Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fine Gael's Brian Hayes proposes to re-erect British imperial monuments in Dublin.

  • 24-09-2011 10:37am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭


    Aside from being ineffably embarrassing to educated Irish people, this is a crazy, lunatic idea. It could only be somebody as disconnected and ideologically driven as Brian Hayes who would propose it. Scarily, he now holds the state finances to carry out his proposal.

    I just read this in a single line in yesterday's Irish Times article on the Phoenix Park here: "The OPW is to pursue the return of two statues by sculptor John Henry Foley blown up by the IRA.".

    For OPW read Brian Hayes, the ideological Fine Gael minister in charge of that office now who has a very long history as a supporter of John Bruton and who, before joining Fine Gael, was a member of Democratic Left entirely because of the anti-republican views of de Rossa (Source). Now, in power it seems Hayes wants to spend our money re-erecting statues that glorify the British Empire. The last imperial statue re-erected was that of Britain's Queen Victoria/the Famine Queen in Dún Laoghaire in 2003 at a cost of some €500,000.


    The statues in question are:

    1. The Carlisle Memorial: It was erected in 1870 and blown up by in 1958. This is what remains of Carlisle's statue in Dublin's Phoenix Park today. Dedicated to the British Lord Lieutenant George William Frederick Howard, seventh earl of Carlisle (1802–1864).

    2. The Gough memorial: This was hugely controversial even before it was erected. It was attacked on several occasions. Following one such attack in 1957 the monument was removed and today is in the possession of a relative of Gough who spent a fortune restoring it in Chillingham Castle in England. This is it there today. Hayes wants to buy this and re-erect it in the Phoenix Park.

    Here's one account of the background to the erection of the Gough monument in 1880:

    "The statue has had a troubled history. At the time of his death in 1869, Gough's friends felt that since he was born in Co. Limmerick and, when not on military service, had always lived in his native land, a statue on a prominent site in Dublin was appropriate, at either Carlisle Bridge, Foster Place or Westmoreland Road. However, the Dublin Corporation was reluctant to commemorate a servant of the empire who had gained the nickname the 'Hammer of the Sikhs', and vetoed each of these suggestions. .... Once finished the statue's problems continued. A site was found for it in Phoenix Park, Dublin, but at the time of the inauguration there was a strong feeling that it would have been more suitably erected in London. This was reinforced by the inauguration ceremony at which so many soldiers were present that the Duke of Malborough, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, was prompted to remark that the Park looked like the 'Champs de Mars of Dublin'. Once in place, because it was subsequently seen as a celebration of empire, the statue was physically attacked on a number of occasions. On Christmas Eve 1944 the rider was beheaded and his sword removed. In November 1956 the right hind leg of the horse was blown off and then finally, at 12.45am on Monday 3rd July 1957, the whole statue was hurled from its base by a huge explosion, the work of experts in plastic bombing brought in from France by the I.R.A. Following this, for the next 29 years, the base remained in place in Phoenix Park while the statue itself was kept in storage by the Office of Public Works at the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham. (Photographs exist of Gough's severed head sitting in a cupboard.) Eventually, in August 1986, the statue was sold to Robert Guinness of Straffan, Co. Kildare for a sum believed to be £1000 or less, on the condition, according to the Irish Times, that it left Ireland. In 1988, it came into the possession of its present owner, a distant relative of Gough, who had it painstakingly restored by the Newcastle blacksmiths, J. S. Lunn and Sons and re-erected at his newly acquired home, Chillingham Castle, in 1990. The statue is now once again complete except for the 18cm high base of the pedestal."

    Aside from using remarkably obtuse military tactics, Field Marshal Sir Hugh Gough, first Viscount Gough, had an infamous reputation for his savagery and brutality towards what he deemed to be "inferior" populations. The nickname mentioned above - "Hammer of the Sikhs" - was given because of his brutality when conquering the Punjab on behalf the British East India Company/British Empire. Gough had also been a significant figure in the First Opium Wars defending British drug producers and merchants against the Chinese who were trying to stop opium getting into China.

    So much more about this guy, suffice to say that he should not be honoured in Ireland in 2011, for many of the same reasons Dublin Corporation voted not to erect a statue to him back in the 1870s.


    Anyway TLDR: Do you think an Irish government should be re-erecting monuments in Ireland which commemorate British imperial figures?

    Do you think an Irish government should re-erect statues to British imperial heroes? 38 votes

    Yes
    0%
    No
    100%
    regiSir Digby Chicken CaesarManachcujimmygafarrellmikemacRoundyMooneyParsleyLordSutchBowWowTimepjprobyseithonAmtmannSky KingIwasfrozendonvito99domkkluckyfrankPace2008 38 votes


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Huh huh,"erect"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,438 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    They'll just get blown up again very quickly.
    What a stupid fukn idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭dan1895


    Like my childish remark above, this idea is stupid. whats the point?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭RachaelVO


    Bad idea, mostly cos it's like all our politicians, a total waste of fecking money!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    still better than the spire


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    No
    At the time of his death in 1869, Gough's friends felt that since he was born in Co. Limmerick and, when not on military service, had always lived in his native land, a statue on a prominent site in Dublin was appropriate

    Makes no sense to me at all

    And while he's from Co Limerick, it pretty much Waterford.

    You have the choice of Limerick or Waterford and it made sense to use Dublin :confused:

    Give it to our friends in the Mid West or South East if it's going ahead


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    dan1895 wrote: »
    Like my childish remark above, this idea is stupid. whats the point?

    Other than to satisfy Brian Hayes's political grudges, ideology and preferences, there is absolutely no point - none at all. If the OPW wants to get into the cult of the personality and erect statues to "heroes", they could find quite a few who fought for Irish freedom, rather than the British Empire, if they looked.

    Hopefully this ridiculous, backward, unrepresentative proposal will receive more attention in the Irish media than the single line it received in yesterday's Irish Times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Keith186


    Ha this is from the same fella who wants to stop paying for the sex changes (I agree with him there) and now he wants to waste the money on unwanted statues.

    He should go back and listen to his own reasoning that these are perilous times and we cannot afford to be spending money on unnecessary stuff.

    All this went on a week or two ago. Can he not remember that far back?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭wild_cat


    Its just preserving our history..

    Why are we still so touchy about the English? They don't opress us anymore and have a crumbled empire!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,300 ✭✭✭martinn123


    still better than the spire


    Yes, rebuild Nelson's Pillar.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    wild_cat wrote: »
    Its just preserving their history..

    FYP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭El Siglo


    It's amazing how the government can cut spending and close hospital beds etc... etc... etc... all for the purposes of austerity and meeting our debt reduction commitments and yet find the money to carry out this project...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    No
    Bernardo O'Higgins who fought for independence for Chile has a monument in Sligo town

    OP, do you have an issue with monuments for Irish people who fought in foreign wars or is just the British Empire that's the problem?

    Are we going to pick and choose which wars are ok? Chile made O'Higgins a hero but India make Gough a butcher?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 810 ✭✭✭Laisurg


    So he wants to actually spend money buying this statue back from the english?! The amount of idiotic Fine Gael ministers is a joke, A few weeks ago one of the fools said she wanted to essentially ban games consoles! They make me want to leave Ireland as much as FF did.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    Other than the fact that we are broke I have no objection to this. I have no idea why a lot of people are so determined almost to deny that part of Irish history.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    tolosenc wrote: »
    Other than the fact that we are broke I have no objection to this. I have no idea why a lot of people are so determined almost to deny that part of Irish history.

    Nobody's denying it...but why spend good money to highlight and "celebrate" it?

    I don't see anyone talking about removing other evidence of British rule, but then again I don't see anyone talking about commissioning and erecting some modern pieces by Irish sculptors featuring Irish politically or historically significant figures... something people might be able to get behind.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭Killer Pigeon


    No
    Brian Hayes has it right. I think we should also tear down that rusty old spire in Sackville Street and re-erect Nelson's pillar.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Amusing rabble rouse by the OP, the Phoenix Park is of course a great example of British heritage in Ireland and the statues are part of the parks history, therefore if a true restoration of the park is to be achieved then its logical the statues are rebuilt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭s20101938


    No
    The "cause of Irish Freedom"? lol. So a bunch of unelected terrorists claiming to represent the people take it upon themselves to take over the GPO. The ordinary people of Ireland were proud to be British subjects, the "British soldiers" in Ireland were made up primarily of Irishmen, most of our judges were Irish, we were well represented in the British Parliament and were well on our way to Home Rule. The people of Ireland overall had a better standard of living than much of the British Mainland. Since then a revisionist campaign of republican bull5hit propaganda makes out that we were brutally oppressed.

    The "liberators" never gave a damn about the people of Ireland, they only cared about their own pockets. Why shouldn't these monuments be re-erected? Why shouldn't we be proud of our British heritage? I certainly am, far more than I am of some imaginary contrived "Celtic" nonsense pseudo-culture reinvented years after its natural death in the 1650s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,699 ✭✭✭deathrider


    There hasn't been a riot in Dublin in a few months, so I'm guessing they are thinking about this to start up another riot. Maybe they'll even make it an annual occurrance?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭giles lynchwood


    A big clap on the back for all the clown´s that voted for this idiot,the country is in ruins and this is what is on his mind instead of high unemployment,disgraceful health service,bad debt,etc,etc.It is no wonder we are the laughting stock of the world.:mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Sure why not change O'Connell Street to Cromwell street? Knock down the Spire and replace it with a stature of cromwell and king billy doing a jig on the corpses of michael collins and wolfe tonne.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Sure why not change O'Connell Street to Cromwell street? Knock down the Spire and replace it with a stature of cromwell and king billy doing a jig on the corpses of michael collins and wolfe tonne.

    Cos its actually Sackville street? :rolleyes: Oh the value of a decent educashun.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    No
    How about a statue for Maryborough in the Queen's county :)

    Anyway OP, it's not like the Dubs respect statues of IRA men anyway. Surely you're aware of what happened the Seán Russell one in Fairview Park.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,077 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    If you wanted to erase all traces of English culture from Dublin, you'd need to flatten most of D2. All that Georgian architecture made it more English than London at the time. Some bits were destroyed after Independence, but now they try to preserve it.

    You are the type of what the age is searching for, and what it is afraid it has found. I am so glad that you have never done anything, never carved a statue, or painted a picture, or produced anything outside of yourself! Life has been your art. You have set yourself to music. Your days are your sonnets.

    ―Oscar Wilde predicting Social Media, in The Picture of Dorian Gray



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭dublincelt


    mikemac wrote: »
    Bernardo O'Higgins who fought for independence for Chile has a monument in Sligo town

    OP, do you have an issue with monuments for Irish people who fought in foreign wars or is just the British Empire that's the problem?

    Are we going to pick and choose which wars are ok? Chile made O'Higgins a hero but India make Gough a butche
    r?


    Jesus, sometimes I give up I really do.

    Since when where the Chileans ever responsible for the slaughter of our ancestors??!
    With the blood spilled by countless generations of Irish people in the quest for independence from the "Empire" surely you have enough intelligence to see the difference between a statue of an Irish man that fought for Chile and a statue commemorating an imperialist war monger whose country have such a bloody history on this island??! Born in Ireland or not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 715 ✭✭✭HellsAngel


    Martin McGuinness is totally right about West Brits - especially in Fine Gael.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    As a an unrepentant Brit even I think that the idea is utter nonsense - perhaps if we took better care of our existing heritage of statues/memorials etc it would be more to the point. The memorial to Dublin Metropolitan policeman Padraig Sheahan at the junction of Hawkins Street and Burgh Quay is one that comes to mind.

    An interesting report on Dublin monuments here: http://www.dublincity.ie/SiteCollectionDocuments/history_monuments_oconnell_st.pdf which includes details of the Sheahan memorial.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Dionysus wrote: »
    Aside from being ineffably embarrassing to educated Irish people, this is a crazy, lunatic idea. (........)figures?

    While I don't believe in destroying these things (and in fact only in preserving them, not celebrating them), the fact is we don't have the money to be spending at the moment.

    There are a number of monuments in this country that need funds, restorative work etc. One has to question why these two are supposedly on the top of his list.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Sure why not change O'Connell Street to Cromwell street? Knock down the Spire and replace it with a stature of cromwell and king billy doing a jig on the corpses of michael collins and wolfe tonne.

    ...Shhhh....they don't need ideas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,148 ✭✭✭✭KnifeWRENCH


    Keith186 wrote: »
    Ha this is from the same fella who wants to stop paying for the sex changes (I agree with him there) and now he wants to waste the money on unwanted statues.

    That was Brian Walsh.

    I vote no but only because it's a waste of money, not for any 800 years type reason.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Great idea. Hopefully it happens. I hope they are rebuilt and left alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 804 ✭✭✭round tower huntsman


    they'll blown up again as soon as special branch stop watching em.
    government is cutting sna's and wants money for this crap! the list of suspects for blowing em up would range from dissos to parents of special needs kids to just really pissed of irish citizens. insane loony blue shirt west brit rubbish idea.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Has Brian Haye been drinking Gay Mitchell's water?

    (In 2006 Gay stated that the British head of state should become the head of state of any new all-Ireland nation! http://lnw.me/mcMxTf)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,084 ✭✭✭oppenheimer1


    I don't think Hayes specifically wants to commemorate British Imperial heroes but to reinstate some very elegant statues. Dublin had many men on horseback statues which were all fine pieces of art but were taken down due to the inscription on the bottom.

    Perhaps these public spaces wuld be improved by returning some classical sculpture to them? The places would then look like as the original architect/planner intended.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,048 ✭✭✭Da Shins Kelly


    What a ludicrous idea. The man is a fool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭Haelium


    Perhaps we should take that money and provide more funding for our education system, you know, something that actually effects the country?

    Or maybe just don't do anything with the cash seeing as we are meant to be "Tightening our belts"?

    I know that it's a drop in the ocean, but it adds up, we should be cutting unnecessary spending as much as possible, regardless of scale.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,582 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    Fùcking idiots, the country is broke, the government is cutting back on health care and these muppets want to spend money we can't afford on statues and their upkeep.

    Someone needs to slap these idiots in the face and wake them up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    TheZohan wrote: »
    Fùcking idiots, the country is broke, the government is cutting back on health care and these muppets want to spend money we can't afford on statues and their upkeep.

    Someone needs to slap these idiots in the face and wake them up.

    For the good of the country, I volunteer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Seanchai


    Biggins wrote: »
    Has Brian Haye been drinking Gay Mitchell's water?

    (In 2006 Gay stated that the British head of state should become the head of state of any new all-Ireland nation! http://lnw.me/mcMxTf)

    Extraordinary. I never, ever knew that. I had heard Mitchell saying the wigs in Irish courtrooms should be abolished, and that the (very colonial) names on the quays around Dublin should be renamed to commemorate Irish writers, and respected him for these two views. But this latest view? Seeing as we're talking about McGuinness's "treason" of this state, this view of Gay Mitchell should definitely be highlighted more.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 732 ✭✭✭Kadongy


    No
    TheZohan wrote: »
    Fùcking idiots, the country is broke, the government is cutting back on health care and these muppets want to spend money we can't afford on statues and their upkeep.

    Someone needs to slap these idiots in the face and wake them up.
    The reconstructions are a necessary part of a bid to have the park designated as a world heritage site.

    "Under certain conditions, listed sites can obtain funds from the World Heritage Fund"

    So this would be something that would be likely to result in bringing money into the country - both in this way and from tourism also.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Seanchai


    Kadongy wrote: »
    The reconstructions are a necessary part of a bid to have the park designated as a world heritage site.

    Ah, so if we don't have a monument to British imperial heroes we mightn't get UNESCO status?

    Jesus, I've heard it all now.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Seanchai wrote: »
    Extraordinary. I never, ever knew that. I had heard Mitchell saying the wigs in Irish courtrooms should be abolished, and that the (very colonial) names on the quays around Dublin should be renamed to commemorate Irish writers, and respected him for these two views. But this latest view? Seeing as we're talking about McGuinness's "treason" of this state, this view of Gay Mitchell should definitely be highlighted more.

    Have a read: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2015630/Gay-Mitchell-Controversial-views-lavish-junkets-notorious-gangster-cousin.html#ixzz1YQXF1JwI

    * http://dossing.blogspot.com/2006/08/gay-mitchell-still-not-in-papers.html

    * http://www.politicsinireland.com/category/former/gay-mitchell/

    * http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055914606

    * http://www.irishelection.com/2006/08/fine-gael-the-monarchist-party/

    * http://ansionnachfionn.com/2011/08/01/gay-mitchell-right-wing-conservative-christian-and-president-of-ireland/

    * http://www.independent.ie/opinion/letters/dubious-stance-on-sovereignty-2183479.html
    ...Mr Kenny might explain comments made by FG MEP Gay Mitchell on August 20, 2006 at the annual Michael Collins/Arthur Griffith commemoration in Glasnevin cemetery, when he suggested that the Irish Government should consider a role for the British monarch in a new all-Ireland state, perhaps even a role as joint head of state to accommodate those Irish who also see themselves as British and have a strong attachment to the crown? Perhaps Mr Kenny should insist that Mr Mitchell "submit for pre-approval" any future comments he may be considering making on Irish sovereignty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,834 ✭✭✭Sonnenblumen


    Dionysus wrote: »
    Aside from being ineffably embarrassing to educated Irish people, this is a crazy, lunatic idea. It could only be somebody as disconnected and ideologically driven as Brian Hayes who would propose it. Scarily, he now holds the state finances to carry out his proposal.

    I just read this in a single line in yesterday's Irish Times article on the Phoenix Park here: "The OPW is to pursue the return of two statues by sculptor John Henry Foley blown up by the IRA.".

    For OPW read Brian Hayes, the ideological Fine Gael minister in charge of that office now who has a very long history as a supporter of John Bruton and who, before joining Fine Gael, was a member of Democratic Left entirely because of the anti-republican views of de Rossa (Source). Now, in power it seems Hayes wants to spend our money re-erecting statues that glorify the British Empire. The last imperial statue re-erected was that of Britain's Queen Victoria/the Famine Queen in Dún Laoghaire in 2003 at a cost of some €500,000.


    The statues in question are:

    1. The Carlisle Memorial: It was erected in 1870 and blown up by in 1958. This is what remains of Carlisle's statue in Dublin's Phoenix Park today. Dedicated to the British Lord Lieutenant George William Frederick Howard, seventh earl of Carlisle (1802–1864).

    2. The Gough memorial: This was hugely controversial even before it was erected. It was attacked on several occasions. Following one such attack in 1957 the monument was removed and today is in the possession of a relative of Gough who spent a fortune restoring it in Chillingham Castle in England. This is it there today. Hayes wants to buy this and re-erect it in the Phoenix Park.

    Here's one account of the background to the erection of the Gough monument in 1880:

    "The statue has had a troubled history. At the time of his death in 1869, Gough's friends felt that since he was born in Co. Limmerick and, when not on military service, had always lived in his native land, a statue on a prominent site in Dublin was appropriate, at either Carlisle Bridge, Foster Place or Westmoreland Road. However, the Dublin Corporation was reluctant to commemorate a servant of the empire who had gained the nickname the 'Hammer of the Sikhs', and vetoed each of these suggestions. .... Once finished the statue's problems continued. A site was found for it in Phoenix Park, Dublin, but at the time of the inauguration there was a strong feeling that it would have been more suitably erected in London. This was reinforced by the inauguration ceremony at which so many soldiers were present that the Duke of Malborough, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, was prompted to remark that the Park looked like the 'Champs de Mars of Dublin'. Once in place, because it was subsequently seen as a celebration of empire, the statue was physically attacked on a number of occasions. On Christmas Eve 1944 the rider was beheaded and his sword removed. In November 1956 the right hind leg of the horse was blown off and then finally, at 12.45am on Monday 3rd July 1957, the whole statue was hurled from its base by a huge explosion, the work of experts in plastic bombing brought in from France by the I.R.A. Following this, for the next 29 years, the base remained in place in Phoenix Park while the statue itself was kept in storage by the Office of Public Works at the Royal Hospital, Kilmainham. (Photographs exist of Gough's severed head sitting in a cupboard.) Eventually, in August 1986, the statue was sold to Robert Guinness of Straffan, Co. Kildare for a sum believed to be £1000 or less, on the condition, according to the Irish Times, that it left Ireland. In 1988, it came into the possession of its present owner, a distant relative of Gough, who had it painstakingly restored by the Newcastle blacksmiths, J. S. Lunn and Sons and re-erected at his newly acquired home, Chillingham Castle, in 1990. The statue is now once again complete except for the 18cm high base of the pedestal."

    Aside from using remarkably obtuse military tactics, Field Marshal Sir Hugh Gough, first Viscount Gough, had an infamous reputation for his savagery and brutality towards what he deemed to be "inferior" populations. The nickname mentioned above - "Hammer of the Sikhs" - was given because of his brutality when conquering the Punjab on behalf the British East India Company/British Empire. Gough had also been a significant figure in the First Opium Wars defending British drug producers and merchants against the Chinese who were trying to stop opium getting into China.

    So much more about this guy, suffice to say that he should not be honoured in Ireland in 2011, for many of the same reasons Dublin Corporation voted not to erect a statue to him back in the 1870s.


    Anyway TLDR: Do you think an Irish government should be re-erecting monuments in Ireland which commemorate British imperial figures?

    I don't suppose there would be much point talking to people like you about restoration of historical buildings or preserving our artistic & cultural heritage?

    Try something useful eg learn how to make a bib.


    :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,834 ✭✭✭Sonnenblumen


    Sure why not change O'Connell Street to Cromwell street? Knock down the Spire and replace it with a stature of cromwell and king billy doing a jig on the corpses of michael collins and wolfe tonne.

    or spend more on education:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Typical West Britism from the Blueshirts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Seanchai


    Biggins wrote: »


    I knew that Gay Mitchell was related to the Dublin gangster, George Mitchell. I wouldn't hold that against him as we all have arsehole relatives (after all, how would we know the good relatives unless we had the arseholes to compare them with), but his personal views that the Presidency of Ireland could be replaced by the Queen of England deserve far, far more scrutiny than they've received. I really don't want a President who is willing to give the position away to the very people from whom it was wrested in the early 1930s. The patriotism and loyaty of somebody - never mind a presidential candidate - who would propose that deserves far, far more scrutiny.

    This photo of Kenny with Mitchell looks like Kenny is saying "oh fúck, what have we done!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,389 ✭✭✭mattjack


    Brian Hayes has it right. I think we should also tear down that rusty old spire in Sackville Street and re-erect Nelson's pillar.

    In honour of Nelson Munce right ? we could have a statue of Bart Simpson in Grafton Street too ,hold on,Killer Pigeon are you just looking for somewhere to **** ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Seanchai


    I don't suppose there would be much point talking to people like you about restoration of historical buildings or preserving our artistic & cultural heritage?

    Try something useful eg learn how to make a bib.


    :(

    I vaguely recollect from previous posts that the OP is one of the (relatively few) people in Ireland who had enough respect for history to complete a PhD in it. If true, that's a lot of egg on your face.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Seanchai wrote: »
    I knew that Gay Mitchell was related to the Dublin gangster, George Mitchell. I wouldn't hold that against him as we all have arsehole relatives (after all, how would we know the good relatives unless we had the arseholes to compare them with), but his personal views that the Presidency of Ireland could be replaced by the Queen of England deserve far, far more scrutiny than they've received. I really don't want a President who is willing to give the position away to the very people from whom it was wrested in the early 1930s. The patriotism and loyaty of somebody - never mind a presidential candidate - who would propose that deserves far, far more scrutiny.

    This photo of Kenny with Mitchell looks like Kenny is saying "oh fúck, what have we done!"

    It just goes to show his disdain for democracy when he proposes replacing a position elected by the people with someone born into the position.

    Though I'm sure the biased media will ignore that fact. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement