Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

War on drugs a failure

  • 02-06-2011 5:17pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    A high-level international commission declared the global "war on drugs" a failure and urged nations to consider legalising cannabis and other drugs to undermine organised crime and protect their citizens' health.
    The Global Commission on Drug Policy called for a new approach to reducing drug abuse to replace the current strategy of strictly criminalising drugs and incarcerating drug users while battling criminal cartels that control the drug trade.
    "The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world," said the report issued by the commission today.
    There are 250 million users of illicit drugs worldwide, with less than a 10th of them classified as dependent, and millions are involved in cultivation, production and distribution, according to UN estimates quoted in the report. The study adds that decriminalisation initiatives do not result in significant increases in drug use.
    "Now is the time to break the taboo on discussion of all drug policy options, including alternatives to drug prohibition," former Colombian president Cesar Gaviria said
    Countries that continue to invest mostly in a law enforcement approach should focus on violent organised crime and drug traffickers, the commission said, and it called for the promotion of alternative sentences for small-scale and first-time drug dealers as the majority of these people are not gangsters or organised criminals.
    The report says "vast expenditure" had been spent on criminalisation and repressive measures.
    "Repressive efforts directed at consumers impede public health measures to reduce HIV/Aids, overdose fatalities and other harmful consequences of drug use," it stated.
    The commission's report adds that money spent by governments on futile efforts to reduce the supply of drugs and on jailing people on drug-related offences could be better spent on different ways to reduce drug demand and the harm caused by drug abuse.
    Reuters


«13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Its about time governments changed and implemented a new policy in combating addiction & drug dealing,its been proven time & time again prohibition does not work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭digme


    well it is when the cia are the ones controlling the trade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Fukuyama


    I'm pro-legalisation.

    But all these daily drug threads are ruining AH :mad:

    Give it a rest...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Yes, even Richard Branson and Judi Dench have called for the UK Government to consider decriminalising drugs

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/branson-backs-drugs-policy-change-230530832.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭who what when


    If the war on drugs got the same kind of effort as the war on terror then drugs would be very hard to come by indeed!

    Where theres a will theres a way. Unfortunately theres fcuk all will!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Dean0088 wrote: »
    I'm pro-legalisation.

    But all these daily drug threads are ruining AH :mad:

    Give it a rest...


    Chill out man, have a spliff,:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    I think we can safely assume that drugs will never go away.

    Lets legalise them. Perhaps junkies will dies quicker and the criminals can sell something else illegal to fund their crime empires.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    Dean0088 wrote: »
    I'm pro-legalisation.

    But all these daily drug threads are ruining AH :mad:

    Give it a rest...

    'War on Drugs-Threads' imminent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Eurons


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭Scrappychimow


    The drugs trade is an important source of income for south american countries,according to United nations ,the illegal drug industry employed 10% of bolivias workforce during the early 90s, the illegal Drug industry is a major player in the world economy ,its affecting the evolution of our societys..

    At the height of the cocaine trafficing in the 80s,there was a construction boom in Cali columbia-luxury flats,five star hotels,.

    The injection of narcodollars ,galvanised the economy,there were jobs galore for architechts& masons,plumbers,lawyers ,investors & financial consultants.Dirty money became one of the engines of the economy and still is over there,the drug industry has reached all sectors of society from the peasant farmers growing the ****,to street dealers,business people and state institutions . If drugs were made legal ,think what would happen over there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    orourkeda wrote: »
    I think we can safely assume that drugs will never go away.

    Lets legalise them. Perhaps junkies will dies quicker and the criminals can sell something else illegal to fund their crime empires.

    And all the junkies from England, Scotland, Wales etc will descend on Dublin and make it an even nicer place to live. The jails are already full too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭Cork boy 55


    It's been won, in Singapore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    realies wrote: »
    A high-level international commission declared the global "war on drugs" a failure and urged nations to consider legalising cannabis and other drugs to undermine organised crime and protect their citizens' health.
    ...........

    ....and fuck all will be done about it as usual. Depressing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    And all the junkies from England, Scotland, Wales etc will descend on Dublin and make it an even nicer place to live. The jails are already full too.

    Just like all the Irish junkies descended on Portugal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,706 ✭✭✭120_Minutes


    John Q'a tax eurons funding failure??? Say it ain't so!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,126 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I doubt this will even be acknowledged by our lot..

    the US have already dismissed the report as 'misguided'.. ffs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    The drugs trade is an important source of income for south american countries,according to United nations ,the illegal drug industry employed 10% of bolivia's workforce during the early 90s, the illegal Drug industry is a major player in the world economy ,its affecting the evolution of our society's..

    At the height of the cocaine trafficking in the 80s,there was a construction boom in Cali Columbia-luxury flats,five star hotels,.

    The injection of narco dollars ,galvanised the economy,there were jobs galore for architects masons,plumbers,lawyers ,investors & financial consultants.Dirty money became one of the engines of the economy and still is over there,the drug industry has reached all sectors of society from the peasant farmers growing the ****,to street dealers,business people and state institutions . If drugs were made legal ,think what would happen over there.



    Now is the time to break the taboo on discussion of all drug policy options, including alternatives to drug prohibition," former Colombian president Cesar Gaviria said.

    I do get what your saying but by ignoring the problem and locking up small time criminals(mostly)we are going to be in a worse place in the not so distant future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    John Q'a tax eurons funding failure??? Say it ain't so!

    John Q taxpayer funding 'professional' failure.

    TD's
    Solicitors
    Judges
    Gardai
    Prison Officers
    Probation Officers
    Social welfare
    Customs Officers


    It's a royal scew-the-tax-payer-cluster-fuck and anyone who supports this spectacular failure is one of either 2 things

    1. Stupid
    2. Making a living from it (inc drug dealers and the above).

    Or a combination of both.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    It's been won, in Singapore.



    Strong community support against drug abuse has been critical to our fight against drugs. Singapore society resolutely rejects drug abuse. Several voluntary welfare organisations run halfway houses to help recovering addicts adjust back into society. Many employers also come forward to offer reformed drug addicts employment opportunities.

    Drug traffickers are a major part of the problem on the supply side. They make drugs available in our communities and profit from the human misery they help create. This is why tough laws and penalties are needed, including capital punishment for trafficking in significant amounts of the most harmful drugs. This sends a strong deterrent signal to would-be traffickers. But unfortunately, attracted by the lucrative payoffs, some still traffic in drugs knowing full well the penalty if they get caught.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    John Q taxpayer funding 'professional' failure.

    TD's
    Solicitors
    Judges
    Gardai
    Prison Officers
    Probation Officers
    Social welfare

    It's a royal scew-the-tax-payer-cluster-fuck and anyone who supports this spectacular failure is one of either 2 things

    Stupid
    Making a living from it (inc drug dealers and the above).

    It's better to pay all this than have John Q footing the hospital bills of pizza-faced hippies, tripping after smoking their last joint, IMHO.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    The jails are already full too.

    Simple solution to that.
    Stop imprisoning ordinary members of society for the act of consuming a plant or the non payment of TV licence fines.

    Or perhaps you prefer to keep the prisons as a training ground where ordinary members of society learn the ropes from hardened criminals.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    If the war on drugs got the same kind of effort as the war on terror then drugs would be very hard to come by indeed!

    Where theres a will theres a way. Unfortunately theres fcuk all will!

    Nah, in between 'the war on communism' and 'the war on terror' there was only 'the war on drugs', it was the big show in town. It's what filled that gap. It had the CIA, military intelligence, and FBI all competing aggressively with each other to become the lead runners on it as it was clear to all of them it was going to be the main funding recipient at the time. Everything was thrown at 'the war on drugs' at one time. Nothing happened. A couple of drug rings were disintegrated and twelve smaller smarter ones popped up in their places. Over and over again. The war on terror is fighting a small number of people (relatively) with limited resources (relatively) and virtually no public support of any kind from the general global citizenry. The drug trade is an entirely different kettle of fish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭pragmatic1


    I doubt this will even be acknowledged by our lot..

    the US have already dismissed the report as 'misguided'.. ffs
    The US is making too much money from drugs. Prisons, police, FBI, even wall street gets hundreds of millions from cartels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Hookah wrote: »
    It's better to pay all this than have John Q footing the hospital bills of pizza-faced hippies, tripping after smoking their last joint, IMHO.

    1.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    pragmatic1 wrote: »
    The US is making too much money from drugs. Prisons, police, FBI, even wall street gets hundreds of millions from cartels.

    Not to mention the amount of black-ops funded by drug money. Far too many vested interests in the States for them ever to take the lead in legalising drugs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,728 ✭✭✭dilallio


    realies wrote: »
    A high-level international commission declared the global "war on drugs" a failure

    Hmmmmmm :rolleyes:

    How high were they when they figured it out?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭DarkJager


    Hookah wrote: »
    It's better to pay all this than have John Q footing the hospital bills of pizza-faced hippies, tripping after smoking their last joint, IMHO.

    You obviously have very little understanding of what a joint is if you think people start tripping off them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,154 ✭✭✭Rented Mule


    Here is the one question to ask if yourself if you are running a 'War on Drugs':


    Does anyone looking for drugs ever have any trouble trying to find drugs ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    DarkJager wrote: »
    You obviously have very little understanding of what a joint is if you think people start tripping off them.

    Borrow mine. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    DarkJager wrote: »
    You obviously have very little understanding of what a joint is if you think people start tripping off them.

    *Taking the piss alert*
    As if the username was not enough of a giveaway, I suggest you check Hookah's post history


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    If the war on drugs got the same kind of effort as the war on terror then drugs would be very hard to come by indeed!

    Where theres a will theres a way. Unfortunately theres fcuk all will!

    Yeah right :rolleyes:

    Since the 'war on(of?) terror' started, the world has been bricking it.
    It's wall to wall terror alerts ffs

    And what about will? Everyone wants to see the problems with drugs sorted out. Crime, addiction, poor health etc. and the best way to do it is to frickin legalise the lot.

    Prohibition doesn't work y'all.

    Ignorance is bliss though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    mikom wrote: »
    *Taking the piss alert*
    As if the username was not enough of a giveaway, I suggest you check Hookah's post history

    But he said IMHO :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,562 ✭✭✭✭Sunnyisland


    Here is the one question to ask if yourself if you are running a 'War on Drugs':


    Does anyone looking for drugs ever have any trouble trying to find drugs ?



    Its not a problem finding/making/growing them its who is best controlling them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    DarkJager wrote: »
    You obviously have very little understanding of what a joint is if you think people start tripping off them.

    I'm tripping on one right now.

    I was only kidding. I am a warrior in the War for More Drugs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    In the war on drugs how is one supposed to figure out if theyre a conscientious objector or a resistance partisan :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,587 ✭✭✭Pace2008


    If the war on drugs got the same kind of effort as the war on terror then drugs would be very hard to come by indeed!
    Not really. "The War on Drugs" is an absurd misnomer as the powers that be are not fighting against a tangible enemy, they're battling in vain to stamp out an abstract concept - the human desire to alter one's state of consciousness, which will never cease to exist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    mikom wrote: »
    Simple solution to that.
    Stop imprisoning ordinary members of society for the act of consuming a plant or the non payment of TV licence fines.

    Or perhaps you prefer to keep the prisons as a training ground where ordinary members of society learn the ropes from hardened criminals.

    I'm on record for saying that prison does not work except for paedos, murderers and rapists. There is already moves to stop petty offenders being sent there including, i believe, small time drug users. The problem is what to do with the petty offenders as an alternative. I suggest community work schemes otherwise nobody will pay fines and everybody will be a small-time drug dealer or user. Can you think of any worthwhile alternatives ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Can you think of any worthwhile alternatives ?

    Horticultural training courses for growers perhaps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    pragmatic1 wrote: »
    The US is making too much money from drugs. Prisons, police, FBI, even wall street gets hundreds of millions from cartels.

    Even Superman, Yogi Bear and the Roadrunner.
    Do you believe all that or can you provide links to you're proof ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    John Q taxpayer funding 'professional' failure.

    TD's
    Solicitors
    Judges
    Gardai
    Prison Officers
    Probation Officers
    Social welfare
    Customs Officers


    It's a royal scew-the-tax-payer-cluster-fuck and anyone who supports this spectacular failure is one of either 2 things

    1. Stupid
    2. Making a living from it (inc drug dealers and the above).

    Or a combination of both.

    What would you have as an alternative to all of the above ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭Pete M.


    Mike 1972 wrote: »
    In the war on drugs how is one supposed to figure out if theyre a conscientious objector or a resistance partisan :confused:

    Maybe you're a conscientious partisan?

    Or vice versa...:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    mikom wrote: »
    Horticultural training courses for growers perhaps.

    Try something realistic, please.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,126 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Even Superman, Yogi Bear and the Roadrunner.
    Do you believe all that or can you provide links to you're proof ?

    Do you know why cannabis was made illegal in the first place?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    Mike 1972 wrote: »
    In the war on drugs how is one supposed to figure out if theyre a conscientious objector or a resistance party-san :confused:

    FYP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Do you know why cannabis was made illegal in the first place?

    Yes its been done to death but the reason why its still illegal and will be is medical. Look at all the articles, they're written by the medical profession.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Yes its been done to death but the reason why its still illegal and will be is medical. Look at all the articles, they're written by the medical profession.

    It has been done before, you're right
    I seem to remember the last time was when we educated you on its original reason for banning, thus blowing out of the water your preconceived ideas for the law.
    I can dig the link up again for you.

    Here we go....
    All illegal drugs were made illegal because they were found (by the medical profession) to be dangerous. Thats why some drugs are legal and others not.
    It will take new research by the same medical profession to change the law and make it legal. Nothing to do with me or you at all.
    mikom wrote: »



    Cannabis was not made illegal on medical grounds.
    So try again.
    Think slavery and servants in the early 1900's
    You've been codded up to the eyeballs.


    The original banning didn't take into account research.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 870 ✭✭✭Jagle


    Yes its been done to death but the reason why its still illegal and will be is medical. Look at all the articles, they're written by the medical profession.

    and look at the other medical articles saying how it helps heal people, causes little to no effect in moderate users, is safer to smoke then drink and drive, and how the gateway drug theory is false, and proven untrue

    long time cannabis user here, im using right now, only thing that would happen if they made the cultivation and use legal for small time users like me is id have more money to spend down the pub or on things that can help the economy instead of funding possible criminal gangs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 850 ✭✭✭Hookah


    Try something realistic, please.

    Not a bad idea from Mikom.

    We could regulate the parity of the levels between THC and CBD, a large disparity of which can lead to psychotic episodes, instead of leaving it to unregulated criminals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,154 ✭✭✭Rented Mule


    realies wrote: »
    Its not a problem finding/making/growing them its who is best controlling them.


    What I am saying is that 'I don't know anyone who wants drugs that is having a hard time finding drugs'.

    The war is futile when this is the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 58 ✭✭TheDukeOfEarl


    Go f*ck yourself War on Drugs, you, you, you stupid...pointless.........war


  • Advertisement
Advertisement