Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pure genius, how the church can pay for all the kiddy fiddling

  • 15-09-2011 8:20am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Rabidlamb


    The church/state are liable for over €1 billion as reparation payments to the victims of abuse.
    Church/State coffers are at an all time low and revenue streams are falling.

    At the same time there's people like myself who were in the process of defecting from the catholic church (Count me out) when that avenue was closed.
    Grant us our wish to formally defect but charge us an administration fee, this fee must be ring fenced for the victims fund.
    Say 100,000 people wanted to have their baptismal records expunged, a €1,000 defection charge would generate €100 million for the fund.
    Take this product worldwide & the liability to the state could be reduced to zero in time.

    I thought of all this before my coffee this morning, excuse any gaping holes.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,463 ✭✭✭KTRIC


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    gaping holes.

    Thats how this all started :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭FatherLen


    this is pointless. i dont give a flying fuck if there is a piece of paper somewhere saying that i have been baptised. so who in there right mind would pay 1000 to get rid of it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,332 ✭✭✭Guill


    excuse any gaping holes


    As the priest said to the Alterboy.


    Way too late, damn you KTRIC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭mawk


    Thats great!

    Have the people pay their debt for them!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,466 ✭✭✭Snakeblood


    FatherLen wrote: »
    this is pointless. i dont give a flying fuck if there is a piece of paper somewhere saying that i have been baptised.

    That does actually make a difference though. The church can go round saying 'we represent this many people and we feel strongly about this matter' to the government. It's a lot less of an impressive argument if they can only say 'we represent fewer people, and look, Fatherlen just left. It must have been something we said'


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 943 ✭✭✭Rebel021


    Really


  • Posts: 0 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Zachary Echoing Yawn


    i have a better idea

    why don't catholics go back to paying their tithes. problem solved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,366 ✭✭✭✭Kylo Ren


    I hate when you see an OP construct a sentence that can be used as ammunition in your comedic arsenal and then you scroll down to see other people have used it :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,351 ✭✭✭Orando Broom


    Then as a bonus the Church should give you a gift of a new baptismal record, gratis, in recognition of your contribution to saving the institution of the Catholic Church.

    Kudos to that man, gets the rest of us off the hook!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    I thought of all this before my coffee this morning, excuse any gaping holes.
    Probably should've waited until you had your coffee. Might have made you think more clearly.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Keno 92 wrote: »
    I hate when you see an OP construct a sentence that can be used as ammunition in your comedic arsenal and then you scroll down to see other people have used it :(

    Just drop down a few levels of sophisitcation.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Rabidlamb


    Ok, I'm putting you early response bunch in the maybe pile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    Feck that, not paying to defect. I don't recall undersigning any agreement to be baptised, so I shall consider that document void.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,720 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I'd rather remain as a member of the Catholic Church than willingly help them pay compensation for sexual abuse just so they would cross my name off their list


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,910 ✭✭✭OneArt


    I don't see why I should pay a fee to get out of something I had no choice in joining in the first place. F*ck them.

    Anyone got any good ideas on how to get excommunicated?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,264 ✭✭✭✭jester77


    OneArt wrote: »
    I don't see why I should pay a fee to get out of something I had no choice in joining in the first place. F*ck them.

    Anyone got any good ideas on how to get excommunicated?

    Fiddle a priest :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,838 ✭✭✭Nulty


    Keno 92 wrote: »
    I hate when you see an OP construct a sentence that can be used as ammunition in your comedic arsenal and then you scroll down to see other people have used it :(

    If you're talking about the gaping holes gag, don't worry about it, it was very lame.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,753 ✭✭✭fitz0


    So you want the people on their way out the door to pay for the higher ups f*cking about?

    I haven't been to AH in a long time. With good reason it seems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    Grant us our wish to formally defect but charge us an administration fee, this fee must be ring fenced for the victims fund.
    I has a better idea: charge people to kneecap the kiddie fiddlers at €1,000 per knee...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    No OP. No way should anyone pay for the criminal behavior of the church or state. Fvck 'em. Let the vatican deal with Fionnula and reach a deal between them.

    There's a story going around about the amount of gold reserves the vatican has. If true €1bn is piddly amounts to them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    Call me old fashioned, but i aint paying no thousand euro to leave some club i didn't join in the first place!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭MetalDog


    They should be paying us to defect.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭MagicSean


    Why would anyone pay? A baptismal cert is just a record of something that happened. Why would you get it expunged? Just do what I do. Don't go to mass and if someone asks then simply say you aren't catholic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 coolpaddy


    Here's an actual solution - how about the Church hand over all the schools and land they have to the State. It's the least we deserve. Should go some way towards paying their debts to Irish society.The suggestion that we actually pay THEM to leave their house of sin is the most absurd thing I've heard in a long time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭i71jskz5xu42pb


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    excuse any gaping holes.

    How about this:
    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    a €1,000 defection charge

    What kind of twat would pay €1,000 to leave the church?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,909 ✭✭✭✭Wertz


    I don't want to have much to do with the organised catholic church but I'll be f*cked if I'm handing over a grand to officially have it acknowledged by them regardless of what they do with the proceeds.
    I said it before: sell the churches stuff out from under them and sue the vatican state to make up the shortfall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    what the fcuk? pay to have yourself removed for a corrupt organisation when you didnt ask to be part of it to begin with? if they just amended their ridiculous canon laws to allow people to freely leave then thats a start, paying for the privalege they can fook right off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,115 ✭✭✭Pdfile


    FatherLen wrote: »
    this is pointless. i dont give a flying fuck if there is a piece of paper somewhere saying that i have been baptised. so who in there right mind would pay 1000 to get rid of it

    muslims... they love trolling. :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    They can pay it off by selling land.

    Simple.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    Whats not genius about having them shoulder the financial burden honestly?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,397 ✭✭✭Paparazzo


    It's free to tick "no religion" on the census form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 796 ✭✭✭TheBunk1


    €1000 to LEAVE the church? That has to be the stupidest idea I've ever heard. Sounds like something one of their crew would propose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Sofiztikated


    Or

    How about the Catholic Head Office pay for this? A quick google, and I know the figures aren't super up to date, put the Vatican's net worth @ $900 million (in 2004) and didn't include St Peters Basilica or the Sistine chapel.

    So... which did you think should pay for it? You, who (hopefully) had nothing to do with it, or head office?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    So essentially what you're suggesting is that those who don't support the Church should pay for the abuses which were carried out and covered up under its watch?
    Snakeblood wrote: »
    That does actually make a difference though. The church can go round saying 'we represent this many people and we feel strongly about this matter' to the government. It's a lot less of an impressive argument if they can only say 'we represent fewer people, and look, Fatherlen just left. It must have been something we said'

    Does it really make much of a difference? It's plainly obvious that the church is losing support but yet no government has taken steps to sever diplomatic relations with the Vatican. I doubt that's down to how many people the Pope says are fans of his. National censuses are a far better measure of religious following than some dusty old book in Rome, and besides, for every one person in the west who officially leaves the church, there are 10 people in Africa joining it, in part due to the hold that Missionaries have on communities there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,100 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Rabidlamb wrote: »

    At the same time there's people like myself who were in the process of defecting from the catholic church (Count me out) when that avenue was closed.
    Why can't you leave the catholic church?

    Doesn't really matter as there's no way I'd give them a cent, they are one of the biggest land owners in the world with the largest art collection and possibly tonnes of WW2 booty.

    Let them pay their own way out of it or set the CAB on them, they have admitted that they won't abide by our laws.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    If you believe that ticking a box on a piece of paper actually makes you enter or leave a religion well then you obviously believe in the religion yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 677 ✭✭✭Tordelback


    Lads and lasses, those of you who don't think you're in the church just because you say so, you must know that the church uses your baptism and subsequent rites of indoctrination as evidence that it's still a relevant and representative force. It's as if they had your voting card delivered to their address and used your franchise on 'your' behalf. Tell them to give it back.

    A formal mechanism for stating that you no longer belonged would go a long way to undermining their power. Of course, when it comes time to get married, name kids or get them into a school, or most importantly of all find somewhere for your corpse to hang out before it gets buried/burned, I suspect a lot of folk would regret their official resignation, but that's precisely why the church still claims to have your support.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    coolpaddy wrote: »
    Here's an actual solution - how about the Church hand over all the schools and land they have to the State. It's the least we deserve. Should go some way towards paying their debts to Irish society.The suggestion that we actually pay THEM to leave their house of sin is the most absurd thing I've heard in a long time.

    Yup, it should be a straightforward situation where any school where abuse by a clergy member is known to have taken place, any school where an abuser who was/is clergy was moved to or any school where the clergical staff took any part in covering up abuse of any kind should be forfeit to the state. The church loses the land and any say in the running of those schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭AoifeCork


    OneArt wrote: »
    I don't see why I should pay a fee to get out of something I had no choice in joining in the first place. F*ck them.

    Anyone got any good ideas on how to get excommunicated?

    A reserved sin is your answer... I believe abortion used to be one of them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 857 ✭✭✭FetchTheGin


    Canon law should be outlawed.:mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,692 ✭✭✭Dublin_Gunner


    Pay to leave an institution I never asked to join, and let them use my money to pay for their paedophile priests court cases???

    Exactly what part of this stupid idea is pure genius?

    You basically want the public, to fund the worlds largest paedophile ring, so they don't have to open their own wallets??

    Serious lol.


    Here's a better idea - if they cannot fund the compensation payments, they can start to demolish some of the churches, and sell off the land.

    In a few years they won't have enough priests to run them anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,611 ✭✭✭✭Sam Vimes


    Seanbeag1 wrote: »
    Why would anyone pay? A baptismal cert is just a record of something that happened. Why would you get it expunged? Just do what I do. Don't go to mass and if someone asks then simply say you aren't catholic.

    I think it's funny that someone with a sig that says "Not in my name" is so blasé about the church using your name on your baptismal record to bulk up their numbers and claim to represent you when making statements etc

    Don't get me wrong here, I never bothered doing it either but then I don't have a sig saying "Not in my name" :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭latenia


    Or

    How about the Catholic Head Office pay for this? A quick google, and I know the figures aren't super up to date, put the Vatican's net worth @ $900 million (in 2004) and didn't include St Peters Basilica or the Sistine chapel.

    If you've ever been to the Vatican museum, you'll see that that figure is laughably low, and that's just the stuff they have on display. They've been accumulating wealth from all over Europe and then the world for 1500 years now in largely deflation-proof assets like gold, jewels and art. If Damien Hirst's diamond skull is worth $50M then how much for La Pieta? $400M?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,172 ✭✭✭Ghost Buster


    Im just gonna watch this one for the glorious time when Crucamin, Audrey Hepburn, Min or Mistress 69 join in.
    Then the fun starts!!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 ✭✭✭UglyBolloxFace


    Rabidlamb wrote: »
    The church/state are liable for over €1 billion as reparation payments to the victims of abuse.
    Church/State coffers are at an all time low and revenue streams are falling.

    At the same time there's people like myself who were in the process of defecting from the catholic church (Count me out) when that avenue was closed.
    Grant us our wish to formally defect but charge us an administration fee, this fee must be ring fenced for the victims fund.
    Say 100,000 people wanted to have their baptismal records expunged, a €1,000 defection charge would generate €100 million for the fund.
    Take this product worldwide & the liability to the state could be reduced to zero in time.

    I thought of all this before my coffee this morning, excuse any gaping holes.

    So let me get this straight - you want us, the people wishing to defect, to pay towards victims of church abuse? Are you mental?

    Why should we have to pay? What part have we played in this abuse?

    Your suggestion seems to discount the liability of the church in this affair.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭gigino


    If you google up " vatican wealth", you will get over half a million hits. Some of the more reputable sources estimate the Vaticans wealth at over 900 million euro. Either use some of that for compensation, and/or sell of the RCC property worldwide. Its the biggest holder of real estate in the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    OP I've just conducted the initiation ceremony to induct you into my religion of Daveism.

    The membership is for life, unless you pay a 20 euro administration fee for defection.

    Interested?


    Srsly, let religions have their silly internal rules and membership cards. Devote more of your energy to trying to stop governments from giving a sh*t if you're a member of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the Catholic Church, or the Mickey Mouse Club.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    The most evil organisation in the world can afford to pay its own bills and evil deeds. No need for anyone to throw cash at them. One day the people will march onto Rome and destroy the Roman Catholic Church and a good day it will be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭squod


    KeithAFC wrote: »
    The most evil organisation in the world can afford to pay its own bills and evil deeds. No need for anyone to throw cash at them. One day the people will march onto Rome and destroy the Roman Catholic Church and a good day it will be.

    No protestant clergy have done the same right?

    http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2007/06/18/80877.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    Those ****s dont deserve the steam off my piss never mind a thousand euro.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement