First Movember for the gents now Fanuary for the ladies

Nevermind_

http://www.mycitybynight.co.za/first-movember-now-fanuarie/

I dunno MOST women I know couldnt grow decent tache, or am I missing something??

alwaysadub

Jaysus.
Think i'd prefere to donate money to Movember!. It'd be against the charter of boards for me to put up pics of my progress if i ever was mad enough to take part anyway:D

KeithM89_old

Hmmmmm - some of the ladies iv known have gone a lot longer than a month without shaving... A LOT longer....:)

phasers

Gross.

Feckfox

phasers wrote: »

Gross.

Bit harsh.

Mrmoe

Tasches
Hairy boxes
Ireland: sick man of Europe
High unemployment
Banking upheaval
Threats of IMF intervention
Incompetent politcal leaders
High emmigration
KerryKIlkenny denied 5 in a row
Holland lose another world cup final

1970's here we come again.:eek:

orourkeda

Baldy fannies are the way to go.

A bit of an aul fannicure is the way

Zemuppet

Mrmoe wrote: »

Tasches
Hairy boxes
Ireland: sick man of Europe
High unemployment
Banking upheaval
Threats of IMF intervention
Incompetent politcal leaders
High emmigration
KerryKIlkenny denied 5 in a row
Holland lose another world cup final

1970's here we come again.:eek:

Any chance of a rock revival in the charts? I think a new thin lizzy or Led Zep is needed badly.....and some afros

joe stodge

KeithM89 wrote: »

Hmmmmm - some of the ladies iv known have gone a lot longer than a month without shaving... A LOT longer....:)

like a stab wound in a gorilla???

Holybejaysus

This is all getting a bit silly now.....

Bramabull81

I hate picking hair out of my mouth and trying to cough up a stray one that gets caught down the back of the throat and then trying not to look obvious when im doing it. Keep them shaved!

FoxT

Umm, women getting rid of their moustaches isn't charity...it's civilisation. Damn!

bonerm

Mrmoe wrote: »

Tasches
Hairy boxes
Ireland: sick man of Europe
High unemployment
Banking upheaval
Threats of IMF intervention
Incompetent politcal leaders
High emmigration
KerryKIlkenny denied 5 in a row
Holland lose another world cup final

1970's here we come again.:eek:

Liverpool FC winning everyt ..... oh wait.

Conor108

Sure just put them both on in November and get it over with ffs

Movember and Muffvember

Crasp

most girls I know are hairy bitches (down there, like). Obv they groom the "usual" areas (legs, arms etc). So how prevalent is the baldy vage in Éire? Are we that Westernised or have we been left behind in this particular area (pun intended), as is my experience?

arybvtcw0eolkf

Crasp wrote: »

most girls I know are hairy bitches (down there, like). Obv they groom the "usual" areas (legs, arms etc). So how prevalent is the baldy vage in Éire? Are we that Westernised or have we been left behind in this particular area (pun intended), as is my experience?

In my experience the majority have either a completely shaved/wax pussy, or very tidy, you've just been unlucky.

Same goes for my male mates, most would trim at least (me included).. It feels cleaner and fresher, and more importantly it does increase sensitivity in the area.

Crasp

Josiah Spicy Grape wrote: »

In my experience the majority have either a completely shaved/wax pussy, or very tidy, you've just been unlucky.

Same goes for my male mates, most would trim at least (me included).. It feels cleaner and fresher, and more importantly it does increase sensitivity in the area.

Unlucky isn't the word mate :mad:

I trim myself too, no need for that much hair down there. I'd only be a hypocrite otherwise.

arybvtcw0eolkf

Crasp wrote: »

Unlucky isn't the word mate :mad:

Yup, I find it revolting tbh.

Darlughda

orourkeda wrote: »

Baldy fannies are the way to go.

Why?
Are you a paedophile? Only prebuscent females have no hair around the pubic area.

Josiah Spicy Grape wrote: »

In my experience the majority have either a completely shaved/wax pussy, or very tidy, you've just been unlucky..

No, you have been with women attempting to imitate pornstars. Unlucky is meeting a hot bloke with a really unimpressive penis.

Josiah Spicy Grape wrote: »

Yup, I find it revolting tbh.

Yeah, so finding a woman in her natural state is revolting? OK....would you prefer pre pubescent girls only???

By the way, I find a man with a small penis revolting, but hey, thats just the roulette of nature isn' it?

orourkeda

Darlughda wrote: »

Why?
Are you a paedophile? Only prebuscent females have no hair around the pubic area.

Theres these new things called razors or other devices whose purpose it is to remove fanny hair.

Caoimhín

I found myself in bed with a Scottish girl who had hairy tits!

dr.bollocko

Darlughda wrote: »

Why?
Are you a paedophile? Only prebuscent females have no hair around the pubic area.

To imply that a preference in terms of pubic hair makes somebody a paedophile is ridiculous.

orourkeda

Caoimhín wrote: »

I found myself in bed with a Scottish girl who had hairy tits!

giggidy.

was it just her diddies

Darlughda

dr.bollocko wrote: »

To imply that a preference in terms of pubic makes somebody a paedophile is ridiculous.

Actually its not.
Women have hair. In their armpits, on legs, on pubic areas etc.

For posters to describe this as 'revolting' just illustrates the idea that women should be hair free just like a pre-pubescent child.

That is what I meant. A man who wants a hair free pubic area is lusting after a paedophilic fantasy.

landsleaving

Caoimhín wrote: »

I found myself in bed with a Scottish girl who had hairy tits!

http://www.firstfoot.com/scotchmyth/macdhui.htm ??

Scary stuff :P

AgileMyth

Darlughda wrote: »

Why?
Are you a paedophile? Only prebuscent females have no hair around the pubic area.

No, you have been with women attempting to imitate pornstars. Unlucky is meeting a hot bloke with a really unimpressive penis.



Yeah, so finding a woman in her natural state is revolting? OK....would you prefer pre pubescent girls only???

By the way, I find a man with a small penis revolting, but hey, thats just the roulette of nature isn' it?

So someone who prefers a well groomed partner is a paedophile?

I shall borrow your stupid logic and assume that anyone who talks about a woman's 'natural state' is a dyke.

orourkeda

Darlughda wrote: »

Actually its not.
Women have hair. In their armpits, on legs, on pubic areas etc.

For posters to describe this as 'revolting' just illustrates the idea that women should be hair free just like a pre-pubescent child.

That is what I meant. A man who wants a hair free pubic area is lusting after a paedophilic fantasy.

You mention that women have hair on various body parts.

A simple question.

1) If a man finds it unattractive when a woman has hairy pits or legs does this make him a paedophile too?

Now I haven't mentioned that I find it revolting but I would find it more attractive a woman who isnt hairy. By the way I'm not a paedophile

alwaysadub

Darlughda wrote: »

Actually its not.
Women have hair. In their armpits, on legs, on pubic areas etc.

For posters to describe this as 'revolting' just illustrates the idea that women should be hair free just like a pre-pubescent child.

That is what I meant. A man who wants a hair free pubic area is lusting after a paedophilic fantasy.

Or maybe just doesn't want to get hairs in his mouth..

landsleaving

Darlughda wrote: »

Actually its not.
Women have hair. In their armpits, on legs, on pubic areas etc.

For posters to describe this as 'revolting' just illustrates the idea that women should be hair free just like a pre-pubescent child.

That is what I meant. A man who wants a hair free pubic area is lusting after a paedophilic fantasy.

I think that would be a slight generalisation on your part. I'm sure some men subconsciously have that very fantasy, but you said yourself, it's to imitate pornstars, so it could as easily be that which leads to the preference for no hair. Whether that originally comes from a paedophilic preference on the part of the porn industry is debatable.

There's also the simple change in social norm, it's expected that a woman will be shaved, I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just that men expect it, again probably more because of pornography than paedophilia.

Of course, it could also be that the increase in knowledge and removal of certain sexual taboos means people are more aware of, and expecting of, oral sex, and a large amount of hair is simply a logistical nightmare in that sense, so it's likely to be shaved, in both sexes.

Do you prefer a man to be shaved or trimmed? And would you be happy if I suggested your motivation, or that the majority of women's motivation for this, is based on a desire for sex witha pre-pubescent male?

It all just seems a bit reductionist to me.

OutlawPete

Darlughda wrote: »

A man who wants a hair free pubic area is lusting after a fantasy.

Are you serious?

So, do you also consider women who don't like men with facial hair to be indulging in a "paedophilic fantasy" too?

amacachi

Darlughda wrote: »

Actually its not.
Women have hair. In their armpits, on legs, on pubic areas etc.

For posters to describe this as 'revolting' just illustrates the idea that women should be hair free just like a pre-pubescent child.

That is what I meant. A man who wants a hair free pubic area is lusting after a paedophilic fantasy.

A lot of women would find the amount of body hair I have revolting, are they also paedophiles?