Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The 'Medium' test

  • 18-10-2010 7:58pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23


    I'm new to this forum so this has probably been suggested a hundred times but are ther any 'Mediums' on here that would be willing to meet up with a bunch of random Boards.ie members and prove that they can do what they claim to be able to do? (I would assume that anyone with such an amazing 'gift' would jump at the chance without feeling the need to charge for the privelege?) If it has been suggested before I'd be very interested to hear how it all panned out.......


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Its been done plenty of times. Go on a paranormal investigation and investigate


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    Grimes wrote: »
    Its been done plenty of times. Go on a paranormal investigation and investigate

    Well the purpose of my enquiry is to see if there are any mediums out there that are willing to prove themselves to the boards.ie skeptics like myself, If thats already been done I'd love to hear how it went, I've no desire to go on a paranormal invesigation, thats also been done to death with zero results. My girlfriend is a spiritual person, she has gone to a few well recomended mediums with friends and family members over the years and even she will admit that it was nothing more than a procedure churned out by these 'mediums' and she has spent a few quid doing it too, thats the thing that bugs me about it, they are basicaly fooling people into handing over their money, there is no regulation, no rules, no nothing, these people are basicaly thieves and their victims are the best kind of victims.....willing! so come on, man up and prove yourselves, no excuses, no smoke and mirrors! I'll bring the beer..............


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    Evenflow1 wrote: »
    Well the purpose of my enquiry is to see if there are any mediums out there that are willing to prove themselves to the boards.ie skeptics like myself, If thats already been done I'd love to hear how it went, I've no desire to go on a paranormal invesigation, thats also been done to death with zero results. My girlfriend is a spiritual person, she has gone to a few well recomended mediums with friends and family members over the years and even she will admit that it was nothing more than a procedure churned out by these 'mediums' and she has spent a few quid doing it too, thats the thing that bugs me about it, they are basicaly fooling people into handing over their money, there is no regulation, no rules, no nothing, these people are basicaly thieves and their victims are the best kind of victims.....willing! so come on, man up and prove yourselves, no excuses, no smoke and mirrors! I'll bring the beer..............

    I think you already have your mind made up about Mediums and no I,m not one. I have an open mind but I have seen some work, I suggest you go see Tony Stockwell next time he's in town and see what you think. Why do you feel Mediums would need or want to prove themselves to someone as negative as you are about what they do?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    The Muppet wrote: »
    I think you already have your mind made up about Mediums and no I,m not one. I have an open mind but I have seen some work, I suggest you go see Tony Stockwell next time he's in town and see what you think. Why do you feel Mediums would need or want to prove themselves to someone as negative as you are about what they do?

    If I'm being honest, you are right, I do have my mind made up but I truely believe that if they could prove me wrong, of course they would want to! and not only me but every other skeptic walking the earth, I know I would if i were in their shoes, the fact remains that they simply can't, don't get me wrong, I'm not expecting my mail inbox to be overflowing with mediums lining up to make an idiot out of me but thats not because they wouldn't want to, its simply because they can't, like I said though, I would wholeheartedly welcome the offer. With regards to Tony Stockwell whoever he is, paying to see a 'medium' type person would not sit well with me as i believe that they are all thieves without exception, some just better at it than others and i think its a disgrace that they are geting away with it un-checked, someone please prove me wrong!!!!!!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Should they need to? People are willing to give them money why do mediums feel that they should walk into a room full of people who despise them and attempt to prove people wrong? I wish I was a medium, id be minted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    Evenflow1 wrote: »
    If I'm being honest, you are right, I do have my mind made up but I truely believe that if they could prove me wrong, of course they would want to! and not only me but every other skeptic walking the earth, I know I would if i were in their shoes, the fact remains that they simply can't, don't get me wrong, I'm not expecting my mail inbox to be overflowing with mediums lining up to make an idiot out of me but thats not because they wouldn't want to, its simply because they can't, like I said though, I would wholeheartedly welcome the offer. With regards to Tony Stockwell whoever he is, paying to see a 'medium' type person would not sit well with me as i believe that they are all thieves without exception, some just better at it than others and i think its a disgrace that they are geting away with it un-checked, someone please prove me wrong!!!!!!!!!!

    On what basis have you formed the opinion that they are all fakes and thieves? Have you ever visited one ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭celtic1888


    Evenflow1 wrote: »
    Well the purpose of my enquiry is to see if there are any mediums out there that are willing to prove themselves to the boards.ie skeptics like myself, If thats already been done I'd love to hear how it went, I've no desire to go on a paranormal invesigation, thats also been done to death with zero results. My girlfriend is a spiritual person, she has gone to a few well recomended mediums with friends and family members over the years and even she will admit that it was nothing more than a procedure churned out by these 'mediums' and she has spent a few quid doing it too, thats the thing that bugs me about it, they are basicaly fooling people into handing over their money, there is no regulation, no rules, no nothing, these people are basicaly thieves and their victims are the best kind of victims.....willing! so come on, man up and prove yourselves, no excuses, no smoke and mirrors! I'll bring the beer..............

    ive never been to a medium and probably never will, the dead should be left well alone imo

    anyway, i was a sceptic with regards to psychics and went along to prove myself right 5 years ago, i was proved wrong & since have returned to the same fella i first went to and have continued to be proved wrong as the majority of what hes predicted has happened in the timeframes hes given (not vast timelines either, quite specific)

    anyway, ive also been to others and have found a lot of them to be chancers and/or just tarot readers with no "gift"

    theres no point in you coming on here and giving it the larry large one about people proving themselves to you from a message board, if you are that interested go to a renowned psychic and see for yourself, go to a cheap one though as some of them charge crazy money (i refuse to go to them ones)


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    I dont often nail my colours to the mast or volunteer information in this area, but I feel in this case I should.

    I am a practising spiritual medium. I do not charge money. In fact, I give of my free time to hold a spiritual circle, I make nothing from that. I have spent a lot of time and a hell of a lot of my own money training to do this, so that I understand what I do well enough not cheat or decieve anyone (myself included).

    I dont do this to score points or to prove to people how great I am at it. I do it to provide some kind of healing or ease to a person who is grieving. I am only ever as good as the last reading I have given. I am well aware of what a huge responsibility this is, and I do not take it lightly. To me, what I do is not a parlour trick, or entertainment. It is the serious business of grief and loss.

    I constantly doubt and question what I do. It keeps me realistic and grounded. Would I meet with a skeptic to try and connect for them? Of course. Most people are skeptical, thats healthy, I dont want an easy time of it, I just want it to work for them. Would I meet with a skeptic who does not need the connection, but only wants to prove to themselves what they already think? I dont know, I dont want to sit and take someone elses venom that I didnt earn.

    Im not sure if you understand the distinction between mediums and fortune tellers, or if you are lumping all together under the same banner. But understand that mediums contact the dead. They never predict. They do not use cards or props unless they also include psychic reading in what they do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    are the paranormal forums, the easy pickings on boards or what?

    How come so many people time and time again visit just to say 'someone prove me wrong!'? Are the mediums round here meant to be supplying free entertainment or something?


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    *I will not be moderating this thread, the other forum mods will*

    I dont mind people questioning and doubting. Its the air of superiority from skeptics that I find hard to take. The assumptions such as mediums are "all thieves without exception" that I find unacceptable.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    i have no qualms on people having their doubts of any kind whatsoever - most of us are sceptics after all. I just wish there were better suggestions than 'prove me wrong'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    Oryx wrote: »
    I dont often nail my colours to the mast or volunteer information in this area, but I feel in this case I should.

    I am a practising spiritual medium. I do not charge money. In fact, I give of my free time to hold a spiritual circle, I make nothing from that. I have spent a lot of time and a hell of a lot of my own money training to do this, so that I understand what I do well enough not cheat or decieve anyone (myself included).

    I dont do this to score points or to prove to people how great I am at it. I do it to provide some kind of healing or ease to a person who is grieving. I am only ever as good as the last reading I have given. I am well aware of what a huge responsibility this is, and I do not take it lightly. To me, what I do is not a parlour trick, or entertainment. It is the serious business of grief and loss.

    I constantly doubt and question what I do. It keeps me realistic and grounded. Would I meet with a skeptic to try and connect for them? Of course. Most people are skeptical, thats healthy, I dont want an easy time of it, I just want it to work for them. Would I meet with a skeptic who does not need the connection, but only wants to prove to themselves what they already think? I dont know, I dont want to sit and take someone elses venom that I didnt earn.

    Im not sure if you understand the distinction between mediums and fortune tellers, or if you are lumping all together under the same banner. But understand that mediums contact the dead. They never predict. They do not use cards or props unless they also include psychic reading in what they do.

    I don't mean to be bad even if it seems like I am because I'm genuinely not that type of person but I dont get the fuzzyness that surrounds this whole topic, there is absolutely no clarity! I'll put a question to you, its a straight enough question so I would assume that most people on here would think that it was reasonable to expect a straight enough answer so lets try it and see.......Is there and afterlife and if so, how could you show me that there is? because lets face it, thats what everybody wants to know right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    if there were mediums - and Im not one so I dont know - but how on earth ... if there are people who believe that they can communicate with people who have died ... how can they prove that to you? thats what gets me - I dont understand how a medium can actually prove something to a cynical person considering all the medium can do is tell you things.


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    I dont know the nature of the afterlife, obviously I think there is one. Some mediums think its just like this life, with buses and everything. I dont hold to that belief. :)

    All I know, and all I can ever try to do, is provide evidence of survival after death. So I tell you about the person you knew who has died, I try to give you evidence of them that I couldnt otherwise know, unless they are telling me. What they look like, personality, describe their house maybe, give names or dates sometimes. How they died, their age. Events from their life. Events from your life since they passed on. Its all such simple stuff, nothing extraordinary, no lottery numbers. Just the mundane things that make up a persons existence.

    Many see mediums work and think they parrot what is whispered in their ear or something, I wish it were that simple. Its like a complicated game of mental charades, to get the information.

    If I do convince you, then it allows the thought that the person must still exist somehow, in some kind of 'afterlife'. But Im not a religious zealot, and its not my job or concern, what you believe about such an afterlife.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Evenflow, have you ever walked into your parish church or local mosque and asked the same question to your neighbourhood priest/imaam? If you fancy it Ill do into one of these buildings with you and you can have a theological debate face to face with a spiritualist.

    But thats only if your really interested and not content with your internet musings but im looking forward to hear what your limited experience and understanding of the whole subject leads you to reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭fionav3


    celtic1888 wrote: »
    ive never been to a medium and probably never will, the dead should be left well alone imo

    anyway, i was a sceptic with regards to psychics and went along to prove myself right 5 years ago, i was proved wrong & since have returned to the same fella i first went to and have continued to be proved wrong as the majority of what hes predicted has happened in the timeframes hes given (not vast timelines either, quite specific)

    anyway, ive also been to others and have found a lot of them to be chancers and/or just tarot readers with no "gift"

    theres no point in you coming on here and giving it the larry large one about people proving themselves to you from a message board, if you are that interested go to a renowned psychic and see for yourself, go to a cheap one though as some of them charge crazy money (i refuse to go to them ones)

    Just out of sheer curiosity, would you mind telling us who he is?

    I'm a bit of a skeptic myself. I've been to psychics/mediums who seemed really genuine at the time (know details about me that there was no way in hell they could have known!) and some of the stuff they told me did happen. But the major thing they both told me did not happen and now part of me thinks they only tell us what they think we want to hear. Having said that, I would love to be proved wrong! But I don't think coming in and demanding one prove their abilities is quite the way to get people with 'gifts' to prove themselves. We all get performance anxiety (I can't type when someone is watching me for example!) so I'm guessing it'd be the same for anyone who really had a gift (again, I could be wrong).

    Personally, even though I don't believe, I would love to be proven wrong. Mad eh? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭celtic1888


    fionav3 wrote: »
    Just out of sheer curiosity, would you mind telling us who he is?

    I'm a bit of a skeptic myself. I've been to psychics/mediums who seemed really genuine at the time (know details about me that there was no way in hell they could have known!) and some of the stuff they told me did happen. But the major thing they both told me did not happen and now part of me thinks they only tell us what they think we want to hear. Having said that, I would love to be proved wrong! But I don't think coming in and demanding one prove their abilities is quite the way to get people with 'gifts' to prove themselves. We all get performance anxiety (I can't type when someone is watching me for example!) so I'm guessing it'd be the same for anyone who really had a gift (again, I could be wrong).

    Personally, even though I don't believe, I would love to be proven wrong. Mad eh? :rolleyes:

    Billy Martin in mullingar

    search for my posts and you can read my rantings about him and how a reading with him should be approached imo...hes the only one that has worked for me...

    im just your average bloke who has kept his experiences to this message board and told no one else out of embarrassment as im a bloke and its not something you sit in the pub telling the lads about:D im honest and not a mug and ive directly contradicted him before and been proven wrong....

    none of the others ive been to have convinced me that they have a gift, other then maybe eddie but he lets himself down on the future stuff and his sensationalism imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Major Lovechild


    I am now a qualified medium. Ask me anything.

    Wo ist die Gemütlichkeit?



  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    I am now a qualified medium. Ask me anything.
    That was quick.

    I have a much loved relative who has passed. Tell me his name and a significant memory I have of him. Now normally, it doesnt work quite like this, but you seem supremely confident.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Major Lovechild


    Oryx wrote: »
    That was quick.

    I have a much loved relative who has passed. Tell me his name and a significant memory I have of him. Now normally, it doesnt work quite like this, but you seem supremely confident.


    You have my deepest and sincerest sympathies.

    Sorry Oryx - I feel that I am unable to answer your questions as it would directly contravene the ethos of the present psychic community by offering substantive proof of my abilities or lack thereof.

    Wo ist die Gemütlichkeit?



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    You have my deepest and sincerest sympathies.

    Sorry Oryx - I feel that I am unable to answer your questions as it would directly contravene the ethos of the present psychic community by offering substantive proof of my abilities or lack thereof.
    You are in no way sincere and I reject your sympathies, as you come here purely to make a very insincere point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Major Lovechild


    Oryx wrote: »
    You are in no way sincere and I reject your sympathies, as you come here purely to make a very insincere point.

    My sympathies were sincere and I offer them once again.


    As for the rest of my comment? You asked for proof and I stood behind the established ethos of this forum.

    Wo ist die Gemütlichkeit?



  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    My sympathies were sincere and I offer them once again.


    As for the rest of my comment? You asked for proof and I stood behind the established ethos of this forum.
    You offered proof. Tongue in cheek, but I wanted to see where you were going with it.

    There is no established ethos for this forum. In the past, people have offered readings here. People still offer them privately from time to time, but you wouldnt know that. The hostility which sometimes is meted out to readers, along with the level of requests from people wanting readings, is what puts people off, not an ethos of refusing to give information.

    Your statement of now being a 'qualified' medium was a set up to make your point. The only thing it illustrates to me, is how limited your understanding is, both of this forum, and of mediumship itself. Your repeated offer of sympathy shows you do still completely miss the point. Mediumship is not a toy, or a game. It is something which deals with peoples deepest emotions, and it can be used to heal, or it can really hurt. You dont respect or understand that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Major Lovechild


    Can I be any less "qualified" than any other medium on here?
    Would I incur further wrath if I revealed myself to be a cold-reader?

    Your repeated offer of sympathy shows you do still completely miss the point.
    No. It shows that I have genuine compassion.

    Wo ist die Gemütlichkeit?



  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    Can I be any less "qualified" than any other medium on here?
    Would I incur further wrath if I revealed myself to be a cold-reader?
    I think that has already been established.

    There are such things as qualifications in mediumship, and a code of conduct. But I think you are completely unqualified, seeing as you arent one at all. And yes, as you are someone who has no knowledge and less experience of mediumship, then I can safely say you are less qualified than anyone here who has attempted to even understand it.


    No. It shows that I have genuine compassion.
    If you had, you wouldnt have made a fake offer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭Major Lovechild


    I think that has already been established.

    There are such things as qualifications in mediumship, and a code of conduct. But I think you are completely unqualified, seeing as you arent one at all. And yes, as someone who has no knowledge and less experience, then I can safely say you are less qualified than anyone here who has attempted to even understand mediumship.

    Well tell me more of these qualifications and code of conduct - let's see how they compare with mine.
    Please do not be tempted to presume too much.
    If you had, you wouldnt have made a fake offer.

    My condolences stand. I too, like everyone else, have lost someone close.
    I do not demean anyone's memory or grief by my standpoint on here and it is churlish of you to even suggest that I am attempting to do so.

    Wo ist die Gemütlichkeit?



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    Grimes wrote: »
    Evenflow, have you ever walked into your parish church or local mosque and asked the same question to your neighbourhood priest/imaam? If you fancy it Ill do into one of these buildings with you and you can have a theological debate face to face with a spiritualist.

    But thats only if your really interested and not content with your internet musings but im looking forward to hear what your limited experience and understanding of the whole subject leads you to reckon.

    Well no, I have never approached a priest or imaam with the question 'is there an afterlife and how can it be proved' but I was taught in a catholic school and even at quite a young age I did ask a brother who taught there a similar question and his answer was, of course there is an afterlife, heaven and hell, It was written in the bible and we must simply believe........Sorry but thats no kind of an answer! but thats besides the point anyway, i have never heard a priest claim that he can communicate with dead people (except jesus but apparently he's not dead at all, he's seated at the right hand side of the father lol) Mediums do claim this and they claim to have the means to prove it too, an astonishing claim in my eyes so I'd like to see that please!


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    Code of conduct (specific to the SNU)

    System of awards (qualifications)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭MrMojoRisin


    Oryx wrote: »
    I dont mind people questioning and doubting. Its the air of superiority from skeptics that I find hard to take. The assumptions such as mediums are "all thieves without exception" that I find unacceptable.

    +1


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭MrMojoRisin


    Well tell me more of these qualifications and code of conduct - let's see how they compare with mine.
    Please do not be tempted to presume too much.

    Lovechild, what are your qualifications and code of conduct in the area of mediumship? I presume the area you're referring to, in which you're qualified, is mediumship. Correct me if I'm wrong though..

    Curious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭MrMojoRisin


    Evenflow1 wrote: »
    I'm new to this forum so this has probably been suggested a hundred times but are ther any 'Mediums' on here that would be willing to meet up with a bunch of random Boards.ie members and prove that they can do what they claim to be able to do? (I would assume that anyone with such an amazing 'gift' would jump at the chance without feeling the need to charge for the privelege?) If it has been suggested before I'd be very interested to hear how it all panned out.......

    I think your grievance with mediums is more personal than you're letting on, or want to admit on here. As in, you went to someone before and you felt they trashed your feelings and screwed you over.

    Sometimes you need to experience the bad and the ugly to be able to separate the wheat from the chaff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 695 ✭✭✭yawha


    @Oryx

    Honest question: how susceptible do you think the human mind can be to playing tricks on itself, or convincing itself that something is true by performing some mental gymnastics, because the person really wants to believe it?

    I'll lay my cards on the table, I conjecture that:

    The people most likely to go to mediums are those who really want to believe that their deceased relative/friend is not gone forever, and is living on in the afterlife.
    Honest mediums are good people, who really want to help others who are grieving.
    People are a lot more homogeneous than most people would like to think. As such, mediums coming up with facts about the deceased that couldn't have been known by a random stranger could often be not as unusual as it might seem.

    I think people who intensely believe that they have the power to communicate with the dead, and especially those who have been practicing for a long time, will have imaginations which will be able to quickly come up with "facts" which will resonate very strongly with those who strongly believe in the afterlife and spirits, and who really want to believe that their relative/friend is still alive.

    Although I am very much a non believing skeptic, I too dislike those who seek to belittle and demean believers. I don't really see the point. Instead, I am intensely interested in what goes on in the heads of those who believe themselves to be mediums, as well as those who go to see them and believe what they say.

    Unfortunately, I am aware that my honest position on the issue could be potentially be offensive, as I am aware that the implication is that mediums and those who go to mediums are deluding themselves. I must stress that offense is not my intent here.


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    yawha, I take no offense from your standpoint, quite the opposite in fact.

    It is incredibly easy to convince people you are connected to a deceased person, too easy, in fact. As you mention, the facts of ordinary lives are incredibly common. Often when talking on this subject, I refer to 'generic grannys'. They are all the same, granny perm, small dog or cat, trouble coping in their latter years, suffered from breathing problems, Mary or Margaret a connection. If I get a link like that, there may be nothing incorrect in it but I know its useless as any kind of proof of connection, because its so common. It would be so easy to leave it at that and the recipient would be happy, but you shouldnt, because you would have failed in what you are trying to do. You need a unique factor to single this person out, like 'she learned to ski at 65'. :)

    If you watch a demonstration, see how many people try to take a link. If its three or more, its a very weak generic description, and the medium will need to up his game if its to be a good and convincing link. Every medium wants the 'wow' factor, where you get info that is so unique and specific, the audience goes 'wow'. :) It means youve done a good job.

    I dont want my mind to play tricks on anyone, or to fool myself into thinking Im doing something Im not. So I constantly analyse and question. Could I have known that already? Was that a lucky guess? I prefer to work with someone who wont just take what I say as gospel and is skeptical, than one who keeps going yes and nodding all the while, (some people would accept anything you say, I bloody hate that, I cant work like that).

    I know I have a good imagination. I write short stories. :) All I can tell you about inside my mind, is that I see these people, Im not just thinking of things to say. If that is purely imagination, then I need to figure out what psychological mechanism is at work that allows me not just see but sense a lady's figure, demeanour, looks, personality and memories. To see where she lived and that she loved drinking pints. To tie all that together without really looking at the recipient for reassurance, just presenting it as a flow of information. For that to be instantly recognised by the recipient. I ask myself is this coincidence? Could just anyone have someone like that in their life which this fits?

    Ive asked myself that a lot, and my conclusion is that somehow, its has to be real. This image in my mind of a larger than life lady was a real person, showing me real facts. It's not the generic grannys that have convinced me this is real, its the unusual characters, and the situations that Ive given without really understanding what I'm saying, and the recipient cries because it means so much to them.

    Sometimes, its weak, and I think I got it screwed up, certainly. Sometimes the recipient imagines you said something you didnt, or gives you credit you didnt earn. But there are readings that happen where I feel immersed in another persons life, where the connection between the recipient, and the spirit person and me, can only be described as profound. That cant be described here, it can only be experienced or witnessed, but that is what convinced me this was not something just pulled from my psyche.

    I have researched things like Barnum statements and cold reading, purely so I dont find myself doing them. I dont want to fool anyone, I dont want to fool myself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    Oryx wrote: »
    yawha, I take no offense from your standpoint, quite the opposite in fact.

    It is incredibly easy to convince people you are connected to a deceased person, too easy, in fact. As you mention, the facts of ordinary lives are incredibly common. Often when talking on this subject, I refer to 'generic grannys'. They are all the same, granny perm, small dog or cat, trouble coping in their latter years, suffered from breathing problems, Mary or Margaret a connection. If I get a link like that, there may be nothing incorrect in it but I know its useless as any kind of proof of connection, because its so common. It would be so easy to leave it at that and the recipient would be happy, but you shouldnt, because you would have failed in what you are trying to do. You need a unique factor to single this person out, like 'she learned to ski at 65'. :)

    If you watch a demonstration, see how many people try to take a link. If its three or more, its a very weak generic description, and the medium will need to up his game if its to be a good and convincing link. Every medium wants the 'wow' factor, where you get info that is so unique and specific, the audience goes 'wow'. :) It means youve done a good job.

    I dont want my mind to play tricks on anyone, or to fool myself into thinking Im doing something Im not. So I constantly analyse and question. Could I have known that already? Was that a lucky guess? I prefer to work with someone who wont just take what I say as gospel and is skeptical, than one who keeps going yes and nodding all the while, (some people would accept anything you say, I bloody hate that, I cant work like that).

    I know I have a good imagination. I write short stories. :) All I can tell you about inside my mind, is that I see these people, Im not just thinking of things to say. If that is purely imagination, then I need to figure out what psychological mechanism is at work that allows me not just see but sense a lady's figure, demeanour, looks, personality and memories. To see where she lived and that she loved drinking pints. To tie all that together without really looking at the recipient for reassurance, just presenting it as a flow of information. For that to be instantly recognised by the recipient. I ask myself is this coincidence? Could just anyone have someone like that in their life which this fits?

    Ive asked myself that a lot, and my conclusion is that somehow, its has to be real. This image in my mind of a larger than life lady was a real person, showing me real facts. It's not the generic grannys that have convinced me this is real, its the unusual characters, and the situations that Ive given without really understanding what I'm saying, and the recipient cries because it means so much to them.

    Sometimes, its weak, and I think I got it screwed up, certainly. Sometimes the recipient imagines you said something you didnt, or gives you credit you didnt earn. But there are readings that happen where I feel immersed in another persons life, where the connection between the recipient, and the spirit person and me, can only be described as profound. That cant be described here, it can only be experienced or witnessed, but that is what convinced me this was not something just pulled from my psyche.

    I have researched things like Barnum statements and cold reading, purely so I dont find myself doing them. I dont want to fool anyone, I dont want to fool myself.

    Some of your statements raise some questions, I'm trying my best to understand you, believe me but Its all so fuzzy, I would have thought that its faily cut and dry, If you've got some guy in a room and he wants to contact his dead mother and lets say you as a medium establish that his mother is in fact in the room trying to converse with him through you, I would have thought that it would be as simple as this: (Medium) Your mother deborah is here, her birth date is____, her mothers name is_____, her favorite colour/food/place to visit is______, she died of_____, on such a date in such a place, her message is...............but instead it seems as though there's a lot of guess-work involved, you said you often ask yourself 'was that a lucky guess?' surely if you really can communicate with the dead, you would never have to question yourself. If you get the mothers name or gender wrong its often said that someone else is trying to communicate but that guy specificaly went to you to contact his mother so where is she? Shopping? And if you (or any) mediums guesses aren't hitting home at all, you've all got some other excuse to fall back on, you can either do it or you can't, I don't understand all this grey area!


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    The communication is mental. There is no conversation, only thoughts, and its very hard to separate your own thoughts from theirs. Hence the lucky guess comment. Getting information involves a mixture of images, feelings and sensations. In my case hardly ever words, which when they do come are usually names. You do get dates. Favorite colour is vague but yeah youd get things like that. You should always have a cause of death, often very specific details too.

    You always do this without knowing how it will go. Every statement I make is based on what I see, but what if I see a bus and think it means a bus driver when it means he never drove and always went by bus. Thats how you screw up, by misinterpreting the image. I once was shown someone shooting up and asked was he on insulin, cos I never thought it could be drugs.

    If someone wants to talk to someone specific it doesnt always work, no. But a lot of the time it will. In cases where it hasnt, there is usually a good reason. My grandfather never came thru to my mother for years. My understanding was that if he did she would not be able to let him go. He did make contact when she was ready. You can either accept that or think it an excuse. But makes sense to me, i fits with my understanding of how this all works.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    @ evenflow1 - thats a bit like saying a football team can win games, and therefore always win games and you get confused with the whole competition angle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    maccored wrote: »
    @ evenflow1 - thats a bit like saying a football team can win games, and therefore always win games and you get confused with the whole competition angle.

    Well not really, I'm saying something more like A football team can win games, so whats stopping them winning games? But the major differece there is it becomes very obvious very quickly if a football team can in fact win games or not because its something that can be seen, counted, Its not nearly as obvious trying to work out if a medium can do what they claim to be able to do or not!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Galway K9


    its cold reading.


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    Galway K9 wrote: »
    its cold reading.
    Based on watching which medium work?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Galway K9


    am....Colin fry, and few others you see on TV all the time. Is there a J in here, ya me.....ok somone who looks like a woman died unexpectedly.....ya my mom. (Wow!) :) she says hi


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Evenflow1 wrote: »
    Well not really, I'm saying something more like A football team can win games, so whats stopping them winning games? But the major differece there is it becomes very obvious very quickly if a football team can in fact win games or not because its something that can be seen, counted, Its not nearly as obvious trying to work out if a medium can do what they claim to be able to do or not!


    its never going to be obvious when it comes to mediums, due to the nature of that they claim to do. A medium doesnt produce physical products so what they do is very intangible, which though its obviously very difficult to prove, its not difficult for the medium to prove it to themselves since its something they experience.

    Mind you, though I do believe theres as good a chance as any that people can communicate with the dead, its still a damnable tiny tiny tiny chance. If mediums exist, there arent that many of them, which obviously means (to me anyway) thats theres a lot of people who believe they are mediums, but who arent.


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    Dunno about Colin Fry, Ive seen John Edward live, didnt like him at all, he was aggressive and his information vague, classic cold and possibly hot reading. Tony Stockwell and Gordon Smith are better. You seen them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Galway K9


    John Edward is the biggets phony. no i havent seen the other guys you mentioned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    If everyone was totaly honest with themselves, they would admit that they (like me and most other people) like to think that there is an afterlife because everyone if terrified to imagine an eternal nothing-ness when we die but if we're being totaly honest with ourselves, we all have deep deep suspitions that there ain't no afterlife, some of us are just able to admit it to ourselves, doesn't mean its easy for us to accept but accept it we must, if a medium (or a religion for that matter) offers even the slightest glimmer of hope that there is an afterlife, most people will jump at it, defend it, convince themselves of it, it has been instilled in most of us from a young age, if you tell a kid something enough times, they grow up believing it to be true, even when all the evidence points to the fact that its not, anyone with me on this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Galway K9


    OMG you can actually see the cold reading in this. Hes gainingg all the info about his age and background so he can create a stroy for him.



  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    I cant see who that is. Mobile here.

    Evenflow1 you should read a book called Supersense by Bruce Hood. Discusses just what you talk about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,353 ✭✭✭Galway K9


    Tony stockwell is cold reading and he asks, is there 2 picturs on display in your house. Thats anyone in the world. I have 2 downstairs like. haha. I would love to smack these people for misleadign and playing on and cashing in on peoples emotions and bereavment.


  • Subscribers Posts: 19,425 ✭✭✭✭Oryx


    Ill look at it tomorrow. :) Had a feeling youd go looking for one of those two cos I mentioned them. Ive seen him work, and not cold read. But if I find a youtube of that, youll say its hot. As always, we remain on opposite sides of the fence based on what weve seen or experienced. I saw an otherwise genuine sounding guy do physical mediumship and to me it was all bogus and fake, while others loved it, so I guess I know what its like from your side too. I just dont think its all bogus based on that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 Evenflow1


    Oryx wrote: »
    I cant see who that is. Mobile here.

    Evenflow1 you should read a book called Supersense by Bruce Hood. Discusses just what you talk about.

    I'll certainly check that out


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,766 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    I'll be totally honest with you and admit that my thoughts on the paranormal bare no relation at all to wondering about an afterlife. Some people (like yourself) seem to tie the two together, but not everyone does that.
    Evenflow1 wrote: »
    If everyone was totaly honest with themselves, they would admit that they (like me and most other people) like to think that there is an afterlife because everyone if terrified to imagine an eternal nothing-ness when we die but if we're being totaly honest with ourselves, we all have deep deep suspitions that there ain't no afterlife, some of us are just able to admit it to ourselves, doesn't mean its easy for us to accept but accept it we must, if a medium (or a religion for that matter) offers even the slightest glimmer of hope that there is an afterlife, most people will jump at it, defend it, convince themselves of it, it has been instilled in most of us from a young age, if you tell a kid something enough times, they grow up believing it to be true, even when all the evidence points to the fact that its not, anyone with me on this?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement