Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Building Lower Chest

  • 22-09-2011 9:29am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,492 ✭✭✭


    Hey guys!

    Can someone recommend a weights exercise for building the lower chest area? I'm currently benching just over my body weight and am pretty happy with the weight and my strength. However, I find that my lower chest area (just under my nipple area I suppose) is not developing in size at all; I find that most of my chest muscle is building is taking place in the upper chest area.

    Basically, I follow 2 different chest programmes which I alternate:

    Number 1:

    1. Flat bench press with bar
    2. Cable flies

    Number 2:

    1. Inclinded dumbell press
    2. Seated chest press (resistance machine)
    3. Cable flies

    When benching, I normally do something along the lines of 50 kg x 8, 65 kg x 8, 70 kg x 6, 75 kg x 4, 75 kg x 4. I weigh 69 kg and am pretty happy with the weight I'm lifting.

    Can someone suggest how to vary the programme a bit? And, more specifically develop the lower chest a little more? From looking at what other guys do in the gym (in term of developing the chest), this seems to be what everyone does.

    Thanks!!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,818 ✭✭✭Inspector Coptoor


    Incline bench hits upper chest, flies while bring hands high hits upper chest.
    Regular flat bench, push ups & regular flies hit middle chest.

    Try decline benching and decline flies
    If you;re happy with upper chest, drop all the incline work in favour of decline work and when doing cable flies, bring your hands low.

    try something like
    Decline Bench press or Decline DB Press - 4 sets of 8-10
    Decline DB Flies or cable flies bringing the hands low - 3 sets of 12-15.

    try it and see if it makes a difference.

    Im just glad you never mentioned "inner" chest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭nbrady20009


    Weighted chest dips might be worth incorporating.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 295 ✭✭john t


    Too hit wrk lower chest you have too do decline exercises and try push bar or dumbells slightly forward so they end up over lower chest,


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    Am I the only one who thinks decline pressing is essentially just a tricep movement?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭COH


    Hanley wrote: »
    Am I the only one who thinks decline pressing is essentially just a tricep movement?

    More of an ego movement.

    Am I the only one who thinks focusing on your 'lower' pecs is a complete waste of time altogether?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    COH wrote: »
    Am I the only one who thinks focusing on your 'lower' pecs is a complete waste of time altogether?

    No. But I think tonight we're supposed to give reasons for stuff.

    I'll go first - "lower" chest is about as good a term as "inner" pec.

    Any form of decline press typically is a shorter range of ROM bench, like a heavily arched flat benched, which is probably gonna be more tricep dominant, especially since you need to tuck your elbows so you don't crush your larynx.

    Sometimes I wonder if the only reason why decline benching is good for your lower pecs, supposedly, is because incline benching preferentially targets your upper pec area, and since they're the opposite, it must work?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭COH


    Hanley wrote: »
    No. But I think tonight we're supposed to give reasons for stuff.

    I'll go first - "lower" chest is about as good a term as "inner" pec.

    Any form of decline press typically is a shorter range of ROM bench, like a heavily arched flat benched, which is probably gonna be more tricep dominant, especially since you need to tuck your elbows so you don't crush your larynx.

    Sometimes I wonder if the only reason why decline benching is good for your lower pecs, supposedly, is because incline benching preferentially targets your upper pec area, and since they're the opposite, it must work?

    I guess pressing at a decline is 'good' for your pecs (in general) because of the reduced ROM you can handle a heavier load, thus providing a different stimulus.. but I doubt very much if that stimulus targets any specific part of the chest. Genetics for the most part determine the shape of a muscle, training detremines the size.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 295 ✭✭john t


    As said in previous posts before being knocked, dumbell flyes and dumbell presses wrk lower pec..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭nice_guy80


    Weighted Dips
    if unable for them then weighted bench dips


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    nice_guy80 wrote: »
    Weighted Dips
    if unable for them then weighted bench dips

    I’m sorry, but no, NEVER do bench dips.

    The only purpose they serve is absolutely WRECKING your shoulder. They’re up there with upright rows in the “exercises that should never have been invented” category for me.

    They’re pretty much all tricep, and they internally rotate your shoulder to a terrible position. If you want to mimic them just do a DB floor press or close grip bench or something. There’s no way anyone should do bench dips. Ever.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,818 ✭✭✭Inspector Coptoor


    Id agree with Hanley and COH, generally people give out about the "lower" part of the chest not being defined because there;s a layer of fat there.
    Most of the time, all you need to do is mix up heavy and light incline and flat work while running a slight (-10%) calorie deficit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭john_cappa


    Hanley wrote: »
    Am I the only one who thinks decline pressing is essentially just a tricep movement?

    Agree!
    COH wrote: »
    More of an ego movement.

    Am I the only one who thinks focusing on your 'lower' pecs is a complete waste of time altogether?

    X 2 on the ego

    X235648 on pointless of working upper, lower, middle. Not possible

    If ye want a laugh read the first post in this thread lol!!!

    http://anabolicminds.com/forum/exercise-science/132253-how-many-heads.html


Advertisement