sexual car

investment

Should a man have a better car than a women??

Ali Babba

Most women aren't into cars..........
Although a female friend of mine owns a Maserati.

x in the city

lol!

of course, only wimmins should ever drive a hyundai accent and all men of the planet earth drive at least a BMW 535 Mtech

orourkeda

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

You cant shag a car.

and it certainly wont hoover and cook

alwaysadub

Sure women can't be driving-it'd mean we'd have to leave the kitchen sure.

KeithM89_old

Women are far more expensive than a good car. So they should at least look the part

starlit

Should it matter? I'm neutral about it. It should not have to either or nor like so shouldn't matter if a guy has a better car than a woman or that a woman has a better car can a guy. A car is a car nothing more other than status is what you saying!

up for anything

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

What's a women? Maybe conjoined female twins?


It's up to men whether they would prefer a better car than a woman. Myself, I'd prefer a better car than a man any day. More reliable and less likely to need a jump start

Juwwi

No harm in letting them have a good car imo.

Sure you would'nt want to be getting dropped off and collected from the boozer in a heap of junk.

af_thefragile

Women's car:



Man's car:

orourkeda

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjeqlmb7Ri8

AnneElizabeth

Yes, all men should be rich

W.Shakes-Beer

Seen a beautiful woman in an M5 the other day, didnt bother me as I got back into my Astra mainly because she was smoking hot.

I then rallied the guts out of my car to show how much bigger my 100bhp was compared to her 500bhp.

Ali Babba

W.Shakes-Beer wrote: »

Seen a beautiful woman driving an M5 the other day, didnt bother me as I got back into my Astra mainly because she was smoking hot.

Your Astra was smoking hot? Are Astras known for electrical fires?

W.Shakes-Beer

Ali Babba wrote: »

Your Astra was smoking hot? Are Astras known for electrical fires?

ehhh no....that was...eh...the fire coming out of the exhausts from the sheer power of the thing :P

kowloon

In my experience someone has to like you already for the vehicle to make a difference.
A woman thinks some guy is a gob****e and finds out he has a fancy sportscar, he becomes an even bigger gob****e,'sure look at him thinking he's great in his car'. Vice versa applies.

Conclusion: car is inconsequential, or at best multiplies the persons first impressions.

Ali Babba

W.Shakes-Beer wrote: »

ehhh no....that was...eh...the fire coming out of the exhausts from the sheer power of the thing :P

If it was an Astra i'd say it was more water vapour.............;)

Terry

Any car that does over 120KP/H is irrelevant.
The average person does not need a car over 1.2l
Anything else is a waste and completely pointelss, unless you have a small penis/ego.

If you think that cars have a gender, then you should seek help.

Finally; OP is troll in my opinion.

Ali Babba

Most women seem to think the Mini Cooper or the Mazda MX5 is the ultimate when it comes to cars.

parker kent

I couldn't give a toss about cars. Much rather have a hot girl on my arm* than a car in the yard.

*I don't really mean my arm! Answers on a postcard....

easyeason3

OP you saw a woman driving a car you want didn't you?

This mad you mad, didn't it?

Novella

Of course. So he doesn't forget that he is superior.

Absurdum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtoyLPROLZI

Glowing

I'm a woman, and I absolutely love cars. I did a weekend of rally driving before, LOVED IT. If I had a bit of money or a rich husband, I'd love an Audi A5, a Maserati, or if I was rediculously rich, an Aston Martin DB9.

As I have neither a rich husband or a lot of money, I've made do with (what I think) is a pretty cool 1.8 MX-5 - not bought purely for it's image (though it looks great I think), but it actually has a great bit of acceleration and good handling too which is more important to me. I have a hard top on it too, wouldn't have bought it otherwise - it's more secure, warmer and looks a lot less 'poser-ish'! It's a good combination of price and 'fun' without costing a fortune in tax or insurance.

My husband has absolutely no interest in cars - I've bought the MX-5 now as I'm sure when kiddie's come along, I'll have to upgrade (or downgrade!) to something a little less impractical!

Midnight_EG

Terry wrote: »

Any car that does over 120KP/H is irrelevant.
The average person does not need a car over 1.2l
Anything else is a waste and completely pointelss, unless you have a small penis/ego.

If you think that cars have a gender, then you should seek help.

Finally; OP is troll in my opinion.

A 1.2l car going up to 120kph is one of the most boring things in the world...

johnn

The only women driving should be sexy limo escorts.......destination: Happy ending :cool:

CreepingDeath

Terry wrote: »

Any car that does over 120KP/H is irrelevant.
The average person does not need a car over 1.2l

Ah now, that's rubbish.
If someone lives in the city and is pretty much confined to a small area then a 1.2l car might do them.
But in general, it depends on a lot of factors.

1. How many people are in the car on average. 1.2 litres might be okay for a single driver, but fit 5 people in and a full boot of luggage and it's a different story.

2. Acceleration is important, especially when overtaking.
If you try overtaking a truck in a Micra, you have to spend longer on the other side of the road cos it's not powerful enough to accelerate past safely.

3. Bigger engined cars are more reliable, as the engine is built more robustly for higher speeds.

4. You need a larger engined car if you are towing a trailer/caravan.

5. Smaller engined cars rev higher and are more prone to overheating on long journeys/high mileage.


So you might have a better argument if you said cars should have speed limiters set to say 130kph. But drop the argument about engine size.

Terry wrote: »

If you think that cars have a gender, then you should seek help.

Some cars are clearly designed and/or marketed towards specific genders.
Most average cars are for everyone, but there's aggressive and sporty looking ones for guys, and cute/quirky little cars for girls.

Terry

Midnight_EG wrote: »

A 1.2l car going up to 120kph is one of the most boring things in the world...

So you would rather a Honda Civic hitting 160 in a few seconds?

Tell me, which Irish road are you going to hit that speed?
I just want to know so that I can avoid that road.

Go boy racer, go!

moonboy52

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

Learn to spell first.

Dr_Phil

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

Are women allowed to have cars these days?

Midnight_EG

Terry wrote: »

So you would rather a Honda Civic hitting 160 in a few seconds?

Tell me, which Irish road are you going to hit that speed?
I just want to know so that I can avoid that road.

Go boy racer, go!

How'd you know that I own a Civic that hits 160 in a matter of seconds?


And any motorway or national road tbh...more than capable them roads are!



Also, boy racer? Care to elaborate on that a bit?

easyeason3

Terry wrote: »

Any car that does over 120KP/H is irrelevant.
The average person does not need a car over 1.2l
Anything else is a waste and completely pointelss, unless you have a small penis/ego.

If you think that cars have a gender, then you should seek help.

Finally; OP is troll in my opinion.

Jesus Christ Terry I'd sooner drive my hairdryer before I'd go back to a 1.2l engine.
It's not snobbery or anything but bigger litre engines feel more solid on the road.

Johro

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

Should a man know it's one woman, two women?

Terry

CreepingDeath wrote: »

Ah now, that's rubbish.
If someone lives in the city and is pretty much confined to a small area then a 1.2l car might do them.
But in general, it depends on a lot of factors.

1. How many people are in the car on average. 1.2 litres might be okay for a single driver, but fit 5 people in and a full boot of luggage and it's a different story.

2. Acceleration is important, especially when overtaking.
If you try overtaking a truck in a Micra, you have to spend longer on the other side of the road cos it's not powerful enough to accelerate past safely.

3. Bigger engined cars are more reliable, as the engine is built more robustly for higher speeds.

4. You need a larger engined car if you are towing a trailer/caravan.

5. Smaller engined cars rev higher and are more prone to overheating on long journeys/high mileage.


So you might have a better argument if you said cars should have speed limiters set to say 130kph. But drop the argument about engine size.




Some cars are clearly designed and/or marketed towards specific genders.
Most average cars are for everyone, but there's aggressive and sporty looking ones for guys, and cute/quirky little cars for girls.

What's the rush?

Seriously. Where are you going to in such a hurry that you feel the need to break the speed limit?

Is it a matter of life or death that you overtake that truck?
If not, then why are you (or anyone else) in such a hurry?


I feel the need...
The need to point out that you're wasting your time buying a souped up car when the maximum speed limit is 120KP/h, and that only applies to about 40km of roads in the entire country.

tsst.

hondasam

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

when did women start driving?

Son Of A Vidic

OP - Who gives a fcuk!

Midnight_EG

Terry wrote: »

What's the rush?

Seriously. Where are you going to in such a hurry that you feel the need to break the speed limit?

Is it a matter of life or death that you overtake that truck?
If not, then why are you (or anyone else) in such a hurry?


I feel the need...
The need to point out that you're wasting your time buying a souped up car when the maximum speed limit is 120KP/h, and that only applies to about 40km of roads in the entire country.

tsst.

Midnight_EG wrote: »

How'd you know that I own a Civic that hits 160 in a matter of seconds?


And any motorway or national road tbh...more than capable them roads are!



Also, boy racer? Care to elaborate on that a bit?

Gonna ignore me there Terry?


As a matter of curiosity, what do YOU drive?

CreepingDeath

Terry wrote: »

What's the rush?

Seriously. Where are you going to in such a hurry that you feel the need to break the speed limit?

Is it a matter of life or death that you overtake that truck?
If not, then why are you (or anyone else) in such a hurry?


I feel the need...
The need to point out that you're wasting your time buying a souped up car when the maximum speed limit is 120KP/h, and that only applies to about 40km of roads in the entire country.

tsst.

I didn't mention breaking the speed limit in my post at all.
There are completely legal and valid times when you might want good acceleration, eg. to overtake say a long vehicle on a road if it's doing 40kph in a 80kph zone.
You would also want good acceleration when merging into a car lane with fast traffic, eg. joining a motorway or major road with limited breaks in the traffic. You would still be working within the speed limits.

Also, cars which can go faster as a rule will have better brakes.
So, if you have a fast car going at 120kph on the motorway, and a 1.2 litre car at 120kph behind it and the car in front slams on the brakes, then the car behind would have a longer stopping distance because it was designed for slower speeds.

strobe

easyeason3 wrote: »

Jesus Christ Terry I'd sooner drive my hairdryer before I'd go back to a 1.2l engine.
It's not snobbery or anything but bigger litre engines feel more solid on the road.

Ohh dear...... Really? They "feel more solid on the road"?

Glowing

Generally, a car with a bigger engine, will be ... well bigger - therefore more solid and probably safer in the event of an accident.

Midnight_EG

Glowing wrote: »

Generally, a car with a bigger engine, will be ... well bigger - therefore more solid and probably safer in the event of an accident.

No actually, some cars have different specs which can include bigger engines but still the same bodystyle. I'd say he meant that bigger engines, when accelerating, are trying just a little less than a smaller engined car so the power feels more smooth rather than rushed...if you get me...?

easyeason3

strobe wrote: »

Ohh dear...... Really? They "feel more solid on the road"?

Yeah
I said this to my mechanic one day & he got a skit out of it too but it wasn't the first time he had heard it, so I'm not the only one.

The only way I have of explaining it is that small litre engines are usually smaller sized cars. Bigger litre engines are usually bigger &, obviously, heavier cars so they 'feel' more solid on the road.

Stained Class

Well, I drive a 17 year old Mazda 626, which we call the Millienium Falcon.:cool:

Mrs Class drives an 01 Rover 75 Tourer. We call it the Shooting Brake.:D:D

BTW what's this KPH stuff?

In ClassWorld we deal in MPH!:cool:

Glowing

Midnight_EG wrote: »

No actually, some cars have different specs which can include bigger engines but still the same bodystyle. I'd say he meant that bigger engines, when accelerating, are trying just a little less than a smaller engined car so the power feels more smooth rather than rushed...if you get me...?

I'd partly agree with you, yes

When you say bigger engines, you generally don't get a car with the same body style with more than a .2 litre difference (you're talking 1 litre versus 1.2, or 1.2 v 1.4 rather than a 1 litre versus 2.4 litre!)

Sheeps

I would like to make Terry aware that a lot of different racing circuits around Ireland, Great Britain and on Continental Europe allow you to drive your car around the track provided you meet track specific requirements. It's not uncommon for people with fast cars to take them to a race track. Also, it's worth mentioning that faster and more powerful cars are usually nicer looking cars.


Bottom line is, yes there is no need for fast powerful cars but fast and powerful cars are awesome.

strobe

easyeason3 wrote: »

Yeah
I said this to my mechanic one day & he got a skit out of it too but it wasn't the first time he had heard it, so I'm not the only one.

The only way I have of explaining it is that small litre engines are usually smaller sized cars. Bigger litre engines are usually bigger &, obviously, heavier cars so they 'feel' more solid on the road.

Ahh no, that's fair enough, I get where you are coming from, but please, don't say things like that to mechanics any more. You might have one that will decide to charge you €300 to re-align the quadgimagoo.

t0mm13b

W.Shakes-Beer wrote: »

ehhh no....that was...eh...the fire coming out of the exhausts from the sheer power of the thing :P

Reminds me of a sticker - "If you get any closer I'll fart"

easyeason3

strobe wrote: »

Ahh no, that's fair enough, I get where you are coming from, but please, don't say things like that to mechanics any more. They might start charging you €300 to re-align the quadgimagoo.

He's a family friend. If he tries to over charge me he knows he will get the ear chewed off him

W.Shakes-Beer

Ali Babba wrote: »

Your Astra was smoking hot? Are Astras known for electrical fires?

Ali Babba wrote: »

If it was an Astra i'd say it was more water vapour.............;)

Jaysus, someone has been paying too much attention to Jeremy Clarkson with his hatred of Opel/Vaux

For an almost 11 year old car it runs as sweet as a nut;)

Coriolanus

orourkeda wrote: »

You cant shag a car.

and it certainly wont hoover and cook

Or hoover your cöck.

OutlawPete

investment wrote: »

Should a man have a better car than a women??

No.