Sako Vs Tikka - Recommendations

FISMA

Lads,
I have listened to some respected shooters on the board rave about the Tikkas find myself thinking about picking one up.

I always thought that Sako and Tikka were synonyms. Kind of like saying Chevy vs GM in the States. Then I started getting a bit more specific and find that they are indeed different. Especially, in price! :eek:

So... Please advise.

1) What's the difference between Sako and Tikka?
2) Which model would you suggest?
3) What round do you shoot deer with?
4) Sako 47 vs Tikka T3 Hunter

Disclosure: this rifle will be bought and live in the States. It will probably make a trip home, but not stay. However, when a Celtic Tiger, Lioness, or even Fox returns, so to will it.

On #1 - I really do not care too much for cosmetics. If Tikka used a few more composite pieces, so be it. I am primarily interested in receivers and barrels, the rest I can change.

On #2, I am thinking about the T3 Hunter. Any opinions about wood vs composite, stainless vs blue?

On #3 , Quite settle on the 300 Winchester Magnum. Primarily, I will be using it to hunt deer. However, I want something that can reach out far and take Elk/Moose. I have the 30-06 and 7mm Rem Mag. Hence, the desire for a 300WinMag.

On #4 - the T3 Hunter looks like a contender. What is the equivalent Sako: the A7 or the 85? The 85 is only a few dollars more - worth the price?

Cautiously awaiting Tack and Poulo...

Tackleberrywho

Sako are the Parent company.

Tikka are (or were the cheaper, or low cost version)

Tika tac Vs Sako TRG etc

They are owned by Beretta now so they are not as defined anymore.

I had a sako 75 and Tikka had a rifle almost identical, except the sako had a few fancy features, steel Mag Vs Plastic etc

Like all companies they are becoming blurred design wise these days.
Differences become more subtle.

The newer Sako's are not as nice as the older ones, and the newer Tikka's are nicer than the Older ones IMHO.

Paulo is selling his Tikka for a Custom sako, what does that say :D

(nothing really, only coincidence);)

Anywho, may get back to work

Tackleberrywho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ttht-W60COM

Beretta, Sako Tikka

Used to be part of the Nokia Valmet group.

bunny shooter

Tikka & Sako use SAME barrels

Tikka actions are all the same size and use a spacer to reduce magazine size for diferent calibres which saves money as they don't have to set machines up for different size actions.

So in short buy a Tikka

It wasn't me!

The Sakos are better in finish and definitely feel more solid in the hands. They also feel more purpose built. The Tikka is a great, smooth action, with a good trigger and the same barrels, but the Sako just feels more well thought out. If you want to go heavier than the 7mm mag, you're not really going to notice a difference unless you step past the .300 and head for the .338 mag. That'll do something different to your 7mm, while the .300 won't really. There'd be no good reason to have a .300 if you have a 7mm, and vice versa. Because the .338 is going to kick, I'd say go with the Sako. The fit, feel and finish, along with the extra weight, will make it more pleasant to shoot. I'd say get a Sako 75 or the older AV or L691 models. Stocks are available from McMillan if you want to get something to handle the rough and tumble of mountain hunting.

declan1980

as bunnyshooter said tikka and sako use the same barrels, but they also have the same trigger. where they differ is that sako's have three locking lugs on the bolt, tikka have two, this will have some effect on accuracy or so i'm told. sako also have a function where you can operate the bolt while the safety is on, and they have a metal magazine which is flush with the stock

zeissman

If you can afford it go for the sako.
It has the metal flush fitting magazine that can also be loaded from the top
and I think they just look and feel a lot better than the tikka. There is just too much plastic on the tikka for me but they do shoot well.
We dont get the sako A7 over here as it is only made for the US market,
they seem to be a a cross between the tikka and the sako 85.
The synthetic stock on the sako is also better than the one on the tikka but if your buying wood there will be no difference.

ejg

I've only held an A7 once and don't know what the recoil lug looks like.
Out of the choices....I think I'd go Tikka T3 and get a few pimp bits
with the money saved.
Sako have just too many modells and aftermarket bits are scarce.
Old Sako's like the Forester or L691 had a great action design which was copied by howa for a reason. Newer Sako's are also made to save production costs.
Single feed of the T3 mag will be more reliable and one has the option of
replacing the mag system with after market systems, even with AICS magazines.
All factory plastic stocks are not very good, be it Sako or Tikka.
Tikka might have the better selection of aftermarket stocks again.

Go for the hunter in wood, at least a usable nice looking stock for sundays
and get a composite for the wet hunts.

edi

zeissman

The sako magazines feed great.
If you buy the tikka and decide to pimp it you will be out the price of a sako anyway.

poulo6.5

hi fisma

i am a big tikka fan. my tikka tac is a great rifle, i have used the tikka t3 lite as well and its just as good as the tac.

it would be wrong of me to say tikka is a cheep sako, they do cost less though.

as tack said i am selling my tikka and buying a sako. that is true but not exactly.
i am having a .243 built on a sako action.
so to put it correctly i am selling my tikka to fund a custom build.

as far as stainless or other, i would have to go stainless for practical reasons as well as looking good.

i would love a 300 win mag and if i was to get one in the morning it would be a tikka tac 300 win mag with a 24" barrel.

one thing is for sure you wont be disappointed with either sako or tikka.

i look forward to seeing what you end up with and maybe someday sharing a hunt with you and your rifle.

ejg

zeissman wrote: »

The sako magazines feed great.
If you buy the tikka and decide to pimp it you will be out the price of a sako anyway.

Some feed ok some don't, double stack never feed as well as single feed.
They can't, because the position is always a compromise.
I've handled a few long action sako's that fed really well. My 308 doesn't
at all and I'm converting it to a AICS magazine system.
edi

pedroeibar1

As said above, they both are owned by Beretta.
Like most manufacturers, Beretta have niche branded products, one solid ordinary, the other 'luxury'.

Nissan has Nissan and Infiniti
Toyota has Toyota and Lexus
Beretta has Tikka and Sako for rifles
Beretta has Franchi and Beretta for shotguns.

Rs
P.

zeissman

ejg wrote: »

Some feed ok some don't, double stack never feed as well as single feed.
They can't, because the position is always a compromise.
I've handled a few long action sako's that fed really well. My 308 doesn't
at all and I'm converting it to a AICS magazine system.
edi

Ejg
Has your sako got a detachable mag or a hinged floorplate ?
Any of the 75s or 85s that I owned or handled all fed really well but they are all the detachable mag type.
I know guys who had problems with the tikka T3 mag in the smaller calibres like 223 etc.

ormondprop

tikka is to sako what skoda is to vw they both drive the same, the vw might come with leather seats and aircon but it doesnt make it drive any better

theey're going to shoot the same it just depends if you want something that is fancier and looks better and all depends how much you want to spend, as said the tikka has a one size fits all action which means you have a very long bolt and magazine for the smaller cartridges but seeing that your going for a large calibre that wont matter

http://www.sako.fi/pdf/specs/85HunterSS.pdf
http://www.tikka.fi/pdf/specs/Hunter_Stainless.pdf

i bought a new rifle at the weekend, had the choice of a new tikka or a 2nd hand sako 75 at the same price, i went with sako as i preferred it, just felt nicer, but i know the tikka would have shot the exact same and i know guys who prefer tikka
handle both and see which you prefer and buy that one, dont compromise on anything because everytime you use it you'll always have it in the back of your mind would the other one have been better

i remember reading this ages ago and couldn't find again, here it is and it might help with your decision
http://www.biggamehunt.net/reviews/sako-a7-review

FISMA

Lads Thanks for all of the feedback.

It wasn't me! wrote: »

... If you want to go heavier than the 7mm mag, you're not really going to notice a difference unless you step past the .300 and head for the .338 mag ...

You may be right, I think I should research more into the 338. It does not look like the A7 comes in 338, just the 85.

declan1980 wrote: »

sako's have three locking lugs on the bolt, tikka have two..

+1 for the Sako. They appear to have a one piece bolt and solid handle.

zeissman wrote: »

If you can afford it go for the sako...
.

Fortunately, I am able to afford either. However, justifying the extra cash to myself is the problem. First, is the 85($1550) worth two A7's ($750)? Does the A7 at $750 beat the T3 at $525.

Sorry to quote prices lads, I don't normally do that as I know the pain of purchasing in Ireland and don't want to depress ye. You're probably thinking: buy them all! Imagine a T3 in Ireland for a total of €415

zeissman wrote: »

We dont get the sako A7 over here as it is only made for the US market,
they seem to be a a cross between the tikka and the sako 85.

There's no restrictions I take it on the A7, just marketing, correct? The intention is that when I return home, the rifle comes with me and stays.

ejg wrote: »

Single feed of the T3 mag will be more reliable and one has the option of
replacing the mag system with after market systems, even with AICS magazines.

True. Although, I have never had a major problem with the double stack, the loading is faster on the single too.

ejg wrote: »

Go for the hunter in wood, at least a usable nice looking stock for sundays
and get a composite for the wet hunts.

What I usually do...

poulo6.5 wrote: »

as tack said i am selling my tikka and buying a sako. that is true but not exactly.

You're shooting seems to justify the new kit. In general, I think most shooters limit their kit and not the other way around. I may not get better groupings out of the A7 wrt the T3, but the price difference is not much.

The T3 lite and the T3 are different models, correct? To be honest, when I am moving up the scale to the 300 Win Mag and maybe the 338, the last thing I want is the word Lite. I always wondered where they saved the weight.

I don't mind buying rifles that were originally designed for, say a 30-06, and are now used for 223. But when it goes the other way, I get concerned.

pedroeibar1 wrote: »

As said above, they both are owned by Beretta.

Seems like Beretta owns everybody. Do they own Winchester?

ormondprop wrote: »

... said the tikka has a one size fits all action which means you have a very long bolt and magazine for the smaller cartridges but seeing that your going for a large calibre that wont matter

I could go for the shorter action 300WSM as opposed to the 300 Win Mag. In either case, the action would come second to the ballistics so you're correct.

ormondprop wrote: »

handle both and see which you prefer and buy that one, dont compromise on anything because everytime you use it you'll always have it in the back of your mind would the other one have been better

Can you believe I am having trouble finding the Tikkas in the shops? I know of several shops that have a couple of hundred guns on display and not one Tikka!

Also, thanks for the links - that review was great! Like something I would write myself.

Looks like I will have to find a gun show or contact Tikka/Sako to determine their local dealer.

**************************************************

So lads, thanks again. I suppose the choice is now the A7 or the T3, unless I have overlooked something that justifies the 85's price.

Also, what about It_Wasn't_Me's valid point? Any suggestions on the big rounds: 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag vs 338 Win Mag vs ??? ?

Slan
**************************************************

ormondprop

If money was no object i'd go for an 85, but thats just me, i love spending money as i'm very good at it,
But if i wanted value for money the a7 seems to be on top, its a tikka but better, stronger magazine and bolt and built in weaver rail, or maybe one of these
a7 tecomate

zeissman

At those prices I would buy the sako A7.
I like the idea of the weaver bases also.
You could buy the A7, a good scope, and rings, for the price of the 85.

It wasn't me!

FISMA, feck buying a new Sako, get yourself an older gun. I'll throw a few Gunbroker links below, see how you like it. The .338 would be my recommendation if you want to step up from the 7mm. It does bring a lot extra to the table, which the .300 won't.

Try this
Or this
Or maybe this.

Personally, I love the Sakos. They're an incredible rifle, and not much else holds up to it in terms of feeling so capable. You certainly wouldn't be disappointed with one.

pedroeibar1

Her is another review for you!

http://www.shootingtimes.co.uk/guns/152560/Sako_85_Hunter_rifle_review.html
Rs
P.

GixxerThou

It wasn't me! wrote: »

. Stocks are available from McMillan if you want to get something to handle the rough and tumble of mountain hunting.

I dont think Mc Millan do stocks for the L691, HS Precision are the only ones that do a hunting stock AFAIK

It wasn't me!

GixxerThou wrote: »

I dont think Mc Millan do stocks for the L691, HS Precision are the only ones that do a hunting stock AFAIK

Hmm, interesting. McM seem to say that a good few of their stocks take "most" Sako actions. I suppose it would be possible to modify the stock to fit the action in some cases, but not much wrong with a HS Precision either.

ormondprop

On the stock topic do any companies make affordable synthetic stocks for the sako 75 action I. Or would i just have to pick up one on ebay going 2nd hand

Tackleberrywho

ormondprop wrote: »

On the stock topic do any companies make affordable synthetic stocks for the sako 75 action I. Or would i just have to pick up one on ebay going 2nd hand

Very few

Edi Graef does a Tikka stock, If you spoke Nicely to him he could make you a Sako 75 stock

GixxerThou

It wasn't me! wrote: »

Hmm, interesting. McM seem to say that a good few of their stocks take "most" Sako actions. I suppose it would be possible to modify the stock to fit the action in some cases, but not much wrong with a HS Precision either.

Yea they could be modified im sure, I have serious reservations about the quality of Mc Millan stocks tho! And its taking an awfully long time to get a HS

ejg

Thanks Tack, you'll get me in some trouble.:D
Quite a lot of work to convert a stock, T3 to medium action 75 was ok but still one or two days extra work.
Only made one so far. Apart from a howa to L579 conversion.



Another point, not sure if it is 100% true but on the hide it was mentioned
that the T3 aluminium recoild lug bends under the hammering of the 338.
This could be cured with a steel lug. The T3 recoil lug design is not the best.
Sako 75 is also only screwed on, the old 691 or 579 was a better design,
same as the howa 1500.

A7 picatinny two piece rail.
Only one reason I would use picatinny rails and that is to be able to swap
scopes from rifle to rifle. That works with one piece rails, but seldom with
two piece rails because the gapping doesn't match with the next rifle.
I have one piece rails on a T3 and on my old sako.

Zeissmann, the non feeding sako is a drop plate L579, it was never
right. The rifle was a dud from day one. I have now almost sorted
out all the problems.

edi

Tackleberrywho

@ Edi

Necessity was the Mother of invention!

If you build it, they will come............;)

GixxerThou

ormondprop wrote: »

On the stock topic do any companies make affordable synthetic stocks for the sako 75 action I. Or would i just have to pick up one on ebay going 2nd hand

John Lambert has a second hand long action Mc Millan in green for a 75

FISMA

It wasn't me! wrote: »

FISMA, feck buying a new Sako, get yourself an older gun. I'll throw a few Gunbroker links below, see how you like it. The .338 would be my recommendation if you want to step up from the 7mm. It does bring a lot extra to the table, which the .300 won't.

ItWasn'tMe,
I think you may be right. I'll watch GunBroker. However, I really need to find someone with these and pick them up. I hate buying a used rifle without picking it up.

I have plenty of time, which is a nice way of saying I just spent my recommended daily allowance of cash on ammo. Prices are about to pop in the states so I figured I would stock up.

Thanks for all of the ideas lads. I really want to see one of these in person. However, I think the next long gun will be a Sako.

Do Sakos and Remmy's fight if they are stored together in the same gun case?

The Finnish are going to have a hard time in the case with all of the yanks! Who will the Swiss, Italians, Austrian, or Germans side with?

Tackleberrywho

A nice Sako 75 is a lovely rifle, and can be got in 7mm-08!

badshot

Tackleberrywho wrote: »

A nice Sako 75 is a lovely rifle, and can be got in 7mm-08!

where?

bunny shooter

badshot wrote: »

where?

On d'internet of course :P

Tackleberrywho

badshot wrote: »

where?

I held a Sako Finlight 7mm08 in my hands in athlone.
Not sure if your dealers can source, but FISMA is in the US so sourcing is not as difficult

FISMA

ItWasn'tMe,
What is the difference between the Finnbear III and V? Anyone any idea or links?

It seems that the L61R action is sought and revered.

This one does look nice.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=224160569

Checked out the 300 Win Mag vs the 30-06. True the 300 beats the 30-06, but at a considerable powder expense. Again, probably will step up to a bigger round.

What's the word on the 338's trajectory?

Thanks

It wasn't me!

The Roman numeral indicates the action length, with V being the long/magnum of the Sako line. That's a very nice looking gun.

In terms of trajectory, the .338 is pretty excellent. The Federal 225 gr TSX load is essentially identical to the 180gr TSX load in the .30-06, but with all the extra thump of the big bullet. I think you'd like it very, very much for what you're trying to do.

Out of curiosity, and to avoid dragging the thread off topic feel free to send a PM if you prefer, how are you liking the 7mm magnum? What bullets are you using and what velocities are you getting from what barrel length?

FISMA

I literally just picked up a Howa 1500 in 7mm Rem Mag on Monday. It is awaiting a scope and has the factory rings and picatinny rails. The price was too good to pass up - $400. With all of the nonsense (shipping, ffl,...), the total cost came to about $500.

The 1500 will probably be out in about two weeks. I will have to pull some ring/base combos off of the others in the case to see which works best. I am a bit obsessed with getting the glass as close to the barrel as possible.

I here it kicks more than the 30-06 - that should be fun!

If you ever make it out to the states, you can fire her yourself.

Maybe we could have a boards day stateside since my attempt at boards day at home did not work!

I picked up some cheap ammo: Remington Core Lokt 175gr, some Pvri 174gr PSP BT, and Federal 150gr SP. I am going to reload for this one.

I might email that fella, with the link before, and offer him $1000 if it does not sell.

It wasn't me! wrote: »

In terms of trajectory, the .338 is pretty excellent. The Federal 225 gr TSX load is essentially identical to the 180gr TSX load in the .30-06, but with all the extra thump of the big bullet. I think you'd like it very, very much for what you're trying to do.

Wow - a 225gr at that speed! That's a lot of Kinetic Energy.

I seriously have to find someone with a Sako.

It wasn't me!

Next time you're home, have a look over my Sako. It's a lefty, but you'll get a feel for the build quality anyway. 7mm should be very slightly rougher than the .30-06, but a good bit louder, assuming you're firing 180gr bullets at about 2700fps. The .338 is putting out that 225gr TSX at 2800, so it's a serious bit of kit. I'd say shoot the 7mm a good bit before you decide you need the bigger gun. It'd be easy to develop a flinch. If you can handle it though, it's an incredible round. My Sako may very well end up a 7mm or .300 magnum. Would love to do something interesting if I could handload, a .308 Norma mag or a .30-338 Win Mag.

FISMA

Tackleberrywho wrote: »

I held a Sako Finlight 7mm08 in my hands in athlone.
Not sure if your dealers can source, but FISMA is in the US so sourcing is not as difficult

My own personal opinion is that I hate the word "lite" when it comes to firearms. It always makes me wonder/cringe where the savings come from.

Do any of the Tikka or Sako people on the board know what Finnbear means? There's the Finn: bear, wolf, scout, and lite. Is the "bear" bit just telling you that it is of the large bore series - don't use anything less on the bears?

Also, is the L61R the Finnish "legend?"

Has anyone anything bad to say about these?

How about the 375H&H while we are talking big calibers?

Slan.

It wasn't me!

FISMA wrote: »

My own personal opinion is that I hate the word "lite" when it comes to firearms. It always makes me wonder/cringe where the savings come from.

Do any of the Tikka or Sako people on the board know what Finnbear means? There's the Finn: bear, wolf, scout, and lite. Is the "bear" bit just telling you that it is of the large bore series - don't use anything less on the bears?

Also, is the L61R the Finnish "legend?"

Has anyone anything bad to say about these?

How about the 375H&H while we are talking big calibers?

Slan.

270gr bullet from a .375 will be about the same trajectory as a 180gr .30-06 but produces over 4000 ft/lbs at the muzzle. It's the absolute all-rounder. If someone told me tomorrow I could only have one rifle to do everything, it'd be a .375. Won't even chew up deer too badly. If you get one though, try get a few shots from one first. The .338 is a tough kicker, but the .375 is another notch up. However, due to the heavier guns and the characteristics of the recoil, a lot of people find it less unpleasant than the .338.

FISMA

It wasn't me! wrote: »

270gr bullet from a .375 will be about the same trajectory as a 180gr .30-06 but produces over 4000 ft/lbs at the muzzle. It's the absolute all-rounder. If someone told me tomorrow I could only have one rifle to do everything, it'd be a .375. Won't even chew up deer too badly. If you get one though, try get a few shots from one first. The .338 is a tough kicker, but the .375 is another notch up. However, due to the heavier guns and the characteristics of the recoil, a lot of people find it less unpleasant than the .338.

Thanks for the ongoing help. I like to scan GunBroker type sites for months before I buy.

The other day I was at the range and someone next to me was shooting 300WinMag. I had my 700 CDL in 30-06 - no stranger to "booms" and was surprised at the boom the 300 gave off.

You're right, I should shoot them both. People in the states are normally quite friendly when it comes to this sort of thing. In most cases, a simple question about their firearm receives an invitation for a few shots, and vice versa. However, not many bigger bores than mine at the range and Sako's/Tikkas are even more rare.

I see what you are saying with the 375. It appears that the round has a lot of versatility based on the bullet mass.

I am in no hurry to pick up the Sako, but if a good deal presents, then...

I want to get some reloading of big loads under my belt before I step up from the 30-06. I think with the extra "smarts" I may be able to make a better decision.

Either the 338 or 375 should be more than enough for anything on either of our continents. Unless there's a board's trip to Africa in the making.

Slan

It wasn't me!

The .300 has a fairly savage bark alright, but it's a barrel length issue mostly. If it were in a 26" barrel it wouldn't be so bad, much like a shorter .308. Your best bet is to look around and try get a few shots out of something bigger. Now, it's all to do with gun fit, as you know. If the stock fits you and there's a decent recoil pad, then there's feck all you can't learn to deal with. The .375 is the eternal classic, but the guns are heavy, and you carry a lot more than you shoot.

Tackleberrywho

It wasn't me! wrote: »

The .300 has a fairly savage bark alright, but it's a barrel length issue mostly. If it were in a 26" barrel it wouldn't be so bad, much like a shorter .308. Your best bet is to look around and try get a few shots out of something bigger. Now, it's all to do with gun fit, as you know. If the stock fits you and there's a decent recoil pad, then there's feck all you can't learn to deal with. The .375 is the eternal classic, but the guns are heavy, and you carry a lot more than you shoot.

The .300 Win Mag is no fun to fire. I watched a fella with a Muzzle Break on his CUSTOM winmag rub his shoulder after firing only 4 rounds at a comp recently.
As a result groups are sh*te.

The ammo is stupid expensive as Nobody uses it.
Even in the states unless you are shooting Moose, which to be honest Feck all do it's a dog of a yoke.

@FISMA, Tune your .30-06 and it will out shoot any .300win mag and kill all the deer you want.
As you are in the states currently reloading might keep ammo costs tolerable, but do you want all that recoil?
Did you ever get a snipers Kiss? I have seen several happen in my time.(never to me as I'm not a .22lr man)

If you have something that works, why change it? (unless for a .308 for course )
I bet feck all of the guys in the ranges actually use .300win Mag for anything other than conversation pieces.

I know of only a handful of guys in Ireland with .300 win mags, and they all have a different stalking calibre
(bigger is not always better)

It wasn't me!

Tackleberrywho wrote: »

The .300 Win Mag is no fun to fire. I watched a fella with a Muzzle Break on his CUSTOM winmag rub his shoulder after firing only 4 rounds at a comp recently.
As a result groups are sh*te.

The ammo is stupid expensive as Nobody uses it.
Even in the states unless you are shooting Moose, which to be honest Feck all do it's a dog of a yoke.

@FISMA, Tune your .30-06 and it will out shoot any .300win mag and kill all the deer you want.
As you are in the states currently reloading might keep ammo costs tolerable, but do you want all that recoil?
Did you ever get a snipers Kiss? I have seen several happen in my time.(never to me as I'm not a .22lr man)

If you have something that works, why change it? (unless for a .308 for course )
I bet feck all of the guys in the ranges actually use .300win Mag for anything other than conversation pieces.

I know of only a handful of guys in Ireland with .300 win mags, and they all have a different stalking calibre
(bigger is not always better)

I've shot a few .300s, including a very lightweight Blaser, and they don't bother me, and I can shoot perfectly well with one. Everyone's tolerance is different. Ammo is a few quid a box more though, probably about a fiver more than say a .30-06. The .300 throws a 180gr bullet the way a .270 throws a 130gr bullet. It's a real class act. If you want to have the option of taking a long poke if it's the only shot that turns up and have lots of energy at the far end, it's a great gun for the job. As to a second stalking rifle, it's always more fun to have more. I'd like a .300 win mag a bit under 9 lbs, but I'd love a 7lb .25-06 or .270 to drag around on long days on rough ground. Also better to keep the hand in and offers a better package for foxing.

Tackleberrywho

It wasn't me! wrote: »

I've shot a few .300s, including a very lightweight Blaser, and they don't bother me, and I can shoot perfectly well with one. Everyone's tolerance is different. Ammo is a few quid a box more though, probably about a fiver more than say a .30-06. The .300 throws a 180gr bullet the way a .270 throws a 130gr bullet. It's a real class act. If you want to have the option of taking a long poke if it's the only shot that turns up and have lots of energy at the far end, it's a great gun for the job. As to a second stalking rifle, it's always more fun to have more. I'd like a .300 win mag a bit under 9 lbs, but I'd love a 7lb .25-06 or .270 to drag around on long days on rough ground. Also better to keep the hand in and offers a better package for foxing.

Everyone's Tolerence is different alrite...........as my Tolerence is wearing thin, next time you "shoot" a .300 Win Mag let me know.

I'll get the popcorn as I'm sure it would be a good show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWM360S7ulA

How long range are you advocating on Game?
As for punching paper; Terminal Energy is not relevant

If you can't kill a deer with a .25-06 a .300 win mag will not solve yer problems my boy.

FISMA, sorry for derailing thread, But The Tangent it was on was going into another ball park altogether :eek:

It wasn't me!

Tackleberrywho wrote: »

Everyone's Tolerence is different alrite...........as my Tolerence is wearing thin, next time you "shoot" a .300 Win Mag let me know.

Yeah, I'll be sure to invite you to the show. :rolleyes: Those who know me and know what I've shot and liked can attest that a .300 doesn't bother me. If you somehow don't believe that, it's your problem. I intend owning a .300 in the future. It's really not that rough. Most people should be able to manage it if they practise and are sensible.

How long range are you advocating on Game?
As for punching paper; Terminal Energy is not relevant

Depends on the game, the circumstances and so forth. Not all game will be possible to stalk into two hundred yards or so. Plenty of places in the world something along the lines of a .300 magnum is the recommended rifle, either for the size of the game or for the distances involved.

If you can't kill a deer with a .25-06 a .300 win mag will not solve yer problems my boy.

Deer aren't the biggest game out there. Broaden your mind.

Tackleberrywho

I was broading my mind before you were in short trousers.

And i know Looooooooooooooads who know you

FISMA

Sako Owners,
What mounts and rings do the Sakos use?

Will an older Finnbear have some strange, hard to find setup?

Hoping for standard weaver or Picatinny. Would like to use the Zee or XTR's.

Thanks for the feedback. There's sooooo many questions I have. I must admit that this one is tempting. http://www.impactguns.com/store/082442811468.html

It wasn't me!

The 75 has a tapered dovetail, which means bases have to be specific. Not sure about older models. You could always have the receiver drilled and tapped for the bases of your choice. I'm thinking of having a one piece rail mounted on mine for flexibility.

Personally, I'd avoid the Tikka in .338 mag. It's a light gun and I reckon that'll just rattle the teeth out of you. That said, if it fits and feels right. Too short and light for me.

FISMA

It's against my religion to drill/tap firearms, especially older ones. I have had a K98 and a K31 which I really wanted to put some modern optics on, but did not.

Unless, the factory were to drill the receiver, I would not want anyone to do such to my firearm. Just a personal opinion.

It wasn't me! wrote: »

The 75 has a tapered dovetail, which means bases have to be specific.

What do you mean by specific? We are not talking custom to the gun, are we?

My cousin had a K98 and a period scope. He had to pay almost more for claw mounts to mount the scope than he did for the rifle!

How about a 458 Win Mag?
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=225318178

Looks like Finnbear is for the bears!

Just found this post explaining 338's - thought it was funny.
************************
338 Federal-Baby Bear(teenager)
338 Win. Mag.-Mama Bear
338 Lapua-Papa Bear
340 Weatherby Mag.-Papa Bear's Brother. Tom.
************************

It wasn't me!

Not custom to the individual rifle, no, but it's a design that's unique as far as I know, so bases need to be specifically for a Sako rail. Not sure about older guns, maybe contact the sellers and ask for photos? .458 is going to kick more again. While both the .338 and the .375 (and the .300) are useful for a 300 yard poke at something, the .458 would be rather outclassed there. It's useful close up, with big 500gr bullets, for stopping things, hard.

ejg

As far as I know the Finbear has the same mounts as the L579 Forester exept longer apart.
My Forester ( late 60's) takes normal optilock mounts or the Roedale rail.
edi

FISMA

Thanks Lads,

It wasn't me! wrote: »

.458 would be rather outclassed there. It's useful close up, with big 500gr bullets, for stopping things, hard.

I forgot to put a smiley face at the end of the statement. I have no intentions of getting the 458. I never even heard of it until I did a search on the Sako Finnbear and that link popped up - only 2500 made.

ejg wrote: »

As far as I know the Finbear has the same mounts as the L579 Forester exept longer apart.
My Forester ( late 60's) takes normal optilock mounts or the Roedale rail.
edi

As long as these combos are not hard to come by. I do not want to have to drill and tap for a scope.