Stop kicking the fcuking can down the road.

mike65

That is all. Thanks.

super_furry

We need to get all our ducks in a row with some blue sky thinking here.

FatherLen

i have no idea what you guys are talking about...

Jumpy

FatherLen wrote: »

i have no idea what you guys are talking about...

Thats because you cant see around the bend.

Dave!

I can't help but feel that playing kick the can is not the most productive use of your time, Mike... It's fun, etc., but like there are other things that need doing

FatherLen

Jumpy wrote: »

Thats because you cant see around the bend.

or over the hill?

Setun

Let's run it up the flagpole and see who salutes it.

Jumpy

Daddio wrote: »

Let's run it up the flagpole and see who salutes it.

Oh. Oh god thats a bad one. It makes me want to punch you.

I think we have a winner.

jackiebaron

And get down to the brass tacks.

Setun

Jumpy wrote: »

Oh. Oh god thats a bad one. It makes me want to punch you.

I think we have a winner.

:pac:

R P McMurphy

At the end of the day we need to keep the ball kicked out, or maybe just kick it into touch to give some breathing room to digest

TheUsual

"Going forward we need to" ...... aaaaggghhhh why am I speaking such ****e !!!!

mcmoustache

I think we should shake that baby and see what falls out.

Guill

I want you all over that like a cheap suit!

Pure Sound

Five point plan

WallyGUFC

Well, that's thrown the cat amongst the pigeons.

jaykay74

this paradigm is messed up people. we need more synergy.

CreepingDeath

What's done is done.
Mistakes were made on all sides.
We need to draw a line under it and move on.

th3 s1aught3r

We need to take the low-hanging fruit first :pac:

K-9

We should touch base with this can.

jackiebaron

paradigm shift

Claasman

Lets take that idea offline


I dont want SWAG figures (silly wild ass guess)

Guill

Squeaky bum time from here on.

jackiebaron

Claasman wrote: »

Lets take that idea offline


I dont want SWAG figures (silly wild ass guess)

Sweet Jesus, are you serious?

Guill

Claasman wrote: »

Lets take that idea offline


I dont want SWAG figures (silly wild ass guess)

Can't wait to use that!

R P McMurphy

Claasman wrote: »

Lets take that idea offline


I dont want SWAG figures (silly wild ass guess)

I think you should tweak that post in order to bring it to conclusion

WallyGUFC

A ripe cranberry will bounce.

billymitchell

Just touching base with this thread to see if anybody mentioned "low hanging fruit"

Guill

billymitchell wrote: »

Just touching base with this thread to see if anybody mentioned "low hanging fruit"

Yes,


Repeating data

Sergeant

We are behind the eight ball on this deal. The product is in danger of becoming betamaxed.

mike65

This topic clearly needs drilling down into, evaluation metrics can be applied.

Guill

How confident are we that a resolution can be reached re: can kicking road issue?

Sergeant

mike65 wrote: »

This topic clearly needs drilling down into, evaluation metrics can be applied.

Get off the fence Mike.

R P McMurphy

We should compartmentalise the issue of the can while also taking an holistic and integrated approach to the kicking of it

Plazaman

I like the way you guys are thinking outside the box buts lets get lateral thinking in motion to gain leverage on the situation

K-9

billymitchell wrote: »

Just touching base with this thread to see if anybody mentioned "low hanging fruit"

Somebody mentioned a cranberry. Are they low hanging?

jaykay74

I notice the can is now trending. Do we have headlights on that ?

K-9

We need some serious brain storming and group think here.

mike65

Sergeant wrote: »

Get off the fence Mike.

I'm 110% fully committed to seeking a solution. At the end of the day, it’s time to step up the plate, and focus on our core competency if we want to take it to the next level.

Setun

Guill wrote: »

Yes,


Repeating data

I think we should all digest the data and see what comes out.

Jet Black

We need to circle the wagons, make sure we're all singing of the same hymn sheet.

Claasman

In a nutshell, we have been proactive in empowering our clients by fast-tracking a win-win solution and process mapping their core competencies with a view to adding value to their results driven metrics

Northernsoul

great results-driven synergies here from the different posters..

Son Of A Vidic

OP - What you need is for them not to kick the can, but to kick the bucket!

Sergeant

Claasman wrote: »

In a nutshell, we have been proactive in empowering our clients by fast-tracking a win-win solution and process mapping their core competencies with a view to adding value to their results driven metrics

Can you disambiguate that for me? Are you saying we require a belt and braces solution?

Claasman

Corvus Maximus wrote: »

OP - What you need is for them not to kick the can, but to kick the bucket!

Has the bucket been adequately field tested though for design-led integration?

TheUsual

Brown sauce.
F-ing delish.

Duggy747

We need to put a stake in the ground around this can situation, bring our A game to the table and push the envelope.

After all, the scenery only changes for the lead dog.

Gingersnaps

You're looking at this through Rose coloured spectacles!

Luxie

CreepingDeath wrote: »

What's done is done.
Mistakes were made on all sides.
We need to draw a line under it and move on.

That's assuming it's not set in stone.

Luxie

Lads, lads, stop.

There is no 'I' in team.*









*Although if you look carefully there is a 'me'.