Who could do something like this?

dark crystal

http://www.eveningstar.co.uk/news/essex_horror_as_dog_killed_in_acid_attack_1_751116

Seriously, how sick do you have to be to even consider doing something that vile to a defenceless animal?

My guess is, even if the scumbags are found, they'll most likely receive minimal sentences or some community service.

The justice system should be far harsher to those caught committing acts of extreme animal cruelty, imo. If they are this cruel to animals, it's not a huge stretch to imagine them dishing out the same treatment to their fellow human beings.....many psychopaths started out with animals first, after all.

Debthree

Just horrific. That poor poor creature.

I agree with everything you said.

macquarie

*Experiences moral outrage at this story*

.....

*Goes off to enjoy a chicken dinner, completely unaware that millions of broiler chickens suffer similar fates every day and by purchasing the chicken- encourage and even fund these methods*

Badgermonkey

Cheers for that OP.

LighterGuy

I dont care if the person/s who did that were aged 13 or 80. Its an terrible act of evil.

Thats serial killer in the making sh*t.

candy-gal1

Stupid pieces of S***! :mad:
I hate this soo much! and these are the people who have kids at like 15 (oldest) and think its great! :rolleyes: the poor defenceless animal your torturing is worth more than you and your "offspring"

yesno1234

Absolute bastards. Between this and the kids in Donegal I do not look forward to the current youth generation growing up.

grizzly

macquarie wrote: »

*Experiences moral outrage at this story*

.....

*Goes off to enjoy a chicken dinner, completely unaware that millions of broiler chickens suffer similar fates every day and by purchasing the chicken- encourage and even fund these methods*

Don't you know your animal hierarchy?

Us > dogs > chimps in funny uniforms > kangaroos with boxing groves > shít we eat.

darragh16

Where do people get off, seriously!

W.Shakes-Beer

Fúck sake. Thats absolutely disgusting.

Hope someone catches the bastards and beats them to a pulp. They aren't human.

MistyCheese

Hello there.

I am a person who does not enjoy reading stories of horrific atrocities heaped upon defenseless members of society (in this case a dog).

I would like to warn others of a similar persuasion (unfortunately I did not receive this benefit, however this does not prevent me from warning others) that if you are of a sensitive disposition when it comes to beings that are attacked whom (a) have not invited attack upon themselves and/or (b) do not deserve the unbridled hatred of humans then you would most likely NOT wish to view the heading outlined in the Original Post.

hondasam

I could not read that story because I cannot understand how anyone could be so cruel to an animal. The obviously have a very sick mind.

Mrs Garth Brooks

CUNNNTS! :mad:

steddyeddy

I say this with no backlash at the story but in an attempt to educate, There is an intrinsic link between battered pets and battered women and children. The fbi were the first to see a connection between the two. Anyone who can degrade a life because its only a child/animal/woman has serious psychological problems. God help the children or wife/girlfriend of whoever of this disturbed person.

orourkeda

They eat dogs in Korea

steddyeddy

orourkeda wrote: »

They eat dogs in Korea

Animal welfare and human rights also go hand in hand in china

dark crystal

steddyeddy wrote: »

I say this with no backlash at the story but in an attempt to educate, There is an intrinsic link between battered pets and battered women and children. The fbi were the first to see a connection between the two. Anyone who can degrade a life because its only a child/animal/woman has serious psychological problems. God help the children or wife/girlfriend of whoever of this disturbed person.

I agree wholeheartedly.

There are many well documented cases of prolific serial killers, who started out by torturing animals.

Cases like these are usually an indication that not all is right in the mind of the perpertrator.

darragh16

orourkeda wrote: »

They eat dogs in Korea

Yeah but I doubt they dip their faces in Acid..

orourkeda

darragh16 wrote: »

Yeah but I doubt they dip their faces in Acid..

They have to be killed what difference is dipping their face in acid going to make.

W.Shakes-Beer

orourkeda wrote: »

They have to be killed what difference is dipping their face in acid going to make.

You's a trollin!


It's completely inhumane.

Farmers dont drive over their cattle in the LandCruiser to get a few steaks.

steddyeddy

orourkeda wrote: »

They have to be killed what difference is dipping their face in acid going to make.

The speed of death, the difference in the psyche of an individual satisfying a natural need to it and an individual killing an animal because of a desire to inflict suffering springs to mind.

dark crystal

orourkeda wrote: »

They have to be killed what difference is dipping their face in acid going to make.

Ah come on - there's a difference between killing an animal humanely* for the purpose of consumption and torturing one for sick jollies.



*I realise this will spark an inevitable debate on what constitutes a 'humane' killing, but I hope most people will get the difference between the two in this case.

flyton5

In lighter news...millions of people are dying from famine all over the world.

macquarie

dark crystal wrote: »

Ah come on - there's a difference between killing an animal humanely* for the purpose of consumption and torturing one for sick jollies.

That 'purpose of consumption' you talk about can also be construed as selfish greed (i.e. the enjoyment of tasting the animals flesh, at that animals expense) for example I haven't eaten chicken in almost 10 years and am in perfect health, what makes someone else NEED to eat chicken (same applies to all meat, just using chicken as an example).

My point is there is no need to eat chicken, it satisfies peoples taste senses so they make the conclusion that the chicken being brutalized* is ok because it creates a sense of pleasure in us. Seeing a connection with this story?

These peoples sense of sadism was satisfied by brutalizing the dog, your sense of taste is satisfied by (being responsible for) the brutalizing of chickens. This is exactly why stories like this don't shock me in the slightest. The net result is the same for the poor animal.

*Look up the conditions and deaths that broiler chickens (i.e. 99% of the chickens in shops) go through if you don't believe me.

m5ex9oqjawdg2i

....Bronson had been attacked by a fox or rats....

Is she fcuking stupid or something???


Poor dog

we'llallhavetea_old

i didn't read the news report, can't stomach it.

flyton5 wrote: »

In lighter news...millions of people are dying from famine all over the world.

there's always one..

steddyeddy

macquarie wrote: »

That 'purpose of consumption' you talk about can also be construed as selfish greed (i.e. the enjoyment of tasting the animals flesh, at that animals expense) for example I haven't eaten chicken in almost 10 years and am in perfect health, what makes someone else NEED to eat chicken (same applies to all meat, just using chicken as an example).

My point is there is no need to eat chicken, it satisfies peoples taste senses so they make the conclusion that the chicken being brutalized* is ok because it creates a sense of pleasure in us. Seeing a connection with this story?

These peoples sense of sadism was satisfied by brutalizing the dog, your sense of taste is satisfied by (being responsible for) the brutalizing of chickens. This is exactly why stories like this don't shock me in the slightest. The net result is the same for the poor animal.

*Look up the conditions and deaths that broiler chickens (i.e. 99% of the chickens in shops) go through if you don't believe me.

many animal welfare group fight for the rights of animals in these conditions

Kimono-Girl

that is horrific! the poor dog...:(


to torture an animal like that is just cruel, its not like killing an animal,

torture like this is a totally different ball game...

knird evol

Lilith Helpless Tiddlywinks wrote: »

Is she fcuking stupid or something???


Poor dog

Yeah I think the real story is a little different to what's in that newspaper

RichieC

I'd have whoever did it shot if i was in charge.

Vote RichieC this coming election

ninjasurfer1

steddyeddy wrote: »

I say this with no backlash at the story but in an attempt to educate, There is an intrinsic link between battered pets and battered women and children and men?. The fbi were the first to see a connection between the two. Anyone who can degrade a life because its only a child/animal/woman/man has serious psychological problems. God help the children or wife/girlfriend/husband/boyfriend of whoever of this disturbed person.

Fyp

steddyeddy

ninjasurfer1 wrote: »

Fyp

I didnt mean its gender specific

stevejr

orourkeda wrote: »

They eat dogs in Korea

Yes but I would be surprsed if even in Korea/Japan that any rational people would delight in the digusting torture of an animal (foodsource or not).

Son Of A Vidic

This is the type of walking human excrement that deserves no place in society. Such scum need to be eradicated, they are beyond help.

starbelgrade

dark crystal wrote: »

I agree wholeheartedly.

There are many well documented cases of prolific serial killers, who started out by torturing animals.

Cases like these are usually an indication that not all is right in the mind of the perpertrator.

That's true.

Look at Dexter. He started off the same way.

Oranage2

"Horrible thing to do to a dog these people should be locked up"

"These people deserve to get their faces dipped in acid"

"But is only a dumb animal"

"Millions of chickens, pigs and cows are painfully slaughtered everyday and you still eat meat"

"But thats different dogs are pets"

"They eat dogs in Korea"

This should cover all bases!!!