Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"Would an EU bailout be all that bad?" - the DEFINITIVE thread

  • 15-11-2010 3:32pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭


    Ok I've seen this question crop up (and asked it myself) in other threads about the current situation but it always gets brushed aside in the larger debate about what's actually happening now, so let's make this the definitive thread for it:

    Would an EU bailout be all that bad?

    My opinion: We're facing into €15bn cuts over the next 4 years anyway. Several people have already stated that if we were to go to the IMF, they wouldn't ask us to do anything differently to what we're already about to do.

    That's the IMF. What would the EU demand in exchange for a bailout? The obvious answer is corporation tax, but several comments I've seen suggest that they wouldn't want to do this as it would further hammer confidence and defeat the entire purpose of the bailout.

    So what sort of additional pain which we are not already talking about would be attached to getting a bailout from the EU fund?

    Would it really be any worse than what our government is planning to do on their own initiative?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    As long as our CT was untouched then I cannot see how it would be a bad thing. We'd still have to get our books in order and it would be a relatively stable and cheap loan source. The bond markets are very predatory and unforgiving - we can well do without the speculators putting us under pressure in an effort to make money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    I agree with jimmycrackcorm. We obviously need to tell them where to go with the corporation tax issue if they insist on that. We also need to ensure that the rate is low enough that we have a hope of extracting ourselves. The main point of the Morgan Kelly article was that if it is 5% such as was extended to Greece, then that is too high and default is inevitable. May as well default than accept a deal that simply puts off default for a couple of years while further damaging the economy.

    I think the key thing is that we don't assume that everything the EU does is for our benefit. They have core European economies to look after first and foremost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭✭later12


    I imagine the difference would be tax. By European standards, Ireland is a low tax jurisdiction. I imagine our tax rates would increase substantially to brng us up to par with mainland Europe. Personally, I don't fully buy your view that it wouldn't be in Europe's interest to touch Corporation Tax.

    At the moment Ireland is pretty much shot in the leg. all Europe wants is for us to be able to hobble along on our own, they don't expect us to be running sprints and doing backflips. So if corporation and other tax increases are how we suffer, then as long as we hobble along, so be it. If education and health take a further battering, it will be irish politicians who take the hit, not the Germans, so be it.
    The difference is that our own government currently consider the repercussions, and therefore are more likely to come up with ways to raise funds which 'spreads the pain' and is arguably fairer on society. This would not be a big concern of the the Europeans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    The problem with the country at the moment is that no matter the solution, the answer is Yes. It would be all that bad.

    It just depends on who it would be bad for.

    Some solutions are bad for all of us, where we end up paying a bunch of tax.
    Some solutions are bad for people who splurged on big houses in the boom, if they get repossessed.
    Some solutions are bad for people who have savings in a bank, if the government were to change to a new currency or include them in a default.
    Some solutions are bad for the public sector workers
    Some solutions are bad for the private sector workers
    etc


    My best guess is that most people don't want any of the solutions on offer...

    but...

    if they have to get stuck with one...

    That they'd rather it be fair than be one that effects them only

    It sucks that we are in this position at all.

    If people aren't angry or upset or very frustrated with this situation, they must be fairly lucky or not very well informed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    The only thing I'm fearful of is the corp tax being raised. The germans and the french (especially the french) will look out for themselves before us. Perhaps they'd use this as an opportunity to "steal" mncs off ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    I think we need to divide the solutions into two classes.

    The first class would include measures that help us sort out the deficit problem and start paying back debts. This might be raising certain taxes or lowering government spending of one sort or another.

    The second class (and this is what we need to be wary of, imo) are measures that don't help us pay back debts but are insisted upon as political the price for getting a bailout. Corporation tax might be one of these. A significant rise in corporation tax might drive out multinationals and Ireland, rather than raise more, would raise less revenue. However other European countries would benefit from greater inward investment due to the removal of Ireland's "unfair" corporation tax.

    [Edit. Basically what RichardAnd says]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,934 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    SkepticOne wrote: »
    I think we need to divide the solutions into two classes.

    The first class would include measures that help us sort out the deficit problem and start paying back debts. This might be raising certain taxes or lowering government spending of one sort or another.

    The second class (and this is what we need to be wary of, imo) are measures that don't help us pay back debts but are insisted upon as political the price for getting a bailout. Corporation tax might be one of these. A significant rise in corporation tax might drive out multinationals and Ireland, rather than raise more, would raise less revenue. However other European countries would benefit from greater inward investment due to the removal of Ireland's "unfair" corporation tax.

    [Edit. Basically what RichardAnd says]


    Exactly, it's the politics of Europe that will really hurt, more so than the necessary economic adjustments. We have to remember, during the boom we bragged to europe about out economic miracle so if now, we have to go to them for help you can be sure that they will take the opportunity to knock us down a few pegs.

    You see, europe isn't a family, if it were the french and germans would punish us in a way that a parent might punish a child. We'll be upset for a bit but after a while, we'll learn from it and be better off. No, the EU is a wild collection of radically different nations/people who have spend most of the last 1000 years at war for various reasons. The only change is that we now do our fighting over a table rather than a battle field but the end result is the same; we're all out for get what's best for ourselves.

    This may seem cynical but I do believe that the EU will not last for long as it currently stands. No state in Europe really gives a crap about anyone else so in short, Ireland is the only person watching Ireland's back. Sadly we're busy fighting with each other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 936 ✭✭✭Fentdog84


    RichardAnd wrote: »
    The only thing I'm fearful of is the corp tax being raised. The germans and the french (especially the french) will look out for themselves before us. Perhaps they'd use this as an opportunity to "steal" mncs off ireland.

    Sadly from our point of view the days us wise arse paddys pissing off the rest of Europe with our corporation tax et al will be over should the IMF come in.. they are obviously chomping at the bit to come and put us in our place..The latest actions from the govt are just a final desperate act to prevent this from happening because they also know their own massive salaries will certainly be when the IMF come in. All social and public services & pay will be cut to ribbons. I think overall the IMF coming in will be agood thing in the long term because it will fix our crazy spending habits bring this country back to reality in line with rest of Europe, but for you're average Joe who goes down to the pubs or shops to blow his money every week, its going to be a massive wake up call


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭dan_d


    RichardAnd wrote: »
    Exactly, it's the politics of Europe that will really hurt, more so than the necessary economic adjustments. We have to remember, during the boom we bragged to europe about out economic miracle so if now, we have to go to them for help you can be sure that they will take the opportunity to knock us down a few pegs.

    You see, europe isn't a family, if it were the french and germans would punish us in a way that a parent might punish a child. We'll be upset for a bit but after a while, we'll learn from it and be better off. No, the EU is a wild collection of radically different nations/people who have spend most of the last 1000 years at war for various reasons. The only change is that we now do our fighting over a table rather than a battle field but the end result is the same; we're all out for get what's best for ourselves.

    This may seem cynical but I do believe that the EU will not last for long as it currently stands. No state in Europe really gives a crap about anyone else so in short, Ireland is the only person watching Ireland's back. Sadly we're busy fighting with each other.

    The politics of Europe are already hurting. Why do you think Angela Merkel is being so incredibly vocal on the subject of bailouts lately?She's answerable to the German people, and therefore, is trying to protect her own political position and future. It's not from any great love towards the EU or it's banks. And the markets are running scared at her remarks, and the interest rates hiked up - and now look where we are. To be honest, this is just a fore-runner of what could happen should we allow ourselves to be "taken over" by the EU. We have no real idea of the issues in France and Germany that led to them voting in their current Governments or where their Governments stand with their electorate, therefore if they chose to protect their political images at home, at our expense, they will - and we will have no control at all over that. And the same goes for future European governments.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    A bailout wont make a difference unless we let some of the banks go and default on some of our debts/banking guarantee

    http://www.thepropertypin.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2281&p=374552&hilit=IMF+database#p374552

    It took 7 years for non performing loans to start killing banks in Japan.
    Deficit aside, arrears alone could bankrupt Ireland around 2013/14 (or earlier) because we are tied to the banks and paradoxically by reducing the deficit we make this problem worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    later10 wrote: »
    all Europe wants is for us to be able to hobble along on our own, they don't expect us to be running sprints and doing backflips. So if corporation and other tax increases are how we suffer, then as long as we hobble along, so be it.
    I think you underestimate how serious any interference in the CT would be for Ireland. It wouldn't be suffering, it would be the equivalent of expecting us to hobble along with a millstone tied to our feet after being nudged into the docks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    On a pretty basic level, why the should the Germans/French/EU be expected to pay for our screw ups?

    What would all the Moaning Michaels in Ireland be saying if the tables were turned and we were expected for bail out Portugal?
    I seem to recall a different attitude when we were supposed to stump up for Greece.

    Isn't it only fair that the Irish should get their house in order?
    Isn't it only fair that some type of responsible governance is forced upon this nation?, as thusfar we have been unable to do it ourselves - as our current predicament quite clearly proves.

    How did Greece end up in the mess they're in? Was it Lehmans? Nope. They cooked their own books.
    Do we laugh at the Greeks, scratch our heads in bemusement - what the feck did they expect?
    Well, the rest of Europe thinks the exact same thing when they look at us.

    I agree that raising the CTR is a death sentence.
    On the other hand, it speaks volumes that the only reason a MNC is attracted to the perfect timezone, English speaking, EU gateway that is Ireland is because of the CTR.
    What infrastructure do we have to offer them?
    Please don't tell me about the fabulous '3' dongle system:rolleyes:.

    Other countries can't use the CTR, so quite clearly they have something else to offer.

    America went into Japan & Germany at the end of WW2 and helped to rebuild & transform those countries.
    Perhaps Germany can now do the same for us?

    Perhaps they can help us finally eradicate the Gombeen-ism which is strangling the nation. As Amhran Nua has said plenty of times, first thing we need to change is the STV system, it needs to go.

    Most important thing is that this mess was made by the Irish and it's up to the Irish to clean it up.
    If other countries are actually prepared to help us - we should be grateful for that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,942 ✭✭✭20Cent


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    On a pretty basic level, why the should the Germans/French/EU be expected to pay for our screw ups?

    Because they lent money to bad investments, these investments didn't work out so tough. Thought that was what capitalism was supposed to be about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    The EU and specifically Germany have been paying for Ireland for 20 years.

    Screw the Corporation Tax, if multinational corporations want access to the EU, they can pay tax like everybody else.
    We've been subsidising their bloody ESB bill long enough.

    Funny to see pro-EU / pro-Lisbon posters get all tetchy once tax harmonisation edges ever closer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Fat_Fingers


    BluePlanet wrote: »
    The EU and specifically Germany have been paying for Ireland for 20 years.

    Screw the Corporation Tax, if multinational corporations want access to the EU, they can pay tax like everybody else.
    We've been subsidising their bloody ESB bill long enough.

    Funny to see pro-EU / pro-Lisbon posters get all tetchy once tax harmonisation edges ever closer.

    i could not find any more recent data for Foreign-owned MNCs in Ireland ... in 2006, 100,687 people were employed in FDI manufacturing companies, and 51,534 in FDI internationally traded services companies.
    This is without considering all the resulting jobs from supporting the above.

    Most have stated that low Corporation Tax is the only reason left to keep them in Ireland.
    I think if that is removed within 2-3 years all MNC's would be gone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 836 ✭✭✭rumour


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    On a pretty basic level, why the should the Germans/French/EU be expected to pay for our screw ups?

    What would all the Moaning Michaels in Ireland be saying if the tables were turned and we were expected for bail out Portugal?
    I seem to recall a different attitude when we were supposed to stump up for Greece.

    Isn't it only fair that the Irish should get their house in order?
    Isn't it only fair that some type of responsible governance is forced upon this nation?, as thusfar we have been unable to do it ourselves - as our current predicament quite clearly proves.

    How did Greece end up in the mess they're in? Was it Lehmans? Nope. They cooked their own books.
    Do we laugh at the Greeks, scratch our heads in bemusement - what the feck did they expect?
    Well, the rest of Europe thinks the exact same thing when they look at us.

    I agree that raising the CTR is a death sentence.
    On the other hand, it speaks volumes that the only reason a MNC is attracted to the perfect timezone, English speaking, EU gateway that is Ireland is because of the CTR.
    What infrastructure do we have to offer them?
    Please don't tell me about the fabulous '3' dongle system:rolleyes:.

    Other countries can't use the CTR, so quite clearly they have something else to offer.

    America went into Japan & Germany at the end of WW2 and helped to rebuild & transform those countries.
    Perhaps Germany can now do the same for us?

    Perhaps they can help us finally eradicate the Gombeen-ism which is strangling the nation. As Amhran Nua has said plenty of times, first thing we need to change is the STV system, it needs to go.

    Most important thing is that this mess was made by the Irish and it's up to the Irish to clean it up.
    If other countries are actually prepared to help us - we should be grateful for that.

    So we want the Marshall Plan not the Treaty of Versailles. Sounds like a good slogan to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,932 ✭✭✭hinault


    If a bailout ensured more direct control of Irelands internal economic policy, I would welcome it.

    Our policy makers here are guilty of economic treason IMO.
    ( we really do deserve better than the bunch of crooks/liars that we have representing us).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    RichardAnd wrote: »
    The only thing I'm fearful of is the corp tax being raised. The germans and the french (especially the french) will look out for themselves before us. Perhaps they'd use this as an opportunity to "steal" mncs off ireland.

    Steal .. ?

    By shuffling money through Ireland its possible to only pay an effective overseas tax rate of 2.4%.

    Alot of MNCs use Ireland as a base for tax reasons, nothing more. (Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Dell etc)

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/1022/1224281723468.html

    Irelands Income tax rate is low, simple as, the income tax rate and corporate tax rate will have to be raised to cover the gap.

    Angela Merkel is seeing a lot of pressure in Germany because people believe if a bailout is offered with no consequences then countries that are experiencing issues will run themselves into the ground to get the bailout.

    i.e. Get out of the hole by digging their way out.

    IMO any bailout should come with strings attached otherwise no lessons will be learnt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Steal .. ?

    By shuffling money through Ireland its possible to only pay an effective overseas tax rate of 2.4%.

    Interesting given our CT rate is 12.5% - what diference would be made at a higher rate? We're such a small economy ( the size of an average city in Europe ) that it's not the rate itself but the super-profits that piss off our EU partners.

    Alot of MNCs use Ireland as a base for tax reasons, nothing more. (Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Dell etc)

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/1022/1224281723468.html

    Irelands Income tax rate is low, simple as, the income tax rate and corporate tax rate will have to be raised to cover the gap.

    Angela Merkel is seeing a lot of pressure in Germany because people believe if a bailout is offered with no consequences then countries that are experiencing issues will run themselves into the ground to get the bailout.

    i.e. Get out of the hole by digging their way out.

    I wonder how elastic CT is - after all we need to be below our competitors but there might be a case to say that it could be raised perhaps a basis point.
    IMO any bailout should come with strings attached otherwise no lessons will be learnt.

    Yes in terms of fiscal prudence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 murphy93


    Sounds good to me. If we go for a bailout or help it might keep our politicans accountable. At present we are drifting and spending is not in check. The longer we leave it the more painfull it may become. We have all got used to the generous EU rebuilding Ireland and we deserve it.
    so what if we have to join the Greeks, Portudgese spainish etc. plenty in common.
    The Corrutpion and dodgy dealings might stop. though god only knows what are MEP s get up to.;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Steal .. ?

    By shuffling money through Ireland its possible to only pay an effective overseas tax rate of 2.4%.

    Alot of MNCs use Ireland as a base for tax reasons, nothing more. (Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Dell etc)

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/1022/1224281723468.html

    So what? The point is, they employ people. To hazard that would be DISASTROUS.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    This is without considering all the resulting jobs from supporting the above.
    Including, lest we forget, most of the public sector jobs paid for out of income taxes collected.
    Alot of MNCs use Ireland as a base for tax reasons, nothing more. (Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Dell etc)
    Google for example employs 1700 people and contributes I'd say the guts of €100 million euros annually to the exchequer. If we had a hundred more like them we could go a lot easier on the cuts. Unfortunately, if we had a hundred more like them we'd be one of the largest tax haven operations on earth, so it would be a lot harder to hold out against US and EU demands to push the CT upwards. The future lies in domestic industry of some sort.

    We have a lot of bright, talented, well educated people in Ireland, but then again so do most European countries. We need something special to make companies set up shop here. So we cut the corporation tax and make it in income taxes, employers contribution, etc instead. What we need, looking towards the future, are homegrown industries to use the same competitive advantage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    So what? The point is, they employ people. To hazard that would be DISASTROUS.

    The point is if your only benefit is a low rate of corporate tax and the country cannot pay its debt, then you can see why the Germans and French would be a little upset when they lose this revenue while still maintaining a good public infrastructure and then end up have to bail out Ireland anyway.

    Ireland should have used the low rate of corpo tax to attract business, not to keep it. All the while investing in infrastructure, encouring more knowledge workers into the country. Keep the Companys sweet but Ireland should not just be a gammy EU tax haven.

    The Transport Infrastructure in Ireland is seen as a joke.

    Ireland is not the only country with a Tax Incentive to get business in, the Netherlands for example has the 30% Ruling to bring in Foreign Knowledge.

    http://www.iamsterdam.com/en/living/official-matters/thirty-percent-ruling

    Taxation across the board compared to other Eurozone countrys is very low.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    The point is if your only benefit is a low rate of corporate tax and the country cannot pay its debt, then you can see why the Germans and French would be a little upset when they lose this revenue while still maintaining a good public infrastructure and then end up have to bail out Ireland anyway.
    If they ever want to see a bent cent of what they lend paid back though, they literally can't touch the corporation tax rate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    Google for example employs 1700 people and contributes I'd say the guts of €100 million euros annually to the exchequer. If we had a hundred more like them we could go a lot easier on the cuts. Unfortunately, if we had a hundred more like them we'd be one of the largest tax haven operations on earth, so it would be a lot harder to hold out against US and EU demands to push the CT upwards. The future lies in domestic industry of some sort.

    Did you read the Article I posted ?
    Google paid taxes of € 18.3 million in Ireland last year
    Google’s “income shifting” helped reduce its overseas tax rate to 2.4 per cent, the lowest of the top five US technology companies, according to regulatory filings in six countries.
    A Google spokeswoman said that the firm’s practices were “very similar to those at countless other global companies” operating across a wide range of industries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 399 ✭✭Bob_Latchford


    Its all in the details, thats why ireland should be wary of being bumped into an agreement. Labeling Ireland a problem and falling overthemselves to offer "help" should be taken with a pinch of salt.

    They are offering debt to pay debt that they themselves own. Its all self interest.

    If you owe the bank 500 thats your problem
    If you owe the bank 500m thats the banks problem
    If the banks owe institutions 100bn then its the inistitutions problem.

    Ireland needs a debt facility but it should not be punitive. The bond holders , lenders, ECB & UK need to take some of the burden.

    Defaulting is everyones problem not just Irelands as is being portrayed by Europe and media


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Did you read the Article I posted ?
    Google pays its 1700 employees a decent wage, and every one of them pays income taxes. The employer's PRSI contribution is likewise not counted as part of corporate tax take; between the two of those they probably surpass the CT income, and if you pile on the VAT from employee expenditure on top of that you get a very healthy annual payment into the exchequer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    Google pays its 1700 employees a decent wage, and every one of them pays income taxes. The employer's PRSI contribution is likewise not counted as part of corporate tax take; between the two of those they probably surpass the CT income, and if you pile on the VAT from employee expenditure on top of that you get a very healthy annual payment into the exchequer.

    Yes and there isn't enough to meet Government spending, can't you see that other European countries would see this as unfair ? Not only are they subsidising Irelands growth but their money into their tax purse also.

    Maybe we should just tell Germany "Arra lads .. can't pay back that pile of cash, how about we just get a load of Irish to go on Holidays there and then you'll get it back in VAT and Jobs serving Beer and Schnitzel"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭galway2007


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    Google pays its 1700 employees a decent wage, and every one of them pays income taxes. The employer's PRSI contribution is likewise not counted as part of corporate tax take; between the two of those they probably surpass the CT income, and if you pile on the VAT from employee expenditure on top of that you get a very healthy annual payment into the exchequer.
    Just heard a Uk guy on radio
    He said that if the UK was to go along with any bailout for Ireland there would have to be big changes to the Irish corporation Tax.

    He said as it stands the Irish are robbing the tax base in the uk and other countries by allowing companies to set up there head quarters here and we could not expect countries to bail us out while we are robbing there tax base.
    You have to be honest what he said is true and we can kiss our 12.5 rate goodbye.
    What the result will be, I would think more unemployed


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    galway2007 wrote: »
    Just heard a Uk guy on radio
    He said that if the UK was to go along with any bailout for Ireland there would have to be big changes to the Irish corporation Tax.

    He said as it stands the Irish are robbing the tax base in the uk and other countries by allowing companies to set up there head quarters here and we could not expect countries to bail us out while we are robbing there tax base.
    You have to be honest what he said is true and we can kiss our 12.5 rate goodbye.
    What the result will be, I would think more unemployed

    Surely if the CT rate is highered it only damages us economically - then how would we ever pay back our bailout debt?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Yes and there isn't enough to meet Government spending, can't you see that other European countries would see this as unfair ?
    If expenditure was at 2004 levels, we'd be breaking even right now, or close to, and we're cutting expenditure to that level. I don't recall the CT rate being any higher then. Also, I don't really care what they think is unfair, let them cut their own corporate tax rate. I'm not getting the confusion here - if the CT rate is raised, nobody will be seeing any of their money back this side of the twenty second century.
    galway2007 wrote: »
    He said as it stands the Irish are robbing the tax base in the uk and other countries by allowing companies to set up there head quarters here and we could not expect countries to bail us out while we are robbing there tax base.
    I'd expect them to say no less. ;)
    galway2007 wrote: »
    You have to be honest what he said is true and we can kiss our 12.5 rate goodbye.
    No, its not true, competition is not theft. If the UK or any other country wants to compete with Ireland they can just drop their own corporate tax rate, and the UK is living in cloud cuckoo land if they think they can dictate Irish tax law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    If expenditure was at 2004 levels, we'd be breaking even right now, or close to, and we're cutting expenditure to that level. I don't recall the CT rate being any higher then. Also, I don't really care what they think is unfair, let them cut their own corporate tax rate. I'm not getting the confusion here - if the CT rate is raised, nobody will be seeing any of their money back this side of the twenty second century.

    Expenditure is not at 2004 levels though is it ?
    Where is the money supposed to come from ? Do you expect other members of the EU to pay for Irelands problems that are self generated?
    I'd expect them to say no less. ;)

    No, its not true, competition is not theft. If the UK or any other country wants to compete with Ireland they can just drop their own corporate tax rate, and the UK is living in cloud cuckoo land if they think they can dictate Irish tax law.

    As one of the larger contributors to the Union they have a say as opposed to Ireland which is just a mountain of debt at the moment.

    Unfortunately I do not think Ireland will have much of a choice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    As one of the larger contributors to the Union they have a say as opposed to Ireland which is just a mountain of debt at the moment.

    Unfortunately I do not think Ireland will have much of a choice.


    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSKS_fPWJTl_5VF-DIgl7HtQmkAjMz1eyZ58rOrDO-7LFfVE3Ei


    Veto says no.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    Expenditure is not at 2004 levels though is it ?
    Er, how about the €15 billion in cuts coming down the pipe?
    Where is the money supposed to come from ? Do you expect other members of the EU to pay for Irelands problems that are self generated?
    Apparently we don't need other members of the EU to pay for Irelands problems at the moment. I'd support this by the way the guards, nurses, teachers and so on aren't getting IOUs in lieu of paycheques.
    As one of the larger contributors to the Union they have a say as opposed to Ireland which is just a mountain of debt at the moment.
    On the contrary, having been unable to achieve the fiscal goals required to join the euro, I'd say the UK is considerably less committed to the EU than Ireland.
    Unfortunately I do not think Ireland will have much of a choice.
    Thats an opinion alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Apparently we don't need other members of the EU to pay for Irelands problems at the moment. I'd support this by the way the guards, nurses, teachers and so on aren't getting IOUs in lieu of paycheques.

    Most of that money has been borrowed.

    If you look at the figures:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EU_net_budget_2007-2013_per_capita.png

    Taken from:
    http://www.openeurope.org.uk/research/budget07.pdf

    The United Kingdom is a net contributor
    Ireland is a net recipient.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSKS_fPWJTl_5VF-DIgl7HtQmkAjMz1eyZ58rOrDO-7LFfVE3Ei


    Veto says no.


    Not talking about a veto, politically they have a say.
    Look what happened when Angela Merkel spoke about the bonds last week.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭Amhran Nua


    The United Kingdom is a net contributor
    Ireland is a net recipient.
    One thing I do note is that Ireland is on the verge of becoming a net contributor. How long do you think it will take for that to happen if the corporation tax rate is adjusted upwards? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    At the end of the day, the books will have to be balanced, but its apparent that undercutting and driving out FDI from Ireland will not only make that much more difficult, but will in fact increase the overall burden on the EU. There's really no argument here. Once the books are balanced, and they will be, borrowing requirements drop drastically.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,208 ✭✭✭keithclancy


    Amhran Nua wrote: »
    One thing I do note is that Ireland is on the verge of becoming a net contributor. How long do you think it will take for that to happen if the corporation tax rate is adjusted upwards? Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    At the end of the day, the books will have to be balanced, but its apparent that undercutting and driving out FDI from Ireland will not only make that much more difficult, but will in fact increase the overall burden on the EU. There's really no argument here. Once the books are balanced, and they will be, borrowing requirements drop drastically.

    I'll put it this way, If the Netherlands has a Corporation tax rate of 25.5% and Ireland raised its rate to 20%, why would they up sticks and move to the Netherlands, or anywhere else for that matter ?

    Ireland needs to invest in its infrastructure and have long term incentives for companies to stay in the country, at the moment Ireland is being used as a Tax Bridge into the Union. In the IT Industry for example, most of the work is done abroad and then sold through Ireland to avoid high corporation tax.

    Microsoft - Development happens in Israel, sold via Ireland into the EU

    Apple - Devlopment Happens in the US, Products are Maufactured in Taiwan.

    Google - Majority of work is done in Switzerland, profits funneled through Ireland

    Dell - Money pushed through Ireland, Manufacturing moved to Lodz, Poland.

    My point is they do not need the Jobs in Ireland, they just need to move the money through Ireland to have a low Corporate tax rate for sales in the EU.

    Whats attractive to companies, depending on their industry is Good Transport and Infrastructure, a skilled workforce and a good quality of life for employees and employers, with an honest government running the show.

    Tax Breaks (and to a lesser extent Grants) add a SHORT term benefit, in the long term they only cripple the country as there is no money to invest in the infrastructure that keeps business there.

    I mean, by your argument, Germany should be a desolate wasteland with everyone unemployed, but its not.

    Long term development is the Key, Ireland is pretty young in economic terms and as a result grew too fast with borrowed money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,988 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    RichardAnd wrote: »
    Exactly, it's the politics of Europe that will really hurt, more so than the necessary economic adjustments. We have to remember, during the boom we bragged to europe about out economic miracle so if now, we have to go to them for help you can be sure that they will take the opportunity to knock us down a few pegs.

    You see, europe isn't a family, if it were the french and germans would punish us in a way that a parent might punish a child. We'll be upset for a bit but after a while, we'll learn from it and be better off. No, the EU is a wild collection of radically different nations/people who have spend most of the last 1000 years at war for various reasons. The only change is that we now do our fighting over a table rather than a battle field but the end result is the same; we're all out for get what's best for ourselves.

    This may seem cynical but I do believe that the EU will not last for long as it currently stands. No state in Europe really gives a crap about anyone else so in short, Ireland is the only person watching Ireland's back. Sadly we're busy fighting with each other.

    You've obviously forgotten the fact that we have never been net contributors to the EU in our time as members and we wont be either for the foreseeable.
    If they didnt give a crap about anyone I doubt that would be the case to be honest.


Advertisement