Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

911 CT, how many people?

13»

Comments

  • #62
    Brown Bomber
    Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Di0genes wrote: »
    Okay, your original claim was

    I'm not going to let you start making this about the Rothschild or anything else. where is your evidence that Bin Laden was a "former" CIA asset?

    Take care. Chat to you when your not so confrontational... Goodnight.


  • #63
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    My name is URL wrote: »
    Where's the evidence that he had no contact with the US..

    Thats really not how the world works. You don't get to claim Bin Laden was a CIA asset, (as BB has) and then demand that I go ahead and show that he wasn't a CIA asset.

    The onus of proof is on the person making the claim, not that person accused must proof their innocence.
    either by proxy or through a double agent? Do you honestly believe that the best intelligence agency in the world had absolutely no idea that Bin Laden had operatives in the US before the attacks took place?

    I think what is clear after the attack is that US intelligence agencies had plenty of intelligence, it's just it wasn't coordinated or organised.

    There's a thing in America it's called "monday morning quarterbacking", it's when a bunch of people get together and look at a game, and with the benefit of hindsight and with more information than was available, people speak with assumed authority what calls the coach or manager should have made.

    It's easy to look at the evidence and the intelligence after the attack, and be incredulous that they didn't spot the signs of the attack, with the benefit of hindsight


  • #64
    Di0genes
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Di0genes


    Brown Bomber wrote: »
    Take care. Chat to you when your not so confrontational... Goodnight.

    Thats two for two... No attempt to support your claims about quackwatch and no attempt to support your claim that Bin Laden was a CIA asset.


Advertisement