Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

€13,000 - Help me choose between a Porsche Boxster 2.7l vs Chrysler Crossfire 3.2l V6

  • 16-12-2010 10:42am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭


    Hi guys!

    Will be in the market to buy a newer car after Christmas and would be interested in seeing what opinions you good folks can offer on the following choices here, or throw in your own choices that would fit my requirements.

    Currently driving a 1993 Toyota Sera. Fun little car to drive but bits and pieces are starting to go on it, lacquer peeling all over the place, and I need a more reliable / presentable car for my job. The Sera is rare enough to keep and fix up little by little, so I'll be garaging her and working on her in my spare time! :)

    Requirements:
    • Budget of €13,000 or less - have enough set by for tax and insurance for the year.
    • Automatic transmission - restricted to auto's by licence.
    • 75,000 miles (121,000 km) or less on the clock
    • Would prefer to buy from a dealer so I have some kind of comeback, but am willing to go private for the right car.
    • I'm only 23, so 'older gent' cars are out! :pac:

    Personally, at the minute its a toss-up between a Porsche Boxster, and a Chrysler Crossfire convertible, or possibly a Mercedes of some shape or form.

    I'm not that mad about Audi's or BMW's in general styling-wise (exception made for the classic 8 Series); there are only about 15 Sera's on the road in Ireland, so I'm looking for something unusual, or if not unusual, then very fun to drive.

    The 2004 Chrysler Crossfire convertible has taken my eye in this regard.
    I know the styling isn't to everyone's taste, but it fits my budget, is unusual enough for me to appreciate its aesthetics, and has a decent bit of poke. It also has the benefit of sharing 80% of its components with the Mercedes SLK class, which offers a degree of reliability (and spare parts!)

    no-image-large.gif&width=400&height=300

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Chrysler/Crossfire/AUTO-con/201019197934204/advert?channel=CARS

    Have seen this one in person, tiny dent over the left rear wheel arch so I reckon I could either get them to fix it or knock down the price a little. Not spelling 'convertible' right in the title shakes my confidence a little though.. :-/

    Then there's the 2002 Porsche Boxster; fairly average looking, but something about the Marque just draws me in. Seems fairly reliable, but with that kind of mileage on it, is it likely that there would be expensive repairs around the corner?
    Something inside me tells me that I'd be happier in the Porsche, but that could just be the younger me in my head saying "you've always wanted a Porsche, go for it!" Not sure if the Boxster would live up well to the young boy's fantastical Porsche reputation though. :cool:

    These two are the ones I've found that would fit most of my requirements. Private sale, but I'd be getting it fully checked over before I buy in any case.

    no-image-large.gif&width=400&height=300

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Porsche/Boxster/2.7/201044200083772/advert?channel=CARS

    Or this one (may be able to stretch budget):

    no-image-large.gif&width=400&height=300

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Porsche/Boxster/2.7-A%23T-/201028198828327/advert?channel=CARS


    Any and all opinions, alternative suggestions, car criticisms, whacky ideas and financial donations welcome! :pac:


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    Just an observation really, but to look after the Boxster properly will cost a lot more than the Crossfire. Make sure you budget properly for that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    Very valid point EPM, and not one I really considered myself to be honest!
    If I budget about 1K for maintenance costs etc., would that be enough I wonder?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Stevie Dakota


    A Porsche with heritage, prestige, fantastic build quality, proven brilliance on the road or a re-hashed SLK (which was average at best) with a Chrysler badge, dodgy image and a woeful interior. Surely this is a no brainer?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭no1beemerfan


    Just a personal opinion here but I HATE the crossfire! And there has to be a reason why I never see one but see a lot more Boxters.

    I'm not up on my porsches but assuming you buy one with a history and lowish miles €1,000 a year should cover servicing but then again if something major fails you could be looking at a lot more.

    If you do go look at such cars try and get someone who knows them to go too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    YraggarY wrote: »
    If I budget about 1K for maintenance costs etc., would that be enough I wonder?

    Should be enough for a set of tyres.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    Should be enough for a set of tyres.

    +1
    YraggarY wrote: »
    Very valid point EPM, and not one I really considered myself to be honest!
    If I budget about 1K for maintenance costs etc., would that be enough I wonder?

    I think you're being a bit optimistic. Of course it depends on your mileage too but if you have a full service and a set of tyres a year you're looking at the bones of €2k. I'd seriously consider a good aftermarket warranty on one too. Great cars but in your budget they are getting on in years and things do fail eventually.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭thirtythirty


    Others to consider too are (based on what I think you're looking for):

    Z4
    Elise
    SC430

    Between your original two, I'd go Crossfire. Had in the states, much nicer cars than some people rate them.

    The boxster is porsche's worst IMO - weird backend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 374 ✭✭STForSale


    Have you drove the boxster?
    Looked at getting one earlier in the year, cabin in the pre facelift is quite primative. Took it for an extended test drive and realised I could never live with it as a daily driver.

    350Z or S2000 worth a look, predictable, I know :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    The boxster is porsche's worst IMO - weird backend.

    That was a fair assessment when Porsche only made two models, but now they make an ugly 5 door hatchback and a tractor, so the Boxster has been bumped to third worst.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭thirtythirty


    Forgot about the 350z! Delish.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭thirtythirty


    I really like the Panamera...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,828 ✭✭✭stimpson


    If it was me I'd buy an S2000.

    But then I'm not a badge snob.

    A little over budget, but you'll save in the long run

    http://www.cbg.ie/Car_Detail.aspx?ID=4049922


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 374 ✭✭STForSale


    That was a fair assessment when Porsche only made two models, but now they make an ugly 5 door hatchback and a tractor, so the Boxster has been bumped to third worst.
    Thanks for the laugh!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭robodonkey


    Old school but that cash would get you a tidy Merc SL...... :)

    http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2174426.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    A Porsche with heritage, prestige, fantastic build quality, proven brilliance on the road or a re-hashed SLK (which was average at best) with a Chrysler badge, dodgy image and a woeful interior. Surely this is a no brainer?

    You've pretty much destroyed everything I love about the Chrysler right there. :P :pac:
    I wasn't sure if the Boxster would be 'Porschey' enough, I mean I've ALWAYS wanted to drive a Porsche, my first car memory was being in a friend of my dad's 1986 911 Carrera.
    My second was being in my mother's Lada and having it break down crossing a dual carriageway. :eek: The shame! First new car my parents had ever bought. :cool:
    I guess with the Boxster though I'm wondering if it'll ruin that childhood idolisation of Porsche! Silly really, although I can't help but think that it'd be a different experience altogether taking off in a 911 Turbo or Cayman S than sitting in an entry-level Boxster. :P Guess I just have to dash the childhood memories and go for it!

    And you're definitely right about the interior.. That's one of the major points for me personally that marks the Crossfire down!
    Just a personal opinion here but I HATE the crossfire! And there has to be a reason why I never see one but see a lot more Boxters.

    I'm not up on my porsches but assuming you buy one with a history and lowish miles €1,000 a year should cover servicing but then again if something major fails you could be looking at a lot more.

    If you do go look at such cars try and get someone who knows them to go too.

    The first time I saw a Crossfire was back in 2004, and I loved it! It was different, looked fast, had a very sexy sleek image (I was in my teens, EVERYTHING was fast, sleek and sexy back then! :P) but then kinda went off it. Passed by that convertible one in my OP recently and its really a completely different looking machine that the coupé. The lines and general styling work quite well with the soft-top, I think anyway. Again though, the interior really does let it down, shiny silver plastic everywhere.. :rolleyes:


    Thanks for the input folks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    YraggarY wrote: »
    I wasn't sure if the Boxster would be 'Porschey' enough, I mean I've ALWAYS wanted to drive a Porsche, my first car memory was being in a friend of my dad's 1986 911 Carrera.
    I recently sold a 1986 911 Carrera and, no, a Boxster won't be like that. How about a 964 tiptronic? You may struggle to find one within budget but it'll be a good compromise and a solid one shouldn't depreciate too much. Way cooler than either of the two cars you mentioned too.;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,817 ✭✭✭Stevie Dakota


    Funny, I also remember the first time a saw a Crossfire, it is a striking looking car but then I saw the interior...

    Anyway, take people comments on boards but drive both yourself and form your own opinion, car buying is insanely emotive and rarely makes sense! The heart often wins.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 132 ✭✭DConway




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    Should be enough for a set of tyres.

    :eek:
    EPM wrote: »
    +1



    I think you're being a bit optimistic. Of course it depends on your mileage too but if you have a full service and a set of tyres a year you're looking at the bones of €2k. I'd seriously consider a good aftermarket warranty on one too. Great cars but in your budget they are getting on in years and things do fail eventually.

    I do tend to do quite a bit of mileage, usually about 20 - 25k a year, but that may come down a good bit as I'll be moving a fair bit closer to where my work is based.
    €2K, steep but not entirely undoable if I shift some other things around / put in heaps of overtime. :pac: As for an aftermarket warranty, how would I go about purchasing one of those? From Porsche directly, from a dealer, from a local garage? Clueless!
    Others to consider too are (based on what I think you're looking for):

    Z4
    Elise
    SC430

    Between your original two, I'd go Crossfire. Had in the states, much nicer cars than some people rate them.

    The boxster is porsche's worst IMO - weird backend.

    The Z4 is a little over-budget I reckon, factoring in insurance and tax and all that. Plus its a manual, as is the Elise, and I'm limited in my choices to automatics. :( Although that being said, they are a STUNNING looking car, as is the Elise, and I'd snap one up in a second if I could!

    The SC430 is a lovely machine, but I'm kind of looking at getting away from the Toyota / Lexus world. Definitely one to look at though, thanks!

    I'm not 100% sold on the Boxster's styling myself, though they both have weird backends in fairness! How did you find the Crossfire's handling, I hear its suspension is somewhat more 'Americanised' compared to its SLK relations?
    STForSale wrote: »
    Have you drove the boxster?
    Looked at getting one earlier in the year, cabin in the pre facelift is quite primative. Took it for an extended test drive and realised I could never live with it as a daily driver.

    350Z or S2000 worth a look, predictable, I know :o

    Haven't driven the Boxster yet, too afraid to in case it ruins my childhood Porsche memories! :P With the Chrysler I'm EXPECTING it to be bad, so anything above 'woeful' will be a bonus! :pac: As for the cabin, if it hasn't got shiny silver plastic all over the place then its got one up on the Crossfire! But no, I just haven't yet had the chance to test drive the Boxster, will definitely do both before I make my decision though! Thanks for your input!
    stimpson wrote: »
    If it was me I'd buy an S2000.

    But then I'm not a badge snob.

    A little over budget, but you'll save in the long run

    http://www.cbg.ie/Car_Detail.aspx?ID=4049922

    No badge snobbery here, I'm looking at a Chrysler for crying out loud! :D

    S2000 would definitely be a runner, but again, I need an Auto which severely limits my choice.
    Initial budget won't stretch that far, would already be pushing it at €13,500, but one can dream eh!
    robodonkey wrote: »
    Old school but that cash would get you a tidy Merc SL...... :)

    http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2174426.htm

    The garage with the Crossfire actually has an SL too, I'm just not mad about the 90's 'boxy' styling on them! Have a mate who practically salivates over them though, so I can definitely see where you're coming from!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,828 ✭✭✭stimpson


    YraggarY wrote: »
    S2000 would definitely be a runner, but again, I need an Auto which severely limits my choice.
    Initial budget won't stretch that far, would already be pushing it at €13,500, but one can dream eh!

    But the S2000 is 614 to tax, as opposed to 1200 for a 2.7 boxter and 1600 for the Crossfire. Running costs would be less too I would imagine.

    Auto is a problem though, but you could learn to use a clutch and a real gearbox. It's not that hard!

    Oh, and this is under budget

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Honda/S2000/201041199843237/advert?channel=CARS


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    Funny, I also remember the first time a saw a Crossfire, it is a striking looking car but then I saw the interior...

    Anyway, take people comments on boards but drive both yourself and form your own opinion, car buying is insanely emotive and rarely makes sense! The heart often wins.

    The interior really does let it down in a big way, its almost as if they spent too much money / time detailing the exterior, then just melted down some cheap kids toys and formed a centre console from the resulting silver mess! Unfortunate really as I think it'd be a fair bit more popular with a half decent interior!

    Oh I know what you mean, my Toyota Sera was a car I just fell in love with - was planning on importing a very high mileage one from the UK, even with the prospect of an engine rebuild, until I stumbled across the one I subsequently bought sitting in the back yard of a garage I stopped in most mornings to pick up my lunch on the way to work! Low mileage, nearly perfect condition, just the colour I wanted; I call it fate! :cool:
    Anan1 wrote: »
    I recently sold a 1986 911 Carrera and, no, a Boxster won't be like that. How about a 964 tiptronic? You may struggle to find one within budget but it'll be a good compromise and a solid one shouldn't depreciate too much. Way cooler than either of the two cars you mentioned too.;)

    ..... Uncle Tony?! :pac:

    They're just plain and simply beautiful cars aren't they? I'm half thinking about relentlessly saving for a 911 Turbo (996) and just carrying on my Porsche dreams from there! A tiptronic 964 would be the bees-knees, but I don't know if I actually would be able to find one even remotely within budget. €13K is pretty much my max for upfront buying, an extra €500 even would be pushing the limit. Don't think I'd find one, but worth a search!
    And I don't know, the Crossfire has that ass on it.. What was it Jeremy Clarkson said.. Ah yes, like a dog squatting to do a sh*t. Delightful! And if that's not cool, I don't know what is! :pac:
    DConway wrote: »

    Didn't even think to look for a Skyline 350 GT, didn't think one could be had so cheap! :eek: About an hour into the thread and my mind is already wandering...!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    A Porsche with heritage, prestige, fantastic build quality, proven brilliance on the road or a re-hashed SLK (which was average at best) with a Chrysler badge, dodgy image and a woeful interior. Surely this is a no brainer?

    Fact


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    I have driven a large amount of the Porsche range and the first gen Boxster is a cracking little sports car. Looks nice, interior while not as nice as the current gen models is tough and wont fall apart over time. While not rocket fast its still a 200+ hp convertible and it handles very nicely. As a Porsche owner (who owns probably the slowest model Porsche ever made) Id said go for it!

    Thanks for that LIGHTNING, its good to hear a previous owner's view! Its speed is likely going to be rocket fast in comparison to my current labour of love though; the Sera is a 1.5l, 110 bhp, body-rolling, 180 km/h limited hunk of I-don't-know-what! What's it like on juice, if you can recall at all?
    stimpson wrote: »
    But the S2000 is 614 to tax, as opposed to 1200 for a 2.7 boxter and 1600 for the Crossfire. Running costs would be less too I would imagine.

    Auto is a problem though, but you could learn to use a clutch and a real gearbox. It's not that hard!

    Oh, and this is under budget

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Honda/S2000/201041199843237/advert?channel=CARS

    Yeah the tax on both my original choices is high enough, going from paying €400 a year on my current car, and the S2000 would be absolutely perfect, but the auto is still the kicker! And less of that 'real gearbox' nonsense, I'm happy enough driving my go-kart. :pac:

    Thanks for the input though! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭Mr.David


    Is there no possibility to get your manual licence?

    A Porsche boxster auto is wrong and the 'box is poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    STForSale wrote: »
    Have you drove the boxster?
    Looked at getting one earlier in the year, cabin in the pre facelift is quite primative. Took it for an extended test drive and realised I could never live with it as a daily driver.

    350Z or S2000 worth a look, predictable, I know :o
    +1 To everything above! To me the Boxster is an awful place to be stuck in driving a commute. Its a fun weekend car.

    @OP, Id very much recommend the Boxster S if you must get a Boxter, though finding one in Auto might be harder. The standard Boxster is, IMO, a bit of an everyman+ car with a Porsche badge. The S is geninely Porsche'y. The Crossfire just doesnt even bear discussion!

    Saying all that, I agree 350z is a better choice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭Mr.David


    stimpson wrote: »
    If it was me I'd buy an S2000.

    But then I'm not a badge snob.

    To be fair, the Porsche has more going for it than a badge.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    YraggarY wrote: »
    • Budget of €13,000 or less - have enough set by for tax and insurance for the year.
    • I'm only 23, so 'older gent' cars are out! :pac:

    have you gotten a quote from anyone for either of the cars you want? what category is a boxter?

    edit; whats the tax going to be? 400/500? insurance i would say wont be less then 2K probably closer to 3k? so you actually have around 10K to get the car. maybe im being pessimistic but i dont think so


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭alanmc


    Matt Simis wrote: »
    +1 To everything above! To me the Boxster is an awful place to be stuck in driving a commute. Its a fun weekend car.

    @OP, Id very much recommend the Boxster S if you must get a Boxter, though finding one in Auto might be harder. The standard Boxster is, IMO, a bit of an everyman+ car with a Porsche badge. The S is geninely Porsche'y. The Crossfire just doesnt even bear discussion!

    Saying all that, I agree 350z is a better choice.

    Having treated myself to a 350Z there a few months back, I couldn't give you any reason not to consider buying one.

    It's as happy wafting along on a motorway as it is in the twisty N/R roads. It's also quite a happy car in traffic. That surprised me actually.

    The interior is a little drab, but it all pales into insignificance.

    As you can tell, I'm smitten with my 350Z.

    The only foibles:
    • Tax is high
    • Fuel consumption is mid to low 20's
    • Gearbox feels a little notchy when cold (I'm told this is normal enough)
    • Interior is a little drab (as stated earlier)
    • It doesn't work at all on snow :eek:

    Edit: They do come in Autos.
    But I just re-read your post. At 23 trying to get insurance on a 3.5l V6 is going be expensive if not very difficult.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    Mr.David wrote: »
    Is there no possibility to get your manual licence?

    A Porsche boxster auto is wrong and the 'box is poor.

    I could go for it, but I'm not entirely sure I'd want to drive a manual at this stage. I remember way back when I took my first driving lessons in a manual Focus, they went fine, it was all easy enough, but then I bought my current car (which is an auto) and just got so used to it that I decided to take the test in that. I also do a lot of city driving at peak times so an auto would just be handier for myself! :) Is the auto box noticeably bad in the Boxster?
    Matt Simis wrote: »
    +1 To everything above! To me the Boxster is an awful place to be stuck in driving a commute. Its a fun weekend car.

    @OP, Id very much recommend the Boxster S if you must get a Boxter, though finding one in Auto might be harder. The standard Boxster is, IMO, a bit of an everyman+ car with a Porsche badge. The S is geninely Porsche'y. The Crossfire just doesnt even bear discussion!

    Saying all that, I agree 350z is a better choice.

    As you say, the Boxster S in auto would be a hard one to find; I'd probably end up having to bring one in from the UK if I went with that option, and then I'd have the VRT etc. which, despite the possible savings on the car itself, would probably be higher on a Boxster S because of the spec? I could be wrong on that one though? What you say there about the Boxster being a bit of an everyman's car with a Porsche badge, that was my initial reservation about it too - how it would measure up to the idea of a Porsche. Have you had one yourself Matt? :)
    PeakOutput wrote: »
    have you gotten a quote from anyone for either of the cars you want? what category is a boxter?

    edit; whats the tax going to be? 400/500? insurance i would say wont be less then 2K probably closer to 3k? so you actually have around 10K to get the car. maybe im being pessimistic but i dont think so

    Insurance on the Boxster comes in at €3,100 fully comp, and the Crossfire comes in at €3,900 fully comp, or €2,500 3rd party F & T. I'd much prefer fully comp insurance and these costs will certainly factor in to my overall decision.

    Tax on the Boxster is €1,164; on the Crossfire its €1,566, and as I said in my OP I've factored all those variants of insurance and the tax into my costs and am left with €13K to spend, maybe €13,500 at a push.

    So its doable, but it really does tighten the options that I have.

    Thanks for the input though, appreciate everyone's comments!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭EPM


    20-25k miles in the Boxster will probably mean 2 sets of tires, 2 services, pads maybe...I think you'd be mad but if your mileage is going to be lower it could be do-able...there's a lot of 840's on carzone that would come in way under budget. Would that be a possibility? Not a full fat 850 but not bad...the savings on purchase price might be a good thing...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭jimbling


    Personally I think you should drop your budget a little bit. You seem to be cutting running costs pretty tight, it's not worth the trouble. Especially in the current climate where you can get great deals. Try get something around the 10k mark.

    Saying that, some of the links below are way above that :pac:

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Mazda/RX-8/---www.N/200840190264585/advert?channel=CARS

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Mazda/RX-8/225-EXCL/201049200461290/advert?channel=CARS&featuredListingClickThru=true (This looks like a very good deal)

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Toyota/Celica/Auto-1.8/200951196255453/advert?channel=CARS
    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Toyota/MR2/Spyder-L/201019197949174/advert?channel=CARS
    http://www.carzone.ie/search/BMW/Z4/Z4-3.0I-/201044200115762/advert?channel=CARS


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    YraggarY wrote: »
    I could be wrong on that one though? What you say there about the Boxster being a bit of an everyman's car with a Porsche badge, that was my initial reservation about it too - how it would measure up to the idea of a Porsche. Have you had one yourself Matt? :)
    In fairness I only had a Boxster S (and didnt drove a standard) but to strip it of the bits that make it the S over the standard 2.7 would to me be a step too far, it would be very toned down. I remember seeing a promo video of people in their late 50s who always wanted a Porsche romancing about the great Porsche experience it (std model) delivers.. Not to sound like an ageist prick, but you are 23 and they are 55+, expectations are presumably very different.

    I prefer torquey big engines and the Boxster S, despite being a 3.2 6pot does not deliver on torque or noise at all. It handled great, though not mind-numbingly great IMO. The 350z handles much better than one would suspect, sounds better, and is torquy'er. It would still likely be outhandled by a Boxster (S), but there isnt much in it.

    On the flip side, the MPG on the Boxster was strangely good on the motorway (34mpg), but it is featherweight. Dont get me wrong, it was lots of fun, but I just cannot see it as an all round car.

    What attracted you to these two models to begin with?
    EPM wrote: »
    ...there's a lot of 840's on carzone that would come in way under budget. Would that be a possibility? Not a full fat 850 but not bad...the savings on purchase price might be a good thing...
    Might be hard to get insured on a 4.4litre V8 though. Its not as sporty as the other options, but at the end of the day is a 1.8ton V8 powered autobahn crusher, it has its own charms. Unfortunately the cheaper ones are early '90s which may be a mixed bag maintenance and reliability wise.
    IMO the 8series is a wrencher or rich mans car.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    YraggarY wrote: »
    I could go for it, but I'm not entirely sure I'd want to drive a manual at this stage. I remember way back when I took my first driving lessons in a manual Focus, they went fine, it was all easy enough, but then I bought my current car (which is an auto) and just got so used to it that I decided to take the test in that. I also do a lot of city driving at peak times so an auto would just be handier for myself! :) Is the auto box noticeably bad in the Boxster?



    As you say, the Boxster S in auto would be a hard one to find; I'd probably end up having to bring one in from the UK if I went with that option, and then I'd have the VRT etc. which, despite the possible savings on the car itself, would probably be higher on a Boxster S because of the spec? I could be wrong on that one though? What you say there about the Boxster being a bit of an everyman's car with a Porsche badge, that was my initial reservation about it too - how it would measure up to the idea of a Porsche. Have you had one yourself Matt? :)



    Insurance on the Boxster comes in at €3,100 fully comp, and the Crossfire comes in at €3,900 fully comp, or €2,500 3rd party F & T. I'd much prefer fully comp insurance and these costs will certainly factor in to my overall decision.

    Tax on the Boxster is €1,164; on the Crossfire its €1,566, and as I said in my OP I've factored all those variants of insurance and the tax into my costs and am left with €13K to spend, maybe €13,500 at a push.

    So its doable, but it really does tighten the options that I have.

    Thanks for the input though, appreciate everyone's comments!

    ah ok if 13k is whats left after insurance and tax thats fair enough i thought you meant you had to take it out of the 13,nvm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    alanmc wrote: »
    Having treated myself to a 350Z there a few months back, I couldn't give you any reason not to consider buying one.

    It's as happy wafting along on a motorway as it is in the twisty N/R roads. It's also quite a happy car in traffic. That surprised me actually.

    The interior is a little drab, but it all pales into insignificance.

    As you can tell, I'm smitten with my 350Z.

    The only foibles:
    • Tax is high
    • Fuel consumption is mid to low 20's
    • Gearbox feels a little notchy when cold (I'm told this is normal enough)
    • Interior is a little drab (as stated earlier)
    • It doesn't work at all on snow :eek:

    Edit: They do come in Autos.
    But I just re-read your post. At 23 trying to get insurance on a 3.5l V6 is going be expensive if not very difficult.

    You certainly do sell it very well, I'll give you that much! :D

    Tax is going to be relatively high whatever way I go with this, whether it's the Boxster, the Crossfire, or indeed the 350Z / 350 GT, although as you rightly mention, insurance may be the dealbreaker on that. I can imagine calling up an insurance company, giving them mine and the car's details, and listening to them laughing down the phone at me for 20 minutes! :mad:
    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    A Manual Boxster will do return 32-34mpg on a Motorways, the autos about 20-25% less. Alot of what you hear about Boxsters is from so called experts who have barely even seen one let alone driven one. The auto box while not brilliant is still ok, I drove a auto one around a track and it was fine. I find the interior is ok but looks better in some colours than others.

    Fuel costs shouldn't be too much of a problem as I'll be moving closer to where my work is based, so the long commute won't be tearing into my petrol. That being said, there's also the city driving with traffic, so I'll have to factor that one in. Thanks for throwing that in there.

    As for the 'experts', I find that's nearly always the way, regardless of the car in question!
    Interior colours don't really bother me all that much, I'm happy enough with black / grey / tan / red, anything at all really! It'll certainly be a step-up from my current interior! :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 374 ✭✭STForSale


    How's about an Alfa GT selespeed, drove one the day after the boxster and actually preferred it, granted it was 5 years newer. Would have bought it too but for a low ball on my trade in.

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/2004-Alfa-Romeo-GT-Coupe-2-0-JTS-SELESPEED-AUTO-/180585822607?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item2a0bc0f98f


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    I'm not up on my porsches but assuming you buy one with a history and lowish miles €1,000 a year should cover servicing but then again if something major fails you could be looking at a lot more.

    If you do go look at such cars try and get someone who knows them to go too.
    Sorry, but on 25k miles a year, unless you're servicing it yourself, that's not enough. And as someone pointed out, you haven't included consumables yet (2 sets of tyres).
    Anan1 wrote: »
    I recently sold a 1986 911 Carrera and, no, a Boxster won't be like that. How about a 964 tiptronic? You may struggle to find one within budget but it'll be a good compromise and a solid one shouldn't depreciate too much. Way cooler than either of the two cars you mentioned too.;)
    LOL - if you think Boxster is expensive to service, wait 'til you do big miles in a 964..........any Porsche person would admit that the 964 is the most labour intensive car to service - twice what a Boxster is. Ignoring all else, that surely is out of OP's budget........isn't it ? And the Boxster would be lighter on juice.
    YraggarY wrote: »
    They're just plain and simply beautiful cars aren't they? I'm half thinking about relentlessly saving for a 911 Turbo (996) and just carrying on my Porsche dreams from there! A tiptronic 964 would be the bees-knees, but I don't know if I actually would be able to find one even remotely within budget. €13K is pretty much my max for upfront buying, an extra €500 even would be pushing the limit. Don't think I'd find one, but worth a search!
    At those number's, you're nowhere hear 911 running costs.
    Mr.David wrote: »
    Is there no possibility to get your manual licence?

    A Porsche boxster auto is wrong and the 'box is poor.
    If OP doesn't want to re-sit his test, then answer to former is a 'no'.
    As for the latter - nonsense comment. Porsche invented the Tiptronic, and my Tip 968 has 165k miles on it - I find it infinitely a nicer car than the 6-speed manual one I have as well. So much so, in fact, I haven't used the manual in a year. The Tip auto/sequential manual concept is now The standard format gearbox in any premium sports car now, and with the advent of double-clutch technology is both faster, quicker, and less maintenance, as well downright civil to drive. I've driven a Boxster S 3.2 and whilst my box is a mere 4-speed, the Boxster one is a peach. I can only assume the newer PDK 7-speeder's are mind blowing.

    I spent a day driving around Mondello in an R8 with Audi's version of it, and it's gobsmacking.
    jimbling wrote: »
    Personally I think you should drop your budget a little bit. You seem to be cutting running costs pretty tight, it's not worth the trouble. Especially in the current climate where you can get great deals. Try get something around the 10k mark.
    Tbh, if you broaden your horizon's age wise, you'll get an equally good Boxster down under 10k these days. Who cares about the no plate ?

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    EPM wrote: »
    20-25k miles in the Boxster will probably mean 2 sets of tires, 2 services, pads maybe...I think you'd be mad but if your mileage is going to be lower it could be do-able...there's a lot of 840's on carzone that would come in way under budget. Would that be a possibility? Not a full fat 850 but not bad...the savings on purchase price might be a good thing...

    Hmmm, mileage will almost certainly be lower, but still even the thought of 2 services, tyres and pads has me doubting whether I could justifiably afford it.
    Could possibly work out too expensive there, but it all comes down to whether I can justify the expense - whether the experience of owning and driving that particular car would be worth it..

    I usually do all my own servicing etc., myself, although I suppose there are the necessary routine servicing checks that'll have to be done by somebody who really knows what they're doing.
    A friend of the family runs a small independent garage, dealing with a lot of newer high-end cars (Mercs, BMWs etc.), he might be able to service it at cheap labour, but I suppose OEM parts would be the main expense there eh?

    If push came to shove I'd really rather something like the Crossfire over the 840. Not entirely sure what it is, I mean I DO like them, but there's just a little niggle in my mind. And when it comes to buying a car that you hope to keep for some time, those niggles really eat away when you've already signed the dotted line, you know that kind of way?
    jimbling wrote: »
    Personally I think you should drop your budget a little bit. You seem to be cutting running costs pretty tight, it's not worth the trouble. Especially in the current climate where you can get great deals. Try get something around the 10k mark.

    Saying that, some of the links below are way above that :pac:

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Mazda/RX-8/---www.N/200840190264585/advert?channel=CARS

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Mazda/RX-8/225-EXCL/201049200461290/advert?channel=CARS&featuredListingClickThru=true (This looks like a very good deal)

    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Toyota/Celica/Auto-1.8/200951196255453/advert?channel=CARS
    http://www.carzone.ie/search/Toyota/MR2/Spyder-L/201019197949174/advert?channel=CARS
    http://www.carzone.ie/search/BMW/Z4/Z4-3.0I-/201044200115762/advert?channel=CARS

    Oh there will be money for running costs throughout the year, but it'll come at the expense of the money I'm putting into various other things which is really something I'd rather avoid having to do. On the other hand though, a good, nice car that I'm going to really enjoy is quite valuable to me, so the right car may be worth the trade-off!

    Thanks for taking the time to search for those; I'd spotted that MR2-S before and quite liked the styling of it, but again, I've been driving a Toyota for long enough that I'm in the mood for a change. Never really been a fan of the Celica either, too similar (aesthetically) imo to the Hyundai Coupé. Mazda's don't give me that funny feeling like the thoughts of the Porsche or Crossfire do either, but your suggestions and advice are much appreciated! :)
    Matt Simis wrote: »
    ... expectations are presumably very different.

    I prefer torquey big engines and the Boxster S, despite being a 3.2 6pot does not deliver on torque or noise at all.

    On the flip side, the MPG on the Boxster was strangely good on the motorway (34mpg), but it is featherweight. Dont get me wrong, it was lots of fun, but I just cannot see it as an all round car.

    What attracted you to these two models to begin with?

    I completely understand what you mean about differing expectations within varying age groups!

    As for the torque / noise, that is a little disappointing to hear alright. Would've expected it to have quite the purr.

    Not entirely sure what attracted me to the Boxster and the Crossfire; I guess the affordability of both within my budget, whilst also being aesthetically pleasing and somewhat out of the ordinary, in line with my current car. I just couldn't go to something like a Focus or an A4, styling-wise. It seems to have been one of those things where you lay your eyes on the car and think 'That's the one for me!'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,815 ✭✭✭✭Anan1


    galwaytt wrote: »
    LOL - if you think Boxster is expensive to service, wait 'til you do big miles in a 964..........any Porsche person would admit that the 964 is the most labour intensive car to service - twice what a Boxster is. Ignoring all else, that surely is out of OP's budget........isn't it ? And the Boxster would be lighter on juice.
    True - I posted that before the OP posted that they were doing 25k miles pa!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    YraggarY wrote: »
    . I just couldn't go to something like a Focus or an A4, styling-wise. It seems to have been one of those things where you lay your eyes on the car and think 'That's the one for me!'

    Just to be clear, Im not in anyway advocating a "normal car purchase" over your choices! And I havent had a car less than 300bhp in about 5years apart from the Boxster S, so my perspective is a bit warped anyhow.

    You should drive a Boxster anyhow and see what you think yourself. Also try and get a go in a 350z.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    YraggarY wrote: »
    Hmmm, mileage will almost certainly be lower, but still even the thought of 2 services, tyres and pads has me doubting whether I could justifiably afford it.
    Could possibly work out too expensive there, but it all comes down to whether I can justify the expense - whether the experience of owning and driving that particular car would be worth it..

    I usually do all my own servicing etc., myself, although I suppose there are the necessary routine servicing checks that'll have to be done by somebody who really knows what they're doing.
    A friend of the family runs a small independent garage, dealing with a lot of newer high-end cars (Mercs, BMWs etc.), he might be able to service it at cheap labour, but I suppose OEM parts would be the main expense there eh?

    Actually, that's the beauty of it - the Boxster is such big seller, there's load's of parts available at reasonable prices for it. The likes of brakes, shocks etc are all widely available from a number of places, and they're quite reasonable. Discs are only € 87 each (Pagid), pads are €67 a set of 4. Plugs (€5), oils, filters (€15 - €30) are all the same, price-wise, as any VAG, tbh.

    And, as you're looking at a Tiptronic - you don't need to know how much a clutch kit is!! :D...........but if you did, it's only €410 for a whole kit anyway. Lot's of 'ordinary' cars cost a lot more, tbh.......

    But, and here's the but: it's popularity has meant there's a lot of drive-and-forget owners out there, so you do need to buy a good one. Do that, and you can't go too far wrong, and there's loads of help around.

    It's eminently as usable as an everyday car, tbh.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭Mr.David


    galwaytt wrote: »


    If OP doesn't want to re-sit his test, then answer to former is a 'no'.
    As for the latter - nonsense comment. Porsche invented the Tiptronic, and my Tip 968 has 165k miles on it - I find it infinitely a nicer car than the 6-speed manual one I have as well. So much so, in fact, I haven't used the manual in a year. The Tip auto/sequential manual concept is now The standard format gearbox in any premium sports car now, and with the advent of double-clutch technology is both faster, quicker, and less maintenance, as well downright civil to drive. I've driven a Boxster S 3.2 and whilst my box is a mere 4-speed, the Boxster one is a peach. I can only assume the newer PDK 7-speeder's are mind blowing.

    1. Thank you for stating the obvious re manual licence - obviously if the OP wont re-do his test then its not a possibility.

    2. They may have invented the tiptronic, but that doesnt make it any good. The newer ones (last 3 yrs ish) are good but I find the older ones crap. And it doesnt suit the car either. Plus the added complexity, reduced fuel economy and higher repair bills if something goes wrong. Manual all the way on an old Boxster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭SouperComputer


    I don't mean to pi$$ on the OPs chips, but I think you might have the cart before the horse. If you haven't already, start calling around insurance companies and get quotes.

    Tiptronic is meh IMO. I have it (well same principle "geartronic") on the S80. I nickname it "suggestive automatic" you can suggest a gear, that's about it. It's handy to be able to hold gears and whatnot, but at the end of the day its still a slushbox.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Tiptronic is meh IMO. I have it (well same principle "geartronic") on the S80. I nickname it "suggestive automatic" you can suggest a gear, that's about it. It's handy to be able to hold gears and whatnot, but at the end of the day its still a slushbox.

    Bear in mind this is effectively all the OP knows and can (legally) drive, so Tiptronic will seem like a good improvement over standard Autos.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,126 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    op the cossfire is 3.2L, if your paying top rate of tax, why not go all put for an m3 or similar?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,822 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    Mr.David wrote: »
    2. They may have invented the tiptronic, but that doesnt make it any good. The newer ones (last 3 yrs ish) are good but I find the older ones crap. And it doesnt suit the car either. Plus the added complexity, reduced fuel economy and higher repair bills if something goes wrong. Manual all the way on an old Boxster.

    I hear ya, as they say, but........

    Yes, an older one isn't as good as a newer one. But by buying a Boxster Tip he IS getting a newer one.

    And I'd disagree on the complexity thing, actually, and the cost, for the following reasons:
    1. No clutch, no DMF, nothing to adjust, only oil changes.
    2. Most people still 'hate' auto's, and in this market, autos are often cheaper to buy, for that reason
    3. Don't agree on the 'box cost, either. In the manuals, the boxes wear, fact. In the auto's, you can pick up a 'box for relative, peanuts. I bought a spare for my one for €750.........still waiting for the old one to give up, though......:D
    4. I don't agree about it not suiting the car, either btw.........but that's just me, maybe.
    5. Complexity ? Less complex imho.
    6. And another variable to consider: a lot of the auto's bought are not 'driven' or 'thrashed' like the manuals, and anecdotally are in better condition than a comparable age manual.

    Non-manual is the future. Heck, it's the present !

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,676 ✭✭✭ArphaRima


    If you need to do the maths to this extent I dont think you can afford a car in this class yet.

    Apart from the usual calculations on the predictable consumables -tax/insurance/tyres/servicing/fuel etc you need to think about the unforeseen issues. It's not a new car you're buying. A few moderate failures could put you out of action. Be 100% sure of the car's history. A fully stamped logbook should be a good indication for example. Far too many Irish people stretch for the brand, dont spec any extras, and then run them into the ground with barely an annual oil-change as a service.

    I'm not saying you shouldnt buy, but I would advise against. I think something like an S2000, Z4, etc is more likely realistic.
    They arent Porsches, but hey -get a 911 next time around.

    You're obviously into your cars. In the meantime why not man-up and get a "proper" licence! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    Sorry I'm only getting back to you all now, was swamped for most of the day!

    @ galwaytt

    Thanks for the prices and the advice there, much appreciated!

    I don't mean to pi$$ on the OPs chips, but I think you might have the cart before the horse. If you haven't already, start calling around insurance companies and get quotes.

    Tiptronic is meh IMO. I have it (well same principle "geartronic") on the S80. I nickname it "suggestive automatic" you can suggest a gear, that's about it. It's handy to be able to hold gears and whatnot, but at the end of the day its still a slushbox.

    PeakOutput also mentioned this; the insurance works out at €3,100 fully comp on the Boxster and €3,900 fully comp on the Crossfire, coming down about a grand on each if I go 3rd party F & T but I'd rather get fully comprehensive.
    (I do realise that my posts can be quitevery drawn out so I won't ask you to read through all of them! :P :pac: )

    The €13,000 is what I'll have to spend on the actual purchase of the car after taking both tax and insurance into consideration. Tip-tronic / general autobox is a requirement for me; manuals, in my opinion, are an optional part that you have the opportunity to make redundant - sort of like evolution removing our tails when we no longer had the need for them! Granted driving a manual makes you feel more 'in tune' with the car, but with the amount of city driving I'll be doing, combined with the Auto restriction on my licence, they're just not for me. Each to their own though! :)
    Idbatterim wrote: »
    op the cossfire is 3.2L, if your paying top rate of tax, why not go all put for an m3 or similar?

    As stated in my OP I'm not mad about a lot of BMW's styling - the M3 being 'a souped up 3 Series wearing a different suit' in the sea of 3 Series BMW's out there (I realise how sacreligious that sounds to M3 fans - I don't mean it that way it comes across! :P), and I want a more unusual looking car than a lot of what's on the road.
    Performance-wise the M3 is a machine and a half, but I also want the aesthetic value of an unusual looking car, as I'm currently driving a Toyota Sera and I guess it gives me that funny feeling knowing that I'm not very likely to bump into another car the exact same. Although I suppose the fact that there are so few Crossfire's on the roads must mean something eh! :pac:

    As for the Boxster, ever since I was very small I've wanted a Porsche. And now I have the opportunity to get one, albeit an entry-level model. Its just an innate draw I have to the Marque.. Call me crazy, but... :cool:

    Thanks for the suggestion though!
    fluffer wrote: »
    If you need to do the maths to this extent I dont think you can afford a car in this class yet.

    Apart from the usual calculations on the predictable consumables -tax/insurance/tyres/servicing/fuel etc you need to think about the unforeseen issues. It's not a new car you're buying. A few moderate failures could put you out of action. Be 100% sure of the car's history. A fully stamped logbook should be a good indication for example. Far too many Irish people stretch for the brand, dont spec any extras, and then run them into the ground with barely an annual oil-change as a service.

    I'm not saying you shouldnt buy, but I would advise against. I think something like an S2000, Z4, etc is more likely realistic.
    They arent Porsches, but hey -get a 911 next time around.

    You're obviously into your cars. In the meantime why not man-up and get a "proper" licence! ;)

    On the contrary! I come at it from the opposite viewpoint; I'm doing the maths to this extent so that I can afford a car in this class. :) From the suggestions and opinions given here I can get an idea of running costs, repair costs, servicing costs etc., so I can loosely plan where my income is going to go, and can have a 'kitty' for any potentially expensive repair bills. If worst comes to worst and fixing the car becomes completely economically unsound loony, then I can go back to something like I'm driving now and try again the next time I have the necessary cash.

    Money, to me, is simply a means by which one gets to experience certain things in this life that would otherwise be unattainable, be they material goods, cars, clothing etc., or trips to deserted islands, and the chance to climb a mountain. If you run out of money, sure it can seem bad, but its not the end of the world; you can always earn more of it. I realise the necessity of actually possessing it in order to get by in the system that we live in, but it isn't really that important in the grand scheme of things. People have made millions, lost millions, and built it all back up again, so running out of it is just a small stumbling block in one's pursuit of the various aforementioned experiences!
    WAY off-topic there, but just wanted to give you a bit of an insight into why I wouldn't have a problem putting money into something that I'm really going to enjoy. You only live once, eh!

    And yes, I know all too well the general Irish attitude to taking care of cars - I used to work in precision engineering; mates used to get me to service / fix various bits and pieces on their cars. I've seen some completely unnatural gunk come out of a sump on quite a few different cars! A shame really, because with the right care and attention, they'll nearly last forever. :(
    Another problem with the used car market here is that a huge chunk of Irish people don't keep receipts / service history, so its often hard to be 100% certain of the car's upkeep.

    Personally I keep the receipts even when I buy new oil and a new sump nut; its no guarantee to the buyer that they were actually ever used, but if the car is purring, with a clean engine bay and everything visually the way it should be, and you have receipts that complement the healthy state of the car, then its a better indicator that that car has had a good life than not having anything at all.

    S2000 is unfortunately a non-runner due to the lack of auto-box, and the Z4, whilst impressive and a potential option that I'm slowly coming round to considering.. I don't know.. it just isn't different enough for me. VERY sexy car though, I will admit that! :pac:

    "Man-up and get a 'proper' licence!" - from the amount of city driving I do, I'll be happy to be labeled as a sissy-driver for driving my auto. :pac: Total comfort! :P

    Appreciate taking the time to dole out the advice though, thanks very much!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    Don't like the crossfire.

    The Boxster I like, especially the S. Its a drivers car. Lovely to drive, but doesn't feel that quick as its so solid, and handles so well. The back can step out if your not used to it. Friend ran an S over the years, which I drove a bit. He had a surprising number of repairs on it over that time. His engine went at 20k which is a common enough failure of some Boxsters and regular 996's. His was covered under warranty.

    http://www.piperboxster.com/Engines-failure.htm

    Personally I wouldn't touch one unless I had money to pay for an extended warranty of some kind, or I had the money to pay for repairs and service it properly, even in a dealer, or specialist. Its more expensive to run than a regular car. IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭Vertakill


    That's a lot of money to be spending on insurance.

    I can understand paying that for your first car to get it comprehensively insured and so on, but to be paying that solely on a car that you'd just fancy buying.... I dunno.
    And the tax on top of that as well...

    If you had a full license to drive manuals, you'd be in s2000 territory and with 13k you'd get a mint one with probably money left over for tax/insurance.

    I was paying 1500 to 123.ie for fully comp on a 350z last year when I was 24.
    They wouldn't even entertain me this year (my insurance lapsed and I went for a new quote).

    I ended up with XSDirect for 1080 as a 25yo this year ... not ideal, but I'll be damned if I'm paying over 3k (like others quoted me recently) for fully comp.. it's just too much.

    If my car was worth 20k+, I might consider paying that sort of money for insurance. But to be paying 3800 on a car worth 13k is madness - to me anyway.


    I'd also vote against that 2.7 Boxster... I thought the 3.2 S was a step in the right direction after driving it, but ultimately, I'd prefer the 350Z... so I really wouldn't vote for a 2.7 Boxster. And the Crossfire.... no thanks.

    I'd also vote for getting a manual license and opening up your options. 13k's a lot of money to be spending and I wouldn't pigeon-hole myself by limiting my options to only autos. An S2000 is a great shout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭YraggarY


    Vertakill wrote: »
    That's a lot of money to be spending on insurance.

    I can understand paying that for your first car to get it comprehensively insured and so on, but to be paying that solely on a car that you'd just fancy buying.... I dunno.
    And the tax on top of that as well...

    If you had a full license to drive manuals, you'd be in s2000 territory and with 13k you'd get a mint one with probably money left over for tax/insurance.

    I was paying 1500 to 123.ie for fully comp on a 350z last year when I was 24.
    They wouldn't even entertain me this year (my insurance lapsed and I went for a new quote).

    I ended up with XSDirect for 1080 as a 25yo this year ... not ideal, but I'll be damned if I'm paying over 3k (like others quoted me recently) for fully comp.. it's just too much.

    If my car was worth 20k+, I might consider paying that sort of money for insurance. But to be paying 3800 on a car worth 13k is madness - to me anyway.


    I'd also vote against that 2.7 Boxster... I thought the 3.2 S was a step in the right direction after driving it, but ultimately, I'd prefer the 350Z... so I really wouldn't vote for a 2.7 Boxster. And the Crossfire.... no thanks.

    I'd also vote for getting a manual license and opening up your options. 13k's a lot of money to be spending and I wouldn't pigeon-hole myself by limiting my options to only autos. An S2000 is a great shout.

    Hi Vertakill,

    Thanks for your input!
    The tax and insurance I don't really mind paying if I'm REALLY going to enjoy the car. I work very hard at my job, put in the long hours etc. (like a lot of people, of course), so I'd like to treat myself to a nice machine (and to the peace of mind that I'm not going to be left stranded when something blows up in my current one! :pac:)

    I know that a manual license would open up my options a fair bit but I'm used to the Go-Kart now :P and am happy enough with the options that an auto-restriction throws at me.
    To be honest (and this may be a tad sacreligious!) I'm not a huge fan of the S2000's styling. I mean don't get me wrong, I fully appreciate the beauty of it's mechanics, but something about it just doesn't appeal to my own taste and I don't think its a car that I'd be pushed getting a manual license for, but thanks for the suggestion all the same! :)

    I'm used to high insurance, the Sera cost me €4,000 to buy and my first year of insurance was about €3,500 (on a 1.5L car.)
    Obviously its come down a lot but I'm also earning a good deal more than I was back then, so I can afford it these days.

    Yeah, the general consensus seems to be against the 2.7L Boxster and to go with the 3.2L 'S' version instead. How did you find it on acceleration, handling etc.?
    350Z's styling doesn't really do much for me either, though again, it's a beautiful car in its own right!

    Thanks a lot for the input, appreciate it!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement