Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

boiler stat temperature

  • 15-01-2011 4:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭


    Hi - quick query

    Got a firebird condensing oil burner and rad system (2.5k sq foot house with three zones - furthest rads would be abot 30 metres from the burner.)

    Just wondering what temp people set the stat on the burner to. Mine is currently around the 65 degree mark (this is what the plumber originally set it to day one).

    I feel the house would benefit from a nudge in the upward direction but I just want to make sure I don't do anything stupid by setting that temp too high.

    ta.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Sparkpea


    if you need more heat turn it up

    it wont mess anything up

    people like different temps.. houses hold the temp better than others sometimes etc. so theres loads of variables as to what other people will have theirs set at - suit yourself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Using a condensing boiler which can't condense due to high return temperatures is a rather stupid idea. A cheaper boiler working as efficient as a condensing boiler (return temperature >47 degrees Celsius) would have done the trick as well.
    Ask your heating system designer why a condensing boiler was purchased when there was no need for it.

    The highest possible surface temperature on the flue-gas exposed side of the heatexchanger (where condensing starts) is for oil
    fires 47 degrees Celsius.
    If this can't be achieved: no condensing.
    Meassure the amount of condensate, compare this volume with the amount of fuel burned and you can check how efficiently the condensing modus is actually used.
    In theory for each liter of combusted oil 0.88 liters of condensate can be collected. A system running on 90% fuel efficiency would therefore produce 0.8 liters of condensate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭alfa beta


    Thanks heinblood - I take it from what you're saying that a condensing boiler would be more suitable with a low temp system like uf heating rather than a standard rad set up.

    Out of curiosity is there a way (and a place) to measure the return temp. Or maybe there's a rule of thumb as to what the stat would be set to to achieve a return temp of around 45 (probably not I assume, as I guess it would all depend on distances of piping and effectiveness of pipe insulation etc.)

    Still, I'd be interested in playing around with temps and seeing what the most effective way of running the system is - now that it's installed. (Finally .88 litres of condensate sounds high to me, is that figure right.)

    Thanks for your reply - very helpful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    What heinbloed says is absoloutly correct.

    I dont understand why SEAI are giving grants to people to change their boilers, in most cases the original system was designed to operate with a flow temperature of 85C and return of 75C the condensing boilers being installed are typically set at 70C flow and 50C return what this effectly does is reduce the output from the radiators by 40% so unless you are going to upgrade some other aspects of the building (insulation) to install a condensing is a waste of money, not to mention the extra CO2 manufacturing the new boiler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Out of curiosity is there a way (and a place) to measure the return temp. Or maybe there's a rule of thumb as to what the stat would be set to to achieve a return temp of around 45 (probably not I assume, as I guess it would all depend on distances of piping and effectiveness of pipe insulation etc.)

    Yes, these data can be found with a thermometer. Check the manual of the boiler how to read the return temperature.

    If your heating system depends on a higher return temperature switch to natural gas, condensation point at 59.7 degrees Celsius.

    But see what you can do with the existing system first, get a heating engineer in to optimise the system, reduce the demand.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Plombier wrote: »
    What heinbloed says is absoloutly correct.

    I dont understand why SEAI are giving grants to people to change their boilers, in most cases the original system was designed to operate with a flow temperature of 85C and return of 75C the condensing boilers being installed are typically set at 70C flow and 50C return what this effectly does is reduce the output from the radiators by 40% so unless you are going to upgrade some other aspects of the building (insulation) to install a condensing is a waste of money, not to mention the extra CO2 manufacturing the new boiler.

    What heinbloed says is waffle and if you know anything about heating systems you'd know this yourself.

    The majority of radiators in houses are oversized ,this is known to be fact. Condense boilers by their very nature are more economical than standard boilers ,regardless of condensing.

    This forum will become a joke soon enough ,with the amount of waffle getting spluttered about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    What heinbloed says is waffle and if you know anything about heating systems you'd know this yourself

    About 12% of the potential heat in the combustion is in the form of water vapor. So unless water vapor condenses, giving up its latent heat energy to the boiler water, the maximum efficiency cannot exceed 88%. Obviously to get the efficiency advertised, nearly ALL of the water vapor must condense.

    Condensation occurs when the water vapor molecules contact a surface below the dew point around 52C.

    If the entering and leaving water temperatures in the boiler are both above the dew point, NO condensation is possible. It doesn’t matter if there are countless water vapor molecules or just one single one.

    To increase the efficiency above 88% there must be condensation of water vapor in the flue gas. In order to condense that water vapor, there must be metal temperatures below the dew point. To get that cool metal temperature, colder water must be introduced into the boiler.

    The colder the water, the more water vapor is condensed and the higher the efficiency becomes. But it will only begin to condense at the dew point it will need to be a lot cooler to get 93% efficiency.

    ANY boiler will be a condensing boiler when you bring cold water into it!

    ANY boiler can operate at even 102% efficiency if the water temperature is say 5C.
    With that condition, the flue gas can be lower than the incoming air and fuel temperature: thus efficiencies over 100%.

    My post is based on these FACTS what have you based your waffle on?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Plombier wrote: »
    My post is based on these FACTS what have you based your waffle on?

    Your quoting figures from the internet and theory ,hearsay. I'm putting condensing boilers in every day of the week and they all condense.
    I've also had people comment on how much cheaper their bills are since the installation of their condense boiler.

    So excuse me if I'm a little annoyed at someone who says "I dont understand why SEAI are giving grants to people to change their boilers"
    Some of us earn a living ,trying to do the best for people and work hard at it.
    Any respectable installer wouldn't come out with such crazy comments as yourself ,thats a fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Yoshytoshy wrote:
    The majority of radiators in houses are oversized ,this is known to be fact. Condense boilers by their very nature are more economical than standard boilers ,regardless of condensing.

    The economics which some plumbers use to educate themself is sometimes shocking....

    Under no circumstances a condensing boiler should be used in a non-condensing modus. It is illegal.
    The condensing trap MUST be filled AT ALL TIMES.

    The flue-balancing would be working at or over it's limits which is very inefficient and reduces the life time of the boiler in itself. Reacting to the fact that the combustion chamber is open when the condensate trap is dry. The boiler is not room-sealed anymore, it is not designed for this purpose.If the boiler's safety functions don't kick in there is a risk of explosion.
    And the risk of gas poisoning anyhow, but that price the cowboys would never be made responsible for, lifes can't be replaced.....

    At the OP:

    Check the competence level of your installer.See yosytoshy's post and ask your questions, like is it efficient to run a condensing boiler in a non-condensing modus and would he recommend it......

    And again: read the manual.

    And get a CO/natural gas alarm installed straight next to the condensate trap.There are some duds operating out there you never can be sure enough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    heinbloed wrote: »
    The economics which some plumbers use to educate themself is sometimes shocking....

    Lord heinbloed ,1000 Points. Internet warrior.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    I'm putting condensing boilers in every day of the week and they all condense

    Wow! you have found a way to defy chemistry and thermodynamics of a combustion reaction.

    I too install condensing boilers but only in a situation where they are appropriate, in other cases I will advise a customer against changing their boiler because my reputation is more important to me than the money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Plombier wrote: »
    Wow! you have found a way to defy chemistry and thermodynamics of a combustion reaction.

    I rest my case about internet warriors ,no plumber talks like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    I am a plumber since 1977 but along the way I have educated myself and I would suggest that you open your mind and do the same just because you think something is correct does not mean it is, please for the sake of your customers buy a book on this subject and read it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Plombier wrote: »
    I am a plumber since 1977 but along the way I have educated myself and I would suggest that you open your mind and do the same just because you think something is correct does not mean it is, please for the sake of your customers buy a book on this subject and read it.

    I'm fully open to anything anyone has to say on this and I know from what you guys are saying ,you're missing several key elements involved in modern condensing boilers and how they operate to maintain condensing while outputing required heat.

    Maybe you should read up about what new boilers have to offer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    Please do explain to me what key elements I am missing, above I have outlined in detail the points I am making, if you have some additional information that you can add then please do.

    You can't backup what you are saying and it seems quite obvious that you don't know what you are talking about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Plombier wrote: »

    You can't backup what you are saying and it seems quite obvious that you don't know what you are talking about.

    Seriously ,what is all this backup business ? Heinbloed is the same with his backup thing.

    Heinbloed has shown on this forum before that he doesn't know the basics about boilers and has admitted he is not an installer.

    You're asking me to backup what I'm saying and all I can say is ,I will have to make a video up of a boiler in operation. Showing flow and return temperatures ,how the boiler copes with rises and how it maintains condensing.

    Modulation is the key word here ,modulation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭slavetothegrind


    Plombier wrote: »


    ANY boiler can operate at even 102% efficiency if the water temperature is say 5C.
    With that condition, the flue gas can be lower than the incoming air and fuel temperature: thus efficiencies over 100%.

    My post is based on these FACTS what have you based your waffle on?

    wow, you have beaten the laws of thermodynamics!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    The above efficiency values are based on gross calorific value of the fuel used. Gross calorific value includes the latent heat of water vapour produced during combustion, whereas net calorific value doesn't. Thats why efficiencies of above 100% can be stated.

    Modulation controls the output of the boiler to maintain a set temperature it does not modulate the temperature so wrong again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Must_Win_Internet_by_DanShive.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭Plombier


    The great question is not whether you have failed, but whether you are content with failure.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Domahony


    I'm not a plumber or an installer, but I am considering replacing my 20-year old gas boiler with a condensing one and I find this discussion fascinating.

    I'd like to extract a few points to test if I am getting this right:

    Condensing boilers are more efficient because they take the water returning
    from the radiators and pre-heat it using the hot, vapour rich exhaust gases
    coming out of the flue. These condense on the return pipes giving up their
    latent heat to the water rather than blowing it into the atmosphere.

    Heinbloed and Plombier believe that if the return water is at a higher
    temperature than the dew point (52 or 47 or 59.7 degrees C), then there will be no condensing and therefore no heat transfer.

    They state that most existing home plumbing systems are designed to
    have return temperatures of 75 degrees C.

    yoshytoshy is installing boilers all the time and sees condensate coming out
    of boilers, where the return temperature is higher than those thresholds.


    Have I got this right or are there more scientific arguments to be put?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    There will be less condense as the boiler heats ,but the issue I had with this thread and the posts of heinbloed and plombier ,is the issue that non-condensing boilers are more efficient than condense boilers.

    This just isn't my experience ,the quality of condense boilers are far more reliable and cleaner than old boilers. The heat from the flue of a condense boiler is not as hot as a non-condensing boiler.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Domahony wrote: »
    I'm not a plumber or an installer, but I am considering replacing my 20-year old gas boiler with a condensing one and I find this discussion fascinating.

    I'd like to extract a few points to test if I am getting this right:

    Condensing boilers are more efficient because they take the water returning
    from the radiators and pre-heat it using the hot, vapour rich exhaust gases
    coming out of the flue. These condense on the return pipes giving up their
    latent heat to the water rather than blowing it into the atmosphere.

    Heinbloed and Plombier believe that if the return water is at a higher
    temperature than the dew point (52 or 47 or 59.7 degrees C), then there will be no condensing and therefore no heat transfer.

    They state that most existing home plumbing systems are designed to
    have return temperatures of 75 degrees C.

    yoshytoshy is installing boilers all the time and sees condensate coming out
    of boilers, where the return temperature is higher than those thresholds.


    Have I got this right or are there more scientific arguments to be put?

    You can only fit condensing gas boilers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭esox28


    Love it, loveit, loveit,

    wot makes me smile:D ??

    the battles that we go on with, not the fact we can help the nation 'for free' with our limitless plumbing and heating knowledge and feel good bout it.

    love the 'net warrior' so describes most of us:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 800 ✭✭✭esox28


    at the tip of blast tube when oil is fired is 1200*c and leaves the flue 'condensing' @ roughly 50*c but on a 'standard' flues leave @ roughly 250*c. wot more is there to say! two heat exchangers v one

    boilers over 92% efficiency must be installed as part of new regs. only one way around this...no available connection or area for condensate disposal

    never seen an empty condense trap only melted ones due to dodgy plumber not fully tighten then and pre-filling it b4 lighting boiler.

    surely the manufacturers know that there boilers are going to be installed into ch systems where boiler will only condense for the initial heat-up period which could be as little as 15 mins and run with a temp differential of 10*c or so for there on.

    very interesting point though,
    will be contacting our main boiler manu. tomorrow c wot they say bout the trap evaporating.

    gas boilers though would be a concern as most are installed inside


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    The condensing boilers are more efficent no argument , im fitting a gas one most weeks and people always find a reduction in their gas bills .
    As was mentioned the second heat exchanger alone will provide an increase in efficency over a standard boiler.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Domahony asks:
    yoshytoshy is installing boilers all the time and sees condensate coming out
    of boilers, where the return temperature is higher than those thresholds.


    Have I got this right or are there more scientific arguments to be put?

    Well, the installer has to have a certain competence.....and off course the specifier as well.

    The scientific argument to make use of the condensing modus :

    One can't make use of entalphic energy (the energy released whilest condensing vapour/steam) as long as the condensing temperature isn't matched.

    If someone who claims the opposite ( claiming to see water driping out of the condensing trap whilest there is no condensing happening) than this is a sure sign that this person either has mental problems/visions or that there is somewhere a leak in the system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Maybe opening a new thread on the issue?

    Here a bit more science,
    the condensing temperatures of various fuels:

    Homeheating oil (light, Kerosene):
    Condensing temperature 47 degrees Celsius
    amount of condensate when condensing 100% : 0.88 kg water per liter of combusted fuel

    Natural gas (low grade)
    Condensing temperature 55.1 degrees Celsius
    amount of condensate when condensing 100% : 1.53 liter per m3 of combusted fuel

    Natural gas (high grade)
    Condensing temperature 55.6 degrees Celsius
    amount of condensate when condensing 100% : 1.63 liter per m3 combusted fuel

    City gas
    Condensing temperature 59.5 degrees Celsius : 0.89 liter per m3 combusted fuel

    Propane
    Condensing temperature 51.4 degrees Celsius :3.37 liter per m3
    combusted fuel

    Butane
    Condensing temperature 50.7 degrees Celsius : 4.29 liter per m3
    combusted fuel


    What are the condensing temperatures of the variuos solid fuels, e.g. coal, lignite, peat, timber ?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    heinbloed wrote: »
    Domahony asks:



    Well, the installer has to have a certain competence.....and off course the specifier as well.

    The scientific argument to make use of the condensing modus :

    One can't make use of entalphic energy (the energy released whilest condensing vapour/steam) as long as the condensing temperature isn't matched.

    If someone who claims the opposite ( claiming to see water driping out of the condensing trap whilest there is no condensing happening) than this is a sure sign that this person either has mental problems/visions or that there is somewhere a leak in the system.

    How many boilers have you worked on/repaired to decide what's right and what's wrong in the boiler world, I know why condense is coming out of the boiler, but It's a shame you can't take someones word for it, I'll leave you to your books.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭Billy Bunting


    alfa beta wrote: »
    Hi - quick query

    Got a firebird condensing oil burner and rad system (2.5k sq foot house with three zones - furthest rads would be abot 30 metres from the burner.)

    Just wondering what temp people set the stat on the burner to. Mine is currently around the 65 degree mark (this is what the plumber originally set it to day one).

    I feel the house would benefit from a nudge in the upward direction but I just want to make sure I don't do anything stupid by setting that temp too high.

    ta.

    Adjust the thermostat when you need to, the thermostat will control the temperature of the water in the radiators,the hotter the radiators the quicker the house will heat, too low and you will begin to feel it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 763 ✭✭✭alfa beta


    thanks for all the replies - had no idea such a debate would ensue!!

    anyway, bearing in mind what Heinblood said I turned the stat down to a level where I thought the return temp might be around about the 47 mark and the result was (obviously) a freezing cold house!!

    so it's back up around the mid/late sixties mark where the installer originally set it and i guess that's where it's staying - presumably this means the burner is not working to its greatest efficiency now but at least the house warms up (which is sort of the idea of a heating system!)

    Pity I didn't know about the whole return temp/condensate thing before deciding which heating method to go with - would have looked more closely into UFH if I had.

    Live and learn I guess!

    Thanks again all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    @ alfa beta:

    Using a condensing boiler in a non-condensing modus is against the manufacturer's instructions.
    Condensing boilers MUST condense because they're sealed systems. If no condensate is created (the artificial water in the condensate trap) then the system isn't sealed anymore.
    Better get a heating engineer in, someone who cares about health and safety.

    You're risking the destruction of the boiler by overheating it, of the house via the fire risk and gas poisoning because of emissions escaping from the condensate or from the flue pipe.

    We have read here in the forum (first page of this thread and further) that people who claim to be plumbers/installers of condensing boilers aren't capeable to understand the manual coming with the condensing boiler. So better get an expert controlling the job after trusting those. Before starting the boiler!

    The risk of gas poisening can be minimalised if the c.-boiler is installed outside in the fresh air. But the other risks remain.
    Note that your fire/home/accidental insurance propably doesn't cover for accidents caused by installations installed and operated against the manufacturer's recommendations.

    Good luck!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,880 ✭✭✭MicktheMan


    alfa beta wrote: »
    at least the house warms up (which is sort of the idea of a heating system!)

    Not correct and is a common misunderstanding!
    A heating system's primary role is to replace the heat lost from a house through air infiltration and insulation weaknesses! If there were no nett heat losses then there would be no need for a conventional heating system - this is the principle of passive houses.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    heinbloed wrote: »
    Using a condensing boiler in a non-condensing modus is against the manufacturer's instructions. !
    All condensing boilers condense from cold, just because it's not condensing all the time doesn't make it unsafe, so what you have posted is nonsense.
    heinbloed wrote: »
    Condensing boilers MUST condense because they're sealed systems. If no condensate is created (the artificial water in the condensate trap) then the system isn't sealed anymore.!
    Again what you have posted is nonsense.

    heinbloed wrote: »
    You're risking the destruction of the boiler by overheating it, of the house via the fire risk and gas poisoning because of emissions escaping from the condensate or from the flue pipe. !
    More nonsense:pac:
    heinbloed wrote: »
    The risk of gas poisening can be minimalised if the c.-boiler is installed outside in the fresh air. But the other risks remain.
    Note that your fire/home/accidental insurance propably doesn't cover for accidents caused by installations installed and operated against the manufacturer's recommendations. !

    How many reports have you written on unsafe installations, what do you base your nonsense on?
    Domestic boilers are tested by manufactures for all types of installation designs and must meet a given safety criteria, so you are wrong to assume they haven't been tested for safety connected to a common rad system where condense is minimal, it is not dangerous so stop talking out of your backside and confusing the issue.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    alfa beta wrote: »
    bearing in mind what Heinblood said I turned the stat down to a level where I thought the return temp might be around about the 47 mark and the result was (obviously) a freezing cold house!!
    .
    If you have stored hot water and reduce the boiler thermostat setting below 60c you risk legionnaires if left for a long time and have no secondary heat source for your hot water cylinder.
    alfa beta wrote: »
    so it's back up around the mid/late sixties mark where the installer originally set it and i guess that's where it's staying - presumably this means the burner is not working to its greatest efficiency
    you are only losing about 3,4% on efficiency by the boiler not condensing all the time.
    alfa beta wrote: »
    Pity I didn't know about the whole return temp/condensate thing before deciding which heating method to go with - would have looked more closely into UFH if I had.
    .
    There is a lot to be said for keeping things simple, Gary:).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    @ gary71:

    Put facts on the table.

    Any condensing boiler manual available which states that the operation of a condensing boiler is safe when not operating in a condensing modus?

    Nothing? Not 1 link?
    Why?

    I can make for my own words,
    so I pick up the non-sense you have adressed at alfa-beta:
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by alfa beta viewpost.gif
    bearing in mind what Heinblood said I turned the stat down to a level where I thought the return temp might be around about the 47 mark and the result was (obviously) a freezing cold house!!
    .


    If you have stored hot water and reduce the boiler thermostat setting below 60c you risk legionnaires if left for a long time and have no secondary heat source for your hot water cylinder.

    We're talking about condensing boilers, gary71.

    Their thermostats (plural,there are several with each c.-boiler) can be set individually, read the manual.
    That a flow temperature of more than 60 degrees Celsius can be achieved AND a return temperature of less than 30 degrees Celsius is simple. Again: read the manual.


    Further you wrote, adressed at alfa-beta:
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by alfa beta viewpost.gif
    so it's back up around the mid/late sixties mark where the installer originally set it and i guess that's where it's staying - presumably this means the burner is not working to its greatest efficiency

    you are only losing about 3,4% on efficiency by the boiler not condensing all the time.

    This is simply not true. Not the operational temperature (here the temperature at the flow/output) is decisive when it comes to energy efficienct usage.
    Again: read the manual.
    And try to understand the laws of physics.


    So.

    And now we wait for your facts. The manual please.

    (Maybe someone could help out gary71?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭Billy Bunting


    Didn't realise Condensing boilers were such a pain in the arse to commision, can't recall reading half this stuff in any manual. :rolleyes:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    heinbloed wrote: »
    Put facts on the table??)
    . you need to work on a few boilers:pac::pac::pac:
    heinbloed wrote: »

    Any condensing boiler manual available which states that the operation of a condensing boiler is safe when not operating in a condensing modus???)

    All domestic condensing boilers will produce sufficient condense to keep the trap full during the daily operation, modern domestic gas boilers have anti cycle and a logic that will try to achieve a delta T of 20 degrees during normal operation, due to this a boiler will produce sufficient condense to keep the trap full, a condensing boiler doesn't stop being a condensing boiler just because it achieves a higher temperature than you agree with, i have never found a dry trap.


    heinbloed wrote: »
    @ We're talking about condensing boilers, gary71.??)
    thanks
    heinbloed wrote: »
    @ Their thermostats (plural,there are several with each c.-boiler) can be set individually, read the manual.
    That a flow temperature of more than 60 degrees Celsius can be achieved AND a return temperature of less than 30 degrees Celsius is simple. Again: read the manual.?)
    Thank you for that, in your experience how many installers want or care to know that information, they want to take it out of the box fit it and walk away, i find getting some installer to fit a filling loop and maybe wire a s-plan system is hard enough, if i start explaining the operation of a thermistor and how the boiler logic works then they tend to tell me to feck off, but you must have a gift.


    heinbloed wrote: »
    @ This is simply not true. Not the operational temperature (here the temperature at the flow/output) is decisive when it comes to energy efficient usage.
    Again: read the manual.
    And try to understand the laws of physics.?)
    I am just a simple gas fitter:o who knows boilers, but I'll work on the physics;).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    Less of the "nonsense" talk please.

    Refute the points with fact, not by sniping.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Can I make it perfectly clear to anyone who is bothering to continue reading this thread ,that there isn't half the information available for boilers on the internet.

    I've got hundreds of engineers notes on different boilers ,that I got directly from them.
    Myself and people like gary71 don't have links for a lot of the stuff we know ,it comes with the job.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Billy Bunting wrote:
    Didn't realise Condensing boilers were such a pain in the arse to commision, can't recall reading half this stuff in any manual. rolleyes.gif

    I'm afraid that's the situation we're in.

    Usually it states in the manuals how to install and operate a condensing boiler. And not how NOT to install and operate them. It's a question of literacy to understand the manual of a car, for example, it won't state that the subject isn't fit for diving or baking...

    In the USA the writers of manuals go great ways of describing what not do do with the product. Here in the EU we are expected to stick to the facts of life, i.e. 'creating' a reality is out of question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭slavetothegrind


    ok i'll bite.

    can you describe the last installation you did heinbloed.

    in all fairnesss we stand to learn a considerable amount here if you could tell us how in one real world case you commissioned a boiler satisfying the critieria you have laid out here.

    Even one case of a boiler failing in a dangerous manner because it was operated at too high a temperature by the customer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭heinbloed


    Slavetothegrind wrote:
    ok i'll bite.

    can you describe the last installation you did heinbloed.

    in all fairnesss we stand to learn a considerable amount here if you could tell us how in one real world case you commissioned a boiler satisfying the critieria you have laid out here.

    Even one case of a boiler failing in a dangerous manner because it was operated at too high a temperature by the customer.

    Answer:
    I can indeed.

    Advice:
    If someone has to learn something concerning theoretical physics then school is the best place, I think, slavetothegrind. And for literacy it is propably the best place to go, reading AND understanding an installer's manual couldn't be done without.
    The chatroom as a source of information isn't much worth without de-facto data, without references or links where to get them.
    The internet chatroom or forum isn't worth anything to the student who shows a disregard to the written word.


    Question:

    Maybe you, slavetothegrind, can help gary71, others have failed so far:
    Gary71 was asked to put some data on the table, some facts. But hasn't done so despite been asked twice, so my question again:

    Which condensing boiler manufacturer states officially that his condensing boiler is safe to use when not using it in a condensing modus?

    Any information available? Like for example a copy from an installer manual or from a user manual ? A homepage from the manufacturer? Safety advise from an official heating engineers association, plumbers organisation? Anything at all?

    Show us your competence with publishing facts, slavetothegrind. And help gary71.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭Billy Bunting


    ok i'll bite.

    can you describe the last installation you did heinbloed.

    in all fairnesss we stand to learn a considerable amount here if you could tell us how in one real world case you commissioned a boiler satisfying the critieria you have laid out here.

    Even one case of a boiler failing in a dangerous manner because it was operated at too high a temperature by the customer.


    I think thats a no then :rolleyes:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    heinbloed wrote: »
    Maybe you, slavetothegrind, can help gary71, others have failed so far:
    Gary71 was asked to put some data on the table, some facts. But hasn't done so despite been asked twice, so my question again:

    Which condensing boiler manufacturer states officially that his condensing boiler is safe to use when not using it in a condensing modus?

    Any information available? Like for example a copy from an installer manual or from a user manual ? A homepage from the manufacturer? Safety advise from an official heating engineers association, plumbers organisation? Anything at all?

    Show us your competence with publishing facts, slavetothegrind. And help gary71.....

    Combi boilers run at high temperatures when running for hot water, producing very little if any condense, so following your logic all combi boilers are dangerous as they are not condensing?

    Heinbloed i do this for a living as do others posting here, i have made a lot of mistakes until i got to the point that i don't make so many anymore, i constantly have to re skill as new products come out, i am as good as you will get in my field of work and i am more than happy to share my practical experience, you have misunderstood the workings of a condensing boiler, you can except that or not, I'll leave it up to you;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,305 ✭✭✭yoshytoshy


    Some people taunt to extract information out of people ,deliberately playing the fool while displaying a "knowledge".

    Experts like heinbloed get people killed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 707 ✭✭✭jeepers101


    Just curious heinbloed, if setting the boiler above 50 degrees is dangerous, why does the boiler let you do it? :rolleyes:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    jeepers101 wrote: »
    Just curious heinbloed, if setting the boiler above 50 degrees is dangerous, why does the boiler let you do it? :rolleyes:

    If only i thought of that, i could of saved all that pontificating:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,842 ✭✭✭Billy Bunting


    jeepers101 wrote: »
    Just curious heinbloed, if setting the boiler above 50 degrees is dangerous, why does the boiler let you do it? :rolleyes:

    I think you'll find that Trolls don't have answers to questions, and by definition our heinbloed is a Troll.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    I think you'll find that Trolls don't have answers to questions, and by definition our heinbloed is a Troll.

    If you have a problem with a post or a poster, report it or PM a Mod.

    We will not have members of this community accuse each other of being trolls.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement