Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"Second Big 4" of thrash

  • 04-01-2011 12:47pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭


    Apologies if this has been endlessly debated before.

    So we all know Metallica / Megadeth / Slayer / Anthrax are the "Big 4" of thrash, but has there ever been definitive confirmation on who the next 4 were, to make a "Big 8" list overall?

    If I had to guess I'd say it would be Sepultura, Testament, and then... I'm not sure. Kreator? Celtic Frost? Nuclear Assault?

    What's your opinion?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,342 ✭✭✭✭That_Guy


    Personally I'd take Slayer out and put Testament in there but that's just me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭Nea


    I would agree with Testament and Sepultura, I would put in Sacred Reich and Suicidal Tendencies also.

    Was never a big fan but many would put Exodus in too


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Second Big 4?

    Kreator, Testament & Exodus anyway, not sure after that. Sepultura probably going by popularity, even though they are a band I never really "got".


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Music Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators Posts: 24,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭Angron


    That_Guy wrote: »
    Personally I'd take Slayer out and put Testament in there but that's just me.

    I'd take out Metallica and replace them with Sepultura myself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Also, Celtic Frost? Are they not more of a "doom" band than thrash?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,382 ✭✭✭Motley Crue


    For me, Anthrax doesn't even deserve to be in the main Big Four, let alone be called a Thrash band....in any case...my pick for a "B Team" would be

    Sepultura
    None of this **** over Max vs. Derrick, Sepultura now are a great band, but I would prefer the original line up that performed in Holland in 1996 - you have to admire how stoned the fans looked during this performance.



    Exodus
    A few years ago Slayer took time out from their tour to go and see Exodus performing in the Voodoo Lounge - that's how relevant Slayer think Exodus are - and personally I have to agree



    Testament
    Seen them open for Judas Priest in 2009 and have been a fan ever since.



    Machine Head
    I have a feeling I'll get in trouble for calling these guys Thrash but they've been around in some form or another since 1994 (Demmel and Flynn have been working together even longer then that) and their debut album was without doubt the driving force behind my decision to listen to more of Thrash Metal. I just wish Rob would stop with the bull**** inbetween songs.

    And to see them five times and counting. And no, this particular track I've chosen isn't the heaviest, but it's still brilliant music.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,780 ✭✭✭sentient_6


    2nd big four? Exodus, Testament, Kreator & IMO Overkill. Who i'm surprised haven't been mentioned yet!

    The problem with some of the '2nd tier' bands is some have had dodgy points and/or huge gaps between albums. Exodus had the terrible Impact is Imminent & Force of Habit then nothing for years. Heathen had a great album in Victims of Deception but then nothing for years. Forbidden had Twisted into Form then a couple of dodgy albums in the mid 90's that changed the sound a bit then a huge gap. Overkill, Kreator & Testament are the only consistant ones out there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20 bledmillennium


    Yes! Overkill!

    ELIMINATE ELIMINATE!!!!!

    Also, from the new breed of thrash metallers, I see great potential from Warbringer and Tankard making even greater waves in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Hmmm. I don't know much Exodus. Kreator I always figured would be on the list.

    What about Flotsam & Jetsam? Destruction? Sodom?

    Hmmm. It looks like the list will probably be:

    Sepultura
    Testament
    Exodus
    Kreator


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Hmmm. It looks like the list will probably be:

    Sepultura
    Testament
    Exodus
    Kreator
    Yup, +1 to that IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    Yup, +1 to that IMO.

    Hardly household names though. The "Big 4" have very strong name recognition, even amongst non-metal fans. I mean, everyone's heard of Metallica! :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,780 ✭✭✭sentient_6


    Yes! Overkill!

    ELIMINATE ELIMINATE!!!!!

    Also, from the new breed of thrash metallers, I see great potential from Warbringer and Tankard making even greater waves in the future.

    I'm really liking Lazarus A.D. as well. Id say check them out if you haven't already.
    Hardly household names though. The "Big 4" have very strong name recognition, even amongst non-metal fans. I mean, everyone's heard of Metallica! :-)

    Ya but thrash in general isn't really a household genre. & are metallica really thrash anymore?! But i digress......

    Oh i think Death Angel deserve a honourable mention by the way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Hardly household names though. The "Big 4" have very strong name recognition, even amongst non-metal fans. I mean, everyone's heard of Metallica! :-)
    The "metallica" everyone has heard of are not thrash!


    And the list is the next most well known thrash bands outside the big 4.

    Wheres your suggestion, if you disagree then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭AaronEnnis


    Yes! Overkill!

    ELIMINATE ELIMINATE!!!!!

    Also, from the new breed of thrash metallers, I see great potential from Warbringer and Tankard making even greater waves in the future.


    Eh...Tankard arent exactly a new breed, they've been around since 'Zombie Attack' in 1986, and before that even.

    All that 'thrash revival' did was unleash a whole load of clone bands who went out and bought hi-tops in their local Footlocker or whatever. The only good band to come out of them was Vektor, who sound like a mix between Destruction, Coroner, and Voivod.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    The "metallica" everyone has heard of are not thrash!


    And the list is the next most well known thrash bands outside the big 4.

    Wheres your suggestion, if you disagree then?

    Well that was my suggestion (T/K/E/S), based on what people are saying here, and what my own thoughts are. I was just making an observation that the "2nd 4" are very different in terms of recognition / commerciality etc, than the Big 4. There's probably no real basis for a next four, maybe its more like a Big 5 or Big 6 (for which I would add Testament and Sepultura to the original Big 4).

    I haven't really listened to thrash metal much since about 1989 - recently I've been delving back in to the old classics. I also got Testament's most recent album and its really good. Nice to hear the old "classic" sound is still there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,780 ✭✭✭sentient_6


    See even out of the Big 4 one is only really really BIG. Every other band thats sticking to the thrash sound are still playing clubs like the ambassabor when they come to ireland, & playing similar i imagine elsewhere. There all pretty much underground par metallica, who arent thrash anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    sentient_6 wrote: »
    See even out of the Big 4 one is only really really BIG. Every other band thats sticking to the thrash sound are still playing clubs like the ambassabor when they come to ireland, & playing similar i imagine elsewhere. There all pretty much underground par metallica, who arent thrash anymore.

    Well I guess now that's true, but maybe it refers to "big then" rather than "big now". I mean, Megadeth had a run of hit albums in the 90s, Anthrax kind of fell off the radar, and Slayer were always too extreme to go overground. But at the time, the late 80s, these were the main big bands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    sentient_6 wrote: »
    See even out of the Big 4 one is only really really BIG. Every other band thats sticking to the thrash sound are still playing clubs like the ambassabor when they come to ireland, & playing similar i imagine elsewhere. There all pretty much underground par metallica, who arent thrash anymore.

    Well I guess now that's true, but maybe it refers to "big then" rather than "big now". I mean, Megadeth had a run of hit albums in the 90s, Anthrax kind of fell off the radar, and Slayer were always too extreme to go overground. But at the time, the late 80s, these were the main big bands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,382 ✭✭✭Motley Crue


    sentient_6 wrote: »
    See even out of the Big 4 one is only really really BIG. Every other band thats sticking to the thrash sound are still playing clubs like the ambassabor when they come to ireland, & playing similar i imagine elsewhere.

    Anthrax aside, Megadeth performed in the old Point Depo in the early 90's twice, and I think that they could fill a venue that size with the right promotion. I remember when they performed in the Ambassador in 2005 the place was wall to wall packed, by all accounts they also got a good crowd in Cork last Summer, even if it didn't sell out.

    And Slayer wouldn't want to play the 02 Arena, I mean I've seen them headline stadium\arena gigs before (like the CIA in Wales) but I would imagine, given the choice, Slayer prefer the intimacy or a "less is more" approach to their attendance. Their two night's in the Ambassador a few years ago could have easily been one in a bigger venue.
    sentient_6 wrote: »
    There all pretty much underground par metallica, who arent thrash anymore.

    I would not class Slayer or Megadeth as underground


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,577 ✭✭✭lord lucan


    For me, Anthrax doesn't even deserve to be in the main Big Four, let alone be called a Thrash band....in any case...my pick for a "B Team" would be

    Wash your mouth out with soap and water!!:eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,382 ✭✭✭Motley Crue


    lord lucan wrote: »
    Wash your mouth out with soap and water!!:eek:

    Why is it that people keep disagreeing with everything I write on here:D

    OK, look, I struggle to believe Anthrax are a Thrash band...a lot of their material since their "Thrash period" proves this was nothing more then experimentation and that their Thrash days were nothing more then a phase of the band.

    I mean, no other Thrash band has ever released....



    Even if some of their material is well worth applauding



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,780 ✭✭✭dasdog


    Anthrax were more melodical than the others but they were one of the definers of thrash and were probably the first to have moshpits/stage diving which they brought accross from CBGB'S (NY) punk/hardcore audiences. If anything with Public Enemy, Anthrax were experimenting with something new which never really worked for me but the whole scene was dying already at that point. Personally I thought Megadeth stopped being thrash around Rust In Peace (I hated No More Mr Nice Guy....hated it and I loved that band) and Metallica after AJFA.

    I suppose like a lot of things it depends on taste. Suicidal/Nuclear Assault/Testament/Sepultura were probably my favourite of the "second tier". Although they started off playing more hardcore (a bit like Suicidal) an honorable mention to D.R.I. who were probably never as popular as the likes of Kreator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,342 ✭✭✭✭That_Guy


    Vio-lence are actually quite good too. Would stick them in there too although I'm really not the biggest fan of thrash as such.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭Nailz


    Apart from the two dudes on the first page there's a tremendous lack of Overkill on this thread. Same goes for Municipal Waste.

    For me it would have to be Overkill, Testament, Sepultura and Nuclear Assault. Leaving out one of my old favourite, Suicidal Tendencies, on the basis I like their Hardcore stuff equally, and they're more of a Crossover band. Kreator & Exodus always deserve a shout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Mike Litoris


    From what I remember in the mid to late 80's Testement, Suicidal, Exodus and Nuclear Assault seemed to be the most popular after the big 4.

    I alway classed Sepultra as death metal and attached to that whole wave in 89-91.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    From what I remember in the mid to late 80's Testement, Suicidal, Exodus and Nuclear Assault seemed to be the most popular after the big 4.

    I alway classed Sepultra as death metal and attached to that whole wave in 89-91.
    lol.

    Its spelt Sepultura, for a start.

    They were one of the main bands from the south american thrash scene. They are not death metal, in the same way that Slayer or Pantera are also not death metal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 168 ✭✭finhex


    Coroner needs to be mentioned here. Not so popular but definitely one of the best. And Finnish band called Stone.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,211 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Vio-Lence (a band I love) were never a big band and arrived too late to justify being anywhere near the top 10.

    I would go with the following:
    * Kreator
    * Testament
    * Exodus
    * Suicidal Tendencies

    Other bands close behind would probably be Nuclear Assault, Death Angel, Forbidden, Possessed, Sepultura and Annihilator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭Jake The Fat Ma


    Razor and Exciter are two amazing bands from Canada


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭AaronEnnis


    Razor and Exciter are two amazing bands from Canada


    Spot on. Heavy Metal Maniac is just deadly. And as regards Razor...just dont get 'Decibels'. Terrible album, ha ha... everything else ranges from excellent (Evil Invaders) to good (Open Hostility).

    Have you heard Sacrifice, also from Canada?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Mike Litoris


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    lol.

    Its spelt Sepultura, for a start.

    Lol, you're the best!:p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Lol, you're the best!:p
    :rolleyes:
    So just ignore the rest of the post (the actual content, the spell czech part was obviously tongue-in-cheek)

    (must resist temptation to make a pun about your username and how you responded like a c...) :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,123 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    AaronEnnis wrote: »
    Spot on. Heavy Metal Maniac is just deadly. And as regards Razor...just dont get 'Decibels'. Terrible album, ha ha... everything else ranges from excellent (Evil Invaders) to good (Open Hostility).

    Have you heard Sacrifice, also from Canada?

    I have. I had "Forward To Termination" on LP. Thought it was good, if a bit non-descript. I wouldn't have rated them higher than any of the other bands we're talking about.

    Although on that note I remember getting Nuclear Assault's "Handle With Care" album and thinking it was terrible. Really boring. Felt the same about Coroner's Punishment For Decadence. I guess at that stage I was going off thrash. Within a year it were all Hendrix and Floyd round these parts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭Jake The Fat Ma


    AaronEnnis wrote: »
    Spot on. Heavy Metal Maniac is just deadly. And as regards Razor...just dont get 'Decibels'. Terrible album, ha ha... everything else ranges from excellent (Evil Invaders) to good (Open Hostility).

    Have you heard Sacrifice, also from Canada?


    Sacrifice are good but not in the same league as the other 2.

    The Razor song "on the edge of a razor" has to be the best speed metal song ever


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭Jake The Fat Ma




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,627 ✭✭✭Lawrence1895


    I would like to add Sodom, Tankard and Dew Scented :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 459 ✭✭PattheMetaller


    Apart from the obvious as mentioned so far, I also like Annihilator, Onslaught and Artillery.

    Now that "The Big 4" are gigging together regular, I'm surprised no-one has thought of a touring Thrash Festival kinda like the Sonisphere set up.

    For the record, based purely on personal taste as opposed to sales etc I'd go for Testament, Flotsam & Jetsam, Overkill and Kreator.

    Some other new bands worth checking out are: Hatchet, Havok and Hexen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭metzengerstein


    i dont know why metalica are in the big 4 anyway they aint thrash,even there 80s stuff was very weak .anthrax id replace them


    so id have slayer,overkill,megadeth,old sepultura.


    2nd wave

    kreator,tankard ,gothic slam ,testament



    ps machine head are not thrash ,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    i dont know why metalica are in the big 4 anyway they aint thrash,even there 80s stuff was very weak .anthrax id replace them

    ,
    Facepalm

    No metallica and in all likelihood you wouldnt have heard of most of the other bands you listed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭darconio


    I alway classed Sepultra as death metal and attached to that whole wave in 89-91.

    I agree with you, in my opinion Sepultura are more DM than thrash mostly because they have the typical death growl.
    Max Power1 wrote: »
    They were one of the main bands from the south american thrash scene. They are not death metal, in the same way that Slayer or Pantera are also not death metal.

    Yes they started as a thrash band but I wouldn't classify Morbid Visions and Bestial Devastation as "thrash".

    But again is a very thin line and I guess it can be stretched to one side or to another depending on the personal taste. ;)

    Back on topic:
    Definitively I would add Overkill one of the most underrated thrash band
    Nuclear Assault
    Defiance
    Grinder



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭metzengerstein


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    Facepalm

    No metallica and in all likelihood you wouldnt have heard of most of the other bands you listed.

    did i touch a nerve :rolleyes:

    why would i not have heard of them,why would i list them otherwise ,i grew up listning to all of them


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Music Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators Posts: 24,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭Angron


    did i touch a nerve :rolleyes:

    why would i not have heard of them,why would i list them otherwise ,i grew up listning to all of them
    To seem cool, or hip to the groove :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭GrizzlyMan


    Apologies if this has been endlessly debated before.

    So we all know Metallica / Megadeth / Slayer / Anthrax are the "Big 4" of thrash, but has there ever been definitive confirmation on who the next 4 were, to make a "Big 8" list overall?

    If I had to guess I'd say it would be Sepultura, Testament, and then... I'm not sure. Kreator? Celtic Frost? Nuclear Assault?

    What's your opinion?

    In no particular Order: Early Sepultura, nuclear assault, Onslaught & kreator


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭metzengerstein


    Denny M wrote: »
    To seem cool, or hip to the groove :pac:

    sure why would i need to do that. :D:D:D

    being born in that era is cool enough


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    did i touch a nerve :rolleyes:

    why would i not have heard of them,why would i list them otherwise ,i grew up listning to all of them
    No you didnt touch a nerve.

    Metallica was what/who brought thrash metal to the wider audience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭metzengerstein


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    No you didnt touch a nerve.

    Metallica was what/who brought thrash metal to the wider audience.

    for maybe a small while when they started for maybe a year then along came slayer and a few others and blew them out of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,863 ✭✭✭seachto7


    Why would there even be a "second big 4"??

    Seems to me there were 4 metal bands who were relatively successful at the same time, hence the "big 4". Surely the second tier could be 10 or 20?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    for maybe a small while when they started for maybe a year then along came slayer and a few others and blew them out of it.
    Slayer? Mainstream/Wide audience in the 80s? I think not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭GrizzlyMan


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    Slayer? Mainstream/Wide audience in the 80s? I think not.

    Well Reign In blood entered the american Billboard 200 chart at 94 and considering they had absolutley no air play proves that there were a wide under ground audience and south of heaven reach somewere in the 50's.

    So their was a big slayer following but obviously nowere near Metallica as and Justice entered in the top ten in the billboards charts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭AaronEnnis


    You don't get on American Recordings without being a pretty huge band. End of.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement