Is It More Gay To Give It Or Receive It?

UsernameInUse

Is It More Gay To Give It Or Receive It?

Da Shins Kelly

I'm not sure if I'm reading this correctly. Are you actually saying this?

kfallon

Sneaky finger???

wandatowell

I voted, does this make me gay???

Dun

Where's the "to start threads about it" option?

admiralofthefleet

whats your opinion op?

me. i like women too much to comment

Diabhal Beag

I'd have to see the Primetime Investigates first before I decided.

Taltos

My vote is - cop on op - pre-school is that-away...

Kevin Duffy

There's gay, bi and straight. One is gay, one is bi and the other is straight. There are no degrees of them.

bonerm

To give it. Just ask the Dundon Queens in Wheatfield Prison.

Wibbs

Its gay when you're a chap who likes chaps and a chapesse who likes chapesses. If you like both, you're bi and if you're a chap who likes chapesses or vice versa it's straight. If you like neither you're asexual. If you find yourself "liking" yourself a lot, especially in a mirror, you're a wanker.

/sexuality lesson.

The_Kew_Tour

Up the bum no harm done, sure that what they say anyway:pac:

kfallon

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

Up the bum no harm done, sure that what they say anyway:pac:

Up the pink then up the stink....nothing wrong with it

hondasam

UsernameInUse wrote: »

Is It More Gay To Give It Or Receive It?

did you give or receive ?

Knex*

Sounds like couple therapy is needed

helimachoptor

kfallon wrote: »

Up the pink then up the stink....nothing wrong with it

Kfallon I applaud you that readily made me laugh

UsernameInUse

Interesting poll (pun intended).

I would have thought that giving it would be more gay as you would have to be sexually aroused in the first place.

Gary4279

Where the option for doing both being gay? Coz like, if your having sex with a man, and a man yourself, then i'd be inclined to say you are gay whether you give or take.

Sea Sharp

Taking it is gheyer by a long shot.
When giving, you can just close your eyes and imagine it's Rhianna.

Dangerous Man

We're all secretly judging you OP.

UsernameInUse

Sea Sharp wrote: »

Taking it is gheyer by a long shot.
When giving, you can just close your eyes and imagine it's Rhianna.

Whats stopping you from receiving it, closing your eyes and imagining you're Rihanna?

Big Nasty

The giver definitely 'wears the trousers'! :pac:

Don't lock mods - this has the potential to be a very entertaining thread!

hondasam

UsernameInUse wrote: »

Whats stopping you from receiving it, closing your eyes and imagining you're Rihanna?

how would that work ?

El Siglo

IBTL, surprised thread is lasting as long.

Kevin Duffy

UsernameInUse wrote: »

I would have thought that giving it would be more gay as you would have to be sexually aroused in the first place.

I'd say you'd want to be fairly committed to the process to take it though.

Dun

UsernameInUse wrote: »

I would have thought that giving it would be more gay as you would have to be sexually aroused in the first place.

That's like saying if you're not in the mood, you're less straight.

UsernameInUse

Dun wrote: »

That's like saying if you're not in the mood, you're less straight.

Not being in the mood is not the same as being in the mood.

Dun

I fail to see the point.. [not in the mood] not = [in the mood]. That's pretty obvious.

efb

Oh to bottom or top, or just be versitile.

The eternal quandary of the gay.

UsernameInUse

Dun wrote: »

I fail to see the point.. [not in the mood] not = [in the mood]. That's pretty obvious.

Well being able to get it up and being in the mood does not equal not being in the mood at all.

Dun

So again, [not in the mood] not = [in the mood].

UsernameInUse

Dun wrote: »

So again, [not in the mood] not = [in the mood].

So you'd have to be in the mood to get it up, meaning you'd be more gay than receiving it, which is what you're disputing.

later12

I have a gay friend whom I have known since college who claims he can tell whether his fellow homosexuals are tops or bottoms based on appearances and mannerisms. He is always picking out the top or the bottom amongst the gay couples we see, and educating me on spotting this. I'm less talented, since I have no gaydar, apparently.

Curiously, I (a straight man) am apparently a bottom. Curiouser again is the fact that lesbians also seem to follow this top/ bottom approach. It's always easier to spot the man amongst a couple of lesbians, I find.

Anyway, to answer your question OP, I would say the bottom is usually the more effeminate. Although that is only an amateur generalisation, and I think both are equally gay!

strobe

UsernameInUse wrote: »

Is It More Gay To Give It Or Receive It?

God I love After Hours.

Dun

UsernameInUse wrote: »

So you'd have to be in the mood to get it up, meaning you'd be more gay than receiving it, which is what you're disputing.

Nope, you said that being more sexually aroused (presuming someone's gay) means more gay. Which means that if you're not in the mood, hence not sexually aroused (and the person claims to be straight) you're less straight.

Anyway, this is all bloody nonsense. Gay = gay, straight = straight.

efb

Dun wrote: »

Nope, you said that being more sexually aroused (presuming someone's gay) means more gay. Which means that if you're not in the mood, hence not sexually aroused (and the person claims to be straight) you're less straight.

Anyway, this is all bloody nonsense. Gay = gay, straight = straight.

bisexual= greedy! :P

Temptamperu

Teh greeks and the romans thought gay sex ok as long as you where the giver not the taker.

efb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top,_bottom_and_versatile

TouchingVirus

IBTL

later12

Temptamperu wrote: »

Teh greeks and the romans thought gay sex ok as long as you where the giver not the taker.

Certainly the greeks didn't. The official version was inserting a sneaky finger, masturbation or intercrural sex (simulation). Anal sex was considered unpleasant and unattractive, and although it undoubtedly happened, it wasn't part of the traditional, mainstream system of Greek homosexual or pederastic behaviour (as has been in the news/ Norris)

TiGeR KiNgS

prison sec
the giver is never the receiver

QED

TouchingVirus

later10 wrote: »

It's always easier to spot the man amongst a couple of lesbians, I find.

Yeah, there are none

efb

being the giver and receiver at the same time can be jizztastic!

carlybabe1

Wibbs wrote: »

Its gay when you're a chap who likes chaps and a chapesse who likes chapesses. If you like both, you're bi and if you're a chap who likes chapesses or vice versa it's straight. If you like neither you're asexual. If you find yourself "liking" yourself a lot, especially in a mirror, you're a wanker.

/sexuality lesson.

hahaha pmsl

In ancient times, the passive was always the younger,and switching of roles was frwoned upon, if i remember correctly

bnt

Poll needs a third option: something like "how the **** would I know?" :rolleyes:

Killer Wench

I bet the OP is referring to "Thanks".

Big Nasty

efb wrote: »

being the giver and receiver at the same time can be jizztastic!

Huh!?!:eek:

bluecatmorgana

UsernameInUse wrote: »

Is It More Gay To Give It Or Receive It?

Well you are on some roll today.
Is there anything you'd like to say, anything you'd like to come out about?

First rimming, now this.

Saila

bnt wrote: »

Poll needs a third option: something like "how the **** would I know?" :rolleyes:

*notes username*

Saila

give, everyone whos had a big ****e knows that

randylonghorn

UsernameInUse wrote: »

Is It More Gay To Give It Or Receive It?

Would you like to offer an opinion yourself, OP?

You sound like you have more experience than most of us on which to base an informed opinion.