Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

ESB Pole

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 945 ✭✭✭loremolis


    Roundymooney

    Have you read none of the previous posts?

    I've already acknowledged that this is not the correct forum for this discussion.

    It's incredible that you consider it worthwhile pick holes in the personal opinions expressed in my posts on the basis of my negative comments towards a statutory body and you ignore all of the factual argument that I made on the query raised in the OP

    If you do KNOW everything about the subject then head on over to Legal Discussions and let's hear it

    If not then maybe you should join the forum where everyone keeps these things a secret


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭RoundyMooney


    I have read all of them. I've reported the thread, so we'll see if this discussion gets moved.

    You're doing more than expressing a passing personal opinion here, this is something of a crusade (edit: in my opinion, sorry), and rather unique in my experience here. I'm not ignoring what you deem as fact, nor am I volunteering hypotheses as you seem to be, without declaring why you need to know all this.

    I have no intention of getting involved in a discussion where case numbers are being thrown around like snuff at a wake, they don't pay me for that.

    By the way, if all this were secret, I doubt you would be able to reference all the documentation that has come your way, nor would you have the opportunity to draw your own inferences from it.

    Like I say, I am very curious as to your motivation here, if you won't get into specifics, you won't blame me, I'm sure for not doing so either.
    loremolis wrote: »
    Roundymooney

    Have you read none of the previous posts?

    I've already acknowledged that this is not the correct forum for this discussion.

    It's incredible that you consider it worthwhile pick holes in the personal opinions expressed in my posts on the basis of my negative comments towards a statutory body and you ignore all of the factual argument that I made on the query raised in the OP

    If you do KNOW everything about the subject then head on over to Legal Discussions and let's hear it

    If not then maybe you should join the forum where everyone keeps these things a secret


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    I don't think this thread should be moved anywhere in it's current state, but it also doesn't belong here. Thread locked. If the OP still has questions, then he could probably try the Construction & Planning forum, or maybe somewhere more appropriate.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement