses, front therm housing, window regs, rear door locks, drivers seat .

    never buy spurious parts

    40mpg is do-able in the auto


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Confab wrote: »
    No, they're not bad quality or have loads of problems, but they are a lower quality car than the pre-'02. All sorts of stuff was removed to save pennies and it did them no favours.

    Such as?

    One think that was driving me towards the post facelift models was the generic radio. That thing that was in them before was crap and if removed, the blanking panel offsets the radio space to one side due to, I assume, something in the way in the space behind. That would do my head in and I gotta have a decent sound system....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Tragedy


    Project drive is overstated. I've had a early-mid 2002 build MG ZT(judging by the stickers I found all over the internals) and a late 2004 build MG ZT and the difference isn't noticeable.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wouldn't be overly worried with the project drive to be honest, long list of much to do about nothing really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    over 6 years 100,000 miles.
    wishbones, bushes, springs, anti roll stab, oil cooler (autobox) very rare part for pre 02 cars, oil coolr hoses, front therm housing, window regs, rear door locks, drivers seat .

    never buy spurious parts

    40mpg is do-able in the auto

    Holy crap...now I'm put right off....


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    Holy crap...now I'm put right off....

    One or two of that list would be bad luck, unusual issues, overall for 6 years on a car that was well broken in its not too bad really, the springs are common on the diesels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Confab wrote: »
    Rear anti-roll bar (1.8 and 2.0 CDT models)
    Fuel burning heater deletion


    They got rid of the anti-roll bar???? Did that not completely screw up the handling??

    The fuel burning heater - is that the thing that heated the cabin at a preset time? How did that work?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,456 ✭✭✭✭Mr Benevolent


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    Holy crap...now I'm put right off....

    Me too. I'm scampering off to find an MX-5!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    over 6 years 100,000 miles.
    wishbones, bushes, springs, anti roll stab, oil cooler (autobox) very rare part for pre 02 cars, oil coolr hoses, front therm housing, window regs, rear door locks, drivers seat .

    never buy spurious parts

    40mpg is do-able in the auto

    What happened the wishbones? Anti roll stab? Oil cooler hoses? Front therm housing? Drivers seat???

    These are not standard maintenance run of the mill problems surely....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Tragedy


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    They got rid of the anti-roll bar???? Did that not completely screw up the handling??
    No, they changed the rear suspension setup as a result. Members have tried adding the rear anti roll bar and found that it actually made the post-project drive car handle worse.

    Point being, it made no noticeable difference :)
    The fuel burning heater - is that the thing that heated the cabin at a preset time? How did that work?
    It burned small quantities of diesel to warm the car and cabin prior to getting into it, used a remote keyfob.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Tragedy wrote: »
    It burned small quantities of diesel to warm the car and cabin prior to getting into it, used a remote keyfob.

    Is this a feature on many cars? Seems amazing! What way did it burn the diesel though? Engine wasn't running etc?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,196 ✭✭✭the culture of deference


    Confab wrote: »
    Way above my budget (€2000) and I prefer the look of the pre-facelift models.

    Me too.
    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    By plenum drains, you mean just the regular water channels below the wipers? Is this a major problem? I have to park under a tree that sheds a huge amount of leaves. Would one day's blockage be potentially a disaster?

    \you just pull out the plenum and cut a cross shape at the thinnest end, others just slice it diagonally, any rover 75 forum will have all the info.

    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    What happened the wishbones? Anti roll stab? Oil cooler hoses? Front therm housing? Drivers seat???
    These are not standard maintenance run of the mill problems surely....

    wishbones need to be replaced at 6-8 years. in the UK you can replace the ball joints and bushes and keep the wb. not here though.

    i replaced mine with spurious for half the price, and they lasted quarter the time the originals did. the stabilisers and bushes are the same,

    genuine setup for the front would cost each side 200 a wb, 100 bushes, 40 stabiliser, then labour.


    all for nct.

    also had to replace braked lines.

    auto gearbox oil must be changed at 90,000miles.
    hoses can burst.
    oil coolers can break when an apprentice gets his hands on it.
    only 3% of 75's were diesel auto's. the 01 model has no fog lights because they couldn't fit it in


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    Is this a feature on many cars? Seems amazing! What way did it burn the diesel though? Engine wasn't running etc?

    Some vans have it, the 75 diesel came with it as standard before project drive. It basically worked like a small parafin heater, it had it's own air intake, and used the normal diesel the engine runs on to warm the engine coolant. They all had them around that time, but they weren't wired in. If you chose the option from the factory, they subsequently fitted a timer.

    It's possible to wire them up youself to run off a separate remote - but that just gets the heater to fire. To get the cabin warm, you need to do additional wiring too. I had mine wired up, and it was brilliant in the depths of winter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Owen wrote: »
    Some vans have it, the 75 diesel came with it as standard before project drive. It basically worked like a small parafin heater, it had it's own air intake, and used the normal diesel the engine runs on to warm the engine coolant. They all had them around that time, but they weren't wired in. If you chose the option from the factory, they subsequently fitted a timer.

    It's possible to wire them up youself to run off a separate remote - but that just gets the heater to fire. To get the cabin warm, you need to do additional wiring too. I had mine wired up, and it was brilliant in the depths of winter.

    So hold on, your car did not come with the heater as an option but you got the wiring done so it did work? What did u do for switchgear etc? That's class!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    The heater's in there, but it's not wired up. Simple enough to wire it though if you're handy with electronics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Owen wrote: »
    The heater's in there, but it's not wired up. Simple enough to wire it though if you're handy with electronics.

    Ok but switchgear etc? Is there no dashboard switch etc required?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    It's up to you where and what switch you use. I had mine working off a keyfob remote control, some people buy a webasto campervan timer and install that under the armrest, other people put a simple switch in there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 Gat Dayum!


    Owen wrote: »
    It's up to you where and what switch you use. I had mine working off a keyfob remote control, some people buy a webasto campervan timer and install that under the armrest, other people put a simple switch in there.

    Pretty cool...anyway...either somebody reassures me that the petrol won't require the €900 DMF job and will give 35+ combined MPG or I'm gonna have to start researching avensis's :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,728 ✭✭✭George Dalton


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    What happened the wishbones? Anti roll stab? Oil cooler hoses? Front therm housing? Drivers seat???

    These are not standard maintenance run of the mill problems surely....

    It is an old car. If you have a budget of €2000 then it doesn't matter what make or model you buy you can't expect to just have routine servicing to think about. Things will break and/or wear out and it will cost money to fix.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gat Dayum! wrote: »
    Pretty cool...anyway...either somebody reassures me that the petrol won't require the €900 DMF job and will give 35+ combined MPG or I'm gonna have to start researching avensis's :(

    can't see you getting 35 plus combined. BArely got that from a 216 coupe when I was up and down to galway.


Advertisement