Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Property Bubble Mark II

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The thing is, as soon as people can borrow they will. Irish people (by and large) appear to have learned very little and are still irrationally attached to property. I'd be highly surprised if prices don't go back up before busting again. A responsible government would introduce legal maximums (wage ratio) to prevent over extension and thereby preventing another bubble, but the government appears to think that increasing property prices are a good thing :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 764 ✭✭✭beagle001


    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/houseprice-rebound-to-divide-the-country-2900588.html

    THE property market is within months of reaching the bottom and house prices in the greater Dublin area could rebound with "the speed and vigour" of a ping-pong ball released under water, according to one expert.

    FFS
    According to one expert ohh my the clowns that floated the previous bubble are now attempting to inflate another.
    The property "experts" in Ireland are blowing smoke up their own behind,property has still a far way to go.
    Once the PS gets nailed onto line with the wages of their European counterparts and wages around the country decrease where are theygoing to get the money for theses sheds.
    Zero growth and a second recession followed by massive emigration and unemployment,how on earth are prices going to rebound in a still depressed Market with zero lending and crippled banks internationally.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    It isn't an expert though, it is the governor of the central bank which just makes it worse TBH.

    The housing market will only pick up after rents start to increase again which will show an increase in demand for rental properties that is likely to cause people to think buying a house makes sense again.

    At the moment, I am looking at switching house I'm renting and I'm in no rush so looking for past few months trying to spot a nicer place to move to and the same places are still up there for about the past 2 months now that I wouldn't bother moving to because I'm not willing to trade down.

    Particularly apartments are stuck on the market with nobody willing to rent them. Until people have to resort to renting the apartments, no hope the housing market can recover IMO.

    The few people that will buy that are starting families and feel the need to own a house might buy but that is about it IMO.

    Why would I buy when I can rent at about half the price of repayments on a mortgage and not have to do any of the upkeep on the house? At the moment, I don't even have to mow the lawns in my current house.

    Should say though that this isn't Dublin I'm talk about and situation could be different there but I don't really think it is (just looked on Daft for Dublin City and 4,003 properties available to rent across the city and obviously that doesn't include those already rented that aren't still being advertised). This is what happens when you over saturate the rental market and balloon the buying market.

    House prices will have to fall to bargain basement prices before I'd consider buying. I'd say we are still 2-3 years away from the bottom myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    IS now a good time to buy your first home? Not according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which last week said that house prices in Ireland are 32pc higher than they should be.

    However, this view was contradicted by the Governor of the Irish Central Bank, John Hurley, who insisted that house prices here were not over-valued.

    Tuesday April 15 2008

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,581 ✭✭✭Voltex


    I think it was Alan Barret from the ESRI who made the point that there has been a growing number of young 30 somethings with a large cash pile waiting for the bottom of the market....and ready to take the plunge.

    Iv had discussions with family memebers who live in Europe and some of them can see the Irish turn away from property ownership and to long term rentals..say 10year leases. However, I just think its too ingrained into our culture to not aspire to own our own home.

    Added to the cultural aspect, the recent census figures pointed out that quality homes in parts of Dublin will be in short supply within a couple of years, particularly in Fingal.

    BTW..does anyone know how many homes we should be building every year? (I cant believe 10k a year is anything close to enough)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,761 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    As there is no access to money for our banks there will be no access to mortgages for the public from these banks, until this changes house prices will continue to decline regardless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭Yahew


    Nothing is going to happen until the European crisis is resolved. I would say, if it is, 2014 might be a time to buy. But property will be lower by 10% by then, at the least.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭Yahew


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    IS now a good time to buy your first home? Not according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which last week said that house prices in Ireland are 32pc higher than they should be.

    However, this view was contradicted by the Governor of the Irish Central Bank, John Hurley, who insisted that house prices here were not over-valued.

    Tuesday April 15 2008

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    Astounding, if I didnt hate tribunals - more money to Official Ireland - I would suggest we investigate this muppet. He was either incompetent, or corrupt.

    ( I know central banks lie, but you can always say nothing).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭Fighting Irish


    murphaph wrote: »
    The thing is, as soon as people can borrow they will. Irish people (by and large) appear to have learned very little and are still irrationally attached to property. I'd be highly surprised if prices don't go back up before busting again. A responsible government would introduce legal maximums (wage ratio) to prevent over extension and thereby preventing another bubble, but the government appears to think that increasing property prices are a good thing :confused:

    Or else they're thinking "the public won't vote me in again if i don't give them what they want"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    Bulldoze apartments built in crap locations and bulldoze the worst/least sought after of the ghost estates. Time to put the bad old says behind us and move on.

    In any society people will want to buy houses, building them provides work etc. But this must be sustainable. The property market does need to get of its arse again but not to boom levels. People seem allergic to property now and that is not entirely healthy either for the economy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭femur61


    beagle001 wrote: »
    According to one expert ohh my the clowns that floated the previous bubble are now attempting to inflate another.
    The property "experts" in Ireland are blowing smoke up their own behind,property has still a far way to go.
    Once the PS gets nailed onto line with the wages of their European counterparts and wages around the country decrease where are theygoing to get the money for theses sheds.
    Zero growth and a second recession followed by massive emigration and unemployment,how on earth are prices going to rebound in a still depressed Market with zero lending and crippled banks internationally.

    An auctioneer friend of mine said once bench marking was approved house prices went up 25% overnight. We don't need another falsely inflated market.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭Tora Bora


    femur61 wrote: »
    An auctioneer friend of mine said once bench marking was approved house prices went up 25% overnight. We don't need another falsely inflated market.

    And if an "auctioneer", said that, it must be true:cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    femur61 wrote: »
    An auctioneer friend of mine said once bench marking was approved house prices went up 25% overnight. We don't need another falsely inflated market.

    It should perhaps be pointed out that there's absolutely no sign of such a jump in the house price index.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    In the early 1960s, my grandparents purchased land and built a home for less than 2000 pounds. Now that was a fair sum of money for the times but the lion's share of the costs were savings with only a few hundred pegged on at the end that borrowed from a bank. Thus, my grandparents did not take out a loan that was 10 to 15 times their annual income.

    Currently, a house across the road from me is on sale for 300k. If I bought that house, I would be putting myself in debt to the tune of over 10 times my annual income, before tax and that's assuming a bank would be foolish enough to give me the loan.

    The point I'm making here is that when my grandparents bought their home, the cost was high but not insanely so. I think house prices will settle at a level such that the average earner can purchase one without taking on a huge level of debt.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭foxyboxer


    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/houseprice-rebound-to-divide-the-country-2900588.html

    THE property market is within months of reaching the bottom and house prices in the greater Dublin area could rebound with "the speed and vigour" of a ping-pong ball released under water, according to one expert.

    FFS

    From Douglas Newman Good eh? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I see absolutely no signs of "recovery" in house prices. What's selling has been selling primarily to cash buyers and lending conditions are extremely tight. We're largely back to the case of "the only way to get a loan is to prove you don't need one", unless you've a hefty deposit and rock-solid public sector employment the banks don't want to know you.

    As a 31 year old with a young family I should be exactly the sort of person buying but prices are still way too high for me to realistically consider it. Like RichardAnd says, to purchase something in my area I'd be looking at 5 to 8 times my gross salary and I have nothing like 10% of that in savings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭edgecutter


    House prices can only increase if the banks LEND. This does not look like happening for a long time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭Sea Sharp


    More blathering on by people who I can all but assume have vested interests in property.

    The floor will be reached when the banks start lending and people are willing to buy again or when prices are low enough to attract a flock of foreign investment. And given the oversupply of property in this country it's quite a flock of investment that is needed.

    Not bloody likely in the next 5 years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    An interesting comment from namawinelake comparing Ireland to NI, food for thought there...
    The one metric that I find most surprising about our residential property bust is that we are down 43% from peak according to the CSO and given inflation has been flat since 2007 (I think we are 0.1% only up on a CPI basis) the real decline from peak is also 43%.

    Northern Ireland, sans ECB cheap money, planning gombeenism, our Keystone Cops financial regulation, our ghost estate legacy and oversupply and with an unemployment rate of just 7.4%, is already down 45% from peak and in real terms, stripping out inflation, 52%.

    Yes there are instances of prices 70-80% off peak but the CSO tracks eight mortgage companies and in the last year for which cash figures are available, 2009, cash accounted for just 6% of the total market.

    What is most remarkable about our bust is not the collapse, but the structures we have put in place to distort, retard and generally prevent residential property finding its natural level. And these artificial interventions probably make our bust unique, so a 4-year bust, a 6-year bust, a 10-year bust? Who knows, with the level of distortion in the Irish (Republic) property market, it could last decades.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Voltex wrote: »
    I think it was Alan Barret from the ESRI who made the point that there has been a growing number of young 30 somethings with a large cash pile waiting for the bottom of the market....and ready to take the plunge.

    I'm one ;) I'm not desperate to buy either, thats a difference to the bubble madness. I will buy when I see value for money.

    On the point of demographics, its the Irish adults(who usually buy) that are emigrating to be replaced by immigrants who rent(replacing both sets who previously left).

    At present prices, alot of housing is still dictating that you need 2 buyers to buy a unit along with the usual job security and hefty deposit. Along with bust banks, there are too many factors weighing against the so called expert in the article.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭D1stant


    gurramok wrote: »
    I'm one ;) I'm not desperate to buy either, thats a difference to the bubble madness. I will buy when I see value for money.

    On the point of demographics, its the Irish adults(who usually buy) that are emigrating to be replaced by immigrants who rent(replacing both sets who previously left).

    At present prices, alot of housing is still dictating that you need 2 buyers to buy a unit along with the usual job security and hefty deposit. Along with bust banks, there are too many factors weighing against the so called expert in the article.

    I have a feeling that the Gov will try and prod people like you into buying. So they will announce a raising of stamp duty in 12 months or so in the next budget from 1% back to 3% or something

    Now if you believe that your target house will continue to fall at 10-15% next year that wont affect you. If you are looking at a well situated 3-4 bed semi in a city, you may start to twitch.


  • Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭ Grayson Thankful Stoplight


    Voltex wrote: »
    I think it was Alan Barret from the ESRI who made the point that there has been a growing number of young 30 somethings with a large cash pile waiting for the bottom of the market....and ready to take the plunge.

    Iv had discussions with family memebers who live in Europe and some of them can see the Irish turn away from property ownership and to long term rentals..say 10year leases. However, I just think its too ingrained into our culture to not aspire to own our own home.

    Added to the cultural aspect, the recent census figures pointed out that quality homes in parts of Dublin will be in short supply within a couple of years, particularly in Fingal.

    BTW..does anyone know how many homes we should be building every year? (I cant believe 10k a year is anything close to enough)
    Owning your own home is better, the problem is people overstretching themselves and being lent sums of money they shouldnt.

    I always find this discussion amusing, as if people are stupid if they want to own a home rather than rent.

    Who is in the better position, the dutch person who rents their whole life and has nothing to show as they hit old age, or the Irish person who ends with something tangible that they own?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Maura74


    Owning your own home is better, the problem is people overstretching themselves and being lent sums of money they shouldnt.

    I always find this discussion amusing, as if people are stupid if they want to own a home rather than rent.

    Who is in the better position, the dutch person who rents their whole life and has nothing to show as they hit old age, or the Irish person who ends with something tangible that they own?

    You will have a place to live nothing else. You will live longer if you do not have the worry about getting your next mortgage payments if you are made unemployed. The stress of the maintenance of up keep the said home.

    At the end of your life you may have to go into a care home and who get the home them it will go towards fees for the care home owner. If you are fortunate enough not to have to go into a care home then a greedy family member will get it.

    What is this something tangible business all about?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,451 ✭✭✭Delancey


    I'd love to know who or what will finance this vigorous rebound in house prices.
    Banks anyone ??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Owning your own home is better, the problem is people overstretching themselves and being lent sums of money they shouldnt.

    I always find this discussion amusing, as if people are stupid if they want to own a home rather than rent.

    Who is in the better position, the dutch person who rents their whole life and has nothing to show as they hit old age, or the Irish person who ends with something tangible that they own?

    If only everyone else were as smart as us!

    amused,
    Scofflaw


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    RichardAnd wrote: »
    ...............

    Currently, a house across the road from me is on sale for 300k. If I bought that house, I would be putting myself in debt to the tune of over 10 times my annual income, before tax and that's assuming a bank would be foolish enough to give me the loan. .........

    Let's be realistic, unless you had a huge deposit or a guarantor no bank would have lent you over 10 times your salary in the boom either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,581 ✭✭✭Voltex


    I find it difficult to believe that the largest property owner in the country wont play some key pivitol role in the future property market of this country.

    There was some talk a couple of months ago about some "Hire-Purchase" scheme NAMA would play alonfg with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Voltex wrote: »
    I think it was Alan Barret from the ESRI who made the point that there has been a growing number of young 30 somethings with a large cash pile waiting for the bottom of the market....and ready to take the plunge.

    Iv had discussions with family memebers who live in Europe and some of them can see the Irish turn away from property ownership and to long term rentals..say 10year leases. However, I just think its too ingrained into our culture to not aspire to own our own home.

    Added to the cultural aspect, the recent census figures pointed out that quality homes in parts of Dublin will be in short supply within a couple of years, particularly in Fingal.

    BTW..does anyone know how many homes we should be building every year? (I cant believe 10k a year is anything close to enough)

    Whats with the "Quality" thing here....?

    One of the defining elements of our native prediliction with property ownership has been the ability of Developers to market base-metal as gold.

    Even during the madcap days,I longed to find a developer/builder with enough honesty/credibility to describe their latest scheme/estate as "Ordinary","Nondescript" or "Plain".

    Instead we were treated to a countryside littered end to end with "Luxury" residences with wildly enthralling elements such as en-sweets and beedays....:rolleyes:

    Voltex,I would suggest your European based family members view's are worth just a bit more in real terms...however until our Governments make a definitive move towards establishing a properly regulated and monitored private rental sector this will remain a pipedream.

    I am still waiting for some Germanic type to enlighten me as to what happens to the elderly burghers of the Rheinland in their lifelong rented dwellings.....are German streets awash with 70 somethings thrown out by their evil top-hatted landlords ?

    As long as Irish Government policy remains intertwined with encouraging and promoting the purchase of private property as the prime means of establishing a Social Presence then we are forever doomed to lurch from Crash to Crash with no hope of long term recovery.

    We really need to develop a better understanding of how to live our lives independently of long-term Property Ownership and it's attendant financial impositions.

    A long shot,I know,but one which neds exploration nonetheless ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭ Grayson Thankful Stoplight


    Maura74 wrote: »
    You will have a place to live nothing else. You will live longer if you do not have the worry about getting your next mortgage payments if you are made unemployed. The stress of the maintenance of up keep the said home.

    At the end of your life you may have to go into a care home and who get the home them it will go towards fees for the care home owner. If you are fortunate enough not to have to go into a care home then a greedy family member will get it.

    What is this something tangible business all about?

    Live longer due to not worrying about having to pay the mortgage, are you serious?

    You have made my point for me, if a person has to go into a care home then if they sell the house it will pay for the home rather then the persons children having to economically destroy themselves paying for a home.

    Also if the person looses their job then the mortgage provider will be more accommodating then a landlord.

    If the person didnt have to go to a home then they can leave it to there "greedy" kids :rolleyes: but they made sure they had their security blanket.

    Tangible means it can be physically touched i.e a real asset.

    Financially speaking, renting would only make sense if the cost of rent v mortgage per month was so much lower that you are going to end up with more surplus cash after the life of the mortgage v the value of the house.

    All of this of course only works if the person is prudent with their finances and did not over extend themselves to a ridiculous degree on how large a mortgage they got in comparison with their salary.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Owning your own home is better, the problem is people overstretching themselves and being lent sums of money they shouldnt.

    I always find this discussion amusing, as if people are stupid if they want to own a home rather than rent.

    Who is in the better position, the dutch person who rents their whole life and has nothing to show as they hit old age, or the Irish person who ends with something tangible that they own?
    The Dutch OAP has probably lived life to the full and gone on 2 or 3 holidays a year for the last 30 years, has never had to worry about any building maintenance and will live in a rent controlled apartment until the end of their days, covered by their generous pension that they've built up for themselves instead of paying a mortgage. It's not as clear cut as you make out ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,219 ✭✭✭woodoo


    murphaph wrote: »
    The Dutch OAP has probably lived life to the full and gone on 2 or 3 holidays a year for the last 30 years, has never had to worry about any building maintenance and will live in a rent controlled apartment until the end of their days, covered by their generous pension that they've built up for themselves instead of paying a mortgage. It's not as clear cut as you make out ;)

    Paddy wouldn't let that happen though. He would be upping the rents as often as he could to pay for the Land Rover and the fancy house. We still have a screw thy neighbour attitude here unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,581 ✭✭✭Voltex


    AlekSmart wrote: »
    Whats with the "Quality" thing here....?

    One of the defining elements of our native prediliction with property ownership has been the ability of Developers to market base-metal as gold.

    Even during the madcap days,I longed to find a developer/builder with enough honesty/credibility to describe their latest scheme/estate as "Ordinary","Nondescript" or "Plain".

    Instead we were treated to a countryside littered end to end with "Luxury" residences with wildly enthralling elements such as en-sweets and beedays....:rolleyes:

    Voltex,I would suggest your European based family members view's are worth just a bit more in real terms...however until our Governments make a definitive move towards establishing a properly regulated and monitored private rental sector this will remain a pipedream.

    I am still waiting for some Germanic type to enlighten me as to what happens to the elderly burghers of the Rheinland in their lifelong rented dwellings.....are German streets awash with 70 somethings thrown out by their evil top-hatted landlords ?

    As long as Irish Government policy remains intertwined with encouraging and promoting the purchase of private property as the prime means of establishing a Social Presence then we are forever doomed to lurch from Crash to Crash with no hope of long term recovery.

    We really need to develop a better understanding of how to live our lives independently of long-term Property Ownership and it's attendant financial impositions.

    A long shot,I know,but one which neds exploration nonetheless ?

    I think we had a period from 1999 through to 2002 where the homes that were being built could be described as "quality" homes. Where you bought a home as oppossed to a property and where you got 3 bedrooms a front garden, a back garden and had amenities within a short distance.

    From 2003 onwards we had these crazy high density (I could never figure this one out..ffs we only had 3.8 million people..why high density!) apartments over duplexs things!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Owning your own home is better, the problem is people overstretching themselves and being lent sums of money they shouldnt.

    I always find this discussion amusing, as if people are stupid if they want to own a home rather than rent.

    Who is in the better position, the dutch person who rents their whole life and has nothing to show as they hit old age, or the Irish person who ends with something tangible that they own?


    whilst I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying here, it's worth noting that as most people get older, the desire for wealth and property tends to diminish. It would be nice to sit in a house and know that it belongs to you in the fullest sense of the word but when you lay on your deathbed, all the years of paying off a mortgage might not seem too worthwhile.

    Just my thoughts ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 pilastr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 413 ✭✭noxqs


    Why is it that the notion of 'having something to show' after paying a mortgage for 1/3rd or more of ones life doesn't seem to bother people in the Nordic part of the continent as much as here ?

    What are you going to do once you 'own' it ? Sell it? After paying back twice the initial sum, how much is gained in real terms after inflation? And more importantly - then what? Rent?

    Pension schemes are where the money should be for long term security.

    The Dutch, the Germans, the Scandinavians and so on - have very decent rental accommodation, at fair prices - many of these countries even have inspectors to value rentals to make sure the price is fair, and if not, it's enforced that the landlord pay back with interest from the lease start until the day of inspection. So that keeps prices in line with the true market value.

    The long term leases are usually until the renter moves out, not fixed term. Comes usually unfurnished so the renter has their own furniture and takes it with them when they move.

    Cost of accommodation is be it mortgage or rent is really just a cost of living. I think many would be quite happy accepting that if Ireland had proper regulations in place, which is far from the case as it is now. It's a bit of a wild west in fact.

    Many people grow up in apartments, there is nothing wrong with that. There's parks and playgrounds and communal areas so who needs a back yard, and a wee front garden ?

    To be perfectly honest, I don't like renting, here - and would prefer my own place. But that is solely because of the awful state of the Irish rental market.

    I'd prefer to rent, save money in stocks and bonds plus pension scheme, rather than rely on an illiquid 'asset' such as a house to have 'something to show' in my old age. I'd say being better off is quite subjective. It all depends how you manage money in the end and what you value. But being 70 or what the pension age will be when its my time, sitting in a house I just barely finished paying off - wouldn't make me feel very rich or secure if I had no other savings or pensions in place. Especially since property taxation may very well go the way of the rest of Europe, I don't know how much it is exactly but 1% of the value of the house or something per year I think? What is fact now may very well change in 30 years if not sooner.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭fedor.2.


    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/houseprice-rebound-to-divide-the-country-2900588.html

    THE property market is within months of reaching the bottom and house prices in the greater Dublin area could rebound with "the speed and vigour" of a ping-pong ball released under water, according to one expert.

    FFS



    Thank god


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Maura74


    noxqs wrote: »
    Why is it that the notion of 'having something to show' after paying a mortgage for 1/3rd or more of ones life doesn't seem to bother people in the Nordic part of the continent as much as here ?

    What are you going to do once you 'own' it ? Sell it? After paying back twice the initial sum, how much is gained in real terms after inflation? And more importantly - then what? Rent?

    Pension schemes are where the money should be for long term security.

    The Dutch, the Germans, the Scandinavians and so on - have very decent rental accommodation, at fair prices - many of these countries even have inspectors to value rentals to make sure the price is fair, and if not, it's enforced that the landlord pay back with interest from the lease start until the day of inspection. So that keeps prices in line with the true market value.

    The long term leases are usually until the renter moves out, not fixed term. Comes usually unfurnished so the renter has their own furniture and takes it with them when they move.

    Cost of accommodation is be it mortgage or rent is really just a cost of living. I think many would be quite happy accepting that if Ireland had proper regulations in place, which is far from the case as it is now. It's a bit of a wild west in fact.

    Many people grow up in apartments, there is nothing wrong with that. There's parks and playgrounds and communal areas so who needs a back yard, and a wee front garden ?

    To be perfectly honest, I don't like renting, here - and would prefer my own place. But that is solely because of the awful state of the Irish rental market.

    I'd prefer to rent, save money in stocks and bonds plus pension scheme, rather than rely on an illiquid 'asset' such as a house to have 'something to show' in my old age. I'd say being better off is quite subjective. It all depends how you manage money in the end and what you value. But being 70 or what the pension age will be when its my time, sitting in a house I just barely finished paying off - wouldn't make me feel very rich or secure if I had no other savings or pensions in place. Especially since property taxation may very well go the way of the rest of Europe, I don't know how much it is exactly but 1% of the value of the house or something per year I think? What is fact now may very well change in 30 years if not sooner.


    I agree with most of your post. Why do people put so much emphasis on owing a property. If you get a mortgage you will not own you home until the mortgatge is paid back and that be up 30 or 40 years depends on your ability to pay it back and if you do not remortgage it to pay for its up keep also depends that you will not lose your employment though ill health or made redundant. confused.gif

    Also if you get a mortgage you will be tied to that for god knows how long and not free from the responsiblity of it to do as you want until you get a tenants to pay for the monthly payments more hassle.rolleyes.gif

    I purchased my home in UK and it was not fun when you lose your ability to pay for it and all the costs around it, include mortgage equivalent to rent of course, council tax (you pay for this in rented property as well) insurances, water rates, maintenance of property and that can be no fun when you get older, as you will not be able to do any DIY as when did when you were younger and of course the garden that is a big hassle in itself if you are suffering from any kind of age related conditions, unless you are very lucky you will get these conditions with ageing. redface.gif

    Renting was a god send foir me, no more worry about any of the above, let someone else do it and you will live longer.smile.gif


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    You know whats the worst part is people

    The FF government wanted and fueled a property bubble since it brought in money and allowed them to bribe the population for a long long time

    The FG/Lab government must be also secretly hopping for a "correction" and "recovery" (note how the "correction" and "recovery" words were used on yesterdays RTE docu, as if high prices are "normal" and "desirable") since NAMA (yes i know its FF/Greens bastard child) is making a farce of the market and they need NAMA and Banks to work out (and not cost em more, making them make tough decisions)

    We live in a state where the whole governing and professional (solicitors, engineers, accountants) and public (gardai with multiple BTLs bought on nice salaries) sections of society are involved heavily and praying for a "recovery to normal", all while the renters (and this is spoken as home-owner who rented) and taxpayers are being screwed, and dont forget the banks the recent "mortgage forgiveness" drive could be fueled by them since it would mean the banks would get the money not from those who own it to them but from the bigger group of suckers called the taxpayer.


    For all the talk of turning the corner we get here, once again I ask, what has changed to reform the broken system?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Maura74


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    You know whats the worst part is people

    The FF government wanted and fueled a property bubble since it brought in money and allowed them to bribe the population for a long long time

    The FG/Lab government must be also secretly hopping for a "correction" and "recovery" (note how the "correction" and "recovery" words were used on yesterdays RTE docu, as if high prices are "normal" and "desirable") since NAMA (yes i know its FF/Greens bastard child) is making a farce of the market and they need NAMA and Banks to work out (and not cost em more, making them make tough decisions)

    We live in a state where the whole governing and professional (solicitors, engineers, accountants) and public (gardai with multiple BTLs bought on nice salaries) sections of society are involved heavily and praying for a "recovery to normal", all while the renters (and this is spoken as home-owner who rented) and taxpayers are being screwed, and dont forget the banks the recent "mortgage forgiveness" drive could be fueled by them since it would mean the banks would get the money not from those who own it to them but from the bigger group of suckers called the taxpayer.


    For all the talk of turning the corner we get here, once again I ask, what has changed to reform the broken system?

    People feel rich when their homes were rising in value. The average employee did not worry so much about getting a pay rise because they felt rich by their home/houses going up in value and of course selling their home would bring in a lot of case for them. The government wants to back to this feel good scenario making lots of money for them as well as solicitors and the other professionals for doing very little for it. :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Maura74 wrote: »
    People feel rich when their homes were rising in value. The average employee did not worry so much about getting a pay rise because they felt rich by their home/houses going up in value and of course selling their home would bring in a lot of case for them. The government wants to back to this feel good scenario making lots of money for them as well as solicitors and the other professionals for doing very little for it. :(

    And thats why I am afraid we are doomed to repeat the same mistakes, despite all the "turned the corner" talk we get here, no frigging lessons have been learned and nothing is in place to prevent repeat such as:
    * nonrecourse mortgages,
    * personal bankruptcy like US,
    * income to loan ratio limits,
    * % loan limits,
    * transparent price/area database
    * banking failure resolution (denmark is getting there)
    * eu wide deposit protection like FDIC
    * the Regulator actually doing their job :rolleyes:
    * separation of depositors and bondholders
    * rental legislation

    that's just top of my head

    I swear nothing has been done, if we do enter another bubble it be an even bigger tragedy


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Maura74


    None­­­ of them have a clue what to do about the current state of their country. We voting them in to do a job, but they are failing miserably. We have them now asking us for ways to get them out of the mess that they are in....:mad:I thought that was why they are getting their large salaries plus expenses which can be sometimes larger than their salaries, plus all their other perks such as gold plated pensions, also expenses after they have retired to keep them in business……how many average working perople gets that amount and still do not know what to do about the state that they got the country into…….:mad::mad::mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Lantus


    Voltex wrote: »
    I think we had a period from 1999 through to 2002 where the homes that were being built could be described as "quality" homes. Where you bought a home as oppossed to a property and where you got 3 bedrooms a front garden, a back garden and had amenities within a short distance.

    From 2003 onwards we had these crazy high density (I could never figure this one out..ffs we only had 3.8 million people..why high density!) apartments over duplexs things!

    Agreed, there was a fundemental problem with the planners and people making high level decisions as to what sort of property and society we created. The places where we live and work form the cornerstone of a social and economic community in which we exist. Instead we patted each other on the back by building soulless estates, apartments and other silly property types with out infrastructure, community or centres.

    We also built very low quality property, poorley built and with terrible long term thought given to energy and sustainability.

    The regulation for planning and construction is still almost non existent. It's the last "cowboy economy" and nothing has changed.

    The fundementals need to change before we can start to rebuild a solid housing market.

    Large swaiths of housing and apartments need to be torn down.

    We need to stop building apartments outside of Dublin. In such a small country with small population it's just maddness to build them at all when housing can be made so cheaply these days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    As usual, people have swung too far the other way with the 'Property=B.A.D' argument.

    Overpriced property = bad
    Considered property ownership != bad


    Consider the Irish Renter vs the Irish buyer.

    Irish buyer bought in the 80s.
    First 10 years of repayments nearly killed him.
    Middle 5 years of repayments were fine.
    Last 10 years of repayments were less than what he'd spent on petrol monthly.
    Now he's retired and lives comfortably, plus has something to pass to his kids.

    Why? Inflation.


    Irish renter started renting in the 80s.
    First 10 years, it consumed 30% of his salary, easy peasy, no demand.
    Middle 5 years, 40% of his salary
    Last 10 years, 50% of his salary!
    Now he's retired and he can barely afford an ice cream because of rent payments, plus has nothing to pass on to his kids.

    Why? Inflation.


    Ireland is not Germany.
    Anyone who has ever been forced to rent in Ireland will understand why we have a national obsession with owning property.
    It's not a throwback to the famine or some other mystical bull****.
    It's a simple fact of life: You're by and large fcuked if you rent in Ireland, compared to Holland or Germany.

    Even the people who are screwed now with negative equity will be in a better situation come the 2020s than the Irish renter. Unless things change. Just look how high rents still are in Cork or Dublin compared to other countries.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    Why? Inflation.

    I just checked with CSO
    with this time in 2006 as base of 100, early 2006 was 98 and now 2010 was 101.2 for CPI, inflation is practically non existent in last 5 years

    ECB target is 2% inflation, in 80s and 90s we werent in the euro needless to say, if the ECB do their job then debtors can forget about inflating away their debts
    and dont forget that house prices fell 42-50% in same period too...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    Ireland is not Germany.

    What all the people buying houses since 2000, and the FF plonkers, forgot is that Ireland is now Germany in monetary terms. They were taking their cue from the situation faced by their parents or from English TV and newspapers rather than the actual situation where inflation was 2%. The bankers, who knew this perfectly well, gave out the loans and took the pensions and headed off to America.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    Ireland is not Germany alright, except that we are tied to them and their influence of the ECB via the euro.

    If Ireland leaves the euro or there is large global shock then yes I could see how the inflation argument can be made but otherwise 0-2% low inflation is here to stay for us


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 559 ✭✭✭Maura74


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    As usual, people have swung too far the other way with the 'Property=B.A.D' argument.

    Overpriced property = bad
    Considered property ownership != bad


    Consider the Irish Renter vs the Irish buyer.

    Irish buyer bought in the 80s.
    First 10 years of repayments nearly killed him.
    Middle 5 years of repayments were fine.
    Last 10 years of repayments were less than what he'd spent on petrol monthly.
    Now he's retired and lives comfortably, plus has something to pass to his kids.

    Why? Inflation.


    Irish renter started renting in the 80s.
    First 10 years, it consumed 30% of his salary, easy peasy, no demand.
    Middle 5 years, 40% of his salary
    Last 10 years, 50% of his salary!
    Now he's retired and he can barely afford an ice cream because of rent payments, plus has nothing to pass on to his kids.

    Why? Inflation.


    Ireland is not Germany.
    Anyone who has ever been forced to rent in Ireland will understand why we have a national obsession with owning property.
    It's not a throwback to the famine or some other mystical bull****.
    It's a simple fact of life: You're by and large fcuked if you rent in Ireland, compared to Holland or Germany.

    Even the people who are screwed now with negative equity will be in a better situation come the 2020s than the Irish renter. Unless things change. Just look how high rents still are in Cork or Dublin compared to other countries.

    What you are saying is your children will not be able to do anything for themselves? will they not be capable of working and making home themselves. They will probably get married and perhaps they will only value you in your old age for what you are going to leave them....Therefore, if and when property market finds the bottom of it perhaps there will be a total different system/market to contend with, why give yourself more hassle if it can avoided, like rent and not having all the problems that goes with owning a property. :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    ei.sdraob wrote: »
    Ireland is not Germany alright, except that we are tied to them and their influence of the ECB via the euro.

    If Ireland leaves the euro or there is large global shock then yes I could see how the inflation argument can be made but otherwise 0-2% low inflation is here to stay for us

    I believe the ECB are going to start playing the quantitive easing game, like the UK/US.

    Germany has influenced the ECB up till now, but I imagine the rest of the EMU are going to start exerting their influence on Germany & the ECB, and we will start to see some QE, especially in the PIIGS(France,Belgium and so on).........we need a new acronym involving every country bar Germany! LOL

    I guess we need to wait and see how Greece pans out.

    Open to correction but I believe avg. inflation is running at 3% in Europe and UK inflation is running at 4.5%+?
    Fuel costs rising, Commodities rising, Insurance rising, Energy costs rising - this will drive some amount of inflation at home, even in the absence of QE and in the absence of economic reform.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    Maura74 wrote: »
    What you are saying is your children will not be able to do anything for themselves? will they not be capable of working and making home themselves. They will probably get married and perhaps they will only value you in your old age for what you are going to leave them....Therefore, if and when property market finds the bottom of it perhaps there will be a total different system/market to contend with, why give yourself more hassle if it can avoided, like rent and not having all the problems that goes with owning a property. :eek:

    Because renting in Ireland is more hassle. It's a cowboy operation.
    I did it for 7 years. I personally couldn't face going back to it again.

    When the system resembles something like what they have in Germany/Holland, and it becomes less hassle, I imagine people will be a lot happier to do it.

    Equating renting in Ireland to renting in Holland at present is a bit like equating Irish Healthcare to Dutch Healthcare tho.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 759 ✭✭✭mrgaa1


    Páirc Uí Chaoimh will undergo a massive development now that Cork County Councillors have agreed to sell almost seven acres of publicly-owned land around the flagship stadium to the Cork County Board for €1.7m. This follows years of talks between GAA and city officials with the Cork City Councillors finally voting in favour of the sale 24-6.

    Thats €242,000 per acre (ish) - the bubble has started.....


  • Advertisement
Advertisement