Failed driving test

lynyg18

Ok i did my driving test and failed on one grade three mark last week with a few grade twos! Was shocked as thought id passed and felt can drive well had a great instructor, so as im moving to australia they let me do a retest today but failed again this time for different reasons, think it a stupid test which doesnt even proove driving ability!! It one against one, where is the proof of anything that the tester says you did wrong! and the stupid thing is plenty driving who never had to do a test or just dont bide by the rules and then also i can still drive afterwards!!

Just all very frustrating, what are other peoples views and experiences??

challengemaster

It's a rather basic test really, and not nearly as difficult as many other countries.

**Timbuk2**

It's frustrating when you fail, but I wouldn't say the test is unfair! The skills that are tested on the test are important (but of course, there are quite a few things not tested which are important too).

Most people feel hard done by when they fail, mainly because they think they shouldn't fail, usually as they don't recall themselves making many mistakes. This is fairly intuitive, as if you knew you were making mistakes, you wouldn't make them, as you'd know it was a mistake - generally it's bad habits that people have, that they don't realise they have (or don't realise are wrong), that accumulates faults. Also, driving extra carefully because "it's a driving test" is a common enough way to accumulate 'Lack of progress' marks, and many people have failed their test that way.

OP, I would advise to possibly change instructor, and just keep practicing. Not that there's anything wrong with your old instructor, but it's possible that he may be missing out on some faults that you are making - a second opinion never hurts! You'll get it soon, and once you do manage to pass, you'll have the licence for the rest of your life (well, until you are 70 at least!).

Good luck!

Axe Rake

lynyg18 wrote: »

Ok i did my driving test and failed on one grade three mark last week with a few grade twos! Was shocked as thought id passed and felt can drive well had a great instructor, so as im moving to australia they let me do a retest today but failed again this time for different reasons, think it a stupid test which doesnt even proove driving ability!! It one against one, where is the proof of anything that the tester says you did wrong! and the stupid thing is plenty driving who never had to do a test or just dont bide by the rules and then also i can still drive afterwards!!

Just all very frustrating, what are other peoples views and experiences??

If you think getting a driving licence is exceptionally difficult and frustrating in Ireland.... you should try and apply for one in Australia... good luck

Proxy

Sorry to hear that OP, my test is up soon and even asking the instructor if he thinks i'll pass, he says nobody knows until the time. You could be driving for years and fail on just a few small bad habits.

Have a read through the Unsuccessful thread for some insight and maybe even points to remember, but also the Successful thread for encouragement!

Unsuccessful : http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055107597
Successful : http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055107587

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

thewelk

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

That's interesting what you say about confidence. For my first test I was going to pass it with confidence. But confidence isn't what you need in this test. After a number of pretests (where I didn't get more than 5 grade 2s...I was not a perfect driver by any means but certainly good enough to pass the test given what you see on the roads every day) I was going there with confidence. And as soon as I was assigned the "examiner that doesn't pass anyone" I was pretty much screwed from that point on. That little random act of administration in an office somewhere suddenly meant that there was no longer a level playing field for me and all the other people being tested there that day. Of course, I failed, 6 grade 2 and a grade 3. And after that I didn't have much confidence left for the next time.

Why should it work like that? Why should the guy sitting next to me waiting for a test have an automatic better chance of passing because of a random act of administration? The system is flawed. And confidence isn't what you need. You also need a dollop of luck. Of course, in Ireland lucky people are clearly better drivers...

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

Jimoslimos

I have experience of doing the test in two countries,

Failed in Ireland
Passed in UK

My opinion (and yes, a subjective one) at the time was that my driving wasn't any better in passing the UK test, even though it was far more thorough.

I also was impressed that my tester (in the UK) offered to explain the reasoning behind the faults that I had clocked up.

I'm sure testers here (and elsewhere) do their best to be objective but its human nature to let personal bias slip in sometimes - unintended or not. Personally I'd like to see TWO examiners present on all tests.

thewelk

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

There are some characters out there who ARE that examiner. We all know it, they know it and those kind of employees tend to exist in every job (although it may have a less direct effect on the public) If a test center has a pass rate of 50% and one of its instructors has a pass rate of 60% and the other one 40% that's statistically significant (huge in fact if you think of it as per 1000 tests) and affects the overall provision of the service that they're charged with providing. A public service no less. But like most public services in this country it comes down to bad/weak management at some point in the chain. I hate be a part of the "wouldn't happen in Germany" brigade but in this case I am.

I'm bitter, yes, but all I ask is that after paying my not insignificant amount of money for this service, can I at least expect to be tested to the same standards as scobey mcscoberson up in sligo or wherever or even the test center down the road or even the examiner at the other side of the office.

Permabear

This post has been deleted.

thewelk

Permabear wrote: »

This post had been deleted.

For the variation between two testers in the same centre, I'm not so sure this kind of thing is investigated. It should be but I'm fairly sure the "ah sure it's grand" lazy attitude exists there as it does in every other work place. So in that case either one instructor is letting too many unsuitable people on the road or one is blocking too many suitable people from the road but the overall average is about right so "it's grand!".

Don't know why we go on about it anyway, it wont change at all until the EDT thing really starts to have an effect. And that should be 20 lessons minimum...(whole new discussion...)

challengemaster

thewelk wrote: »

For the variation between two testers in the same centre, I'm not so sure this kind of thing is investigated. It should be but I'm fairly sure the "ah sure it's grand" lazy attitude exists there as it does in every other work place. So in that case either one instructor is letting too many unsuitable people on the road or one is blocking too many suitable people from the road but the overall average is about right so "it's grand!".

Don't know why we go on about it anyway, it wont change at all until the EDT thing really starts to have an effect. And that should be 20 lessons minimum...(whole new discussion...)

An inspector sits in quite regularly on driving tests to make sure the tester is doing their job right, so despite what you might think, it is regulated.

BIGGIEsmall

I failed mine the first time but passed the second as I knew what to work on.

**Timbuk2**

thewelk wrote: »

For the variation between two testers in the same centre, I'm not so sure this kind of thing is investigated. It should be but I'm fairly sure the "ah sure it's grand" lazy attitude exists there as it does in every other work place. So in that case either one instructor is letting too many unsuitable people on the road or one is blocking too many suitable people from the road but the overall average is about right so "it's grand!".

Don't know why we go on about it anyway, it wont change at all until the EDT thing really starts to have an effect. And that should be 20 lessons minimum...(whole new discussion...)

To be honest, I doubt that somehow.

Variation between test centres is to be expected to some degree, as Permabear said, but significant variation between testers in the same centre is something which would stand out like a sore thumb - and as challengemaster said, the testers are supervised occasionally to make sure they are consistent.

Have a look at the RSA Marking Guidelines - it gives you an idea of what testers mark for, it's quite clear about when to mark each fault. http://www.rsa.ie/Documents/ADI/DrivingFault_Marking_Guides.pdf

Reloc8

lynyg18 wrote: »

Just all very frustrating, what are other peoples views and experiences??

The driving test is pretty basic and not a very thorough test process. If you failed it, you have failed it for being unable on the particular occasion of the test to drive to a basic standard of safety over a very, very short period of time.

Your ability to drive to that standard when not being tested is irrelevant.

There is no conspiracy. They are not out to get you.

mikemac

thewelk wrote: »

And as soon as I was assigned the "examiner that doesn't pass anyone"

I feel your pain

Even if you get an easy tester some of them are grumpy and hungover on Monday mornings and fail everyone
And they pass everyone on Tuesday and Wednesday evenings as they are anxious to get home for Champions league football

However this causes issues as they've used up their quota of passes by Thursday and everyone has to fail on Friday, quota is all gone :pac:

cmos_ajay

If you fail a driving test in Ireland, then write a complaint letter to :

The complaints officer,
Driving Test Section,
Road Safety Authority,
Moy Valley Business Park,
Ballina, Co. Mayo, Ireland.

On receiving the complaint, the test examiner will have to provide an explanation to his supervisor about the test report. Basically its an internal investigation. If several complaints are received about the same examiner, then there seems to be some problem in his grading procedure. Possibly he may have to undergo training again or maybe given a warning if they find too much failure rate. Guys, be brave to file a complaint if you feel injustice was done. There have been cases in UK where, examiners have been fired for failing too many candidates. Please read

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/mar/01/transport.world1

http://www.drivingtesttips.biz/driving-examiner.html

Chris_Heilong

The only way to fix the unfair system is to have an independent supervisor who goes trough all your basic training for say 20 lessons, If you have proven you are of a good enough standard you graduate and get handed a license otherwise you must repeat the coarse.

The whole non accountability issue with testers is part of the problem, if there is no communication between tester and leaner then is it any wonder that there is distrust that things are being conducted fairly, also I did a test 3 years ago and can tell you it has gotten much harder in recent times, I almost passed back then and hadn't any idea about correct lanes to be in, what speed to be doing or even checking blind spots. IMO those who have your full licenses a few years and got them on the 1st or 2nd go may have just been lucky.

Tommie Kelly

I just passed but I do think that the whole Progress element encourages unsafe driving.
Making people do things as fast as humanly possible, adds more stress and more danger to the road. Fine if you are going stupidly slow, but getting marked down because you don't instantly get to 50kph is, in my opinion, wrong and dangerous.

Just my two cent.

GFish

cmos_ajay wrote: »

If you fail a driving test in Ireland, then write a complaint letter to :

The complaints officer,
...

Please, please, please don't do that!

Read the examiner's report, pay attention to what he/she says, practice those points and re-take the test. Your time will be much better spent than composing letters of complaint - you will still have to retake the test anyhow!

The last thing any of us need on the road (including you) is people who are bad at driving but good at writing letters of complaint.

Honestly, if you fail the test, it is far more likely that you are not a competent driver than that the tester is not a competent tester.

Just my 2c.

ferretone

I really feel we have a whole systems problem going on over here, and that with the learning-to-drive process, rather than the testing one. I know there is now a system of accreditation in place, without which instructors cannot give the required EDT lessons for taking a test - obviously a new development, as is the requirement itself.

However, this in no way compares with rigorous apprenticeship, schooling and testing that instructors have to undergo in Germany, for example. Our young people are simply not being given this standard of instruction to prepare for their tests. Granted some instructors will be excellent, but plenty of weaker ones are without doubt creeping through.

Other issues are, as another poster mentioned, 12 lessons really aren't enough to ensure a wide enough range of situations are met, or that good habits become truly ingrained. Many get away with 12, or with half that in the past, before the requirement, but mainly because we have the insane system of allowing learners to drive with any "qualified driver" for practice to gain experience for it. In other words, we let them muddle through.

This is no way to train young road-users, and I'm pretty sure we wouldn't do it if we could ensure the resources to allow them to test as soon as they were ready, as they do in civilised countries.

Also, no motorway training before qualifying is just stupid. I really thought they would introduce that, once they decided on the mandatory EDT system. In Germany the mandatory hours include a minimum of motorway time, and also a minimum of night driving as well. A test includes some motorway driving, and also a parallel parking, which I just cannot believe doesn't happen in the test here.

Theory testing incorporates mandatory hours in the classroom, which teaches the understanding of many important things about how a car works, of how it behaves on the road in different situations, and very in-depth teaching on how priority works in pretty much every possible situation. All this before a theory test can be taken, although this does not have to be totally completed before the instructor can take a given student out on the road. Again, their high level of training ensures they know at what stage it's safe to start taking a given student out.

All this leads to a much greater understanding of cars, driving and road usage by the time the test is taken, and nobody ever complains/suspects about a lottery system in the testing over there.

I know our legislators bang on about how the German model is not a good one to follow, as their road death stats aren't way ahead of ours, but I have a problem with how they never take the location of a country into account when examining these stats. Germany is bang in the middle of Europe, with everybody's lorry-drivers, holiday-makers, migrants, etc. driving across every day. German drivers can't be held to account for the statistics they generate on the basis of this.

All of their favourite countries for RTAs, road death stats, etc are island or peripheral states, and they never seem to notice this fact. I just wish they would use some common-sense sometimes. *sigh*

Mister Jingles

GFish wrote: »

Please, please, please don't do that!

Read the examiner's report, pay attention to what he/she says, practice those points and re-take the test. Your time will be much better spent than composing letters of complaint - you will still have to retake the test anyhow!

The last thing any of us need on the road (including you) is people who are bad at driving but good at writing letters of complaint.

Honestly, if you fail the test, it is far more likely that you are not a competent driver than that the tester is not a competent tester.

Just my 2c.

You work for the RSA ?

Rothmans

ferretone wrote: »

I really feel we have a whole systems problem going on over here, and that with the learning-to-drive process, rather than the testing one. I know there is now a system of accreditation in place, without which instructors cannot give the required EDT lessons for taking a test - obviously a new development, as is the requirement itself.

However, this in no way compares with rigorous apprenticeship, schooling and testing that instructors have to undergo in Germany, for example. Our young people are simply not being given this standard of instruction to prepare for their tests. Granted some instructors will be excellent, but plenty of weaker ones are without doubt creeping through.

Other issues are, as another poster mentioned, 12 lessons really aren't enough to ensure a wide enough range of situations are met, or that good habits become truly ingrained. Many get away with 12, or with half that in the past, before the requirement, but mainly because we have the insane system of allowing learners to drive with any "qualified driver" for practice to gain experience for it. In other words, we let them muddle through.

This is no way to train young road-users, and I'm pretty sure we wouldn't do it if we could ensure the resources to allow them to test as soon as they were ready, as they do in civilised countries.

Also, no motorway training before qualifying is just stupid. I really thought they would introduce that, once they decided on the mandatory EDT system. In Germany the mandatory hours include a minimum of motorway time, and also a minimum of night driving as well. A test includes some motorway driving, and also a parallel parking, which I just cannot believe doesn't happen in the test here.

Theory testing incorporates mandatory hours in the classroom, which teaches the understanding of many important things about how a car works, of how it behaves on the road in different situations, and very in-depth teaching on how priority works in pretty much every possible situation. All this before a theory test can be taken, although this does not have to be totally completed before the instructor can take a given student out on the road. Again, their high level of training ensures they know at what stage it's safe to start taking a given student out.

All this leads to a much greater understanding of cars, driving and road usage by the time the test is taken, and nobody ever complains/suspects about a lottery system in the testing over there.

I know our legislators bang on about how the German model is not a good one to follow, as their road death stats aren't way ahead of ours, but I have a problem with how they never take the location of a country into account when examining these stats. Germany is bang in the middle of Europe, with everybody's lorry-drivers, holiday-makers, migrants, etc. driving across every day. German drivers can't be held to account for the statistics they generate on the basis of this.

All of their favourite countries for RTAs, road death stats, etc are island or peripheral states, and they never seem to notice this fact. I just wish they would use some common-sense sometimes. *sigh*

I'm sick of all this bullsh!t that so many people come out with about the Irish system.
You praise the German system and how burdensome, therefore how great it is, but you look at the facts, and they tell a completely different story.
Even per capita, road fatalities on the continent are far higher than in the UK and Ireland. In June I read in the Kildare Nationalist that, in my own county, with a population of 210,000 people, with the M7, M8 and M9s trraffic (ie the busiest roads) passing through it, that only one person had died so far this year which reflects the comparatively low road deaths Ireland has.
Our annual road deaths are no greater than they typically were in the 1960s, when there were a lot less cars on the road.

On top of this, we have the sh!ttiest roads in Europe, yet our road fatalities are much less. This is clearly indicative of us being better drivers, No?
Look, here's some more evidence that we do in fact have the safest drivers in Europe.

http://www.insuranceage.co.uk/insurance-age/news/1563838/british-drivers-safest-europe-axa

That was Nov 2009, our roads have only gotten safer since then.

If you've ever been to any continental countries and saw how inconsiderate and dangerous most of the drivers were over there, you'd soon be quite appreciative of the safety with which Irish drivers drive and the decency and respect they show to other road users.

ferretone

As stated, German drivers have to contend with those from all over Europe on a daily basis. What happens on this island or the neighbouring one is not comparing like with like. Even if you are looking at the crashes the natives themselves have, there is definitely an element of how many foreign drivers they are dealing with day-to-day in that. And also the high population density anyway.

And I have long experience with continental roads, and have not experienced anything like what you suggest, Rothmans.

I wonder if you accounted for differing laws in your observations? Such as much higher prevalence of right-priority, including on all Dutch roundabouts, despite the fact they drive on the right - yes that's a mad way to run roundabouts, but if you ignore it, it's still you being disrespectful!

You surely can't deny drivers on the continent have a far better knowledge of motorway usage, at least. I certainly haven't observed the level of ignorance of Irish drivers anywhere else I've been except South Africa, where the low density of cars means they can get away with that.

GFish

Mister Jingles wrote: »

You work for the RSA ?

No, but I do drive so I care about who I share the road with.

To advocate complaining about the tester just because you fail a test is illogical, shortsighted, vindictive and irresponsible.

Rothmans

ferretone wrote: »

As stated, German drivers have to contend with those from all over Europe on a daily basis. What happens on this island or the neighbouring one is not comparing like with like. Even if you are looking at the crashes the natives themselves have, there is definitely an element of how many foreign drivers they are dealing with day-to-day in that. And also the high population density anyway.

And I have long experience with continental roads, and have not experienced anything like what you suggest, Rothmans.

I wonder if you accounted for differing laws in your observations? Such as much higher prevalence of right-priority, including on all Dutch roundabouts, despite the fact they drive on the right - yes that's a mad way to run roundabouts, but if you ignore it, it's still you being disrespectful!

You surely can't deny drivers on the continent have a far better knowledge of motorway usage, at least. I certainly haven't observed the level of ignorance of Irish drivers anywhere else I've been except South Africa, where the low density of cars means they can get away with that.

Well, that's your opinion, and your opinion contradicts the facts. I don't really buy the 'blame it on the foreigners' line at all. The same effect can be observed in Ireland with Northern Irish drivers driving on our roads if that's the argument you want to make.
Besides, it doesn't matter on the nationalities of the drivers anyway, its the driving safety in Germany which should be the concern.

Also, that roundabout rule in the Netherlands seems peculiar, so does it mean traffic already on the roundabout has to stop and give way to traffic entering the roundabout?

Mister Jingles

GFish wrote: »

No, but I do drive so I care about who I share the road with.

To advocate complaining about the tester just because you fail a test is illogical, shortsighted, vindictive and irresponsible.

Whats that got to do with somebody who feels they have been failed unfairly though ? And it does happen a lot. Look at the unsuccessful thread and the fail rates in certain test centres around the country.

I'm repeating myself here again on this forum but the test needs a complete overhaul as does how driving is taught.

And fair enough as much as €85 is a rip off its not going to change, I've even heard that it could possibly become even more dearer sometime in the future but like with the NCT for those who don't pass first time it should be cheaper to do it again. It would probably encourage more drivers to sit their test and not stay on their permit too long.

Not 3/4 years ago I believe the test was only €35 to sit, then €55 and now €85. Why the massive increase (not directed at you GFish) ?

Mister Jingles

Rothmans wrote: »

Also, that roundabout rule in the Netherlands seems peculiar, so does it mean traffic already on the roundabout has to stop and give way to traffic entering the roundabout?

If that's true then wow. Roundabouts do work well but only when people use them correctly, the amount of people who do not know how to use indicators on them is unreal and others who don't know what lane there meant to be in is another big issue that does cause accidents, most of these been full licensed drivers of course.

GFish

Mister Jingles wrote: »

Whats that got to do with somebody who feels they have been failed unfairly through ?

Nothing at all.
The post I replied to (#18 above) did not specify being failed unfairly.
It said:

cmos_ajay wrote: »

If you fail a driving test in Ireland, then write a complaint letter to :

The complaints officer,
...

That advice is what I object to and called illogical, shortsighted, vindictive and irresponsible while you endorse it.

Sheep Shagger

Failed a second time at Churchtown, pretty much all for observation (or lack of) which is something I thought I had worked on.

Didn't agree with the testers comments especially when he said I didn't look over my left shoulder during the 3 point turn (which gave me a grade 2, without that I would have passed).

Got the same guy as the first attempt (looks like Gay Byrne), guess I'll have to do another lesson or two, have registered for another test this morning - another 85 notes

cmos_ajay

There is a quota system in the driving test. If 50 percent people fail, then they will have to pay 85 euros again to repeat the test. Its a money making racket guys. Wake up to the reality.

Faith+1

cmos_ajay wrote: »

There is a quota system in the driving test. If 50 percent people fail, then they will have to pay 85 euros again to repeat the test. Its a money making racket guys. Wake up to the reality.

That is a complete and utter myth. If you put the work in both theory/practice you will pass the test. It's not rocket science.

RacoonQueen

Failed in Churchtown. Got the failed before I got in the car feeling. Was ridiclously nervous, just not comfortable with the guy. Torrential rain just before I went in to the centre, muddled couldn't get my road signs. Fine on hand signals and under the bonnet. Fudged up my reverse around the corner and that threw me then I only went and clipped someones mirror. Straight fail for that anyway but he'd already given me a grade 3 for my reverse around a corner. Two kids on bikes on the road/path of the road I was reversing onto. Not really much I could do. Mostly pissed off about the 85 yoyo, nerves are the main reason I failed.

GFish

Faith+1 wrote: »

That is a complete and utter myth. If you put the work in both theory/practice you will pass the test. It's not rocket science.

Agreed. Those testers who are failing Ajay and Shagger and their like are doing exactly what they are being paid to do.

Driving does require a basic level of skill, but if you can't acquire that basic level, nobody wants you on the road. We pay driving testers to protect us from the few who can't.

GFish

RacoonQueen wrote: »

Failed in Churchtown. Got the failed before I got in the car feeling. Was ridiclously nervous, just not comfortable with the guy. ....

That sucks. But don't let it get to you.

Driving is a pretty basic skill - you sit in a tin box whose every movement you control. Making it go forward, back, left, right, etc are all basic mechanical skills:

left, right, forward, back, start, stop, change up, change down, mirror, signal, etc

You need to practice them until you don't need to think about them at all. Do it in a carpark, a field, your own drive, etc. Do it until your head is sick of it but your feet and hands can do it without your head even thinking about it

Then you can learn to drive - which is about anticipating and making decisions:
Is it safe to pull out?
Am I too close to the car in front?
What could go wrong now?
Is my speed safe?
Is the road slippy?
What could go wrong now?
What if that lorry shed it's load?
What could go wrong now?
Suppose a dog ran out in front of me now?
Suppose a dog ran out in front of the car in front of me?
What could go wrong now?

I'm sure there are bad testers, and I'm sure good drivers get failed unfairly now and again. But in general, I don't see any evidence that the testers are setting the standard too high.

RacoonQueen

GFish wrote: »

Agreed. Those testers who are failing Ajay and Shagger and their like are doing exactly what they are being paid to do.

Driving does require a basic level of skill, but if you can't acquire that basic level, nobody wants you on the road. We pay driving testers to protect us from the few who can't.

Ajay and Shagger probably aren't booking tests in the first place.

GFish wrote: »

That sucks. But don't let it get to you.

Driving is a pretty basic skill - you sit in a tin box whose every movement you control. Making it go forward, back, left, right, etc are all basic mechanical skills:

left, right, forward, back, start, stop, change up, change down, mirror, signal, etc

You need to practice them until you don't need to think about them at all. Do it in a carpark, a field, your own drive, etc. Do it until your head is sick of it but your feet and hands can do it without your head even thinking about it

Then you can learn to drive - which is about anticipating and making decisions:
Is it safe to pull out?
Am I too close to the car in front?
What could go wrong now?
Is my speed safe?
Is the road slippy?
What could go wrong now?
What if that lorry shed it's load?
What could go wrong now?
Suppose a dog ran out in front of me now?
Suppose a dog ran out in front of the car in front of me?
What could go wrong now?

I'm sure there are bad testers, and I'm sure good drivers get failed unfairly now and again. But in general, I don't see any evidence that the testers are setting the standard too high.

I think for a lot of people who feel they were failed unfairly it's because they are generally good drivers but get done over with nerves or while their observation may be good, they might miss a thing or two the examiner sees, it is the sort of test that you could do 5 times and fail on different things each time. I couldn't use the gears, clutch, brake etc right(basics) then once you do one thing wrong you know you should get right it's hard to bring yourself back from that. Going into it saying there's nothing to be nervous about it, you're well able for this - but soon as I had some oul fella in front of me I seized up.

Looking at the pass rates on the RSA website 47% for Churchtown, would think that is quite poor assuming that largely people are competent drivers when applying. :eek:

GFish

RacoonQueen wrote: »

Ajay and Shagger probably aren't booking tests in the first place.



I think for a lot of people who feel they were failed unfairly it's because they are generally good drivers but get done over with nerves or while their observation may be good, they might miss a thing or two the examiner sees, it is the sort of test that you could do 5 times and fail on different things each time. I couldn't use the gears, clutch, brake etc right(basics) then once you do one thing wrong you know you should get right it's hard to bring yourself back from that. Going into it saying there's nothing to be nervous about it, you're well able for this - but soon as I had some oul fella in front of me I seized up.

Looking at the pass rates on the RSA website 47% for Churchtown, would think that is quite poor assuming that largely people are competent drivers when applying. :eek:

I just bolded some of the reasons why you might not yet be ready to drive without supervision.

JohnMc1

Tommie Kelly wrote: »

I just passed but I do think that the whole Progress element encourages unsafe driving.
Making people do things as fast as humanly possible, adds more stress and more danger to the road. Fine if you are going stupidly slow, but getting marked down because you don't instantly get to 50kph is, in my opinion, wrong and dangerous.

Just my two cent.

Agreed. It seems like an excuse to penalize people. I can't tell you how many times I've been tempted to say "Do you want me to drive carefully or do you want me to drive like a ****ing moron? because its seems like my only way to pass is to drive like a ****ing moron."

Progress and Observation are the two the testers really love to abuse. You get faulted if you observe too much and you get faulted if you check too little. No middle ground for these two areas.

caroline2k10

Did my driving test today in woodview limerick failed by 2 grade 2's sickend but gonna reapply straight away

challengemaster

Mister Jingles wrote: »

And fair enough as much as €85 is a rip off its not going to change, I've even heard that it could possibly become even more dearer sometime in the future but like with the NCT for those who don't pass first time it should be cheaper to do it again. It would probably encourage more drivers to sit their test and not stay on their permit too long.

Not 3/4 years ago I believe the test was only €35 to sit, then €55 and now €85. Why the massive increase (not directed at you GFish) ?

I'm surprised nobody picked up on this yet, but here's your answer:

You do not pay the full whack for the driving test. Nowhere close to what it actually costs to run, even at €85. The test was and still is subsidised by the government, however with the recession and tightening budgets, the amount they can afford to subsidise the tests obviously decreased. Back when things were good and money was aplenty, they could afford to heavily subsidise the test and as such, €35 - 55 were the fees.

People tend to forget that driving is not a right, it's a privilege, and in fact there's no reason for government subsidy in the first place. So as much as a "rip off" you see it to be, you're about €1500 better off than other countries.

And no, it should not be cheaper again to repeat. The actual cost to run the test hasn't changed, so why should the government reward failure in something they're already being generous about? And when you consider the relative standard of the test, it's not difficult. There's absolutely no logical reason to reward anyone failing it.

That's like suggesting that should you fail college exams through your own fault, the college forks out the 7-9k for you to repeat the year. Living in cuckoo land I'm afraid. If anything the government should drop subsidy of the repeat and cost of the repeat test should go up, which would encourage people to actually pass their test first time around.

areyawell

So failed my driving test for the second time.
Got three grade 2's for Hazards which I have no idea what for. Didnt get one reaction to hazards the first time I did it. Met no bikes, pedestrians or anthin on the route. Asked the instructor and he wouldn't tell me at the end of the test.

One grade 3 for oberservation turning left in a housing estate. It was a T junction and there was a road on the right leading onto the road I was going onto. Said at the end of the test I never looked right. Of course I looked frickin right! No one is that stupid to go left without looking right.

1 Grade 2 for Rules/Checks - I knew everything about the engine, and all the signs still got a grade 2. How i got a frickin grade 2 there I dont know. Didnt get any marks the first time I did it.

1 Grade 3 for Obeservation on reverse? I looked in the left mirror reversing and also out the back window. looked all around me as well and all the mirrors to see if anything was coming. 2 Driving instructors said I was perfect at it. Got no thicks for using mirrors

Other couple of ticks on observation,. Do I need to turn my head 180 degrees or sumtin and tell him I'm looking right or sumtin. Second time doing it on the same route and got way more thicks than last time. Of course the test was in the highest failure rate centre in Ireland, KILKENNY. I failed the test the first time because I hit the kerb on reverse. Woulda passing it otherwise.

starlit

Take note where you were marked down on and work on them. That is as much as you can do other than practise as much as possible to pass the test. Its straight forward but sometimes the nerves can get you or not enough preparation.

I wasn't far off from a pass but just made two mistakes I shouldn't have only for them I'd have passed. Anyway since then I am challenging myself with the driving more in the hope I pass the test eventually. I didn't think I pass first time anyway but felt it be 50 50 if I did or didn't at the time. It's probably better I didn't pass first time meaning it gives me a chance to work on things I need to take note of.

Hazards and observation and other things usually cost people a fail. Its hard going if you miss a pass by two faults. It was the case for me but in a way I rather that at least I know I have the confidence and reached a certain standard to get to that stage of passing.

lukegriffen

challengemaster wrote: »

You do not pay the full whack for the driving test. Nowhere close to what it actually costs to run, even at €85. The test was and still is subsidised by the government, however with the recession and tightening budgets, the amount they can afford to subsidise the tests obviously decreased.

I don't think that's true, there was a spokesman on radio 1 last week who said the driving test is now fully self-sufficient (obviously due to rising costs for learners), it was costing the taxpayer about 17 million a year X years ago, but nothing now.

Onomeanacon

I couldn't imagine my test going any better for me but then I failed with 20 Grade 2 faults and 3 Grade 3s (2 for not stopping at stop signs and 1 for being too reckless entering a roundabout which I know didn't happen). Any instructor I've ever had said that I have a good awareness of when I've make a mistake because I tend to be very hard on myself.

When I complained and pointed out where I thought he was wrong the tester backtracked a bit but still said that he didn't feel "comfortable". He tore into me and basically asked if I had even had lessons. It was pretty much the worst personal experience I've ever had.

If I had failed with the typical 9 or 10-ish faults I could have taken it. I don't think I can ever drive again if I'm actually that bad.

Can I chalk it down to that tester being an *expletive deleted* to me or should I just take the bus?

ZombieMed

My sis failed several years ago. As I had helped teach her and monitored her driving she was a pretty decent driver. We went through the failure report after as she was very upset and basically looked at it as constructive criticisms..

The tester marked you as not doing something even though you were sure you were - so make it doubly apparent next time - practice doing everything to the letter as you drive - be conscious as you drive about what you weren't doing to make it apparent and a habit.
The tester said you had done something you felt you didn't - monitor yourself or have someone else do so as you're driving to see if you might do it once in a while, without realising.
Take a pre-test lesson a few days in advance to see if you're still doing anything wrong - request the instructor to be particularly critical. This gives you a few days to fix whatever bad habits remain.

After you've been driving for a while it's automatic to let your body get on with the driving, sometimes you might not even realise what you're doing wrong.

I passed my test first time, in a Dublin centre. On the day I was extra aware of what I was doing and tried to show that I was checking blind spots, keeping up with traffic, stopping smoothly. I think I'm a good driver (I know everyone does but I'm just saying I'm a competent driver) but that I was particularly aware of where I could go wrong on that day and aimed to cover those errors - good drivers fail because they forget the specifics and concentrate on just driving as normal. Also, I get a little nervous during tests so I waited until I was very comfortable driving before taking the test. Anyway, I didn't pass because I'm a good driver but just because I didn't make enough of those little mistakes to fail.

ZombieMed

RacoonQueen wrote: »

Two kids on bikes on the road/path of the road I was reversing onto. Not really much I could do.

Same thing with reverse around a corner on my test, except that I said to the tester that I was going wait until the kids moved past the car before I'd reverse.. cue 60 seconds of waiting and then a decent reverse with no pressure.

I also get a bit nervous.. just wait until you are very comfortable with driving so nothing should change if you're nervous.

JohnMc1

Onomeanacon wrote: »

I couldn't imagine my test going any better for me but then I failed with 20 Grade 2 faults and 3 Grade 3s (2 for not stopping at stop signs and 1 for being too reckless entering a roundabout which I know didn't happen). Any instructor I've ever had said that I have a good awareness of when I've make a mistake because I tend to be very hard on myself.

When I complained and pointed out where I thought he was wrong the tester backtracked a bit but still said that he didn't feel "comfortable". He tore into me and basically asked if I had even had lessons. It was pretty much the worst personal experience I've ever had.

If I had failed with the typical 9 or 10-ish faults I could have taken it. I don't think I can ever drive again if I'm actually that bad.

Can I chalk it down to that tester being an *expletive deleted* to me or should I just take the bus?

You should file a complaint with the RSA. He has no right to tear into you during a test [or even after]. Sadly alot of these testers are powertripping jackasses. For €80+ we all deserve to be treated with respect.

Shakti

the tao of driving tests says 'one must become like tester to pass test',

weeks leading up to test one must become hyper critical of every small defect in everyday life especially in the lives of others and write lengthy scathing driving critiques on internet forums, one must wear matching socks at all times and regular bowel movements must be established and strictly adhered to this daniel san is .... 'the way of the tester'.

Einhard

So I failed on Friday and I can't really complain. I was alwatys on the backfoot as it were, as I had to use my instructor's car and I've never really gotten used to it. My own is up for NCT, so couldn't use that. Anyway, thought I had failed within 10 minutes because he kept on scribbling away in his pad. Went through the test, and just as we were coming to the end, a lorry pulled out in front of me. In normal circumstances, I would have stopped, but they're so feckin anal about progress, and I stupdily tried to slip in alongside the truck. Ended up clipping the kerb and getting a straight red. Didn't mind so much as I assumed I had already failed about 5 times over going by the amount of scribbling her was doing.

Got back to the centre, and lo and behold I had failed, but only on that one red. I had gotten 5 blues, and all the rest of his scribbling was greens. I had completely forgotten that he'd note the greens because my instructor didn't in pre-tests. So if I hadn't clipped the keb I'd have passed. Head=Wrecked!!

Still, it was a good experience and I've re-booked. Hope to do it again in a different car in a few weeks.

intellectual dosser

Did my test a few months ago.

Turned onto a road - there was a large box truck coming the other direction waiting at the traffic lights I had just come through. It was blocking half my side. The car in front went up on the footpath - which I have no option of doing.

I could have stayed, holding up the traffic behind me at the traffic lights causing gridlock = probable fail.
I could have gone up on the footpath = definite fail.

I eased forward using the clutch to see if I could squeeze through. Was almost past him, my heart was dancing and then *CLUNK* as the wing-mirror hit off the rear-lights bar of the lorry. Heart sank - I had to drive around for another 20 minutes knowing I'd failed the test, that it was all a huge waste of time and I'd have to come back.

Got to the depot - instructor brought me into the office - and painfully slowly told me I had PASSED.

I managed to catch myself before saying "I'd sworn I'd failed as soon as I hit the truck" and got the fcuk out of there as fast as I could.