How to hide pets from landlord?

UnyBoo

OKay here's my query. I have two lovely kitties and a King Charles puppy. Myself and my boyfriend are moving house in a month, and I don't think the new house allows pets.

I'm not getting rid of my animals and I realise that not moving house may be an option so please hold any advice in relation to either of these two. I'm looking for ways to hide the animals from the landlord.

I'm an excellent tenant, sometimes the houses I leave are in better condition when I go that when I first moved in. I would repair any damage done by the animals, but I'm looking for ways to minimise the damage and also make sure the landlord or letting agent don't find the animals.

There's a garage attached to the house so the cats will sleep in there with some heatpads from zooplus and a giant cat tree. I won't be letting them into rooms with carpets. I won't let them on chairs unless they're on my lap, or they're sitting on a blanket. They use a litter tray, but there's a large garden and the house is detached so they'll be allowed outside as well. I need to protect the door into the garage though, and was thinking of putting up tin foil or cardboard or something? Any suggestions here???

The puppy is still in the process of being house-trained but she's nearly there, and there's a big door in the main front room so if she's in there with us she can go to that door if she needs to go to the toilet. I'm thinking of crate training her for the nights so that she doesn't do any damage. And she'll be walked away from the house.

Now the landlord said he may pop in every few weeks (the family are moving to the UK but he'll be back every so often for his business) but the letting agent has assured us that he won't be doing this without giving us notice.

So what do people think? Can this work? Is there anything I should be doing to make sure no one finds out? I'll be hoovering and cleaning and mopping the whole time, and I'm doing my best to make sure furniture won't be damaged.
Thanks

aidan_walsh

don't think the new house allows pets.

First things first, phone and ask.

UnyBoo

Well the letting agent told us that dogs are not allowed, but she didn't mention cats. The house is beautiful and it's a first letting so the family are quite anxious about it. They've agreed to give it to us, despite huge interest in the place. And I'm half afraid to ask now, even hypothetically, in case it raises their suspicions.

There are two letting agents showing the house so I texted them from a different number. One said "Shouldn't be a problem" (the one we're not going with) and the other said "No sorry the house is gone". (the one we are going with)

Baralis1

UnyBoo wrote: »

Now the landlord said he may pop in every few weeks (the family are moving to the UK but he'll be back every so often for his business) but the letting agent has assured us that he won't be doing this without giving us notice.
Thanks

Pop in every few weeks? I definately wouldn't allow this. The landord can inspect at reasonable intervals, i.e. every six months, maybe 3 months at a push but surely can't be calling in to look at the house every few weeks. You are entitled to peaceful enjoyment of your home. The landlord and his family need to realise that this is your home now while you are leasing, not theirs.

As for the animals, I'd chance it if I were you if you are absolutely certain that they will do no damage and the house will be given back a perfect as you got it. You will need to be disciplined though and not slip in your standards or you may loose a hefty chunk of your deposit. Are you really going to leave your two kittens out in the garage for the entire time you are living in the house or will you start letting them in to roam the house after a few weeks/months. If the landlord is giving plenty notice about his visit, maybe one of you could bring the animals out in the car or something while he is there.

Treehouse72

Why would you disrespect someone's right to ask for tenants with no animals? Why do you think you have the right to just ignore this stipulation?

I respect that you are a good tenant and take you at your word that you leave places as you find them. So do I. But it is not on to presume it's ok to just pull a fast one on this.

Baralis1

Treehouse72 wrote: »

Why would you disrespect someone's right to ask for tenants with no animals? Why do you think you have the right to just ignore this stipulation?

I respect that you are a good tenant and take you at your word that you leave places as you find them. So do I. But it is not on to presume it's ok to just pull a fast one on this.

I'm not sure where I stand on this. I can see the arguement from the landlords point of view. But 99% of landlords as far as I have seen, will ban animals on their property off hand. If the tenant is responsible enough, there should be no damage due to animals, and tenants have a right to enjoy their leased property as their home and keep pets if they wish. In my own place, pets were never discussed on renting, and I signed a generic lease from the estate agent which did have a line stating no pets allowed. This lease is a template though which is copied and given to every property letted though so I am considering ignoring it and getting a pet.

UnyBoo

The cats will be able to go outside most of the time as it's in the country and they love the outdoors, they'll just sleep in the garage. They'd go stir crazy if left there all the time.

The dog will be confined to a couple of rooms, I'm not planning on having her run riot in the house. She'll get plenty of walks and playtime.

There's always a chance that they'll be allowed as she is only a small dog

Thanks for your post, hopefully he'll realise that he can't just go in and out of the house as he pleases.

Baralis1

UnyBoo wrote: »

OKay here's my query. I have two lovely kitties and a King Charles puppy. Myself and my boyfriend are moving house in a month, and I don't think the new house allows pets.

I'm not getting rid of my animals and I realise that not moving house may be an option so please hold any advice in relation to either of these two. I'm looking for ways to hide the animals from the landlord.

I'm an excellent tenant, sometimes the houses I leave are in better condition when I go that when I first moved in. I would repair any damage done by the animals, but I'm looking for ways to minimise the damage and also make sure the landlord or letting agent don't find the animals.

There's a garage attached to the house so the cats will sleep in there with some heatpads from zooplus and a giant cat tree. I won't be letting them into rooms with carpets. I won't let them on chairs unless they're on my lap, or they're sitting on a blanket. They use a litter tray, but there's a large garden and the house is detached so they'll be allowed outside as well. I need to protect the door into the garage though, and was thinking of putting up tin foil or cardboard or something? Any suggestions here???

The puppy is still in the process of being house-trained but she's nearly there, and there's a big door in the main front room so if she's in there with us she can go to that door if she needs to go to the toilet. I'm thinking of crate training her for the nights so that she doesn't do any damage. And she'll be walked away from the house.

Now the landlord said he may pop in every few weeks (the family are moving to the UK but he'll be back every so often for his business) but the letting agent has assured us that he won't be doing this without giving us notice.

So what do people think? Can this work? Is there anything I should be doing to make sure no one finds out? I'll be hoovering and cleaning and mopping the whole time, and I'm doing my best to make sure furniture won't be damaged.
Thanks

To stop draught is it? Get an old blanket , roll it up a bit and push it up against the door all along the bottom. If you're not going to be using the door, you could tape the cracks.

Kristopherus

If he dose'nt go in , then the letting agent may very well do. It is now standard in a lot of contracts that the owner/agent can make regular visits/inspections. I would advise you be straight up, just as you are here and explain where the pets will be accomadated.

Ev84

Treehouse72 wrote: »

Why would you disrespect someone's right to ask for tenants with no animals? Why do you think you have the right to just ignore this stipulation?

Why do you you think you have the right to be so judgemental towards the op?
she/he is only looking for advice on how to maintain/protect the house she will be renting... hardly a crime is it?

In fairness OP the main reason landlords say no pets allowed is due to the havoc they cause, with the property AND with the neighbors, barking etc.
If you DO keep the place in tip-top shape like you say and your pets are peaceful i don't think the landlord would have a problem with it. The cats will be outside mostly so they can't really do much damage.

All you can do is hide them for a little while and once you are true to your word and keep the place lovely, repair any damage yourself (as it's not the landlords fault you have pets), pay your rent etc.... The landlord should be happy.

UnyBoo

Thank you Baralis1. I too have signed several of those generic leases, often in a house where pets were allowed. It's a standard one that everyone seems to use.

Treehouse - there are several clauses in a lease which are rountinely ignored by tenants. Do you know many people who "wash their windows four times a year"? I don't, yet it's been in every lease I've signed.

I totally understand why someone would not allow pets. In my view if a landlord allows pets, it often means that the tenants end up giving the animals free rein of the house. Also it could imply that I could have 5 Rottweilers living inside the house. The pets I have are small and well-behaved. The only issue with the cats could be scratching the door in the garage which I could cover with tin foil or even put up an old door until I move out. The dog is one of the top choices for indoor pets, for a reason! She is almost troilet trained, she's being crate trained for when she's asleep. She doesn't even shed much and she doesn't bark much. I plan on hoovering and cleaning their areas thoroughly at least once a week.

I'll be going to even extra effort now to ensure that the place is spotless

UnyBoo

Thanks for the posts everyone! And the support Ev84b.

I don't mind having inspections, I just want notice. If I knew a couple of days in advance, then all trace of the pets could be gone and the animals left with friends.

The family are a bit anxious as it's their first let of the family home so I don't know if telling them now would be a good idea. However, if in a couple of months time they see that the place is spotless and rent is being paid on time, then I could broach the topic with them then.

I met them for 2 hours the other day and they went through the whole house and didn't mention pets. It was just the letting agent that said no dogs. I don't know where the kitties stand. We'll ask with them again.

Baralis1 - the door query was to protect it from being scratched by the cats but the cat tree should divert them enough.

Ev84

No problem:D

But i would recommend something a little more heavy-duty than tin-foil;)

doctor evil

Be prepared to replace carpets and furnishing (that may be relatively new) due to peeing and claw damage. Once urine gets to the underlay there is no hope!

Be sure that the owners understand that it may be their property but while you are renting it it is no longer their home. Make sure you get a weeks notice in writing for any inspections (not every few weeks!) If they owners are overly anxious they could be overly precious.

D3PO

Treehouse72 wrote: »

Why would you disrespect someone's right to ask for tenants with no animals? Why do you think you have the right to just ignore this stipulation?

I respect that you are a good tenant and take you at your word that you leave places as you find them. So do I. But it is not on to presume it's ok to just pull a fast one on this.

here here. OP you say your a good tennant but in fact your not. A good tennant wouldnt blatently disregard a very clear stipulation regarding pets.

even attempting to hide this from your new l;andlord is a disgrace

D3PO

Ev84 wrote: »

Why do you you think you have the right to be so judgemental towards the op?
she/he is only looking for advice on how to maintain/protect the house she will be renting... hardly a crime is it?


what planet are you on. That isnt the theme of this thread. He/she is looking for advise on how to blatently decieve her landlord and break a very clear stipulation regarding the rental agreement.

Treehouse is spot on. Nobody has the right to pick and choose the terms of a lease they will and will not adhere to. If your not happy with the terms then you dont sign it and you find somewhere else simple.

And to be clear Im a dog lover but you cannot decide to act like a renegade tennant and expect people to accept and give you advise on how to do this.

homerjk

So you're going to be totally fine then when he kicks you out of the house if/when he finds out you've been keeping pets behind his back as its stated before you move that you're not allowed to? You wont be creating a thread then to say "My landlord is kicking me out just becasue I have pets"? Because that is what you are letting yourself in for.

Graces7

UnyBoo wrote: »

Thanks for the posts everyone! And the support Ev84b.

I don't mind having inspections, I just want notice. If I knew a couple of days in advance, then all trace of the pets could be gone and the animals left with friends.

The family are a bit anxious as it's their first let of the family home so I don't know if telling them now would be a good idea. However, if in a couple of months time they see that the place is spotless and rent is being paid on time, then I could broach the topic with them then.

I met them for 2 hours the other day and they went through the whole house and didn't mention pets. It was just the letting agent that said no dogs. I don't know where the kitties stand. We'll ask with them again.

Baralis1 - the door query was to protect it from being scratched by the cats but the cat tree should divert them enough.

I would be very, very wary of this house, frankly. After several bad experiences of first lettings of treasured family houses.

They find it hard to "let go", and thus your privacy is not their priority.

And they may well not know the Tenancy Act on the issue of inspections, access etc; and the agent also may not know this.

So please, make sure from the start that they cannot just arrive, as else they will do that. We have in this latest tenancy made sure that both landlord and agent have copies of the Tenancy Act sections re privacy and inspections. This was after a couple of unadvised visits and the utter astonishment by the landlord when we said he could not come in without an appointment. "But I am the owner..!!"

And that that applied also the the garden. And even more so when we are not in.

Thankfully we have a good agent who we made sure informed the landlord. The tenancy was then registered with PTRB which it had not been before.

NB we also had to make sure that they were not coming in when we were out after we came home one day to find the dogs not where we had left them.. So that was clearly laid down also; we actually put a wee chain and small padlock on the outside of the door so we will know if they have tried to get in.

Unless you are in all the time it is going to be very, very hard to hide the dog and hard to walk it also in case you are seen. They tend not to worry about cats as cats in Ireland live outdoors....

We fronted up here and it was fine; there was an old couch they were going to throw out so we commandeered that for the dogs.

We have in the past said nothing; landlords then told us to chain the dogs up outside but we said no way. And another was very glad to have any tenant.

If the landlords are so possessive and worried then you will have abattle for any peace and privacy. Been there, done that; will never do it again.

EricPraline

UnyBoo wrote: »

Treehouse - there are several clauses in a lease which are rountinely ignored by tenants. Do you know many people who "wash their windows four times a year"? I don't, yet it's been in every lease I've signed.

The two clauses aren't even remotely comparable. There are good reasons why many landlords do not want pets kept in their properties.

OP I think you should be up front with your landlord. Even if you believe that they won't damage the property (which is debatable, despite how well-behaved you believe your animals are), have you considered that you may be causing problems for future tenants of the property who have allergies to pets? Despite what some believe, a quick hoover won't solve the problem.

I wonder if a landlord posted a thread asking for advice on deceiving a tenant and subverting the terms of a signed lease, would he/she receive as much support.

buddygit

As a landlord, I have a no pets policy due to past experience and the huge expense I had to go to after the tenant left. I would wonder if you are lying to me about your pets, what else are you hiding?

tesslab

Op you could very easily caught out here. The neighbours may not appreciate the cats doing their business in their garden or the dog barking. They may very well get in touch with the landlord.
I have always been upfront with landlords re my dog. Have gotten references from old neighbours stating that there has never been issues with the dog. Also offer for them to meet the dog. If thats not good enough for them I'm happy to walk away but have been pleasantly surprised by some.
At the end of the day landlords are human. Honesty is the best policy. Not worth losing the roof over your head imo.

Ev84

D3PO wrote: »

what planet are you on?

Planet earth...

D3PO wrote: »

That isnt the theme of this thread.

Please enlighten me as to what the theme of this thread is... I know the FORUM is about *property but i understood this particular THREAD to be about help or advice?

D3PO wrote: »

He/she is looking for advise on how to blatently decieve her landlord and break a very clear stipulation regarding the rental agreement.

Listen to yourself... who are you? Mr. MORALS? :mad: It's a small matter and not a catastrophe worthy of so much scrutiny...

D3PO wrote: »

Treehouse is spot on. Nobody has the right to pick and choose the terms of a lease they will and will not adhere to. If your not happy with the terms then you dont sign it and you find somewhere else simple.

Good for Treehouse, Fair play. maybe ye can all write something morally incorrect about my reply and you can all thank each other for it later...

D3PO wrote: »

And to be clear Im a dog lover but you cannot decide to act like a renegade tennant and expect people to accept and give you advise on how to do this.

If you say so but the OP is not a bad person for not wanting to give her/his pets away to a shelter and i don't think the OP deserves the grilling she/he is getting from all you law-abiding perfectionists who live every second of your lives being morally correct...

* Edit; i had originally written "law" instead of "property"...

common sense brigade

i think its an absolute disgrace that you are going to lie to your landlord. can i just point out that this is not your house. its your landlords and he is entitled to refuse pets. I am renting a property and i was upfront to my landlord that i have a dog. its common decency and manners. If this is a family house you can bet your bottom dollar the landlord will be around and will catch you out. if anything the neighbours will tell him. and then you may find yourself homeless. not very responsible pet ownership is it. not a very secure home.

convert

It's people who try to hide their pets who get all pet owners a bad name with landlords and agencies, and which results in extreme difficulty in responsible pet owners trying to find somewhere suitable which accepts them and their pets.

If you're such a good tenant, OP, you should contact the landlord or agency and see what they say. If they're still adamant that there should be no pets, then obviously it's not the right place for you, and you should look elsewhere which is more suitable and accepts pets.

D3PO

Ev84 wrote: »

If you say so but the OP is not a bad person for not wanting to give her/his pets away to a shelter and i don't think the OP deserves the grilling she/he is getting from all you law-abiding perfectionists who live every second of your lives being morally correct...

nobody said he/she is a bad person just a bad tennant. nobody said give your pets away but find somewhere where pets are allowed.

there is no argument to lie to your landlord about having pets. Your told up front no pets then you know what the terms are your not forced to accept the property go find somewhere else.

Im not preaching morals or law here but respect for somebody elses property.

Ev84

D3PO wrote: »

Im not preaching morals or law here but respect for somebody elses property.

And you are right to do so Everyone knows that the OP is doing wrong, it's clear for all to see but she/he has already stated that she/he is going ahead with this regardless and to please hold any advice of going elsewhere or getting rid of the pets... so i did just that.

Maybe the thread is in the wrong forum? She/he is not looking for legal help so maybe this thread should be somewhere else? The OP only had 2 posts in total at the time of my first reply.

Edit; i thought this thread was in the legal section. my mistake, forget that last bit!

D3PO

Ev84 wrote: »

And you are right to do so Everyone knows that the OP is doing wrong, it's clear for all to see but she/he has already stated that she/he is going ahead with this regardless and to please hold any advice of going elsewhere or getting rid of the pets... so i did just that.

Maybe the thread is in the wrong forum? She/he is not looking for legal help so maybe this thread should be somewhere else? The OP only had 2 posts in total at the time of my first reply.

look cavet emptor. Im just makign it clear to the OP thay they shoudlnt do it. Ultimatly they can make their own mind up but if they expect to get sympathy in a few months time when they are posting how they have been evicted and their deposit has been kept, Im telling them now not to waste their time

Ev84

D3PO wrote: »

look cavet emptor.

I'm not being smart or anything but i do not know what this means?

I realize that there are two people (landlord/tennant) in this argument and everyone wants to stick up for the landlords rights. That is completely understandable but seeing as the tennant is already going ahead with this, the only way i can see that you could help the landlord is to advise the tennant on how to maintain/protect the property. It's too late for right versus wrong in this case

I have to admit though if it was me i would ask the landlord was it OK to bring pets... most Landlords ARE human and would understand the OP's dilemma...

Paulw

Of course, friends and neighbours may also see these pets, and report it to the unit owner.

The apt below me is rented out and I get along well with the unit owner. We talk from time to time, and I would certainly point out such things to him. But, in saying that, I also get along well with the tenant.

There is another unit beside me where I know the owner, and the unit is rented out. The tenant (who I don't know) seems to have brought in a pet in the last week or so. The dog is left outside a lot and barks a bit. This I have now reported to the unit owner.

bakedbean

"The family are a bit anxious as it's their first let of the family home so I don't know if telling them now would be a good idea."

There is also the chance that someone in their family is allergic to animal hair. If it's the family home being rented out I can understand why they wouldn't want to rent it out to someone with pets, especially if there are carpets.

Jaysoose

An Adult would pick up the phone and ring the landlord, if they say no way...move on. Cant have it everyway OP.

Ev84

Paulw wrote: »

The dog is left outside a lot and barks a bit.

Now THIS is very annoying... I used to have a neighbor who had a big black Lab and he never shut the f**k up. Wasn't his fault though as he was a big dog and was never taken for walks to release some energy. Always locked into the garden. poor fella. This went on for a LONG time...

If the OP's dog is like this (barking) the neighbors would have every right to complain...

Ortiz

I completely agree with D3PO (even though he keeps spelling tenant tennant...) on this one. It's the landlords house - have some respect.

I have a King Charles though and they're the most amazing pets ever so don't give the little fella away... Just be upfront with your landlord and tell him/her that you really are a fantastic tenant and just ask for permission. If he/she says no then find somewhere else to live - simple as that. Don't be so selfish that's the landlords property and they can stipulate that no pets are allowed.

Btw King Charles shed like the bitch they are! If there's carpet in the house you'll be driven demented trying to hoover it up. As puppies they are also known to chew on furniture - all of my couches at home have holes in the corners of them from when she was a puppy so we put covers on them and now she's chewed threw them! I don't care at all because we own our house and we can do what we want. The effects on the house can definitely be seen from having our dog and that's the only pet we have. Your King Charles will more than likely act this way in the landlords house and you want to hide it from him for your own selfish reasons? Find somewhere that accepts pets and move on.

And don't call yourself a good tenant in the same post in which you are asking "please help me deceive my landlord. I have pets that can potentially ruin his house but I don't want him to know!"

Ev84

Ortiz wrote: »

I completely agree with D3PO (even though he keeps spelling tenant tennant...)

I'm guilty of this too

What way was tennants beer spelled? i blame that

Ev84

* or was it tennents?

Am i the only one who sympathizes with the OP and thinks that what she/he is doing is not ACTUALLY that bad?

Baralis1

The OP said that she had a two hour meeting with his/her prospective landlords and the issue of pets being present never arose. So the landlord has not said that the OP cannot have pets.

The estate agent did mention no pets but they will say that anyway with every property. It's part of their standard speil. I would advise now however, having read all the thread that the OP should mention it to the landlord and put forward their case for being responsible tenants and pet owners. It will save hassle in the long run and make everything completely above board. Maybe offer a larger deposit if you can afford it to put the landlord more at ease.

Baralis1

Ev84 wrote: »

* or was it tennents?

Am i the only one who sympathizes with the OP and thinks that what she/he is doing is not ACTUALLY that bad?

I sympathize with the OP too and I am in two minds about it. In this case however, where the house was the landlords family home, and they are very protective of the house, I would suggest that they mention it. If it was a place that has a history of being let, where the landlord is more hands off and you never meet them and work through a letting agent, I would chance it.

Ev84

Baralis1 wrote: »

I sympathize with the OP too and I am in two minds about it. In this case however, where the house was the landlords family home, and they are very protective of the house, I would suggest that they mention it.

Yes, good point.

mikemac

UnyBoo wrote: »

Now the landlord said he may pop in every few weeks (the family are moving to the UK but he'll be back every so often for his business) but the letting agent has assured us that he won't be doing this without giving us notice.

Even with notice that's far too excessive.

I haven't seen my landlord in two years.
And the pushiest landlord I ever had we left it at 3 month intervals and even that was a lot.

No way do you accept visits every few weeks.
Even if you get permission over the pets, even then I wouldn't move in with a landlord like this

Their house but your home

3DataModem

You can shampoo the carpets etc and someone allergic will still have a reaction.

You keep pets (or habitually smoke) without agreement in a place I'm renting and I'll let you stay till the end... but the carpets and air filters come out at your expense.

I sympathise with renting pet-lovers, but tend not to rent to them.

Ev84

Treehouse72 wrote: »

Why do you think you have the right to just ignore this stipulation?

D3PO wrote: »

here here. A good tennant wouldnt blatently disregard a very clear stipulation regarding pets.

D3PO wrote: »

He/she is looking for advise on how to blatently decieve her landlord and break a very clear stipulation regarding the rental agreement.

D3PO wrote: »

Your told up front no pets then you know what the terms are your not forced to accept the property go find somewhere else.

I keep hearing about this stipulation being broken or ignored but it does not say any where in the OP's posts up to this moment in time that the LANDLORD has said "no pets"...

Op, maybe you SHOULD just ask the landlord after all, the peace of mind would be well worth it.

Also i think maybe the How to hide pets from landlord heading is causing some anger... maybe if you had wrote how to protect my home from pet damage you would have received plenty of friendly advice

Jaysoose

Ev84 wrote: »

I keep hearing about this stipulation being broken or ignored but it does not say any where in the OP's posts up to this moment in time that the LANDLORD has said "no pets"...

Op, maybe you SHOULD just ask the landlord after all, the peace of mind would be well worth it.

Also i think maybe the How to hide pets from landlord heading is causing some anger... maybe if you had wrote how to protect my home from pet damage you would have received plenty of friendly advice

The estate agent said "no pets" its pretty simple really, op needs to pick the phone up and get the info. They know that they will not be allowed pets so trying to decieve the landlord is fairly childish behaviour. Find somewhere else that allows pets or lose the pets as its obvious they cant have both.

bladebrew

as mentioned i have a feeling we will see a thread in a few weeks "my landlord threw me and my pets out":D

seriously though trying to hide your pets is not a sensible option, we have a cat and a dog in my family home and it is tricky to keep clean, unless you watch a puppy all day it will get bored and chew things up (well ours did)
how could you even relax knowing the pets are a secret?

but do ask the landlord directly, the estate agent may be reading his standard lease!

Theboinkmaster

UnyBoo wrote: »

OKay here's my query. I have two lovely kitties and a King Charles puppy. Myself and my boyfriend are moving house in a month, and I don't think the new house allows pets.

I'm not getting rid of my animals and I realise that not moving house may be an option so please hold any advice in relation to either of these two. I'm looking for ways to hide the animals from the landlord.

I'm an excellent tenant, sometimes the houses I leave are in better condition when I go that when I first moved in. I would repair any damage done by the animals, but I'm looking for ways to minimise the damage and also make sure the landlord or letting agent don't find the animals.

There's a garage attached to the house so the cats will sleep in there with some heatpads from zooplus and a giant cat tree. I won't be letting them into rooms with carpets. I won't let them on chairs unless they're on my lap, or they're sitting on a blanket. They use a litter tray, but there's a large garden and the house is detached so they'll be allowed outside as well. I need to protect the door into the garage though, and was thinking of putting up tin foil or cardboard or something? Any suggestions here???

The puppy is still in the process of being house-trained but she's nearly there, and there's a big door in the main front room so if she's in there with us she can go to that door if she needs to go to the toilet. I'm thinking of crate training her for the nights so that she doesn't do any damage. And she'll be walked away from the house.

Now the landlord said he may pop in every few weeks (the family are moving to the UK but he'll be back every so often for his business) but the letting agent has assured us that he won't be doing this without giving us notice.

So what do people think? Can this work? Is there anything I should be doing to make sure no one finds out? I'll be hoovering and cleaning and mopping the whole time, and I'm doing my best to make sure furniture won't be damaged.
Thanks

You're a disgrace - if it says no pets allowed move on to the next ad. If you don't like the rules don't rent there.

Zoundz

I keep a number of pets, always have, always been up front too - in fact, it's my most important thing in choosing somewhere to rent - first question to ask - can I keep pets? Yes - great! Now - I need to tell you what I have - and that's a lot of rats Most people are taken aback - but fine with it in the end, and those who aren't, I just say thank you - but no thank you - because my animals come first - and through no fault of my own, I've already been on the receiving end of a 'kicking out' order from a landlord who found out about my pets when he was being lied to...

... not by me I hasten to add I was renting through a very dodgy (now defunkt thank god!) letting agency when I was a student in Swansea, and they had screwed up the first place I was renting (loooong story) and so found us a new small flat. We loved it, asked about the pets (they knew that was the most important thing anyway, but we double checked!) - and in front of us they phoned the landlord and asked. Or in fact not. They pretended to! :mad::eek:

Some months into our tenancy we had a problem with the boiler, and a serviceman canme to fix it. A few days later we got an eviction notice. Why? Because landlord did *not* want pets there, serviceman was landlord's friend (small world!), and he went out for a pint with him and told him all about the cages of rats in the flat! Moral of the story? Make sure you talk to the landlord yourself if possible, get *everything* in writing (and yes, our contract stipulated that pets were OK - added in by the agents without landlord's signature!) - and don't be naive and dull like we were then! Never again of course

No - do not deceive your landlord. Be up front. Explain that you are totally secure in the knowledge that your pets will cause no damage, and any they do cause you will pay for. In fact, why not do what we've done in the past? Add an extra deposit for the pets we used to offer an extra £150-200 for the pets in case anything went wrong and they escaped/chewed furniture etc. Most landlords like that you're willing to accept responsibility. Of course, some just don't want animals in their houses, and it's your moral obligation to respect their rights in that area. The main thing here is to think about your animals. If you are evicted for breach of contract, what becomes of them if you can't find somewhere that you can live *with* them at very short notice? Will they end up in rescue for example? I know it's horrid to think about - but it does happen,and you need to prepare for all eventualities - so the best bet is just to be honest from the start, that way you're less likely to end up with nasty surprises Hope that helps?

xx

kevin99

Why deceive your landlord and letting agent? No dogs means no dogs. No cats means no cats.
What if the neighbour nearby has been asked by the owners to keep a distant eye on the tenants? If they see animals in the property they could very well inform the landlord and letting agenty immediately?
The house two doors from me is rented and the tenants are not permitted any animals. The previous tenant had a dog. It barked all day, scraped the front door etc. Myself and my neighbour next door to them reported the fact that they had a dog on the premises. They denied it initially but were evicted after a while.
The landlord witheld part of their deposit to pay for covering the clawmarks on the front door and painting it, replacing a bedroom carpet where the dog was allowed sleep and replacing the stairs and landing carpet too.
I think you should not have animals in.

tanyabond

TBO children would do 100 times more damage to the property than pets... So I personally feel it's not such a big deal... (please don't throw rottent tomatoes at me)

ztoical

tanyabond wrote: »

TBO children would do 100 times more damage to the property than pets... So I personally feel it's not such a big deal... (please don't throw rottent tomatoes at me)

If your renting out a property and it's not a big deal for you then make tenants aware of that but if a LL feels it is a big deal to them they are within their rights to requst as such in the lease. No one would rent a property with children and not inform the LL before hand that they will be living there with their kids and it's the same for pets.

I've two cats and it's the first question asked when I'm looking at places.

Graces7

There was a thread way back on I think pets; may have been here..about this. One poster had successfully hidden her dogs from her landlord for many years. She knew in advance if he was coming, took the dogs to a friend, removed all traces.....

A very tense way to live.