Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Supplement for people who take things without knowing what they are

  • 25-10-2011 11:31am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 732 ✭✭✭


    Am I missing something here?

    omega 3 6 9 supplement
    Our Omega 3-6-9 contain a blend of fish and plant oils, which provide a perfect blend of Omega-3, Omega-6 and Omega-9 fatty acids.

    Amount per 2 softgel serving:
    EPA (Omega-3): 180mg
    DHA (Omega-3): 120mg
    GLA (Omega-6): 180mg
    Omega-9: 18mg
    Vitamin E: 16mg
    The proportion of omega 3 still would make this a beneficial supplement, to my understanding, but why include omega 6 at all - and especially why put it forward as if it is a good thing to have in a supplement?

    Just so it seems better value for money because you get a larger volume?
    wikipedia wrote:
    Some medical research suggests that excessive levels of certain n−6 fatty acids, relative to certain n−3 (Omega-3) fatty acids, may increase the probability of a number of diseases.[3][4][5]
    Modern Western diets typically have ratios of n−6 to n−3 in excess of 10 to 1, some as high as 30 to 1. The optimal ratio is thought to be 4 to 1 or lower.[6][7]
    Excess n−6 fats interfere with the health benefits of n−3 fats, in part because they compete for the same rate-limiting enzymes. A high proportion of n−6 to n−3 fat in the diet shifts the physiological state in the tissues toward the pathogenesis of many diseases: prothrombotic, proinflammatory and proconstrictive.[8]
    Chronic excessive production of n−6 eicosanoids is associated with heart attacks, thrombotic stroke, arrhythmia, arthritis, osteoporosis, inflammation, mood disorders, obesity, and cancer.[9] Many of the medications used to treat and manage these conditions work by blocking the effects of the potent n−6 fat, arachidonic acid.[10] Many steps in formation and action of n-6 hormones from n-6 arachidonic acid proceed more vigorously than the corresponding competitive steps in formation and action of n-3 hormones from n-3 eicosapentaenoic acid.[11] The COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor medications, used to treat inflammation and pain, work by preventing the COX enzymes from turning arachidonic acid into inflammatory compounds.[12] (See Cyclooxygenase for more information.) The LOX inhibitor medications often used to treat asthma, work by preventing the LOX enzyme from converting arachidonic acid into the leukotrienes.[13][14] Many of the anti-mania medications used to treat bipolar disorder work by targeting the arachidonic acid cascade in the brain.[15]
    A high consumption of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which are found in most types of vegetable oil, may increase the likelihood that postmenopausal women will develop breast cancer.[16] Similar effect was observed on prostate cancer.[17] Other "analysis suggested an inverse association between total polyunsaturated fatty acids and breast cancer risk, but individual polyunsaturated fatty acids behaved differently [from each other]. [...] a 20:2 derivative of linoleic acid [...] was inversely associated with the risk of breast cancer".[18]


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    I've always wondered that too tbh.

    Like our omega 3:6 ratios seems completely out of whack versus what is deemed to be "optimal" for health, so why add in additional omega 6? It's hardly like most peoples diet is lacking in that regard.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,892 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Hanley wrote: »
    I've always wondered that too tbh.

    Like our omega 3:6 ratios seems completely out of whack versus what is deemed to be "optimal" for health, so why add in additional omega 6? It's hardly like most peoples diet is lacking in that regard.

    Agreed. I think your average Joe soap is bamboozled by the whole thing though, so they think anything with a number and omega has to be good.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,234 ✭✭✭Edwardius


    Pretty sure you don't need to supplement the 6, but the 6 in this case is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-Linolenic_acid, might be useful for the womenfolk

    w-9 isn't an essential fatty acid (you can synthesize it)

    This seems to be more complicated than "w-3 good w-6 bad"

    "Unlike AA and EPA, DGLA cannot yield leukotrienes. However it can inhibit the formation of pro-inflammatory leukotrienes from AA." So that particular w-6 is not inflammatory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,234 ✭✭✭Edwardius


    Had a look around and found this.

    Gotta remember that the 3 and 6 just denote the position of a double bond in a large enough family of compounds so their individual actions can be fairly different (e.g. ALA in flax oil vs EPA and DHA in fish oil and grassfed unicorn)


Advertisement