Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Architects & Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 - AE911Truth.org

12345679»

Comments

  • #242
    davoxx
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭davoxx


    meglome wrote: »
    You'll notice where I repeatedly said 'mass murder of their own people". Also I fear you don't see that showing more examples that we know about is proving the opposite that you claim about 911. i.e. secrecy.
    so it's okay if it's not their own people, like Iraqis?
    so there are no examples of secrecy? i thought Ramocc gave some history lessons, but you forgot about them.
    claiming that "someone" would have come forward is not evidence, it's an assumption, with no proof.

    but lets look at this logically, right, if someone did come forward, you'd be the first to write him off.
    and those that can't be written off, generally have a way of finding quick unexplained deaths, that then get written of.

    that would explain why 'no-one' has come forward.
    meglome wrote: »
    A taste of our own medicine, huh?
    not really, medicine is generally good for you :P
    meglome wrote: »
    We keep asking for evidence and getting opinion.
    so did we :(
    meglome wrote: »
    You and your new buddies have shown a complete lack of understanding of how an investigation or court of law works.
    no we didn't, you just can't grasp it.
    besides we are not in court.

    Ramocc made several good points that you countered with rubbish (perhaps that you did not understand it).
    meglome wrote: »
    We've got the very detailed NIST reports, complied over years by hundreds of top professionals.
    WHICH YOU DID NOT READ LET ALONE UNDERSTAND.
    that was in capitals as you forgot to mention that none of you guys actually read it.
    just because they are professionals, does not mean they are right, one has to read it to make sure and then give weight to the report based on the background of the professionals.

    but step one is reading it!!

    meglome wrote: »
    We have also many other sources.
    no you don't otherwise you would have shown them when asked ..
    meglome wrote: »
    I've yet to see any of you supply relevant evidence for anything.
    ok if you really believe it ... i can't force you to open you eyes and read it ... (just like the NIST report)

    but i guess this all boils down to that you don't understand evidence.
    meglome wrote: »
    Even the video that precipitated this thread is very long on opinion and speculation and completely lacking in evidence.
    did you actually watch it? or did you form an opinion based on preconception?


Advertisement