Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ethics of not helping agressive drivers

  • 01-10-2011 9:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭


    Ive been pondering this since yesterday when I had the very same car pull the very same asshole maneuver twice within minutes.

    he overtook me twice both times when there was nowhere to go. first time he overtook 4 cars before getting alongside me as the overtaking lane ran out and he found himself parallel to me with traffic coming straight for him. he pushed in on me until I eventually had to brake to allow him in front of me before he caused a head on crash.
    this same car stopped and pulled into a house about 30 seconds later. Annoyed obviously but away I went. then about ten minutes down the road the cnut flew up alongside me and exactly the same thing happened again.
    furious didnt cover it.

    so, the question. why should I let him in? he clearly does this a lot, why should he not have to slap on the hazards and brakes and get stuck on the wrong side of the white line?

    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,473 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    mawk wrote: »
    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.

    Those Yaris drivers are nothing but trouble:mad:


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You are probably better off having someone like this heading off ahead of you rather than getting more and more inpatient behind you.
    Anyhow, you don't know the reason for their urgency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭PARKHEAD67


    mawk wrote: »
    Ive been pondering this since yesterday when I had the very same car pull the very same asshole maneuver twice within minutes.

    he overtook me twice both times when there was nowhere to go. first time he overtook 4 cars before getting alongside me as the overtaking lane ran out and he found himself parallel to me with traffic coming straight for him. he pushed in on me until I eventually had to brake to allow him in front of me before he caused a head on crash.
    this same car stopped and pulled into a house about 30 seconds later. Annoyed obviously but away I went. then about ten minutes down the road the cnut flew up alongside me and exactly the same thing happened again.
    furious didnt cover it.

    so, the question. why should I let him in? he clearly does this a lot, why should he not have to slap on the hazards and brakes and get stuck on the wrong side of the white line?

    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.
    Im guessing theres an M in the middle of the cars 3 letter name???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    mawk wrote: »
    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.

    Audi A4


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭coolbeans


    Thread failure imminent.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭PARKHEAD67


    Well Mawk.Dont keep us waiting.Was it an A4 or a car with 3 letters with the middle one being M.Put us out of our misery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 688 ✭✭✭maxfresh


    mawk wrote: »
    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.

    honda civic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,520 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Report him to the cops


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Report him to the cops
    1890 205 805 - Garda Trafficwatch


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    kbannon wrote: »
    1890 205 805 - Garda Trafficwatch

    Thats a waste of time imo, nothing will be done about it unless the OP makes a statment and attends court.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,620 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    I know the feeling.
    In Limerick some people are obviously more important than others, so they don't have to wait in the correct lane at lights and roundabouts.
    Instead these assholes will go into the wrong lane, blast past everyone and bully their way in at the top.
    Gardai don't seem to care since I NEVER ONCE saw anything done about it and you will see the same people end up on the obnoxious parking thread, because they should be allowed to park wherever they want.
    A lot of these people will play innocent when challenged, but when pressed further will surely become aggressive and violent.
    In short, they are psychopaths who don't give a sh*t about anyone but themselves, if the police actually did something about it they would complain about being "picked on" and would not understand what they are doing wrong in a million years.
    The problem is twofold:
    1: Parents.
    Never taught any manners by their mammy and daddy. Mammy and daddy probably the same ignorant assholes themselves, it goes back generations, until it becomes inbred.
    2: Enforcement.
    I.e. what enforcement? Aside from standing with a hairdrier on the side of the section of motorway that mysteriously has a suspiciously low speed limit and checking tax and insurance (and nothing else besides as far as I can make it out), I don't see the Traffic Corps do anything.
    So, if you can't beat 'em...:
    Long queue for going straight at the lights? Simply roll into one of the turn left or right lanes and floor it when you get to the top.
    Sure, there might be some beeping and flashing, but other than that, nothing will happen. So why wait like a fool in line with the others? You don't have to wait!
    Also, it's not good enough to make it past everyone in the queue, you have to make it past the first car at the lights!
    Parking?
    It's the process of coasting to a halt the shortest distance from the door possible.
    Sure, someone might "tsk" at you, but that's the worst that's going to happen.
    Remember, should you get in trouble just say "wha?" with a look of hurt innocence and if that doesn't fail, become aggressive.
    Sorted, you are ready for Ireland's roads!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,771 ✭✭✭michael999999


    mawk wrote: »
    Ive been pondering this since yesterday when I had the very same car pull the very same asshole maneuver twice within minutes.

    he overtook me twice both times when there was nowhere to go. first time he overtook 4 cars before getting alongside me as the overtaking lane ran out and he found himself parallel to me with traffic coming straight for him. he pushed in on me until I eventually had to brake to allow him in front of me before he caused a head on crash.
    this same car stopped and pulled into a house about 30 seconds later. Annoyed obviously but away I went. then about ten minutes down the road the cnut flew up alongside me and exactly the same thing happened again.
    furious didnt cover it.

    so, the question. why should I let him in? he clearly does this a lot, why should he not have to slap on the hazards and brakes and get stuck on the wrong side of the white line?

    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.

    Ice cream van?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You can make a statement and the gardai will issue a caution (been there and done that)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,620 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    Ice cream van?

    Ass cream van more like it.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    PARKHEAD67 wrote: »
    Well Mawk.Dont keep us waiting.Was it an A4 or a car with 3 letters with the middle one being M.Put us out of our misery.

    an m version of a 3 letter manufacturer containing the letter m.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 120 ✭✭johnny test


    Passat ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    Passat ?

    Not many M`s in that....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ResearchWill


    -Corkie- wrote: »
    Thats a waste of time imo, nothing will be done about it unless the OP makes a statment and attends court.

    I remember a few years ago old cork Dublin road, had a bus stuck to my tail no more than a few feet away doing 70 mph on single lane road, when safe at next town pulled in to let him go cause if I had to brake we all wrecked. I rang the coach company straight away to ask them to get the guy to use safe stoping distance, they told me to f off. So rang guards, explained what happened and buses details, about 20 miles up the road later bus pulled in by motorbike guard. So make complaint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    You called the guards to report a bus tailgating while YOU were doing 70 mph on a single lane road? There's one set of rules for you then is there? Yer man shouldn't have been tailgating but you shouldn't have been doing those sorta speeds therefore I would argue you had no right to call the guards on him as you were also breaking the law. The phrase pot calling the kettle black springs to mind.

    Now I'm not saying i haven't been guilty of the odd bit of speeding from time to time but i don't go telling on other people who break traffic laws. I try not to be a hypocrite.

    (that riled me up a fair bit more than i thought it would lol!!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭rebel.ranter


    mawk wrote: »
    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.
    HAS to be an Octavia! It's always mentioned on here!

    As for the point of not letting him in, ask yourself this: 1) Would you really wish harm on another human being? 2) Even if you have no regard for a bad driver you surely have regard for the poor innocent that this tool might hit head on?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 50,630 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    guyfo wrote: »
    You called the guards to report a bus tailgating while YOU were doing 70 mph on a single lane road? There's one set of rules for you then is there? Yer man shouldn't have been tailgating but you shouldn't have been doing those sorta speeds therefore I would argue you had no right to call the guards on him as you were also breaking the law. The phrase pot calling the kettle black springs to mind.

    Now I'm not saying i haven't been guilty of the odd bit of speeding from time to time but i don't go telling on other people who break traffic laws. I try not to be a hypocrite.

    (that riled me up a fair bit more than i thought it would lol!!)

    Eh, he said he pulled in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    had a bus stuck to my tail no more than a few feet away doing 70 mph on single lane road

    If the bus was stuck behind him at 70 wouldn that mean he was doin 70? Just because he pulled in afterwards doesn mean its ok!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    HAS to be an Octavia! It's always mentioned on here!

    As for the point of not letting him in, ask yourself this: 1) Would you really wish harm on another human being? 2) Even if you have no regard for a bad driver you surely have regard for the poor innocent that this tool might hit head on?

    thats exactly the reason I always slow to let asshat drivers have my spot. well that and the fact that if he the slightest glimmer of intelligence they will know its safer, for them, to sideswipe me than to plough head on into something

    also im not a sociopath. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Kersh


    guyfo wrote: »
    If the bus was stuck behind him at 70 wouldn that mean he was doin 70? Just because he pulled in afterwards doesn mean its ok!

    Mind you dont get vertigo way up there on that horse shep


    As for the op, leave him out there, he will get the message soon enough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    My father (ex army driver) and some of his mates tell great stories of doing cash escorts years ago. Someone would try overtake the whole convoy, go passed the first jeep,then the cash van, then the second jeep and then they'd see the cop car leading the escort and jam on the breaks and drop back behind the escort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,099 ✭✭✭johndaman66


    Passat ?

    I was going to guess that too before the OP ruled it out. Tiddly Diddly Eye of course.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    guyfo wrote: »
    You called the guards to report a bus tailgating while YOU were doing 70 mph on a single lane road? There's one set of rules for you then is there? Yer man shouldn't have been tailgating but you shouldn't have been doing those sorta speeds therefore I would argue you had no right to call the guards on him as you were also breaking the law. The phrase pot calling the kettle black springs to mind.

    Now I'm not saying i haven't been guilty of the odd bit of speeding from time to time but i don't go telling on other people who break traffic laws. I try not to be a hypocrite.

    (that riled me up a fair bit more than i thought it would lol!!)

    You are allowed to use your phone while driving to call the emergency services/AGS...;)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    mawk wrote: »
    Ive been pondering this since yesterday when I had the very same car pull the very same asshole maneuver twice within minutes.

    he overtook me twice both times when there was nowhere to go. first time he overtook 4 cars before getting alongside me as the overtaking lane ran out and he found himself parallel to me with traffic coming straight for him. he pushed in on me until I eventually had to brake to allow him in front of me before he caused a head on crash.
    this same car stopped and pulled into a house about 30 seconds later. Annoyed obviously but away I went. then about ten minutes down the road the cnut flew up alongside me and exactly the same thing happened again.
    furious didnt cover it.

    so, the question. why should I let him in? he clearly does this a lot, why should he not have to slap on the hazards and brakes and get stuck on the wrong side of the white line?

    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.



    You are just as dangerous as the aggressive driver. If a driver is clearly impatient, and whats to overtake, then when safe to do so, you should let him.

    Otherwise, how would you feel if he tries to overtake in a dangerous place and smashes headon to an oncoming car causing carnage.

    While it is not your fault, if you make it easier to overtake rather than holding your ground, it may not have happened. And you may save a life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,905 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    mawk wrote: »
    an m version of a 3 letter manufacturer containing the letter m.


    GMC?...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    Personally if I see an agressive driver behind I will drive exactly to the rules of the road, so as not to give any reason for coming off worse in court, when I phone up the garda hotline to report said car.

    I will *always* phone up the hotline if I see a dangerous driver. I've seen plenty of manouvres that are idiotic but possibly a genuine mistake. If I see the same car make a second manouvre that is dodgy I will phone up at that stage as it's obvious there's either incompetence or gross negligence both of which come under either DWDCA or dangerous driving.

    I've always found that the follwoup from the gardai has been very good. Generally the question is asked "how would you like this to proceed", and my answer is always to suggest that the garda go and has a chat with the driver and then to make his own judgement on the driver. If the driver is belligerent and non-apologetic, proceed with the court route. If the driver holds up their hands and says, yes, genuine mistake, then fair enough they actually realise their mistake and has had an opportunity to learn from it.

    One example was a genuinely dangerous driver that was unable to get past me (and did not show any signal that they was in an emergency situation at all) for about 10 miles on a countryside national primary route, then stormed past me through the start of a ghost island pushing oncoming traffic into the verge. I phoned up, the gardai asked if I would make a statement and go to court. As it turned out that driver had previously been reported for dangerous driving and I was another witness to make the court case more iron-clad. I did go to court, as in my mind hte behaviour before the overtake nad the overtake itself was genuinely an idiot driver. This driver had a previous conviction as it was revelealed at sentencing of dangerous driving with no tax/license/insurance but the judge bought the clemency request and convicted of DWDCA and fined a total of just under €1000. That driver did spend months hiding and lying to the gardai as well which didn't help his case at all.

    A different one was the situation where I was last in a line of cars being overtaken by a 1.1 polo driven by two foreign nationals, and the overtake was on the wrong side of a double white line on a long blind over-crest left hand bend. Shortly after this I saw that car overtake another line of traffic on a single white line approaching the brow of a hill. After ringing up and giving the details, the local garda met that car heading the same way a week later, pulled them over, and had a chat with them. The driver readily admitted that yes it was bad driving, but that they were late for prayers (!) :) but that it certainly wouldn't happen again. In that case, the garda used his discretion and let them off with a warning, and I couldn't agree more with the garda's decision. The other driver was polite and appeared to show genuine contrition, and now has an awareness that the local garda (who is the garda for the area that this driver was living in) will be keeping an eye out on his driving in the future.

    If there's an ass behind me I'll not deviate from my driving in any way. If there's a genuine overtaking possibility I won't get in the way. If there is half a chance and the risk to me is too high I will try to make it obvious in a non-agressive way that there is no space to come in front of me so please don't try. If there's a failed overtake manouvre I will generally just drive my own car and not compound a bad situation by changing my path and speed. I've seen failed overtake ahead of me and having the car that was being overtaken put the anchors on leaving the overtaker outside with nowhere to get back in, leaving me to use up my margin of safety to stop in a hurry before becoming part of an unpleasant situation.

    It's a tough one to call though, when you weigh up the risk of having to take avoiding action from an agressive driver (possibly causing you to get out of shape) and entrenching that bullying behaviour in the dangerous driver, or being on the receiving end of a sideswipe. Sometimes there is actually nothing that can be done in a situation and you just become a no-fault victim of an incident caused by an idiot.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I was going to write a piece pulling you on a few items but I really couldn't be bothered.
    However, with regard to:
    Popoutman wrote: »
    A different one was the situation where I was last in a line of cars being overtaken by a 1.1 polo driven by two foreign nationals,
    Did the car really need two people to drive it? Was it a learner car or what?
    As for their nationality, what has that got to do with anything? How did you know what nationality both of them were?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ResearchWill


    guyfo wrote: »
    You called the guards to report a bus tailgating while YOU were doing 70 mph on a single lane road? There's one set of rules for you then is there? Yer man shouldn't have been tailgating but you shouldn't have been doing those sorta speeds therefore I would argue you had no right to call the guards on him as you were also breaking the law. The phrase pot calling the kettle black springs to mind.

    Now I'm not saying i haven't been guilty of the odd bit of speeding from time to time but i don't go telling on other people who break traffic laws. I try not to be a hypocrite.

    (that riled me up a fair bit more than i thought it would lol!!)


    It was a main road the speed limit on the road at that time was 60 there was no one in front of me, the reason I mention the speed I was doing was someone on here would have said he was tailgating because you where going too slow. In fact I would have been doing about the limit of 60, I put 70 as that is the limit now, sorry I should have said I was driving at the speed limit, even doing a few miles over it does not excuse a bus so close to you that you can read the time on his watch in your mirror.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭bijapos


    PARKHEAD67 wrote: »
    Im guessing theres an M in the middle of the cars 3 letter name???

    Ami 6 ? :eek:

    ami6-5.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    kbannon wrote: »
    I was going to write a piece pulling you on a few items but I really couldn't be bothered.
    Good to hear :) If you had issues with my post, I'd prefer to hear it in a PM, and I'll try to give my defence or explanation why. No point in going off-topic in this thread too much. (I will leave my driving record of no involvement in any accidents in ~18 years, and no points on my license, and a distance driven in Ireland of nearly 400,000 miles in that time speak for itself though.)
    kbannon wrote: »
    However, with regard to:
    Did the car really need two people to drive it? Was it a learner car or what?
    As for their nationality, what has that got to do with anything? How did you know what nationality both of them were?

    More than one occupant - it increases the likelihood that the bad driving could be a peer pressure issue when it's two young guys. In this case I had a hard time guaging age with the wearing of a full beard and and a taqiyah by each occupant. Just something I observed about that car at that time, I really didn't think that the presence of a passenger made that much difference to whether the driving behaviour was worth reporting or not, the consistent overtaking in very dangerous locations was what was worth reporting.

    The nationality comes into it when there are different driver education standards between e.g. Turkey or India, and Ireland. We're not great but there are worse - the point is that with some education some drivers will drastically improve, and maybe this chat from the garda was a pointer to get some education.

    Is that an acceptable explanation? ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Popoutman wrote: »
    I will leave my driving record of no involvement in any accidents in ~18 years, and no points on my license, and a distance driven in Ireland of nearly 400,000 miles in that time speak for itself though.

    If you have a small accident next week, or get a penalty point, will you retire from policing the roads then?
    The nationality comes into it when there are different driver education standards between e.g. Turkey or India, and Ireland. We're not great but there are worse - the point is that with some education some drivers will drastically improve, and maybe this chat from the garda was a pointer to get some education.

    Is that an acceptable explanation? ;)

    Im surprised the gardai dont give you your own blue light, and reduce their work load:pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    I should clarify something that doesn't come across in my post above. If I can, I drive as defensively as possible, anticipating and observing, maintaining as good a situational awareness as I can. I will leave gaps to overtake if i'm not in a position to overtake myself in the immediate future. This means that most aggressive drivers will have no problem in getting past me when the road makes it safe to do so. I was trying to explain the situation where there isn't an overtaking possibility and it could be dangerous for me to take avoiding action (upcoming traffic on the hard shoulder, pedestrians/animals etc), and an idiot tries something dangerous outside me. My choice is possibly hit a pedestrian/parked car/wall or be hit from the side by the failed overtake. That's a tough decision and it usually happens too fast to consciously make. I have actively changed my driving style and habits over the past few years for various reasons to be far more defensive and careful, mostly as I'm more aware of the risks involved.

    @robbie7730
    Not the most helpful of responses - what's your beef? The Gardai have made facilities available to the public to report dangerous situations, and you'd have to be dumb not to use those facilities when the situation warrants it. Would you prefer a dangerous driver be reported and intercepted before killing someone you know and love, or would you prefer that nobody did anything and another life be possibly needlessly lost on our roads? I'd always hope that a dangerous driver would be reported in the hope that an incident could be avoided. What would you do?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,220 ✭✭✭✭Lex Luthor


    kbannon wrote: »
    Anyhow, you don't know the reason for their urgency.
    still doesnt excuse that type of suicidal driving and taking others along with him
    kbannon wrote: »
    1890 205 805 - Garda Trafficwatch

    worth a shot

    IMO, even if you dont let them in, they will eventually shoot by you at the next slightest opportunity...best to let them off and kill themselves further up the road when you're nowhere near them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,535 ✭✭✭btkm8unsl0w5r4


    ah just let him in and don't get aggravated. He may be acting the maggot but sure why get worked up. Zen on the road is the way to go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    ah just let him in and don't get aggravated. He may be acting the maggot but sure why get worked up. Zen on the road is the way to go.
    Agreed - to an extent. It sounds like this guy is going to kill someone, or himself. As Kbannon said call the cops. Must get one of those dashcams...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,875 ✭✭✭✭MugMugs


    robbie7730 wrote: »
    If you have a small accident next week, or get a penalty point, will you retire from policing the roads then?

    Im surprised the gardai dont give you your own blue light, and reduce their work load:pac:

    +1

    @Popoutman

    It's like reading the diary of a the most innocent perfect driver in the world. Do you log it all in your leather bound notebook ? I'd say AGS will be recruiting again soon enough. Give it a look at, you can get paid for being Robocop

    lucyfur09 wrote: »
    My father (ex army driver) and some of his mates tell great stories of doing cash escorts years ago. Someone would try overtake the whole convoy, go passed the first jeep,then the cash van, then the second jeep and then they'd see the cop car leading the escort and jam on the breaks and drop back behind the escort.

    Yup.... and I hammer by them because come hell or high water, that Garda car ain't leaving that convoy ! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Wolverine_1999


    I know the feeling.
    In Limerick some people are obviously more important than others, so they don't have to wait in the correct lane at lights and roundabouts.
    Instead these assholes will go into the wrong lane, blast past everyone and bully their way in at the top.
    Gardai don't seem to care since I NEVER ONCE saw anything done about it and you will see the same people end up on the obnoxious parking thread, because they should be allowed to park wherever they want.
    A lot of these people will play innocent when challenged, but when pressed further will surely become aggressive and violent.
    In short, they are psychopaths who don't give a sh*t about anyone but themselves, if the police actually did something about it they would complain about being "picked on" and would not understand what they are doing wrong in a million years.
    The problem is twofold:
    1: Parents.
    Never taught any manners by their mammy and daddy. Mammy and daddy probably the same ignorant assholes themselves, it goes back generations, until it becomes inbred.
    2: Enforcement.
    I.e. what enforcement? Aside from standing with a hairdrier on the side of the section of motorway that mysteriously has a suspiciously low speed limit and checking tax and insurance (and nothing else besides as far as I can make it out), I don't see the Traffic Corps do anything.
    So, if you can't beat 'em...:
    Long queue for going straight at the lights? Simply roll into one of the turn left or right lanes and floor it when you get to the top.
    Sure, there might be some beeping and flashing, but other than that, nothing will happen. So why wait like a fool in line with the others? You don't have to wait!
    Also, it's not good enough to make it past everyone in the queue, you have to make it past the first car at the lights!
    Parking?
    It's the process of coasting to a halt the shortest distance from the door possible.
    Sure, someone might "tsk" at you, but that's the worst that's going to happen.
    Remember, should you get in trouble just say "wha?" with a look of hurt innocence and if that doesn't fail, become aggressive.
    Sorted, you are ready for Ireland's roads!

    I have to say after years of driving in Limerick I just don't have the patience to wait for inexperienced drivers to hold up the correct lane entering roundabouts by which time you just say **** it and get out in half a second.

    Like's been mentioned throughout the thread.. some people have places to get to.

    Edit: Just realised I do take the correct lane.. was thinking of the lanes coming in to the roundabout at Jury's Inn. Both say straight, so I take the less busy one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭cjt156


    MugMugs wrote: »

    Yup.... and I hammer by them because come hell or high water, that Garda car ain't leaving that convoy ! :D

    The driver does have access to ANPR and a radio, though. I usually coast by at 5mph above the speed limit* and then floor it once I'm out of sight.








    *yes, I am going to hell, wanna come with me?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    @mugmugs
    No need to be an arse on a Monday morning! :D

    mugmugs wrote: »

    Yup.... and I hammer by them because come hell or high water, that Garda car ain't leaving that convoy ! :D

    That's true, but they have these little things called 'radios' which can be used to call ahead to another car in the area to get you intercepted. I've seen this happen with the daily Cork-Limerick cash convoy. Generally a good idea to remember that the next time you 'hammer by'. No point in causing yourself unnecessary hassle by being silly.

    I'm far from perfect as a driver, but at least I know what I've to improve on, and taking steps to try to be a better and safer driver. There's no harm in that, is there?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,875 ✭✭✭✭MugMugs


    cjt156 wrote: »
    The driver does have access to ANPR and a radio, though. I usually coast by at 5mph above the speed limit* and then floor it once I'm out of sight.
    *yes, I am going to hell, wanna come with me?

    You'd twig an ANPR on the rear tail generally...
    Popoutman wrote: »
    @mugmugs
    No need to be an arse on a Monday morning! :D




    That's true, but they have these little things called 'radios' which can be used to call ahead to another car in the area to get you intercepted. I've seen this happen with the daily Cork-Limerick cash convoy. Generally a good idea to remember that the next time you 'hammer by'. No point in causing yourself unnecessary hassle by being silly.

    I'm far from perfect as a driver, but at least I know what I've to improve on, and taking steps to try to be a better and safer driver. There's no harm in that, is there?

    Never said I break the speed limit. That'd be silly and illegal... If the Gardai didn't get me, there's a good chance you could

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    MugMugs wrote: »

    Never said I break the speed limit. That'd be silly and illegal... If the Gardai didn't get me, there's a good chance you could

    :pac:


    ;) I'll try to keep an eye out so! <grin>

    Ah, I'm sorry if I come across badly above, I don't mean to and I know I did. I've noticed more and more bad driving over the past few years. I'm a lot more aware of the consequences after coming across a few fatal crashes as one of the first to arrive on the scene. Those were a kick in the arse for me to change my ways before it was me. I think I'm noticing the bad driving due to the average driving in this country improving as well as the infrastructure improving, making the bad driving show up more. It's not as though I'm on first name terms with the hotline, I've phoned twice in 10,000 miles so not so much, and each time it really was warranted.

    Sorry for dragging the thread off-topic.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,240 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Popoutman wrote: »
    Good to hear :) If you had issues with my post, I'd prefer to hear it in a PM, and I'll try to give my defence or explanation why. No point in going off-topic in this thread too much. (I will leave my driving record of no involvement in any accidents in ~18 years, and no points on my license, and a distance driven in Ireland of nearly 400,000 miles in that time speak for itself though.)
    Its a public debate so why would I want to bring it to a private level?
    As for your driving record, that's great, well done! I'll order your medal, can you please PM me your address?
    Popoutman wrote: »
    More than one occupant - it increases the likelihood that the bad driving could be a peer pressure issue when it's two young guys. In this case I had a hard time guaging age with the wearing of a full beard and and a taqiyah by each occupant. Just something I observed about that car at that time, I really didn't think that the presence of a passenger made that much difference to whether the driving behaviour was worth reporting or not, the consistent overtaking in very dangerous locations was what was worth reporting.

    The nationality comes into it when there are different driver education standards between e.g. Turkey or India, and Ireland. We're not great but there are worse - the point is that with some education some drivers will drastically improve, and maybe this chat from the garda was a pointer to get some education.

    Is that an acceptable explanation? ;)
    Not really.
    I spent several years training young lads from Pakistan. Many of these guys sat the Irish driving test. They (IIRC) all passed first time and of those who I saw driving, they were quite competent, possibly more so than "Irish" drivers.
    As for the lads that you saw, at what point did you see their licence and passport or are you simply making assumptions on their nationality and driver training?

    Lastly, you also say "I really didn't think that the presence of a passenger made that much difference to whether the driving behaviour was worth reporting or not" - you did feel that it was worth mentioning here and then followed up with an explanation that this makes the driver more likely to be a bad driver. So why not report it also?


    MugMugs wrote: »
    You'd twig an ANPR on the rear tail generally...
    Not usually before it twigged you!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭no1beemerfan


    ah just let him in and don't get aggravated. He may be acting the maggot but sure why get worked up. Zen on the road is the way to go.

    I agree 100% with this. I used to be the type of person who got pretty worked up when someone was an a hole on the road. But I realised it didn't do me one bit of good and more importantly it made me do stupid things on the road in retaliation that were not safe and on a few ocassions when thinking back on my reactions I was pretty upset with myself that I reacted like I did. So now I just let the a hole go. Its not worth getting worked up over.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭Paparazzo


    On roads like the OP was talking about I let them in. Too dangerous to be messing about at speeds like that.
    It's the fúckers in the city that I don't let in. People that go up the left hand turning lane to bypass the queue for going straight/right and try and jump in at the top. I drive along side them not letting them in :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭Popoutman


    kbannon wrote: »
    Its a public debate so why would I want to bring it to a private level?
    I do apologise - I thought you were wearing your moderator hat and actually had an issue with my post, and that as a mod you could do a private contact instead of hinting publicly without an explanation at your perceived problems with my post. I would have preferred an actual post with your issues stated, instead of having a moderator 'suggest' that there are issues with the post for others to think the worst when there may be a perfectly reasonable explanation of what your perceived issues were.
    kbannon wrote: »
    As for your driving record, that's great, well done! I'll order your medal, can you please PM me your address?
    I thought trolling was not allowed here.. Especially by a moderator? I think you might have forgot your sarcasm tags as well.

    As a moderator, can you explain your attitude here? I hope this response of yours was an attempt at humour. However, you appear to be a little bit insulting and can be thought of as attempting to troll me. Was expecting better of a mod to be honest.

    kbannon wrote: »
    Not really.
    I spent several years training young lads from Pakistan. Many of these guys sat the Irish driving test. They (IIRC) all passed first time and of those who I saw driving, they were quite competent, possibly more so than "Irish" drivers.
    Seriously though, this is something that I really do appreciate and I genuinely applaud you for this. I love to see driver education, and to see any driver (foreign, Irish, even Tipperary drivers ;)) become less of a hazard to themselves and to others on the road. You have a very valid point that we do need to have more competent (and more-competent) drivers on the roads.
    kbannon wrote: »
    As for the lads that you saw, at what point did you see their licence and passport or are you simply making assumptions on their nationality and driver training?
    I passed on the appearance to the Gardai if they were to accurately identify the dangerous driver if they managed to intercept them en route. The garda that was actually chatting to them a week later phoned me up to tell me what had transpired, and they were not long in the country and had come from Turkey last year. Yes, I did assume about the driver training, both from personal experience of spending a fortnight in Instanbul working 2 years ago, and the fact that this driver did spend well over a minute on the wrong side of the road with a full line of traffic to his left, I would have thought that this action would have shown a lack of driver training..

    The fact that the guy was not an Irish national was of no bearing on the fact that he was driving in a manner that was considered dangerous, both by myself at the time and by the driver himself when he was asked about it a week afterwards.

    kbannon wrote: »
    Lastly, you also say "I really didn't think that the presence of a passenger made that much difference to whether the driving behaviour was worth reporting or not" - you did feel that it was worth mentioning here and then followed up with an explanation that this makes the driver more likely to be a bad driver. So why not report it also?
    I reported the facts of the situation, without making judgement on the driver other than I considered the driver to be dangerous at that point. I reported a dangerous driver with a passenger in the car. There's no need to report people with passengers that are driving normally. Maybe I'm missing your point that you tried to make here?

    Anyway this is seriously off-topic now, I think that if you have issues with me please either start a new thread or PM me and I'll continue the conversation with you if you want.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭Tec Diver


    mawk wrote: »
    Ive been pondering this since yesterday when I had the very same car pull the very same asshole maneuver twice within minutes.

    he overtook me twice both times when there was nowhere to go. first time he overtook 4 cars before getting alongside me as the overtaking lane ran out and he found himself parallel to me with traffic coming straight for him. he pushed in on me until I eventually had to brake to allow him in front of me before he caused a head on crash.
    this same car stopped and pulled into a house about 30 seconds later. Annoyed obviously but away I went. then about ten minutes down the road the cnut flew up alongside me and exactly the same thing happened again.
    furious didnt cover it.

    so, the question. why should I let him in? he clearly does this a lot, why should he not have to slap on the hazards and brakes and get stuck on the wrong side of the white line?

    p.s ill thank anyone who can guess the car he drove.

    I get that from time to time, I never let them in. They get angry, but hopefully they learn a lesson. Nothing more has ever come of it either.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement